- Registrado
- 17 de Dic, 2019
We derailed mht about whether or not we should hate all men or niggers more.
Race and criminality etc
I DEMAND RACE WAR NOW!!
Race and criminality etc
I DEMAND RACE WAR NOW!!
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
You level of racialism is disappointing, you're missing the Medshit/Snowmonkey/Moorberian/Turkroach options among others.I DEMAND RACE WAR NOW!!
This is a team effort, we need you to pull your weight on the racialism with your funny bongwords, and we appreciate the effortMaking it a race thing is somewhat missing the chromosomal trees for the forest IMO, "pls giv bob show vagene" is just the ESL version of "get your tits out for the lads" afterall, it's one of those transcendal things that disregards petty barriers like whether or not you pass the one drop rule.
You don't have to be BLACK to be a gendernigger is what I'm saying.
You level of racialism is disappointing, you're missing the Medshit/Snowmonkey/Moorberian/Turkroach options among others.
DO.BETTER.
57.5% were White, 16.1% were Black, 12.1% were Native American, 11.8% were Hispanic, and 2.5% were Other races.
♦ 61.3% of offenders in cases involving criminal sexual abuse (rape) were Native American.4
♦ 65.4% of offenders in cases involving abusive sexual contact were Native American.
♦ 84.6% of offenders in cases involving statutory rape were Native American.
Actual full blooded Feather Indians aren't a thing anymore and haven't been for a while, I think the only statistically significant subgroup that manages above 50% Native ancestry are the Inuits. UnitedStatesians try and fudge it with the "Blood Quantum" bullshit, but that's an accountancy trick; just look at their faces and you just know. Of course there are plenty of advantages to claiming Native Status (federal tax exemptions mostly) which is why it's gatekept somewhat, the true % goes far lower/much much higher depending on how you want to creatively interpret bloodlines.Aren't Native Americans only like 2% of the population? What the actual hell is happening on the rez?
The data smells. These are federal crimes reported to the USSC (crimes committed on the rez are federal crimes).Aren't Native Americans only like 2% of the population? What the actual hell is happening on the rez?
4 Under the Major Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 1153), the federal government has jurisdiction over sexual assault crimes committed by Native Americans in Indian Country
Lots of cousin/uncle molestation/rape.I was catching up with the Man Hate thread, and
Aren't Native Americans only like 2% of the population? What the actual hell is happening on the rez?
Pajeets wil def rape any female they find.The answer to the bear question depends on the race of the man.
OH GOD, IT COULD BE A FEMALE BEAR! Gotta protect her from the jeets!Pajeets wil def rape any female they find.
A lot of really, really bad things, unfortunately, both on and off the rez. Between Native men and white men Native girls/ women are 2.5x times as likely to be raped as women in general. And the incidence of missing and murdered Native girls/women is also disproportionately high.I was catching up with the Man Hate thread, and
Aren't Native Americans only like 2% of the population? What the actual hell is happening on the rez?
According to the US Justice Department, one in three Native American women who live off or on Native American reservations report being raped during their lifetime. In comparison, about one in six women report being raped in their lifetime.18 Native Americans are roughly 2.5 times more likely to experience sexual assault compared to all other races.19 On average, Native Americans ages 12 and older experience 5,900 sexual assaults per year.20 Sexual assault victims may often suffer from mental illnesses, economic instability, and physical illnesses.
The perpetrators of sexual violence crimes against all Native American victims are predominantly white men. According to comprehensive data from 1992 to 2001, white men committed approximately 80% of the crimes.21 This data provides sufficient aggregate information about victimization against Native Americans over an extended period to indicate the role of white males as a significant contributor to the issue and is the most recent comprehensive dataset for this issue to date.22
No, those are only Federal crimes, as you note, and the USSC data was only about reported crimes that had gone through to sentencing. Most rape in the US is prosecuted as a state matter, so that largely explains the disproportionate level of NA offenders in the USSC/ Fed data, as a percentage. However, prosecution of crimes involving Native Americans is complex:The data smells. These are federal crimes reported to the USSC (crimes committed on the rez are federal crimes).
From the file:
"In FY 2021, 57,287 cases were reported to the US Sentencing Commission"
"1,062 involved sexual abuse offences."
of which 50% is "production of child pornography" (production only, does not include possession and trafficking) and under 15% is rape+statutory rape.
You can't tell me there were only 150 rapes in a year in the whole US of A. Obviously only some crimes are reported, and out of those, a lot involve Feathers (maybe for bureaucratic reasons, maybe for slimy DEI reasons to get the sentences reduced)
The interplay between Native American reservations and the federal government complicates the prosecution of perpetrators of sexual assault. Native Americans who live on federal Indian lands are citizens of the United States and are afforded the same rights and obligations as citizens of other ethnic backgrounds, including voting, paying taxes, and receiving Social Security and welfare.16 Native American tribes can self-govern, meaning they can make and enforce laws. Some legal cases are handled by the tribal government and some by the federal government. Tribal governments can address dating violence or domestic violence. Other crimes, such as rape committed by a stranger, are handled by the state or federal government.17 This distinction explains the complexity of charging a perpetrator with sexual assault on a reservation. Prosecution also can be difficult because of a lack of resources.
Tl; dr: NA women and girls are in a shit situation. Understanding the data requires looking at a variety of sources, because the legal system when it comes to serious crimes in the NA world is a patchwork of often-reluctant or sometimes culturally self-protective tribal courts, and poorly funded and limited jurisdiction Feds.Tribal courts can only try non-Natives who live in or do business on federal Indian reservations,38 or, in cases of sexual assault, are involved in a relationship with a Native.39Such stipulations reveal some noticeable limitations for prosecuting sexual assault perpetrators since most of the offenders are non-Natives.40 When tribes do not have the authority, the federal government is supposed to prosecute the offenders. Before the Justice Department takes legal action, it reviews certain criteria. These considerations include the Indian status and residency of the victim and the perpetrator, the nature of their relationship, and the location of the assault.41
However, the federal government often does not allocate the time or money necessary to prosecute non-Indian perpetrators or will not seek to prosecute them when the resources are available.42 In 2010, United States Attorney Offices (USAOs) declined to prosecute 67% of the sexual abuse or related cases from Indian country that they received. The USAOs cited 32 reasons, the most common being “weak or insufficient evidence,” “no federal offense evident,” and “witness problems.” 43 Some of the issues surrounding evidence collection could be attributed to the fact that police departments work differently for each tribe; some tribes work with tribal police and federal law enforcement officers, and some work with only one or the other. The confusion over which department should take the case can lead to slow and poor responses and less substantial evidence.44 Native American women who live on reservations are the least likely demographic to see their sexual assault case investigated or taken to trial.45