Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

[Idiot Asshole]

Big brained bluesky user is enough of a retard to be fooled by an AI image of a STUNNING AND BRAVE moment at a giant sporting event that never happened, gets thousands of likes by other big brained retards who probably decry "fake news" and "AI slop" without any self-reflection.

link

 

[srs bsns]

3 mile long bluesky screenshot of users chimping out over the idea of having to use their powerwords

Why would bluesky have to implement a real name feature when we have @gagabobo1997 right here?

 

[Comp0site Specter]

So one of the most common points in this thread is how Bluesky is a damn repetitive echo chamber. If this doesn't prove it, I don't know what will. Musk being a trillionaire has been circulating for a while. I can't be sure if these niggas are bots or what.

Bluesky is an echo chamber in the funniest sense of the word. They finally have a platform to what amounts to thousands of clones of themselves, and they still argue and can't stand each other.

 

[Hood-ass Mulatto]

Bluesky is an echo chamber in the funniest sense of the word. They finally have a platform to what amounts to thousands of clones of themselves, and they still argue and can't stand each other.

I sometimes suspect some of those users are actually different alternate profiles for some people or even the staff to make it seem like Bluesky has a bigger user base than it really does and to make it look like it is actually competing against X/Twitter. Especially a bigger leftist user base.

 

[bouquetnine]

I sometimes suspect some of those users are actually different alternate profiles for some people or even the staff to make it seem like Bluesky has a bigger user base than it really does and to make it look like it is actually competing against X/Twitter. Especially a bigger leftist user base.

Bluesky is absolutely full of fake accounts. These are the first accounts to show up in my discover feed that I'm not following.


None of these accounts are real people. I keep blocking accounts like these but they're endless. Between the CNN and other legacy accounts (which I follow because they don't police their comments), it's all leftist propaganda bots.

 

[Hood-ass Mulatto]

Bluesky is absolutely full of fake accounts. These are the first accounts to show up in my discover feed that I'm not following.
Ver archivo adjunto 9168431Ver archivo adjunto 9168433Ver archivo adjunto 9168434Ver archivo adjunto 9168435Ver archivo adjunto 9168440

None of these accounts are real people. I keep blocking accounts like these but they're endless. Between the CNN and other legacy accounts (which I follow because they don't police their comments), it's all leftist propaganda bots.

I just ignore them. After learning of bot farms, I realized I can just go FUCK IT and realize the Internet is not a real place and if I'm not doing anything to hide and I'm careful, then I have no time to entertain this negativity and retardation.

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

None of these accounts are real people. I keep blocking accounts like these but they're endless. Between the CNN and other legacy accounts (which I follow because they don't police their comments), it's all leftist propaganda bots.

What do you base this on? I remember when libs claimed that 80% of twitter was actually Russian bots, so I'm always dubious of claims like these.

 

[The Fatriarchy]

What do you base this on? I remember when libs claimed that 80% of twitter was actually Russian bots, so I'm always dubious of claims like these.

They're not russian, but most of twitter is fake regardless. Whether it be for propaganda, or now for money, they are and they do.

 

[bouquetnine]

I just ignore them. After learning of bot farms, I realized I can just go FUCK IT and realize the Internet is not a real place and if I'm not doing anything to hide and I'm careful, then I have no time to entertain this negativity and retardation.

I try, but they're endless. There is so little genuine content on bluesky.

What do you base this on? I remember when libs claimed that 80% of twitter was actually Russian bots, so I'm always dubious of claims like these.

>10k posts is a huge red flag. Who the hell is posting 100 times a day? Many of them are political cartoons or some generic "look at this orange buffoon" post. Extremely high concentration of image posts. These accounts NEVER repost other content, it's always direct posts. Reposts don't get engagement to build the account and it doesn't have the same saturation power of clogging up the discovery feed. They often have the most cringe bios too, using the bio as another avenue to say "CURRENT POLITICAL TALKING POINT".

We're at the point where it's so easy to run these bots that "AI unless proven otherwise" should be the default position. If you give these accounts the benefit of the doubt then you will be wasting time engaging with non-genuine users.

 

[Nigger Respecter]

I try, but they're endless. There is so little genuine content on bluesky.

>10k posts is a huge red flag. Who the hell is posting 100 times a day? Many of them are political cartoons or some generic "look at this orange buffoon" post. Extremely high concentration of image posts. These accounts NEVER repost other content, it's always direct posts. Reposts don't get engagement to build the account and it doesn't have the same saturation power of clogging up the discovery feed. They often have the most cringe bios too, using the bio as another avenue to say "CURRENT POLITICAL TALKING POINT".

We're at the point where it's so easy to run these bots that "AI unless proven otherwise" should be the default position. If you give these accounts the benefit of the doubt then you will be wasting time engaging with non-genuine users.

None of this is proof they’re bots and is the same justification the libtards used to say twitter was nothing but Russian disinformation bots. “They post a lot and it’s all just talking points!” Yeah there are many losers out there with nothing to say but time to say it, that doesn’t mean anything.

That Karl guy you posted for example can easily be found online

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

Who the hell is posting 100 times a day?

Patrick Tomlinson and other big time Twitter addicts who got brainbroken by the Musk takeover and migrated to Bluesky.

 

[bouquetnine]

None of this is proof they’re bots and is the same justification the libtards used to say twitter was nothing but Russian disinformation bots. “They post a lot and it’s all just talking points!” Yeah there are many losers out there with nothing to say but time to say it, that doesn’t mean anything.

That Karl guy you posted for example can easily be found online

"there are many losers out there with nothing to say but time to say it"

This makes them only slightly better than bots and I'm losing nothing by blocking them. Even in Karl's case, being a faggot is clearly his entire personality so good riddance.