Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign

Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign




Mr. Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience, mounted a long-shot campaign that promoted a universal basic income and persisted well beyond expectations.

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Andrew Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience who evangelized a universal basic income and warned of the perils of automation, ended his longer-than-long-shot bid for president on Tuesday night after a yearslong campaign that endured even as those of members of Congress and governors fell away.

Speaking to supporters inside a ballroom in Manchester, N.H., as the state’s primary results were coming in, Mr. Yang said “endings are hard” and that he had intended to stay in the race until the end.

“I am the math guy, and it’s clear from the numbers we’re not going to win this campaign,” he said. “So tonight I’m announcing that I am suspending my campaign.”

Mr. Yang’s campaign has spent considerable time and resources in the state and was banking on the backing of its many independent voters. Mr. Yang had signaled in recent interviews and emails to supporters that he would need to vastly outperform expectations in the Granite State for his campaign to continue.

The end comes a week after Mr. Yang, 45, failed to win any pledged delegates in Iowa despite spending a significant share of his war chest on ads there.

Mr. Yang’s decision to exit the race closes out one of the Democratic primary’s most surprising story lines, removing a candidate who developed a fiercely loyal following of disaffected voters from across the ideological spectrum and intrigued even skeptics with his wit, levity and relentless positivity.

The son of Taiwanese immigrants, Mr. Yang was one of about a half-dozen viable Asian-American candidates to ever run for president. He became something of an involuntary torchbearer for Asian-Americans as he grappled with how to discuss his identity on the trail and how to address and confront racism.

But it was Mr. Yang’s plan to give every American adult $1,000 a month that formed the foundation and rationale for his run. Aware that a candidate beginning with essentially no name recognition and few traditional credentials would face stiff odds, Mr. Yang often told audiences that he had not initially wanted to run for president, because he was not “crazy.”

But he would add that during a trip to Washington, he was told that if he wanted the government to do anything about job loss caused by automation, he would need to bring a “wave” crashing down on the heads of bureaucrats. His run for president, he said, amounted to that wave.

Mr. Yang enjoyed steady growth from under the radar as higher-profile candidates took turns as the front-runner and absorbed the media scrutiny and attacks from rivals that came with that status.
But two days after Mr. Yang’s underwhelming performance in Iowa, his campaign laid off dozens of staff members from a team that had ballooned from fewer than a dozen people to over 200. Despite having raised more than $30 million over the course of his presidential campaign — a remarkable sum for a political outsider — Mr. Yang’s team had only $3.7 million in cash on hand at the start of this year, according to federal filings.
In an email to supporters last week, he suggested he would need to finish in the top four in the New Hampshire primary for the campaign to get “the boost” it needed — a goal he failed to achieve.

Mr. Yang’s base of political support consisted mostly of young and male voters — some progressive, some who previously supported President Trump, and many in between. His departure from the race could aid Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, whom many of Mr. Yang’s most loyal fans said they had voted for in 2016.But given that Mr. Yang’s support in the polls never exceeded the mid-single-digits, no candidate is likely to be significantly helped by his exit. Indeed, at rallies and town halls throughout the primary, many members of the so-called Yang Gang said they had never been involved in politics before encountering Mr. Yang.His plans moving forward were not immediately clear, though senior campaign officials would not rule out a return to politics. “We are just getting started,” Zach Graumann, Mr. Yang’s campaign manager, said Tuesday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/09/...lback=false&imp_id=438993197&imp_id=139083322

Speaking to reporters later that day, Mr. Yang was asked if he would consider running for mayor of New York City. “I wouldn’t rule anything out,” he said.

Early in his campaign — sometimes in front of audiences of a few dozen people or less — Mr. Yang, the Schenectady, N.Y.-born former head of a test-prep company and a nonprofit organization, often sounded the alarm about what he called the “fourth industrial revolution.” Automation, he warned, would bring mass unemployment, chaos and even violence if no remedy were pursued; free money combined with a more human economic system, he argued, would buffer American society against its worst effects and help restore people’s dignity.

The candidate and a small campaign staff labored in relative obscurity for about a year until February 2019, when Mr. Yang went on a popular podcast and raised hundreds of thousands of dollars overnight. From there, he began a slow but steady rise, raising millions of dollars each quarter and moving from less than 1 percent in the polls to 4 and 5 percent early this year. His political operation grew and formalized.
Unlike several more experienced candidates, Mr. Yang qualified for all of the 2019 Democratic debates, and he appeared to grow more comfortable on the trail and the debate stages. At a debate in the fall, moderators asked the candidates about automation, a moment of pride for Mr. Yang.

By the time the Iowa caucuses arrived, Mr. Yang was one of just 11 people in the field, which had at one point ballooned to two dozen.
But Mr. Yang’s modest rise also coincided with increased scrutiny of his policy proposals, his past treatment of employees and his handling of topics like race and gender. The news media began digging into the cost of his universal basic income proposal; he was criticized for saying at a debate, “I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors”; and he faced claims of gender discrimination from campaign volunteers and past employees.
Still, when Mr. Yang ostensibly kicked off his campaign in February 2018 by announcing it in an article in The New York Times, few would have expected him to make a run so deep into the primary.

Mr. Yang seemed self-aware enough to comprehend this. At a debate in December that had been winnowed down to seven candidates, Mr. Yang earned laughs when he remarked, “I know what you’re thinking, America: How am I still on this stage with them?”

In an interview last week, he reflected on his two years on the trail.

“Supporters come up to me just about every day and say, ‘Thank you, this campaign lifted me out of a depression,’ or ‘Thank you, this campaign made me feel so much better about my future,’” he said. “It’s really incredible.”

“And while you’re running, you don’t really reflect on these things because you’re trying to get to the next benchmark,” he continued. “But it’s very touching that this campaign has touched other people. It is something that I had hoped for, but I didn’t realize what it would feel like to actually see it.”
 
Isn't that the sped that was claiming we were going to lose a bunch of jobs because we are going to replace truck drivers with hackable computers?

The fucking absolute state of these people supporting automated deadly weapons(self-driving cars) while trying to ban manual deadly weapons (guns).
Way to break the 'Asians are smert' stereotype Andy.
 
The fucking absolute state of these people supporting automated deadly weapons(self-driving cars) while trying to ban manual deadly weapons (guns).
Nah, see, you're thinking like a civilian. To get how this works, you need to think like a Clinton. A British Clinton.

See, guns allow civis to defend themselves against naked oppression, if you're a corrupt politician then that's bad. A self driving car can be hijacked by the government to kill wrongthinkers and then blame it on some anonymous crime group that doesn't exist, incompetent programming or an unnecessary override where the passenger took it upon themselves to be the driver and swerved off a cliff.
 
UBI might work. In fact if technology continues to progress the way it does, it might become necessary for a free society. BUT it does not seem compatible with anything other than a very restrictive immigration policy. And the Democrats are not the party for that. Wealthy Dems make too much money and get too much political capital from immigration. And I can't see the Republicans going for UBI because it's still way too early for it to be necessary. Yang may well be right and it might even be a good idea to start testing this stuff out now on the small scale. But there's no political home for it.
 
Última edición:
um look but if you listen to austrian economics any money given to the people by the government will simply be accounted for by rent inceases and other price increases. all of it! 100%

And the reason for that is restricted supply and housing being a necessity. If we were talking TV sets then UBI would lead to an increase in price just through raising the amount of disposable income people had. But it should theoretically be countered by competition. Yes, someone might have $500 to spend on a new TV they wouldn't otherwise but TV manufacturers still have to compete on price with each other to get that sale. So Capitalism is still functioning to push prices down. But rental market and housing market don't function as cleanly as that because limited supply turns it from manufacturers competing for customers to customers competing with each other - by price. Further, that supply is more limited than it outwardly appears because there are so many restraints on a buyer's choice. It needs to be near their job, near family, buying and selling is complicated due to the costs being greater than liquidity... and so on.

UBI comes with a lot of unsolved problems. But it's one answer to another very big potential problem. Now another answer to the problem would be population reduction. But whilst the West seems to be engaged in that itself, it's creating a vacuum into which other cultures not pursuing that move in.
 
They'd rather let a gay or a commie be president than a chink.
Eh. When did his parents/ancestors get here? There’s a hell of a difference between the old rail workers, people that fled from the commies, the rare Taiwanese that ends up here and the more recent ones.
 
Is Marianne Williamson still in it? I love her to bits. She's genuinely the only Dem candidate I would vote for over Trump.
16704632-7303863-Twitter_was_left_baffled_by_Marianne_Williamson_s_quirky_jewelry-a-1_15645477...jpg
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • marianne-williamson.jpg
    marianne-williamson.jpg
    73.4 KB · Vistas: 9
UBI honestly wouldn't be a bad idea. Half the population gets some form of welfare benefits anyway, so you wouldn't have to waste time and money deciding who qualifies. Might even save money.

The only thing is welfare recipients might whine that they should get more anyway.
It's possible a UBI may one day be a necessity and maybe it would be wise to start it sooner than later.

Or maybe it just isn't feasible.

Anyone who wants to see what the US would look like with UBI, just go visit the nearest reservation. Once people don't have to work, they tend to get fat and lazy, and even if they are just surviving, they will still sit around and do nothing or work a part-time job at most. All the while complaining about the government not giving them more.
 
Negative, she dropped out some time back.

Then her prophecy will come true:

giphy.gif


Seriously, I know she is batshit crazy but I feel she was the only one that really understood Trump and the American people. Yang seems smart and has big ideas but I don't think he understood just how American citizens thought and worked as a culture. What he was proposing and his chances of getting it through - unfeasible. If a time comes when UBI is necessary, it will be a long time before people and politicians accept that it is. He's either wrong or ahead of his time. Tulsi gets a lot of support from online commentators because she's rational and seems sincere. But she thinks she can win on being smart, presentable and sane. These are all qualities you want in a president but I don't think they by themselves provide the secret ingredients to win. Kamala is in Clinton's mould: a Saruman to Hillary's Sauron. Biden a disaster waiting to happen and complicit in international money laundering. Sanders a rallying point for those on the Left who still hope to pull the Democrats out of the corrupt fallen state they are in but I don't think he can beat Trump - the media wouldn't back him and Trump can point at the strong economy as a counter to almost everything he says. People only turn to real Socialism out of desperation and the people are not desparate. They rather like Trump on the whole. Williamson can meme. She has positive energy the same way Trump has. In fact, she's the closet thing the Democrats have to Trump. Except better at yoga. Yang never really engaged me. Part of that was media blackout on his presence meaning simply saw less of him. But also, I don't think he could take the fight to Trump no matter how much logic he brought to bear. Williamson understood it wasn't all about logic, but about being liked, determined and positive. I don't think Yang had any of those three qualities in enough quantity to win.
 
Wasn't the whole point that the $1000 was in exchange for existing welfare program So in order to cut bureaucracy and save more?
Everything getting more expensive would have already happened because of excess disposable income circulating through existing programs.
I can't see why big business would not want the real-life equivalent to the Dave Chapelle Reparations sketch, so he may have gotten kneecapped by the government pencil pusher vultures!

Going to have to change my longshot stance from Yang/Tulsi 2020 to Tulsi/Yang 2020.
 
Anyone who wants to see what the US would look like with UBI, just go visit the nearest reservation. Once people don't have to work, they tend to get fat and lazy, and even if they are just surviving, they will still sit around and do nothing or work a part-time job at most. All the while complaining about the government not giving them more.
That is a meaningless statement.
 
Maybe Reddit isn't the best sample, but judging by the candidates', respective subreddits, a lot more previous Yang supporters seem to be jumping to the Pete Buttgieg boat vs the Sanders and Warren boats.
 
A lot of folks liked his tousand dorrah dream, but I'll always remember him as the loveable sidekick to Dr. Henry Jones in The Temple of Doom.

F
ShortRound.jpg
 
It's possible a UBI may one day be a necessity and maybe it would be wise to start it sooner than later.
I think some form of it will eventually be necessary as automation continues to improve. Most workplace automation is still getting its legs (outside of manufacturing), so it'll be a minimum of 5-10 years before it starts becoming a significant problem, but it's gonna hit the minimum wage sector extremely hard once it's good enough to be viable. Why pay a handful of pepperoni-faced high schoolers/retards 1100+ bucks a week when you could spend that on a kiosk system that works just as well, if not better, and doesn't no-show/run late/take breaks/occupy a spot on payroll?
 
He was wasting his time anyway because we know my man Trump is gonna be president until the day he dies, which is never, because he is so powerful he will have the technology to make himself immortal!
 
Yang's "meme magic" would have had to take down other Democrat candidates before Trump. One of the things that the Trump memes did was it mocked other Republican candidates and how cool/smug/not-giving-a-fuck Trump was. With Yang it wasn't anything more than "muh thousand bucks" and "orange man bad". Mocking front-runners like Biden, Warren, and Kamala should have priority number one.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo