Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votos: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 9 0.7%

  • Total de votantes
    1,211
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Granted I'm not au fait wtih US tax affairs, but she must file for corporation tax somewhere right? Doesn't the US make all companies accounts available to the general public?
 
Granted I'm not au fait wtih US tax affairs, but she must file for corporation tax somewhere right? Doesn't the US make all companies accounts available to the general public?
She's running a private LLC. Other than showing that she pays her taxes, she doesn't have to report to the public anything.
 
"supporting me"

v.

[MEDIA=twitter]624605978768478209[/MEDIA]https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/624605978768478209

This implies Wu has been underpaying this mythical employee every time that patreon amount has not meet that minimum value, if all patreon money was the sole source of this mythical employee's salary.

She's running a private LLC. Other than showing that she pays her taxes, she doesn't have to report to the public anything.

Except the requirement to report imagined crimes against women in tech jobs, the fact they're constantly high on nasty cough syrup while "Dying" of pneumonia, obviously salty posts while traveling to worthless speaking engagements while SJW rivals make fools of themselves in front of the UN, shit Frank does which nobody cares an iota about...

Basically, Wu seems to think they're required to post fucking everything that does not actually involve progress on R60, the state of finances for GSK/Chessboard, or addressing the numerous lies they keep getting caught up in saying.
 
Granted I'm not au fait wtih US tax affairs, but she must file for corporation tax somewhere right?
Yes, and you can see online that she fully paid her 2015 tax bill of $300, which is the standard amount for an LLC in Delaware. That's all you can get.
Delaware is the legal home to a lot of corporations specifically because its rules are so business-friendly.
 
Comparing yourself to President Barack Obama and J.J Abrams?
We have far passed Kardashian levels of narcissism.
The chans have to get racist about anything. If there is a black person anywhere they have to flip their shit. In real life most channers are not racist at all but still exceptionally immature.
 
https://tweetsave.com/cryptotweeter/status/679760206448988161

In case anyone was wondering the results of John's shameless, mendacious, emotional manipulation and e-begging today, he was able to net six new suckers, I mean, patrons. On a monthly basis, four pledged a buck, one pledged $3.50, and one German rube - in the spirit of the season - decided the best use of $25 per month is to give it to a crazy tranny scammer in America.

Pre-begging*: $2,239.57 ..... 548 hayseeds
Post-begging: $2,268.84 ..... 554 dupes

Unfortunately for "Natalie's" "baby", the total is still $100 less than it was just ten days ago with only 552 noobs.

In the seven hours since John gave out the link to his Patreon page and asked his followers to retweet it, only 42 of 47,436 of them have done so - less than one in a thousand. One of them was Chu Chu.

chu_chu_hearts_john.png

If you're interested, take a look at John's most recent tugboat fuelers, Twitter followers, and retweeters. They're overwhelmingly male. It's quite an "accomplishment" for the self-appointed savior of women.

* archived right after first new patron today, who pledged $1/mo; tugboaters net about 90% of a chump's pledge
 
If you're interested, take a look at John's most recent tugboat fuelers, Twitter followers, and retweeters. They're overwhelmingly male. It's quite an "accomplishment" for the self-appointed savior of women.

* archived right after first new patron today, who pledged $1/mo; tugboaters net about 90% of a chump's pledge
From the little experience I have with staunch feminists, they tend to be tight with the purse strings. Men tend to be much easier to hustle in the right environment, and those that hang around third wavers are ripe for the pickin'.

I have a feeling after christmas a bunch of kids will have christmas money. I also predict by February all these guys are going to have to pull back their tranny money to buy over the top gifts for IRL girls who have been politely avoiding them all year.
Just as it should be. I'd be mortified if one of those twitter followers or Patreon donators had the mad hots for Wu and sent her a secret Valentine tho...
 
From the little experience I have with staunch feminists, they tend to be tight with the purse strings. Men tend to be much easier to hustle in the right environment, and those that hang around third wavers are ripe for the pickin'.

If they're hanging around 3rd wavers by that time you can tell them anything and they're ok with being insulted because we mean.... guys who aren't you. Lucky you enlightened dude you.
Also you can inject any thought or idea into their head with "Well it's true but you can't tell because of privilege. This is scientifically proven"
 
There's the kind of autism where you post on 4chan. And there's the kind of autism when you start taking "4chan culture" seriously. (TW: cringe)

Ver archivo adjunto 64657

The chans have to get racist about anything. If there is a black person anywhere they have to flip their shit. In real life most channers are not racist at all but still exceptionally immature.

I always thought the channers were more of a mixed bag and hated on anything and everything including conservative targets and big business.
 
I always thought the channers were more of a mixed bag and hated on anything and everything including conservative targets and big business.
In my experience 4chan is more of a gelatinous mass that can move in multiple directions at once. They have no leaders and act purely on the whims of a mob of anonymous individuals all acting with their own motivations. To say 4chan has any kind of inherit political leaning is foolish. Its a collectivist statement too broad to ever be true. It's like saying all black people are criminals. It can be true of a minority, but never the majority.

The reason I like 4chan, and I'm prepared for disagreements, is because it is the ultimate meritocracy. No one knows what your race, gender or sexuality are so all that matters is your argument. If you post on 4chan with a stupid argument and get called an idiot because of it, its not because everyone who disagreed with you is racist/sexist/transmisogynistic, it's because your argument was flawed. You can either improve your argument or accept that it was wrong and move on. There are no identity politics. No one cares if you're a polyamorous trans-gendered demisexual otherkin. No one gives a shit if you're depressed or overweight or came from a poor family. All that matters is your argument. No one will coddle you because you think the big mean world is against you. If you cannot reasonably pursued people that you are correct, you will be ignored or more likely insulted and then ignored.

The reason 4chan can often seem hostile to outsiders is because Reddit and Tumblr are used to using tactics other than pure reason to defend their arguments. Look at liberal progressives and their obsession with identity. You cannot say this because you are X. I can say this because I am Y. Z cannot be criticised because of reasons. You try pulling that shit on 4chan and you're going to have your shit pushed in so far you'll be tasting it for a month. No one cares who you are. You are Anonymous. Your argument is all that matters.

Anyway, Brianna Wu is like... bad. And stuff.
 
I know the whole "Black Hermione" thing happened a couple days ago, but it's so retarded I just have to vent on it right the fuck now.

Colorblind casting is incredibly common in the theater. Fuck, it was the default in all creative media up until fairly recently. Most of the people who played Othello alone, up until the middle of the 20th Century, at most put on some makeup like Konstantin Stanislavsky. Yul Brynner is by far the most popular portrayer of King Mongkut in the various productions of The King and I, and he likely wasn't even that Mongolian, let alone Siamese. Productions of Avenue Q often don't even cast black people to play Gary Coleman, and that play came out within this century. As far as plays are concerned, people only started complaining about this shit fairly recently, and it's fucking stupid.

Hermione isn't black you fucking spastics. It's just colorblind casting, which, contrary to what you fucking speds preach, is not, and has never been, problematic. Cover yourselves in grease paint, and go Dolezal yourselves. Maybe it'll knock those sticks out of your asses.
 
In my experience 4chan is more of a gelatinous mass that can move in multiple directions at once. They have no leaders and act purely on the whims of a mob of anonymous individuals all acting with their own motivations. To say 4chan has any kind of inherit political leaning is foolish. Its a collectivist statement too broad to ever be true. It's like saying all black people are criminals. It can be true of a minority, but never the majority.

The reason I like 4chan, and I'm prepared for disagreements, is because it is the ultimate meritocracy. No one knows what your race, gender or sexuality are so all that matters is your argument. If you post on 4chan with a stupid argument and get called an idiot because of it, its not because everyone who disagreed with you is racist/sexist/transmisogynistic, it's because your argument was flawed. You can either improve your argument or accept that it was wrong and move on. There are no identity politics. No one cares if you're a polyamorous trans-gendered demisexual otherkin. No one gives a shit if you're depressed or overweight or came from a poor family. All that matters is your argument. No one will coddle you because you think the big mean world is against you. If you cannot reasonably pursued people that you are correct, you will be ignored or more likely insulted and then ignored.

The reason 4chan can often seem hostile to outsiders is because Reddit and Tumblr are used to using tactics other than pure reason to defend their arguments. Look at liberal progressives and their obsession with identity. You cannot say this because you are X. I can say this because I am Y. Z cannot be criticised because of reasons. You try pulling that shit on 4chan and you're going to have your shit pushed in so far you'll be tasting it for a month. No one cares who you are. You are Anonymous. Your argument is all that matters.

Anyway, Brianna Wu is like... bad. And stuff.
But didnt they get all wierd during gamergate and start blaming the Illuminati or some shit or was that sarcasm that went over my head?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo