🐱 Black Lives Matter Bans White People - Sorry allies. Sorry progress

CatParty
http://www.dailywire.com/news/15067/black-lives-matter-just-banned-white-people-chase-stephens


According to BLM Philly, white people are banned from future gatherings and are not allowed to be official members of the organization because it is considered a “black only space.”

blm_philly_1.jpg

blm_phill_4.jpg
 
Presiona para expandir...
I can just repeat myeslf:
Any group that claims to work in favor of equality but seperates their members and treats one group as mere "allies" rather than partners can go fuck itself.

But that being said, it's BLM, that thing is pretty much a hate group in and of itself.
 
I don't often agree with the man but this Sean Hannity quote is so fucking true.

The fact these people can protest for weeks or even months on end without leaving to go to work or school demonstrates that there's something very wrong with the black community and it's not racist cops.
Presiona para expandir...
 
CatParty dijo:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/15067/black-lives-matter-just-banned-white-people-chase-stephens


According to BLM Philly, white people are banned from future gatherings and are not allowed to be official members of the organization because it is considered a “black only space.”

Ver archivo adjunto 201861
Ver archivo adjunto 201862
Presiona para expandir...

To enact change, you need a broad base of supporting. Alienating the majority group in your country is not going to change anything.

So business as usual for BLM.
 
I've said this before, but for some reason groups like BLM just cannot grasp the concept of pragmatism. Sometimes, to advance your interests, you have to do things that you don't really want to do.

Like, let's take a look at the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, particularly the part of the movement that was committed to nonviolence. I'm positive that not every single person there was a devout pacifist who never even felt the urge to strike back at their oppressors. I'm sure a lot of them did want to lash out, but logically knew that the nonviolent approach was better than the violent one in terms of publicity and changing the public's opinion. If they lashed out, people would just go "See? They ARE dangerous and shouldn't be allowed near us!" whereas if they were nonviolent, people would become more sympathetic and invested in their cause.

The same principle applies here. You can hate whitey as much as you want, but the fact of the matter is you need to have white people invested in your cause and working with you if you want to make any changes. When you're a minority, you need the majority to help carry your cause.
 
I'd powerlevel but I have spent far too much time in my life being the only honky around and I can tell you blacks are fundamentally different from all other upright walking hominids. We spend more and more time and money on them and they remain hopeless. Eventually there'll be a nasty race war and attempted cleansing because far too many people observe blacks just shit up everything they touch.

My high school had started these hour long clubs that were mandatory, sort of a break from the day. They started a blacks only club, it was required if you didn't join a club you had to go to study hall. I thought it was in the cafeteria and it was the blacks only club. They started fucking with me "Hey peachy keen you wanna be like us?" This was slightly before the wigger explodion, btw.
It made the local news about how fucked up it was and there was an outcry about reverse racism, because this was back when people had common sense about bixnoods. The club got dissolved.
 
Última edición:
I'm not opposed to them voluntarily segregating themselves, just so long as they understand that freedom of association doesn't begin and end with them.... and they don't, because they're fucking retarded.
 
And without the white man to guide them, BLM crashed and burned to the ground, ushering in an era of peace and prosperity for the nation.
 
Cosmos dijo:
I've said this before, but for some reason groups like BLM just cannot grasp the concept of pragmatism. Sometimes, to advance your interests, you have to do things that you don't really want to do.

Like, let's take a look at the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, particularly the part of the movement that was committed to nonviolence. I'm positive that not every single person there was a devout pacifist who never even felt the urge to strike back at their oppressors. I'm sure a lot of them did want to lash out, but logically knew that the nonviolent approach was better than the violent one in terms of publicity and changing the public's opinion. If they lashed out, people would just go "See? They ARE dangerous and shouldn't be allowed near us!" whereas if they were nonviolent, people would become more sympathetic and invested in their cause.
Presiona para expandir...

A while back I was watching a doc on James Brown, who was pretty republican as one of the first big black breakout stars. He always claimed if the black community was going to get better, it had to work for it to happen.

He obviously was keen on civil rights, but he also felt if he could make it, then other black fellas could as well. He was on tour around the US when MLK was murdered - there was thoughts of cancelling his show, but they decided the situation would get worse if they didn't go ahead. So James Brown does the concert, and is then confronted with the local activists trying to take over his stage, and his managing of it is pretty amazing.


It could of so easily devolved into a total mess that night, but Brown managed to get through to them why what they were doing was stupid.

That said BLM is going to BLM anyway.
 
Considering BLM started out by supporting obvious fucking criminals just because they were black this is pretty much just following through on their entire belief system.

The genius of these organizations lie in the name - it's a terribly, shitty movement with completely ridiculous standards but you can't criticize it since, "What? Are you saying black lives DON'T matter, you racist?"
 
BadaBadaBoom dijo:
Considering BLM started out by supporting obvious fucking criminals just because they were black this is pretty much just following through on their entire belief system.

The genius of these organizations lie in the name - it's a terribly, shitty movement with completely ridiculous standards but you can't criticize it since, "What? Are you saying black lives DON'T matter, you racist?"
Presiona para expandir...
That's really a page out of PETA's book. If you don't support acting like a lunatic, telling kids their parents are psychos, and actually killing a whole bunch of animals, then you're against the 'ethical treatment of animals.'
 
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo