Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign

Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign




Mr. Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience, mounted a long-shot campaign that promoted a universal basic income and persisted well beyond expectations.

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Andrew Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience who evangelized a universal basic income and warned of the perils of automation, ended his longer-than-long-shot bid for president on Tuesday night after a yearslong campaign that endured even as those of members of Congress and governors fell away.

Speaking to supporters inside a ballroom in Manchester, N.H., as the state’s primary results were coming in, Mr. Yang said “endings are hard” and that he had intended to stay in the race until the end.

“I am the math guy, and it’s clear from the numbers we’re not going to win this campaign,” he said. “So tonight I’m announcing that I am suspending my campaign.”

Mr. Yang’s campaign has spent considerable time and resources in the state and was banking on the backing of its many independent voters. Mr. Yang had signaled in recent interviews and emails to supporters that he would need to vastly outperform expectations in the Granite State for his campaign to continue.

The end comes a week after Mr. Yang, 45, failed to win any pledged delegates in Iowa despite spending a significant share of his war chest on ads there.

Mr. Yang’s decision to exit the race closes out one of the Democratic primary’s most surprising story lines, removing a candidate who developed a fiercely loyal following of disaffected voters from across the ideological spectrum and intrigued even skeptics with his wit, levity and relentless positivity.

The son of Taiwanese immigrants, Mr. Yang was one of about a half-dozen viable Asian-American candidates to ever run for president. He became something of an involuntary torchbearer for Asian-Americans as he grappled with how to discuss his identity on the trail and how to address and confront racism.

But it was Mr. Yang’s plan to give every American adult $1,000 a month that formed the foundation and rationale for his run. Aware that a candidate beginning with essentially no name recognition and few traditional credentials would face stiff odds, Mr. Yang often told audiences that he had not initially wanted to run for president, because he was not “crazy.”

But he would add that during a trip to Washington, he was told that if he wanted the government to do anything about job loss caused by automation, he would need to bring a “wave” crashing down on the heads of bureaucrats. His run for president, he said, amounted to that wave.

Mr. Yang enjoyed steady growth from under the radar as higher-profile candidates took turns as the front-runner and absorbed the media scrutiny and attacks from rivals that came with that status.
But two days after Mr. Yang’s underwhelming performance in Iowa, his campaign laid off dozens of staff members from a team that had ballooned from fewer than a dozen people to over 200. Despite having raised more than $30 million over the course of his presidential campaign — a remarkable sum for a political outsider — Mr. Yang’s team had only $3.7 million in cash on hand at the start of this year, according to federal filings.
In an email to supporters last week, he suggested he would need to finish in the top four in the New Hampshire primary for the campaign to get “the boost” it needed — a goal he failed to achieve.

Mr. Yang’s base of political support consisted mostly of young and male voters — some progressive, some who previously supported President Trump, and many in between. His departure from the race could aid Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, whom many of Mr. Yang’s most loyal fans said they had voted for in 2016.But given that Mr. Yang’s support in the polls never exceeded the mid-single-digits, no candidate is likely to be significantly helped by his exit. Indeed, at rallies and town halls throughout the primary, many members of the so-called Yang Gang said they had never been involved in politics before encountering Mr. Yang.His plans moving forward were not immediately clear, though senior campaign officials would not rule out a return to politics. “We are just getting started,” Zach Graumann, Mr. Yang’s campaign manager, said Tuesday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/09/...lback=false&imp_id=438993197&imp_id=139083322

Speaking to reporters later that day, Mr. Yang was asked if he would consider running for mayor of New York City. “I wouldn’t rule anything out,” he said.

Early in his campaign — sometimes in front of audiences of a few dozen people or less — Mr. Yang, the Schenectady, N.Y.-born former head of a test-prep company and a nonprofit organization, often sounded the alarm about what he called the “fourth industrial revolution.” Automation, he warned, would bring mass unemployment, chaos and even violence if no remedy were pursued; free money combined with a more human economic system, he argued, would buffer American society against its worst effects and help restore people’s dignity.

The candidate and a small campaign staff labored in relative obscurity for about a year until February 2019, when Mr. Yang went on a popular podcast and raised hundreds of thousands of dollars overnight. From there, he began a slow but steady rise, raising millions of dollars each quarter and moving from less than 1 percent in the polls to 4 and 5 percent early this year. His political operation grew and formalized.
Unlike several more experienced candidates, Mr. Yang qualified for all of the 2019 Democratic debates, and he appeared to grow more comfortable on the trail and the debate stages. At a debate in the fall, moderators asked the candidates about automation, a moment of pride for Mr. Yang.

By the time the Iowa caucuses arrived, Mr. Yang was one of just 11 people in the field, which had at one point ballooned to two dozen.
But Mr. Yang’s modest rise also coincided with increased scrutiny of his policy proposals, his past treatment of employees and his handling of topics like race and gender. The news media began digging into the cost of his universal basic income proposal; he was criticized for saying at a debate, “I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors”; and he faced claims of gender discrimination from campaign volunteers and past employees.
Still, when Mr. Yang ostensibly kicked off his campaign in February 2018 by announcing it in an article in The New York Times, few would have expected him to make a run so deep into the primary.

Mr. Yang seemed self-aware enough to comprehend this. At a debate in December that had been winnowed down to seven candidates, Mr. Yang earned laughs when he remarked, “I know what you’re thinking, America: How am I still on this stage with them?”

In an interview last week, he reflected on his two years on the trail.

“Supporters come up to me just about every day and say, ‘Thank you, this campaign lifted me out of a depression,’ or ‘Thank you, this campaign made me feel so much better about my future,’” he said. “It’s really incredible.”

“And while you’re running, you don’t really reflect on these things because you’re trying to get to the next benchmark,” he continued. “But it’s very touching that this campaign has touched other people. It is something that I had hoped for, but I didn’t realize what it would feel like to actually see it.”
 
I think some form of it will eventually be necessary as automation continues to improve. Most workplace automation is still getting its legs (outside of manufacturing), so it'll be a minimum of 5-10 years before it starts becoming a significant problem, but it's gonna hit the minimum wage sector extremely hard once it's good enough to be viable. Why pay a handful of pepperoni-faced high schoolers/exceptional individuals 1100+ bucks a week when you could spend that on a kiosk system that works just as well, if not better, and doesn't no-show/run late/take breaks/occupy a spot on payroll?
I'm still not sold. How is this different than all of the progress made since the dawn of the industrial revolution? That we are calling it "automation" now rather than "that steam-shovel took my ditch digging job"? Just look at tractors, for example, the mass manufacture and spread of them put millions of agricultural laborers out of work. We went from farmers being something like 30% of the population to 2% in just a couple decades and, by and large, the quality of life improved for everyone because subsistence farming sucks balls.

Nobody has come up with definitive proof that this isn't just more of that.
 
Milton Friedman came up with the idea, he despised the welfare state. I don't remember all the details but an absolute requisite was all participants has to register with the Labor Department since it was meant to provide for basics like housing, utilities and food so if you wanted a car you'd have to work for it. I do recall the amount of $1,600 a month being throw around which went pretty far in the seventies.

Look it up, it was a really interesting idea especially since the people that claimed to care about poor blacks and whites raged against it hard because it would have destroyed every welfare office in the US overnight. Since it assumes everyone would behave responsibly it would have probably failed anyway.
$783 is the max people get on ssi these days and only reason that exists was to standardize welfare across the nation. It's a very bloated bureaucractic mess and the micro managing of funds.
 
I respect Yang for (oh so briefly) bringing up the topic of circumcision and rightly condemning it as a backwards, barbaric tradition. Otherwise he was a stewpot of bad ideas and generic democrat talking points. Meh to the extreme
 
J0drt4L.jpg
 
Silly round eye no free money for u now.

Yang was such a buffoon and cartoon, I really enjoyed watching him. I swear to god the man thought star trek was a fucking reality TV show in it's social and economic status.

He was very socially poorly graced (seems to be a theme for any one (re)running for the WH now. The social credit score shit was both fucking scary and comical.


I'll spare my econ geekery on the UBI issues, but one thing he never just addressed is why the middle class needs it, why not just cut our fucking taxes? I don't want a check, I want to not have a check taken from me. It is a LOT less work for the gov too, you don't need to hire people to hand me back my money adding to cost waste pensions etc.

As with ALL gov programs, Yang ganngers, couldn't explain, if it's so good why is it mandatory at gun point? I'd be happy to opt out of ubi not that I'm extra pissy write now filing my own taxes.
 
I think some form of it will eventually be necessary as automation continues to improve.
Implying that most people made redundant won't just be left to starve. Nobody gives a shit about a humanitarian crises, when's the last time you gave money to the homeless? And how often do you do it? That much alone should clue you in to what'll happen once a large minority of the populace are made jobless. Most people on this forum look down on the kind of people who would've been made obsolete anyway. When it happens, everyone unaffected by it will start crowing about the low skill job sector getting purged and feeling smug about being such big galaxy brains, and KF will be no exception.
 
Implying that most people made redundant won't just be left to starve. Nobody gives a shit about a humanitarian crises, when's the last time you gave money to the homeless? And how often do you do it? That much alone should clue you in to what'll happen once a large minority of the populace are made jobless. Most people on this forum look down on the kind of people who would've been made obsolete anyway. When it happens, everyone unaffected by it will start crowing about the low skill job sector getting purged and feeling smug about being such big galaxy brains, and KF will be no exception.
Since our dawn we fear/want/respect being phased out, it's part of the human condition. The water mill, plumbing etc didn't end the world it made it better. The cotton gin ended slavery. So in some ways I can see how something like UBI is seen as a next step while I'm strongly against it.

But also more notable is how dark times the industrial rev was for those who didn't have themselves a boiler. If robots take our jobs most of us will just die off or adapt. I think youre right.

UBI can be seen as a smoother transitional thing when it's really to put us in this comical "post work" ideal of humanity. I think socialized programs for ditch diggers etc won't get traction, selling that same thing in a hip package is all UBI really is. But as I'm trying to be fair in this post, maybe it could make their lives a little less shitty than an 1800s chimney sweep. But I have to ask, how's that any different than welfare because I get a little of my money back? See my post above how that's a pain in the dick for anyone making above a "living" wage.
 
Since our dawn we fear/want/respect being phased out, it's part of the human condition. The water mill, plumbing etc didn't end the world it made it better. The cotton gin ended slavery. So in some ways I can see how something like UBI is seen as a next step while I'm strongly against it.

But also more notable is how dark times the industrial rev was for those who didn't have themselves a boiler. If robots take our jobs most of us will just die off or adapt. I think youre right.

UBI can be seen as a smoother transitional thing when it's really to put us in this comical "post work" ideal of humanity. I think socialized programs for ditch diggers etc won't get traction, selling that same thing in a hip package is all UBI really is. But as I'm trying to be fair in this post, maybe it could make their lives a little less shitty than an 1800s chimney sweep. But I have to ask, how's that any different than welfare because I get a little of my money back? See my post above how that's a pain in the dick for anyone making above a "living" wage.
Your average truck driver ain't adapting to shit. Their job is practically a 24/7 affair with a non-insignificant amount of them having to take meth just to stay awake during the odd and long hours they're expected to perform. When are they gonna have the time to learn how to program? Schools haven't changed with the times since the 50s and are structured around creating assembly line workers that we don't and won't need anymore. In fact, they're getting increasingly worse.
 
Looks like the CCP agent forced meme candidate is out. I am actually shocked that he go this far to begin with considering that his voter base consisted of 20-something college dropouts and communists. All well...

serveimage (28).jpg
884.jpg
a81.jpg
8bb.jpg
403.jpg
450.jpg
547.gif
21f.jpg


Now take a good look in the mirror and see just how silly you look.
 
Your average truck driver ain't adapting to shit. Their job is practically a 24/7 affair with a non-insignificant amount of them having to take meth just to stay awake during the odd and long hours they're expected to perform. When are they gonna have the time to learn how to program? Schools haven't changed with the times since the 50s and are structured around creating assembly line workers that we don't and won't need anymore. In fact, they're getting increasingly worse.
Truckers are limited more and more, there's ways around that, esp at UPS (after your mandatory break of driving, they go load unload and go right back on the road after 10 hours driving 8 of hauling for another 10 on road) the whole methed out trucker thing, is kinda a past tense.. well working it's way down.

But to reuse the analogy before, they are the cart handlers, porters of before. Most will just not be there and the next gen will be the new low end of totem pole (while very needed mind you for a lot of factors).

The whole learn to program thing burns me up for a lot of reasons, but that's another topic for another day. What I'm trying to say, in short is, there will always be lower skilled jobs, even if the skill cap raises. Hell there were people in Rome who's entire job was to walk around a tread mill to keep baths flowing. Now our lowest of the low skill levels needs to know how to read write and use a computer as they flip and hand you their fries. What will the lowest need in 50 years? I can't say.

Education social climate, econ etc until you hit some magic bull post scarcity like Yang claims we live in now, someone's always gonna be on the bottom and they are needed for any economic model. Even a post scarcity, because someone is gonna have to fix your leaky sink even if they make the same as the guy who cures your cancer. etc.

But while I'm on the topic (read tangent) would you rather be a truck driver today, where you can vote, read, write, own a home, own a truck have a CDL or would you want to be one of the guys who's entire life is rowing a warship to troll Spartans ?
 
I liked Yang's fanbase, it was nice to see so many asian faggots playing outside their parents' homes.

Seriously, the amount of soy in the Yang gang cannot be understated. So many sad asians angry over their supposed oppression or whatever. Since most asians are as racist as the average klansman, we won't see any of these losers doing much for a while. Maybe over in the weebwars board.
 
Your average truck driver ain't adapting to shit. Their job is practically a 24/7 affair with a non-insignificant amount of them having to take meth just to stay awake during the odd and long hours they're expected to perform. When are they gonna have the time to learn how to program? Schools haven't changed with the times since the 50s and are structured around creating assembly line workers that we don't and won't need anymore. In fact, they're getting increasingly worse.
Fucking Jesus no, that isn't how the industry is. Truckers have Hours-of-Service that are monitored by both their carrier and the DOT by an ELD. The freewheeling days of guys loading up on whities and driving all night hasn't been true in decades. You are also limited by HoS to 70 hours of duty time every 8 days.

The big reason a lot of folks in the industry struggle is because they are fucking idiots picked up off the street, ran through a mickey mouse training course, and dispatched centrally out of some cubicle farm staffed by people just as dumb as them. Professionalism is dead in the big fleets. Retention is dog shit. Nobody sticks around long enough to actually get good at the job and move up the ranks. Turn and burn is the norm.

They, once they wash out of trucking when their fleet contract is up, move on to a job at Walmart or Goodwill Industries or Fast Food. The same low wage dead end job pool they were plucked from and thrown into a Freightliner to begin with.

It wasn't automation that did that but corporate fuckery. Nobody seems to recognize that you get what you pay for with skilled workers. Worse than that in the last couple decades they have been stacking the regs to drive the independent professional guys out of the industry. The guys that developed into skilled workers and do more than just hold a steering wheel and go where the GPS tells them.

Shit, I can service and maintain a semi. If automation kicks off I'll buy one and shitpost from the sleeper berth all day stopping every now and then to inspect, fuel it, make repairs, etc. Those tasks will not be automated and are super critical to having a smooth operation with minimal downtime. The professional core will be fine. It's the booger-eaters on the margins who are gone. Good. They should have never been in the industry in the first place.
Truckers are limited more and more, there's ways around that, esp at UPS (after your mandatory break of driving, they go load unload and go right back on the road after 10 hours driving 8 of hauling for another 10 on road) the whole methed out trucker thing, is kinda a past tense.. well working it's way down.
Lol, old man with your outdated HoS rules. The 14-hour rule pretty much forces you to have a normal sleep schedule. 14 hours from when you started your day you must then take 10 hours off-duty continuous. The 10-8 thing where you can split 'em up and switch them around hasn't been true since the early 2000's. No more midday naps. :(
 
He shouldn't have talked so much about his autistic son and about being "the math guy". The average American voter don't like autists and they surely don't like math.
 
Fucking Jesus no, that isn't how the industry is. Truckers have Hours-of-Service that are monitored by both their carrier and the DOT by an ELD. The freewheeling days of guys loading up on whities and driving all night hasn't been true in decades. You are also limited by HoS to 70 hours of duty time every 8 days.

The big reason a lot of folks in the industry struggle is because they are fucking idiots picked up off the street, ran through a mickey mouse training course, and dispatched centrally out of some cubicle farm staffed by people just as dumb as them. Professionalism is dead in the big fleets. Retention is dog shit. Nobody sticks around long enough to actually get good at the job and move up the ranks. Turn and burn is the norm.

They, once they wash out of trucking when their fleet contract is up, move on to a job at Walmart or Goodwill Industries or Fast Food. The same low wage dead end job pool they were plucked from and thrown into a Freightliner to begin with.

It wasn't automation that did that but corporate fuckery. Nobody seems to recognize that you get what you pay for with skilled workers. Worse than that in the last couple decades they have been stacking the regs to drive the independent professional guys out of the industry. The guys that developed into skilled workers and do more than just hold a steering wheel and go where the GPS tells them.

Shit, I can service and maintain a semi. If automation kicks off I'll buy one and shitpost from the sleeper berth all day stopping every now and then to inspect, fuel it, make repairs, etc. Those tasks will not be automated and are super critical to having a smooth operation with minimal downtime. The professional core will be fine. It's the booger-eaters on the margins who are gone. Good. They should have never been in the industry in the first place.

Lol, old man with your outdated HoS rules. The 14-hour rule pretty much forces you to have a normal sleep schedule. 14 hours from when you started your day you must then take 10 hours off-duty continuous. The 10-8 thing where you can split 'em up and switch them around hasn't been true since the early 2000's. No more midday naps. :(
So basically, automation is actually fixing a problem?
 
So basically, automation is actually fixing a problem?
Unless you are one of the mutants driving for Swift, yes. But it's too early to tell. Like I said they are fucking with the regs, picking winners and losers, so who knows how it will all pan out.

Point is, however this turns out in the future is going to be 100% on political lobbying and 0% robots took er jerbs.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo