US Biden Says Communism Is a ‘Failed System’ and Cuba a ‘Failed State’ - “Communism is a failed system—a universally failed system. And I don’t see socialism as a very useful substitute, but that’s another story,” "Cuba is a failed state"

The authoritarian and communist regime of Cuba is a “failed state” and universally, communism is a “failed system,” President Joe Biden said while speaking from the White House on Thursday.

“Communism is a failed system—a universally failed system. And I don’t see socialism as a very useful substitute, but that’s another story,” Biden said during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Biden’s remarks were the strongest signal yet by the president in support of Cubans demonstrating against the ruling regime of leader Miguel Diaz-Canel—also the head of the Cuban Communist Party.

He also addressed that his administration is “considering” ways to possibly reinstate access to the internet for people on the island nation after the regime disrupted citizens from their online communications in the wake of the biggest anti-government protests in decades.

“We’re considering whether we have the technological ability to reinstate that access,” Biden said.

The president also indicated that for now, they are not considering re-establishing the U.S. to Cuba remittances because it’s “highly likely” that the regime would confiscate the funds.

“There are a number of things that we would consider doing to help the people of Cuba, but it would require a different circumstance or a guarantee that they would not be taken advantage of by the [Cuban regime],” Biden said. “For example, the ability to send remittances back to Cuba. I would not do that now because the fact is it’s highly likely that the regime would confiscate those remittances or big chunks of it.”

Starting over the past weekend, thousands of Cubans have openly demonstrated against the authoritarian regime and called for leader Diaz-Canel to step down. Some demonstrators, as well as Cubans in the United States, have called on the Biden administration to intervene amid mass arrests of demonstrators by the regime.

Biden’s remarks that they “consider” to aid Cubans came as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) asked the president in a letter to provide federal assistance to the citizens of the island nation as well as help them with internet access.

“I write to urge you to assist in providing Internet access to the people of Cuba standing up against communist oppression and demanding a voice after decades of suffering under the yoke of a cruel dictatorship,” the Republican governor wrote in the letter (pdf).

“As you know, the Cuban people are taking to the streets to protest the Communist regime, and the Cuban government has responded with violence,” he said. “At first, the world could see the images and videos of this mass movement, but now the tyrannical regime of President Miguel Diaz-Canel has shut off access to the internet.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Thursday during a separate press briefing also called communism a “failed ideology,” explaining that Cubans “deserve freedom.”

“They deserve a government that supports them, whether that is making sure they have health and medical supplies, access to vaccines, or whether they have economic opportunity and prosperity,” Psaki said.

“This has been a government—an authoritarian, communist regime—that has repressed its people and has failed the people of Cuba, hence we’re seeing them in the streets,” she continued.

Amid the demonstrations, activists told news outlets this week that more than 100 people have been arrested, detained, or are simply missing in a regime-led clampdown.

Article (alt)
Statement (alt)
 
"I wanted to be a doctor, but I didn't have a lot of money so I knocked a hobo out one day and I haven't stopped stealing kidneys ever since!"

I do not call that man a doctor not matter how much he insists I call him one. You can demand I do the same because he intended to do it, but he didn't even try. Since he didn't try he doesn't even get a gold star for effort and I'm not agreeing to a damn thing you or anyone else has to say about it, the man is a kidney thief and a liar.
That entire spiel is fucking retarded, m80. It's a non-sequitur.
Obviously this is a little different than that example,
Yeah no shit, because saying "I wanted to be a doctor" rather than "I tried to be a doctor" is the way you worded it in your shitty example as a way of weaseling out of the fact that communism was tried, and failed. Rather than your kidney-thief who merely wanted to be a doctor.
but not one of you have proven that communism has been attempted on a national scale.
If you're seriously going to say that the USSR, the Chinese Communist Party, and various other communism-driven parties that have taken over nations didn't try it on a national scale, you are either a batshit insane tankie or a fucking actual retard.
Every time it's something about "well they intended to do it!"
No nigger they tried. And every time it's tried it ends the same way. Stop trying to re-word the argument to give it an easier context to deal with. This is like some autistic cousin of the strawman argument with Down's syndrome.
Yeah woulda coulda shoulda, I am not buying it. It has always, every single time, been authoritarian socialism run by a small pack of sociopaths and they can insist that they tried and failed but I am calling bullshit because you cannot make a commune out of millions of people. Ever.
Why the fuck not? Since you're being so autistic about definitions, explain to me where it says in the definition of "commune" that it's size is limited?

Moreover they're literally calling themselves communists, saying they're trying to make communism happen, telling the people to read communist manifestos and missives from their communist party. Again these piss-poor mental gymnastics make you look like a blubbering, drooling helmet-wearing, window-licking, crayon-eating actual retard. Every time communism is tried it has ended the same fucking way, trying to redefine that phenomenon as "ackshually it's authoritarian socialism!" is apeshit crazy and to the average non-indoctrinated person it looks like the most desperate attempt at weasel-wording your ideology's fuckups in the entirety of human ideological discourse.

I mean fuck at least capitalists can admit that the system has problems. Just stop. You and every person who tries/has tried/will try this semantic horseshit is embarrassing themselves. Apologies I suppose if you're just earnestly trying to argue a point but holy fuck do fallacious semantic arguments involving such serious subjects piss me off.
 
You're retarded. Nobody gives a shit about communism. Nobody. All your average person wants, all black people want, all those college students who say they want communism want, all the Trump voters want, all the neo-liberals want is access to hamburgers and pussy. In the USSR, China, etc. communism was just used as a way to promise plebs hamburgers and pussy to turn them against government. Every war is about access to more hamburgers and pussy. Climate protests are about kids being worried boomers will use all the resources and they won't get hamburgers and pussy. Riots are about a lack of hamburgers and pussy. Joining gangs is about easy access to hamburgers and pussy. Everyone has easy access to hamburgers and pussy and your society is stable. That's why the USA where monogamy is normalized and hamburger costs the same as a half hour work at minimum wage is the richest country in human history. The Chinese government is able to hang onto power because it trades with the US and gives everyone living there hamburgers and pussy. It's really very simple. Hamburgers and pussy. That's literally all people want.

Nobody gives a shit about utopian ideals past age 25. Fuck off with your technicalities. You think Jed working down at the body shop cares about the technical difference between communism and socialism? Fuck no! He cares about hamburgers and pussy.

You know what system has given the most people access hamburgers and pussy? Liberal democracy.

Because I know you're retarded I will say here hamburgers and pussy refer to luxuries and the ability to procreate and raise your resulting children a stable environment, not literally hamburgers and pussy.
Its funny, no communist regime ever really rose on the back of communism alone.

USSR -> Peasants didn't understand communism. They thought it was expanding traditional village communes
China -> Nationalist China lost face after ww2 and it was more of a nationalism war. Corrupt traitors vs Real China
Vietnam -> The Saigon regime was seen as corrupt and in the pocket of foreigners
Khmer Rouge -> Only got support from peasants when the King endorsed the regime
Warsaw Pact -> Arose through fixed elections managed by Stalin
North Korea -> Created by Soviet occupation
Spanish Republic -> Only after years of war and Soviet aid

Socialism on the other hand actually did arise from popular support.
Baathism, African Socialism, India is technically socialist according to its constitution, socialist parties have won many elections, etc. It just usually failed or devolved into dictatorship.

Yugoslavia kinda did win via popular support, but British aid and Soviet invasion helped. The fact that they practiced market socialism with alot of decentralization actually made them pretty successful.
 
Apologies I suppose if you're just earnestly trying to argue a point but holy fuck do fallacious semantic arguments involving such serious subjects piss me off.
I am and when I get four posts freaking out at me because they think I am a communist it just proves to me that I am right. Nobody thinks anymore, they just react and they are conditioned to do nothing but bitch and moan about stuff. Call me crazy but who do you think injected this into popular speech? That Lenin is in the same boat as Woodstock hippies because, darn it, he tried to make it work. There is nothing fallacious here and I will say again that I am not trying to argue on behalf of communism and I am not saying that holy crap we should throw everything out the window and try it. I am forced to repeat myself and it proves my point every time.

You're bitching at me about a "serious subject" (your words, keep that in mind, you allegedly take this seriously too) and you are falling into the language trap all the same. It's simple how this works. They are all communists and if you know one you know them all, right? There is no difference, they all have the same label so they are all equally a threat or not a threat, and based off of that your nappy-headed nephew or that kid down the block who doesn't wake up before noon is in the same group as Pol fuckin Pot. Communism isn't a dirty word anymore, hell who even knows what it means? People sometimes call FDR a communist, and he basically won WWII right? Obama was a communist according to some, we survived him, and maybe your below-average thinker is thinking that communism isn't so bad. All that bad stuff happened last century anyway.

Then that below-average thinker stops caring when there's a guy waving a big red hammer and sickle flag running for office. This has happened several times already, we are there thanks to lazy people. I put this into as many words as I could without trying to hit you over the head with it, but I am about done trying to explain this to people who don't want to admit that this is a problem.

I will also make a quick edit here and admit that I just realized how autistic this sounds but I can't go back now.
 
Última edición:
I am and when I get four posts freaking out at me because they think I am a communist it just proves to me that I am right. Nobody thinks anymore, they just react and they are conditioned to do nothing but bitch and moan about stuff. Call me crazy but who do you think injected this into popular speech? That Lenin is in the same boat as Woodstock hippies because, darn it, he tried to make it work. There is nothing fallacious here and I will say again that I am not trying to argue on behalf of communism and I am not saying that holy crap we should throw everything out the window and try it. I am forced to repeat myself and it proves my point every time.

You're bitching at me about a "serious subject" (your words, keep that in mind, you allegedly take this seriously too) and you are falling into the language trap all the same. It's simple how this works. They are all communists and if you know one you know them all, right? There is no difference, they all have the same label so they are all equally a threat or not a threat, and based off of that your nappy-headed nephew or that kid down the block who doesn't wake up before noon is in the same group as Pol fuckin Pot. Communism isn't a dirty word anymore, hell who even knows what it means? People sometimes call FDR a communist, and he basically won WWII right? Obama was a communist according to some, we survived him, and maybe your below-average thinker is thinking that communism isn't so bad. All that bad stuff happened last century anyway.

Then that below-average thinker stops caring when there's a guy waving a big red hammer and sickle flag running for office. This has happened several times already, we are there thanks to lazy people. I put this into as many words as I could without trying to hit you over the head with it, but I am about done trying to explain this to people who don't want to admit that this is a problem.

I will also make a quick edit here and admit that I just realized how autistic this sounds but I can't go back now.

Listen reddit-fag all you do is insult peoples intelligence and then act like you are deserved respect. The constant condescension even when faced with legitimate criticism is why you are getting torn to shreads here.

This isn't fucking reddit and the janny's aren't going to save you nigger.
 
Listen reddit-fag all you do is insult peoples intelligence and then act like you are deserved respect. The constant condescension even when faced with legitimate criticism is why you are getting torn to shreads here.

This isn't fucking reddit and the janny's aren't going to save you nigger.
Every post you have made at me has been complaining about how I am mean or something. I don't like you because you are trying too hard and you whine too much so I'm not going to change anything.
 
Every post you have made at me has been complaining about how I am mean or something. I don't like you because you are trying too hard and you whine too much so I'm not going to change anything.

We don't give a flying fuck if you're mean, it's that you're holier-than-thou and completely disregard anything anybody says to you while posting text walls cause somebody disagreed with you.
 
We don't give a flying fuck if you're mean, it's that you're holier-than-thou and completely disregard anything anybody says to you while posting text walls cause somebody disagreed with you.
Sounds like a you problem, if you don't like my replies then don't talk to me. I stand behind everything I said even if it is just me being (possibly unnecessarily) stubborn about words. This thread's actual topic is why I typed all that up, Cuba is used as some grand example of "communism" when it is not. "It has the most doctors!" "It's so nice in Cuba, I don't know why there's an embargo!" It's socialism for one, and for two that is just bs propaganda or window dressing for dumb tourists. I'm not taking anything back and I am not changing a damn thing.
 
Real National Socialism hasn’t been tried either

thats true throught her same with real fascism Hitler didnt follow his own election program and mussolini stepped back from fascism as mix of right and left back towards generic authocracy.

BTW one has to wonder what would happen if Syndicalism emerged instead of communism, since syndicalism is based on decentralized centralism with various unions acting as interests group. Union is something that could actually work on large VOLUNTARY scale voluntary is the key part in these systems and by having multiple unions for the professions you can ensure they dont get too dominating and thus you can keep democratic system, look at Denmark they dont even have minimal wage its not needed since its negotiated based on profession basis.
 
thats true throught her same with real fascism Hitler didnt follow his own election program and mussolini stepped back from fascism as mix of right and left back towards generic authocracy.

BTW one has to wonder what would happen if Syndicalism emerged instead of communism, since syndicalism is based on decentralized centralism with various unions acting as interests group. Union is something that could actually work on large VOLUNTARY scale voluntary is the key part in these systems and by having multiple unions for the professions you can ensure they dont get too dominating and thus you can keep democratic system, look at Denmark they dont even have minimal wage its not needed since its negotiated based on profession basis.

I think the problem then would be that large companies would form and you'd have an Car or even worse Health Insurance type of system being tied to your employment. Where each large company just covers the union stuff for most if not all jobs, maybe charging more for some professions even. They would of course all collude so that their fees all ended up the same.

I don't know much about it though, there could be more safeguards in place to prevent those type of situations that I'm not aware of. I just hope I didn't break Denmark by having the thought.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo