EU Austria is looking for employees who hunt down vaccine refusers

Anyone who does not want to be vaccinated in Austria from February 2022 must expect a fine. Employees should ensure that the fines are paid. That is why we are now looking for inspectors.

From February Austria wants to get serious: Anyone over 14 years old has to be vaccinated against Corona. The Austrian government announced this last week.

This can create new jobs, as the example of Linz shows. The city has a good 200,000 inhabitants and is the capital of the federal state of Upper Austria and has the lowest vaccination rate in the entire state. According to data from the e-vaccination card, only 63 percent of residents have been vaccinated twice.


Chasing after the unvaccinated booers

Linz now wants to hire people who are supposed to hunt down vaccine refusers, as reported "today". They should check whether those who do not get vaccinated really pay for it. Because whoever does not get vaccinated will be asked to pay. Up to 3600 euros, the equivalent of a good 3740 francs.

The vaccination inspectors receive a wage of at least 2774 euros, the equivalent of around 2880 francs. The salary is paid 14 times a year.


The job includes, among other things, creating penalties as well as processing appeals. A completed Matura is required in the job profile. In addition, the hunters should be resilient and willing to work. Specifically: ready to work more overtime!

Only Austrian citizens are employed for the work. And of course, applicants must either be vaccinated or recovered.

Even if the unvaccinated in Austria will soon be upset - the general corona situation in the country seems to be easing for the moment. On Monday, almost 1,800 new cases were reported within 24 hours. The lowest value in two months. Probably the result of the three-week lockdown that ended on December 12th. (nl)

Article
 
Nice to see Austria moving from “show me your papers to prove you’re not a Jew” to “show me your papers to prove you’re vaccinated”
I was going to say they could have these concerned citizens wear armbands to show their commitment to hunting the unvaxxed and they could force the unvaccinated to wear special colored patches to make them stand out to make it easier to gather them into vaccination camps.
 
i would have considered it if:
a: hugo boss uniform provided
b: my immigrant english ass was accepted
c: no vax needed for inspectors
 
(x) to doubt
americans always claim they'll resist but it never happens, while europeans never boast but you'll see a refugee center fly up in flames every so often.
What's the american equivalent to football hooligans?
Americans have restraint, because we've fought a bloody civil war before within the past few generations. Even the retards who wish for it to happen know better.
 
Americans have restraint, because we've fought a bloody civil war before within the past few generations. Even the retards who wish for it to happen know better.
Lmao, and Europe had (in just the last century) the Yugoslav civil war, the years of lead (low level commie-cappie civil war) WW2, Spanish civil war, German Civil War, Eastern European border wars and civil wars , WW1. Then two Balkan wars. Running down to the same decennium as the ACW: the Franco-Prussian war, the wars of German unification, Italian independence, and then we're around 1860. Between that and Napoleon there are two more rounds of revolution.

I'll admit that America too, had some of the years of lead.

The ACW wasn't bloody either, if we look at purely the KIA, then its about equal to the Franco-Prussian war, (+200k each) which was a quick and decisive conflict by European standards.

Modern Americans absolutely do not have any idea what a war would bring to their shores. No, bombing 10 Afghanis in a mudhut in the mountains isnt experiencing war for the home front. (nor is it for the soldiers. I mean, getting shot at before calling in airstrikes is a very effective doctrine if you have overwhelming firepower available, but in a more even conflict?) Even their civil war was quite mild. (with maybe the exception being Shermans march to the sea). The closest thing to war that happened to the American public consciousness in recent centuries was 9/11 and look how well Americans coped with that. A real war would be like that, but daily and everywhere in the country. American morale would drop harder than a brick.

Also
>Americans
>restraint
c'mon


Sorry for sperging but americans thinking they have a war-tested homefront is something that really grinds my gears.
 
(x) to doubt
americans always claim they'll resist but it never happens, while europeans never boast but you'll see a refugee center fly up in flames every so often.
What's the american equivalent to football hooligans?

The white yanks have just spent the last 18 months hiding in their homes as blacks rampaged across the nation looting and burning everything down.
 
Modern Americans absolutely do not have any idea what a war would bring to their shores. No, bombing 10 Afghanis in a mudhut in the mountains isnt experiencing war for the home front. (nor is it for the soldiers. I mean, getting shot at before calling in airstrikes is a very effective doctrine if you have overwhelming firepower available, but in a more even conflict?) Even their civil war was quite mild. (with maybe the exception being Shermans march to the sea). The closest thing to war that happened to the American public consciousness in recent centuries was 9/11 and look how well Americans coped with that. A real war would be like that, but daily and everywhere in the country. American morale would drop harder than a brick.
Do you unironically believe that an invasionary force would be capable of showing up on american shores? I'll have some of whatever you're smoking.
Also
>Americans
>restraint
c'mon
Uh, yeah. We're not going to have a civil war unless a whole lot of people would rather be shooting and killing their neighbors than dealing with say, a dementia addled retard in office. You act like people not going on killing sprees over this covid shit is somehow a sign of cowardice, which is frankly retarded.
Sorry for sperging but americans thinking they have a war-tested homefront is something that really grinds my gears.
I didn't mention any of that shit. And yeah, we did have a civil war, and calling it mild is also pretty fucking retarded.
 
I can't see any historical parallels to this at all, no sir, none whatsoever, especially none concerning Austria in particular.

Does anyone like paintings by chance? I found some nice ones from this one Austrian painter with a Charlie Chaplin mustache, pretty obscure, you've probably never heard of him before.
I didn't mention any of that shit. And yeah, we did have a civil war, and calling it mild is also pretty fucking retarded.
Europeans trying to comment on shit they have no purview in.
 
Última edición:
Do you unironically believe that an invasionary force would be capable of showing up on american shores? I'll have some of whatever you're smoking.

Uh, yeah. We're not going to have a civil war unless a whole lot of people would rather be shooting and killing their neighbors than dealing with say, a dementia addled retard in office. You act like people not going on killing sprees over this covid shit is somehow a sign of cowardice, which is frankly retarded.

I didn't mention any of that shit. And yeah, we did have a civil war, and calling it mild is also pretty fucking retarded.
It's been 60+ years of slow erosions of the American lifestyle and of individual liberties and we've seen nothing but whimpers of resistance (that includes cities burned, elections stolen, and the worst biotrash committing unspeakable crimes and receiving meager punishment and at times even reverence). I have no doubt that if China invaded the U.S. that even the most comatose of boomers would finally wake up and fight for the country and would send them running back screaming to their rice paddies, but that is not the reasonable fear of the future. When the day comes that the government finally starts hauling people off to FEMA camps and anarcho-tyranny is instantiated in law in all but name do you really think that suddenly people will take up arms and fight? Do you think generations upon generations of lethargy will suddenly undo themselves like an out-of-shape high school athlete waking up one day to go run a marathon? I am reminded of the "paling with terror" Solzhenitsyn described of those who were dragged off to the gulags, showing no meaningful resistance as they awaited their fates, but I pray that I am wrong. I will say to thank the wisdom of the founders of this country for the 2nd amendment as otherwise, this country would already be becoming some dystopian shithole like bongland. However, one must remember rights are not secured by a piece of paper but by the demonstrated willingness to defend them.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

Imagine being the type of person to willing sign up for a job that is essentially being a hall monitor for adults.
The jannies have been preparing all their lives for this role.
download.jpg
 
I almost guarantee that some Muslim migrant is going to go postal after getting fined by these guys, and then this entire program will silently be swept under the rug. Europeans politicians love teasing authoritarian policies, but they'll always backpedal on them the moment they receive even slight pushback.
 
Do you unironically believe that an invasionary force would be capable of showing up on american shores? I'll have some of whatever you're smoking.
The invasion force is already there, since it is a civil war. Regarding a foreign force, I do not believe such a thing would happen. I've never claimed such a thing. The "war comes to american shores" might have been the wrong idiom to apply. I meant that if war comes to american soil, the people will not know what happens to them. They'll think they understand, but they don't. And it will hurt them deeply.

Uh, yeah. We're not going to have a civil war unless a whole lot of people would rather be shooting and killing their neighbors than dealing with say, a dementia addled retard in office. You act like people not going on killing sprees over this covid shit is somehow a sign of cowardice, which is frankly retarded.

My entire post was a reaction to you claiming americans were somehow paragons of restraint (lmao) because they had fought a "bloody civil war" (double lmao). Both assertions are laughable at best, since the american home front has never really fought a war, with all the suffering it entails. There are many virtues I'd admit americans have, love of freedom being chief amongst them, but restraint is not one of them. Americans are universally seen as brash and abrasive, with an "act and we'll see what happens" mentality.

I'm not a jingoist at all. I fully understand what war brings. It's not a decision taking lightly.

I didn't mention any of that shit. And yeah, we did have a civil war, and calling it mild is also pretty fucking retarded.

It was mild. By all standards of civil war it was fought clean and with respect towards the common civilian population. It's death toll for battles was average. There were no real guerillas nor were any actions undertaken in response. How many confederate villages got ten men executed for every union soldier shot by guerillas? The exception being Sherman's march to the sea, but even that was done in a controlled manner. What's the My Lai equivalent of your oh-so-bloody american civil war? The year-after-year shrinking food rations? The political repression after a civil war when the victorious side rounds up the leaders of the defeated and throws them in the oubliette, and orders yet another round of reprisals against their supporters?

And you mentioned exactly that:

Americans have restraint, because we've fought a bloody civil war before within the past few generations. Even the retards who wish for it to happen know better.

>war was fought
>it was bloody
>it taught us to not fight war so often because the result is horrific
You claimed exactly that; that the general US population learnt what the horrors of war were in the ACW and became war-tested, even though that's demonstrably false.

Europeans trying to comment on shit they have no purview in.
Europeans Americans trying to comment on shit they have no purview in. American exceptionalism at its best once more!
 
Aaaah, armbands are kawaii, now if they really enforced this on migrants...
 
The invasion force is already there, since it is a civil war. Regarding a foreign force, I do not believe such a thing would happen. I've never claimed such a thing. The "war comes to american shores" might have been the wrong idiom to apply. I meant that if war comes to american soil, the people will not know what happens to them. They'll think they understand, but they don't. And it will hurt them deeply.
I never said nor meant to intimate that every american in the country personally knows the horrors of war.
My entire post was a reaction to you claiming americans were somehow paragons of restraint
Which I didn't say nor claim.
(lmao) because they had fought a "bloody civil war" (double lmao). Both assertions are laughable at best, since the american home front has never really fought a war, with all the suffering it entails. There are many virtues I'd admit americans have, love of freedom being chief amongst them, but restraint is not one of them. Americans are universally seen as brash and abrasive, with an "act and we'll see what happens" mentality.
There's 400,000,000 guns in the nation and yet no politicians have been shot (that I'm aware of) over political problems in years by anyone who wasn't mentally deranged. Yeah, I'll go ahead and say there's a common restraint there as we have more guns than people and shit has gotten pretty badly fucked over covid, to say nothing of the 2020 election and the fraud there.
I'm not a jingoist at all. I fully understand what war brings. It's not a decision taking lightly.
And yet, you mock the idea that civil war is horrific by saying that the possibility exists of one being "mild". Okay.
It was mild. By all standards of civil war it was fought clean and with respect towards the common civilian population. It's death toll for battles was average. There were no real guerillas nor were any actions undertaken in response. How many confederate villages got ten men executed for every union soldier shot by guerillas? The exception being Sherman's march to the sea, but even that was done in a controlled manner. What's the My Lai equivalent of your oh-so-bloody american civil war? The year-after-year shrinking food rations? The political repression after a civil war when the victorious side rounds up the leaders of the defeated and throws them in the oubliette, and orders yet another round of reprisals against their supporters?
You do understand that while, yes, there wasn't genocidal intent or something similar, and we did do a decent job at coming together as a country after it ended, that the conflicts still had their fair share of the usual horrors of war right? Rape, arson, etc. Calling a civil war "mild" because the people involved weren't on the same level as Rape of Nanking or Tutsis vs Hutu-tier shit is still pretty fucking retarded.

Families were split apart, brothers killing each other was common. Yes, it was a bloody civil war as they are all bloody. I'm not saying that people alive are all battle-hardened killers or whatever dumb shit you think I was getting at, I was simply saying that nobody's going to fucking take it to that level when the lights are on, food is available, the internet still works, and public water filtration systems still work - not just out of convenience but also out of understanding both of what civil war entails and that it has already happened at least once in our country's admittedly short lifespan.
And you mentioned exactly that:



>war was fought
>it was bloody
>it taught us to not fight war so often because the result is horrific
You claimed exactly that; that the general US population learnt what the horrors of war were in the ACW and became war-tested, even though that's demonstrably false.
Uh, no, I didn't claim anyone was "war-tested". Not that you need to be to understand the horrors of it. I don't need to be a victim of a shark attack to know that it's a gruesome thing to go through, what kind of logic is that?
Europeans Americans trying to comment on shit they have no purview in. American exceptionalism at its best once more!
I don't get where your hate-boner for the U.S. is coming from but we can start the healing process if you show me on the doll where Uncle Sam touched you.

Jokes aside you seem to be coming at this from some weird "americans are pussies" angle and I really don't get it.
 
Completely unrelated to the thread topic, but the FGC-9 9mm carbine was designed in Germany to be buildable in guncuck counties with parts available at any hardware store and little to no manufacturing experience.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo