Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
“It’s so disconcerting to see Trump remake the country in the image of Mississippi.”
:stress:

Mississippi Demographics: 36.6% Black
Massachusetts Demographics: 8.8% Black
And hey just for shits, Colorado Demographics: 4% Black

Mississippi, home state of Medgar Evers, Ida B Wells, Oprah, James Earl Jones, Jerry Rice, and Richard Wright. But please John, continue to tell us why the state with highest black population in the country is such a shithole.
John over here showing off his Mississippi origins again.
 
But mysteriously only the 2016 presidential results were cause for any alarm out of all the elections since 1988.

code.PNG
 
But mysteriously only the 2016 presidential results were cause for any alarm out of all the elections since 1988.

Ver archivo adjunto 908634
Because 3rd party does not install software in a voting machine, dumbass. End user cant verify the signature anyway. And it has nothing to help audit for bugs, that is what open source is for.
 
Because 3rd party does not install software in a voting machine, dumbass. End user cant verify the signature anyway. And it has nothing to help audit for bugs, that is what open source is for.

I do this for a living and mostly let it slide. Hands up, who does hash checks on a tar.gz fetched from the web? Yeah. Signing is great for automated origin verification, you release your public key and sign your packages. Your packaging manager throws a fit if the package is not signed. Works well.

What would a signed code from RandomCorp, Inc tell me? I can't see source anyway. There's nothing stopping RandomCorp, Inc from releasing buggy code for a voting machine.

Code signing will put an end to shitty voting machines just like license plates on cars put an end to vehicle accidents.
 
I do this for a living and mostly let it slide. Hands up, who does hash checks on a tar.gz fetched from the web? Yeah. Signing is great for automated origin verification, you release your public key and sign your packages. Your packaging manager throws a fit if the package is not signed. Works well.

What would a signed code from RandomCorp, Inc tell me? I can't see source anyway. There's nothing stopping RandomCorp, Inc from releasing buggy code for a voting machine.

Code signing will put an end to shitty voting machines just like license plates on cars put an end to vehicle accidents.

It shows a serious difference between Wu, who wants people to think she's a qualified security expert, and people who actually are security experts. You look at all the celebrity cryptographers like Bruce Schneier and I don't think there's one who thinks you can improve voting machines to make them secure, to a man they all advocate voting on paper. Wu has a completely different agenda, the security or otherwise of the voting process is at best a secondary concern behind promoting the image of Wu as software engineer and "cybersecuriy expert." I suppose she couldn't do as much damage by that kind of narcissism as Trump can, but she probably shouldn't ever be allowed near a position of power anyway.
 
Oh I know John, remember the Great Niggerfaggot Genocide of 2018? Things surely can't get any worse.

Ver archivo adjunto 907917

Totally a missed opportunity: "As someone who has been unemployed for 30 years"

Ver archivo adjunto 907916
We should look at John’s FEC filing to see if he has any disbursements to people because I’d expect John is paying plants to heckle Lynch.

Anyway, where are your town halls John? Weren’t you going to work a construction site? How come you avoid direct sunlight and slink around neighborhoods like a tubby version of slender man in a dress?
 
Is it just me that have noticed that relatively recently Wu tries to talk like Elizabeth Warren when he's doing his serious politician videos? Gay Kermit is his normal speaking voice.

Makes sense if you ask me, Eli is also a "minority" who went from conservative to liberal and has media giving her undue praise. If anything Warren is the perfect person for Wu to mimic.
 
I’m really surprised John hasn’t jumped on to the gaming #metoo. Maybe she’s jealous Zoe’s getting all the attention?

John aka Brianna continues to claim he knows all the deep dark secrets in gaming and who’s the big harassers and rapists. This is the perfect time for him to come forward if he really has info.
 
I’m really surprised John hasn’t jumped on to the gaming #metoo. Maybe she’s jealous Zoe’s getting all the attention?

John aka Brianna continues to claim he knows all the deep dark secrets in gaming and who’s the big harassers and rapists. This is the perfect time for him to come forward if he really has info.

Thing is, Brianna probably does know about a harrasser in the games industry. Problem is, it's only herself and Frank
 
It shows a serious difference between Wu, who wants people to think she's a qualified security expert, and people who actually are security experts. You look at all the celebrity cryptographers like Bruce Schneier and I don't think there's one who thinks you can improve voting machines to make them secure, to a man they all advocate voting on paper. Wu has a completely different agenda, the security or otherwise of the voting process is at best a secondary concern behind promoting the image of Wu as software engineer and "cybersecuriy expert." I suppose she couldn't do as much damage by that kind of narcissism as Trump can, but she probably shouldn't ever be allowed near a position of power anyway.

Nothing John has said about voting machines betrays the slightest knowledge of them on his part. He also doesn't grasp that the more secure you make the actual machines, the more security measures you have in place, and the more you disenfranchise the specific voters who you supposedly want to be protected.

This is why paper voting with a secure backup guarded by actual people and procedures is the proper standard, and to the greatest possible extent, this should be transparent to the end user. They should be able to do it entirely on paper if they want to.
 
A majority of states still use paper ballots (and/or produce a paper record using the computer merely for the UI), including Massachusetts, which not is only a paper ballot state, it doesn't digitally record ballots at all only tallies them with computers to speed up the count.

In all states that tally by computer it's a legal requirement to match the actual paper ballots to the tally.

These idiots like Wu know so little of how the actual election process works that they don't realize that whenever there's a close election (for example, Al Franken in Minnesota) there's always stories about "finding ballots" in trunks or bags or shit because that's the only way to change the count. You can't just change the computer's count and not have hard copies.

The "origin story" for all these tards' woes about voting is the 2000 election in Florida, but there the count could differ because humans were interpreting physical marks on the ballots among other things, it wasn't a computer count problem.
 
A majority of states still use paper ballots (and/or produce a paper record using the computer merely for the UI), including Massachusetts, which not is only a paper ballot state, it doesn't digitally record ballots at all only tallies them with computers to speed up the count.

In all states that tally by computer it's a legal requirement to match the actual paper ballots to the tally.

These idiots like Wu know so little of how the actual election process works that they don't realize that whenever there's a close election (for example, Al Franken in Minnesota) there's always stories about "finding ballots" in trunks or bags or shit because that's the only way to change the count. You can't just change the computer's count and not have hard copies.

And the issue isn't whether the count is absolutely perfect, because it never is. There are always anomalies. Some idiot will fill in something he made up. Someone will vote three times in the same election. And you have to go through all these and decide if there are enough that are legitimately contested that you have to keep counting.

And if it's bad enough you have to throw it out and do it again.

And if it's really bad enough someone gets arrested.
 
A majority of states still use paper ballots (and/or produce a paper record using the computer merely for the UI), including Massachusetts, which not is only a paper ballot state, it doesn't digitally record ballots at all only tallies them with computers to speed up the count.

In all states that tally by computer it's a legal requirement to match the actual paper ballots to the tally.

These idiots like Wu know so little of how the actual election process works that they don't realize that whenever there's a close election (for example, Al Franken in Minnesota) there's always stories about "finding ballots" in trunks or bags or shit because that's the only way to change the count. You can't just change the computer's count and not have hard copies.

The "origin story" for all these tards' woes about voting is the 2000 election in Florida, but there the count could differ because humans were interpreting physical marks on the ballots among other things, it wasn't a computer count problem.
I doubt he has voted enough times in Massachussetts to even remember what the voting machine looks like.
 
In which another Boston rag pretends John is a True and Honest Canidate.
Boston Magazine dijo:
The Incumbent: Representative Steve Lynch
lynch-327x400.jpg

Represents: Massachusetts’ 8th district, including Quincy, Brockton, and parts of Boston.
First elected to House in: 2001
Running for reelection? TBD.
Challenger: Brianna Wu
1566971557183.png

Currently: Co-founding Giant SpaceKat, an independent technology firm in Dedham.
Known for: Wu’s name became nationally-known after she was targeted by the alt-right—including a group led by Steve Bannon himself—in the GamerGate movement, receiving death threats, getting doxxed, and eventually having to flee her home in Arlington. Wu also ran a longshot campaign for Lynch’s seat two years ago and earned 23 percent of the vote.
How she’s standing out: This year, Wu is coming back to the ballot with renewed vigor. She hired a campaign consultant who is acting as her press secretary, and she has been bold and vocal on Twitter, criticizing Lynch for his reluctance to call for Trump’s impeachment and his “incremental approach to climate change.”
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo