- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2021
No, the Holocaust totally happened.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
I don't remember my age but vividly what i saw and how i reacted to it, i am not surprised at the result of your buddies survey. I imagine it's extremely different now with hardcore porn being a press away on every kids phone, the age of first exposure is most likely horrifyingly low.No, events that had an strong impact on you, you're more likely to remember than forget.
I mentioned this once in the US political thread on the topic of trauma and a theory of buddy of mine came up with to how exposure to porn is a traumatic event for people, by retelling how my buddy would survey people and ask them when was the first time they watched porn and his was amazed how all them could remember their age and what they saw in detail. As if it imprinted its self on their physic.
Good read and next to Mother Horse Eyes the only thing literarily worthwhile coming from leddit. His second book sucked dick, though.In the story it's fake for the sake of having a plot. The video I referred to was two guys talking about a story called Penpals. I didn't want to make the classic mistake of mentioning something that is more interesting than the original topic.
You mean the same Elizabeth Loftus who was brought in as an "expert" to discredit witnesses in the Weinstein, Epstein, and Maxwell trials? That kike bitch is full of shit and so are all the other pedophiles and pedo sympathizers who worked under the wing of the FMSF, she's never been anything more than a coverup artist used to discredit witnesses with a fake ass syndrome that doesn't exist.No, look up the Elizabeth Loftus studies on memory confabulation. There's no evidence for Freudian "repression" and it makes no sense evolutionarily; you would not want to forget dangerous or threatening situations. Whenever you see someone push repressed memories, they're usually a psychoanalyst which means they are basically into pseudoscience.
Yeah except Dr. Goldblattstein is actually the one telling people that the abuse never happened and they all hallucinated it, just as miss (((LOFTUS))) did in the Epstein and Maxwell trials. Similar arguments were of course brought forward to discredit the kids in the McMartin case, and despite those reports on the tunnels in the declassified FBI documents on the finders, lets just say for the sake of argument none of the satanic ritual abuse claims were real. There is still a mountain of evidence to suggest that those kids were being abused by Ray Buckey, and many of them said so before they were ever interviewed by CII, hell the whole thing happened because one child was showing signs of abuse to his parents (not being able to sleep, being constantly terrified, keeping secrets from his parents, etc.), they took him to the doctor, the doctor found obvious signs of sexual abuse, and a memo was sent out to other parents in the community by the local police department telling parents to check up on their kids and see if they were abused as well. But all the public was ever told about that case was "muh satanic panic" and those kids are liars who were told to say they were abused."I was in a satanic pedo sex cult as a child and only now, in my 30's, after three years of psycho analysis under Dr. Goldblattstein, i remember it"
I don't care about your conspiracy theories, nobody in experimental psychology labs is thinking about the Jews or Harvey Weinstein, dude. Loftus made her career on these studies because they're landmark studies and have been replicated and are continually replicated in similar studies. You have abolutely no idea what you're talking about and I'm confident you're one of those morons that is taking up this retarded position because you need to believe in some Satanic Panic conspiracy theory. Go on, out with it, let's hear your looney bullshit. You're a fucking kook.You mean the same Elizabeth Loftus who was brought in as an "expert" to discredit witnesses in the Weinstein, Epstein, and Maxwell trials? That kike bitch is full of shit and so are all the other pedophiles and pedo sympathizers who worked under the wing of the FMSF, she's never been anything more than a coverup artist used to discredit witnesses with a fake ass syndrome that doesn't exist.
So called "false memory syndrome" isn't real, it was literally made up by some fucking guy named Peter Freyd as a defense after his daughter accused him of raping her when she was a kid. If someone got accused of a crime, then made up a syndrome, and said the accuser had it to explain away their accusations would you buy that story? I wouldn't. But it worked wonders for the media whenever they were downplaying cases of organized child sexual abuse (Mcmartin, franklin coverup, epstein/maxwell, etc.) so its no coincidence that the foundation for so called "false memory syndrome" was packed to the brim with literal pedophiles and pedophile advocates, because the whole thing was started as a con to gaslight victims of child sexual abuse and cover up crimes, which is why it shut down. This on top of the obvious fact that that diagnosis FMS is basically unsubstantiated, extremely vague, and coincidentally only applies to recovered memories of child sexual abuse (what a cowinkydink!)
Do people have "false memories"? Yeah, all the time, that's why the Mandela effect exists, but "false memory syndrome" is a very specific thing that was made up by a very sketchy group of Jewish psychologists to cover up for child rape.
No,I don't care about your conspiracy theories, nobody in experimental psychology labs is thinking about the Jews or Harvey Weinstein, dude.
Then show me the SHTUDIES mister science man. Are you talking about the lost in the mall study, the one that's like 29 years old and, despite only having a sample size of 24 people, she pretends that it's the fucking gospel and has cited it nearly 300 times? Or are you talking about the palmer study where she asked a bunch of people some questions about a car crash video they saw a week earlier? I mean at least that study, despite being even older, still had nearly double the sample size as the lost in the mall study: a whole whopping 45 people, holy cow! I mean we all know that recounting details of a car crash video you saw a week ago is basically the same thing as repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse. Of course this is also not to mention Loftus' record as a defense EXPERT™ in other trials, like that time she acted as a defense expert for Ted Bundy in his 1976 trial for the attempted kidnapping of Carol DaRonch, where Loftus called into question her ability to identify Bundy as the assailant because she couldn't remember what color his shoes were or the color of the fake police badge he showed her to lure her into his vehicle. Luckily the judge didn't buy this bullshit defense and found Bundy guilty of aggravated kidnapping, but he still escaped and killed more people until he was caught in 1978.Loftus made her career on these studies because they're landmark studies and have been replicated and are continually replicated in similar studies
You're right, Peter Freyd made it up and Loftus ran with it, creating a bullshit defense that numerous sex offenders and rich pedophiles have used since.Loftus didn't just make this shit up
Yeah good thing it was just a conspiracy theory and there isn't a fucking mountain of declassified FBI documents that link the CIA to weird satanic child sex cults, which also show archeological reports confirming there were indeed tunnels under McMartin daycare.you need to believe in some Satanic Panic conspiracy theory
never said this, in fact I LITERALLY FUCKING SAID that people do in fact have "false memories" but that is entirely a different phenomenon from so called "false memory syndrome".but that confabulation is bullshit
yeah, again, good thing there aren't numerous examples of exactly just that happening, right? I mean North Fox Island? Delta Project? Troop 137? Dutroux Affair? Franklin coverup? The finders? Presidio military daycare? Epstein island? Yeah none of that ever happened, chud, take your meds!because you believe in a secret cabal of Satanists that molest children
note how you had to latch onto this one video (which has sources cited in the description, beneath a bunch of ridiculous faggot/nigger charities, I won't deny that) to try and discredit my entire argument by portraying me as a kook, but you completely ignore my other citations like Nick Bryant or Ross Cheit. I mean, of course, why actually attack what your opponents are saying when you can just scream "TRUST LE FUCKING SCIENCE™" over and over again and shoot the messenger.Nice videos. Let's show people what a kook you are and who you follow...
Surprised to see so many people here saying nocategorically. Must have had good childhoods. I say yes simply from personal experience, sometimes shit from 20+ years ago just bubbles to the surface.
Forgetting something, and repressing memories are totally different. It took years of dope, and meditation to repress some of my memories.I think just because memory implantation or false memories are real does not mean repressed memories cannot also be real. The human brain is very complex and I believe no expert that claims to have definitive answers. We also know that trauma that occurs before the ability to form memories still causes long-lasting effects. Like if a baby is SA'd do you really think that this will have no long-lasting impacts on them, just because they can't remember it? The Body Keeps the Score is a good book that discusses this.
True.Forgetting something, and repressing memories are totally different.
Stop right there. I don't want to know that.It took years of dope, and meditation to repress some of my memories.
Just saying we're programmed to remember trauma to avoid similar outcomes in the future, and it takes real effort to actually repress them.Stop right there. I don't want to know that.
I am having a hard time finding actual science in psychology. I have been looking for a long time. I'm not really sure any of it is valid.It's a shame so many therapists out there are fucking idiots. They bullshitted through their easy degree and the second they get into practice, they only loosely apply actual science while instead ingesting pop culture science nonsense.
My stance in this thread is mainstream modern academic psychology's, it's such a shame the psychoanalysts are still around pushing this kind of horse shit. It's also a failure of academic psychologists and their refusal to disavow this kind of pseudoscience, since academics are spineless twerps and don't want to say anything if it'll rock the boat inside their department.