EU Austria is looking for employees who hunt down vaccine refusers

Anyone who does not want to be vaccinated in Austria from February 2022 must expect a fine. Employees should ensure that the fines are paid. That is why we are now looking for inspectors.

From February Austria wants to get serious: Anyone over 14 years old has to be vaccinated against Corona. The Austrian government announced this last week.

This can create new jobs, as the example of Linz shows. The city has a good 200,000 inhabitants and is the capital of the federal state of Upper Austria and has the lowest vaccination rate in the entire state. According to data from the e-vaccination card, only 63 percent of residents have been vaccinated twice.


Chasing after the unvaccinated booers

Linz now wants to hire people who are supposed to hunt down vaccine refusers, as reported "today". They should check whether those who do not get vaccinated really pay for it. Because whoever does not get vaccinated will be asked to pay. Up to 3600 euros, the equivalent of a good 3740 francs.

The vaccination inspectors receive a wage of at least 2774 euros, the equivalent of around 2880 francs. The salary is paid 14 times a year.


The job includes, among other things, creating penalties as well as processing appeals. A completed Matura is required in the job profile. In addition, the hunters should be resilient and willing to work. Specifically: ready to work more overtime!

Only Austrian citizens are employed for the work. And of course, applicants must either be vaccinated or recovered.

Even if the unvaccinated in Austria will soon be upset - the general corona situation in the country seems to be easing for the moment. On Monday, almost 1,800 new cases were reported within 24 hours. The lowest value in two months. Probably the result of the three-week lockdown that ended on December 12th. (nl)

Article
 
I am just waiting for immigrants to pack up and leave and then watch the whole country shit itself trying to bridge the gap .

Bwahahahahahaha, good one.

You mean the nogs or afghani/syrian engineers and doctors that came 2015? Nah, those gibs are too good and they won't have to show any papers (they burned them before they invaded) - we have to be tolerant, considerate and can't risk to trigger those traumatised towelheads.

Papers and rules are for natives only.
 
I hope you're not American yourself because if you are then the sheer brass balls of this statement :story:
No, fuck you. If I'm too far out of my depth to comment on Europe then they're too far out of their depth to comment on the U.S. with retarded comments like "the Civil War wasn't THAT bloody."
 
No, fuck you. If I'm too far out of my depth to comment on Europe then they're too far out of their depth to comment on the U.S. with retarded comments like "the Civil War wasn't THAT bloody."
Yeah, the American Civil War only killed 2-3% of the American population, if I remember my numbers right. Scholarship is looking at closer to 675,000 dead these days. Ten percent of that in three days outside a sleepy little town in PA.
 
Yeah, the American Civil War only killed 2-3% of the American population, if I remember my numbers right. Scholarship is looking at closer to 675,000 dead these days. Ten percent of that in three days outside a sleepy little town in PA.
So? Stalingrad got 1.1 million Russians killed, when their total population was 205 million people living in the country at the time. That's 0.5% of the populace.

I guess it doesn't count because the number wasn't bigger proportionally.
Both assertions are laughable at best, since the american home front has never really fought a war, with all the suffering it entails.
Rebuttal: The Revolutionary War.
It was mild. By all standards of civil war it was fought clean and with respect towards the common civilian population. It's death toll for battles was average. There were no real guerillas nor were any actions undertaken in response. How many confederate villages got ten men executed for every union soldier shot by guerillas? The exception being Sherman's march to the sea, but even that was done in a controlled manner.
Wait, whatever happened to Americans having no restraint? I thought you said we do shit without thinking about it? & now you're saying the Civil War was all neat & tidy?
Americans are universally seen as brash and abrasive, with an "act and we'll see what happens" mentality.
Europeans are seen universally as weak & cowardly, with a "let the migrants roll in and rape my kids" mentality.

So which is it? We're brash & irrational or our country has never been battle tested before?
What's the My Lai equivalent of your oh-so-bloody american civil war? The year-after-year shrinking food rations? The political repression after a civil war when the victorious side rounds up the leaders of the defeated and throws them in the oubliette, and orders yet another round of reprisals against their supporters?
This sounds an awful lot like a confession to your side of the pond being full of brash & abrasive retards who murder political opponents after winning a civil war. & you're claiming we didn't do these things to our own people at the end of the war? That sounds like restraint to me, especially if such actions are typical of those victorious after a civil war.
 
Última edición:
No, fuck you. If I'm too far out of my depth to comment on Europe then they're too far out of their depth to comment on the U.S. with retarded comments like "the Civil War wasn't THAT bloody."
I was pointing out that Americans take great delight in sharing their (usually negative) opinions on other countries without anyone asking but hate when other countries do it to them. Don't believe me? Go to any other European thread on this board.
 
So? Stalingrad got 1.1 million Russians killed, when their total population was 205 million people living in the country at the time. That's 0.5% of the populace.

I guess it doesn't count because the number wasn't bigger proportionally.
The measurement was "Civil War wasn't that bloody." Pointing our percentages and where a lot of those loses were is to deal with that. No one is going to argue that certain countries aren't perfectly willing to just keep throwing men at the problem. A better comparison would be Eurotrash spats more contemporary. How does the Franco-Prussian War match up? No one will be particularly surprised at which side had the most soldiers captured.
 
The day the societal pendulum swings back, it'll be interesting to see what these people have to say.

"B-bb-but I was just following orders!"
The more time we spend in covid hell, the more I understand how Hitler was able to captivate so many idiots.
(yes, I'm aware I'm citing myself.)
They weren't idiots, the Austrian Guy pointed out the (((common denominator))) present in many areas of society, especially their poisonous political and cultural influence in a country. All he wanted was to get those elements removed from their nation, and get back what was rightfully theirs.

Those weren't bad ideas back then, and considering what we've seen over the last 80 years, they aren't bad ideas today, time has proven him right.
 
Imagine being the type of person to willing sign up for a job that is essentially being a hall monitor for adults.
These aren't people. These are Austrians, just following the example of their most famous individual. Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Impfung!
What is it with Austians and being petty little tyrants? Between them and the Krauts it kinda makes me wonder if the entire Germanic lineage ought to be purged from the gene pool.
There's a reason the Morgenthau Plan was on the table in 1945. The Eternal German has been the bane of civilized Europe ever since the days of the Roman Republic.
The ACW wasn't bloody either, if we look at purely the KIA, then its about equal to the Franco-Prussian war, (+200k each) which was a quick and decisive conflict by European standards.
The ACW was an incredibly restrained conflict, mostly because both sides knew no matter what we'd be stuck with each other afterwards, either in one country or two, and bitter hatred is the worst possible thing to have in that situation. There's an old Greek maxim of "After the war, make alliances" that you Euros tend to ignore but is the USA's guiding light in terms of conflict.
The measurement was "Civil War wasn't that bloody." Pointing our percentages and where a lot of those loses were is to deal with that. No one is going to argue that certain countries aren't perfectly willing to just keep throwing men at the problem. A better comparison would be Eurotrash spats more contemporary. How does the Franco-Prussian War match up? No one will be particularly surprised at which side had the most soldiers captured.
That's what four years of war gets you, sadly. The only thing keeping the F-P War from becoming a meatgrinder to put the ACW to shame in terms of percentages was the French Army being surrounded, besieged, and surrendering... twice. One of the reasons it was so bloody early on was because the Germans were feeding wave after wave of their own men into the French chassepots before their own artillery had done its work, completely failing to learn from the examples of the Austrians at Koeniggratz in their earlier war. The Euro, no matter his nationality, has an appalling disregard for casualties that I find stomach-churning.
Hiram Maxim dijo:
"In 1882 I was in Vienna, where I met an American whom I had known in the States. He said: 'Hang your chemistry and electricity! If you want to make a pile of money, invent something that will enable these Europeans to cut each others' throats with greater facility.'"
You Europeans sure are a contentious people if Americans like Hiram Maxim and Benjamin Hotchkiss are willing to pick up stakes and move across an entire ocean just so they can get rich making and selling weapons to you guys.
 
Given that the Prussians captured over 700,000 Frenchmen, I'm inclined to agree. I have a soft spot for it though, the fallout is part of the reason the ethnic German side of my family eventually came to America.
the French just run away after getting all their good troops crushed in a couple of weeks.
Can we all agree that signing up to be a professional moral busy body is fake and gay regardless of country?
NEIN!

One of the reasons it was so bloody early on was because the Germans were feeding wave after wave of their own men into the French chassepots before their own artillery had done its work, completely failing to learn from the examples of the Austrians at Koeniggratz in their earlier war.
Yeah that maybe wasnt a mistake. the guys getting send into the meatgrinder were from catholic, lesser german states that could have been problems after the war like bavaria...
 
That's what four years of war gets you, sadly. The only thing keeping the F-P War from becoming a meatgrinder to put the ACW to shame in terms of percentages was the French Army being surrounded, besieged, and surrendering... twice. One of the reasons it was so bloody early on was because the Germans were feeding wave after wave of their own men into the French chassepots before their own artillery had done its work, completely failing to learn from the examples of the Austrians at Koeniggratz in their earlier war. The Euro, no matter his nationality, has an appalling disregard for casualties that I find stomach-churning.
I think the closest the ACW got to Euro tactics was probably Pickett's Charge and maybe the Crater. Both were dumb ideas, but I've been to Gettysburg. Even with the wood line moving and such I don't see how anyone could have thought that was a good idea.
 
I think the closest the ACW got to Euro tactics was probably Pickett's Charge and maybe the Crater. Both were dumb ideas, but I've been to Gettysburg. Even with the wood line moving and such I don't see how anyone could have thought that was a good idea.
I'll give you Pickett's Charge, especially since all of Lee's generals told him it was a fucking terrible idea, but the Crater was originally supposed to be assaulted by a volunteer company that had been doing specialized pre-assault training just for it. Unfortunately since said company of volunteers was black, they got rotated out at the last minute for political reasons, to be replaced by a white company that hadn't done specialized training for the expected conditions. No doubt it would have been bloody as hell even with the original company, but it possibly would have succeeded since unlike the actual assaulting company, they knew better than to hop down into the very middle where they were nothing but targets.
 
just a quick heads up for our austrian kiwis, the chance to get pass secrutiy is pretty high, i had one last year and they only asked me about mainstream social media.
 
1640136443715.jpg
 
The austrian government must have developed a fetish for getting buried in civil rights lawsuits for trying to literally threaten people into accepting a medical treatment. The lawyers will have a field day with this one
Nah, they'll buck and cuck. As they always will. Germany's high court ruled that the lockdowns were fully legal and necessary, so Austria will follow in its footsteps. It's already planning on making the fourth dose mandatory.

They just swapped Jew hunting with unvaxxed hunting. Even the Born and Bred Jews in Israel are going all out with their police forces hunting down those who oppose the third and fourth shot.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo