💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I'm not sure if this has been posted yet or not but I think its very relevant.

ec9.jpg

Pretty funny one, i really dig his art
 
Última edición por un moderador:
But why he is a crappy artist? i mean, he get the right proportions, he can color too, in comparition tho who he is a bad artist?
No, no he does not. His coloring techniques consist of doing both the line art and the coloring/shading on one layer. With said shading just simply being black colors. Plus have you even seen any of his stuff? The dude can't keep anything proportionate (most noticeable with his bear icon). He's in his thirties and graduated from art school. You think he should know this shit by now, but he doesn't.

And that's before you get into his SJW antics, inflation fetish, his unholy Korrasami obsesson, the CattyN debacle, the list goes on.
 

If find that other guy much better. Just by looking through what he's made he has a better grasp at perspective when it comes to staging a character in a room or spacing them in a panel. Also he makes character concepts that look more lively and natural despite having abnormal human proportions. Part of this comes form his ability to draw characters loosely and freely, as opposed to Dobson who draws his characters very static and with the very minimal of ink work.

Also, the loose coloring shown by this artist is much more interesting than Dobson's 2 tone color scheme. It isn't that 2 tone color schemes aren't enough to look interesting, it's that Dobson doesn't understand shape and how light reacts to it, causing his color shading to look flat and boring. Understanding how light reacts to shape is vital in creating dimensions after all.
 
No, no he does not. His coloring techniques consist of doing both the line art and the coloring/shading on one layer. With said shading just simply being black colors. Plus have you even seen any of his stuff? The dude can't keep anything proportionate (most noticeable with his bear icon). He's in his thirties and graduated from art school. You think he should know this shit by now, but he doesn't.

And that's before you get into his SJW antics, inflation fetish, his unholy Korrasami obsesson, the CattyN debacle, the list goes on.

I notice he actually got and style of drawing by now, maybe its not the style for all people.
and about his fetishes and obsessiones, well, he's entitled to have his obsessiones i guess, i cant see the crime here, he's cerntainly not Chris Chan

If find that other guy much better. Just by looking through what he's made he has a better grasp at perspective when it comes to staging a character in a room or spacing them in a panel. Also he makes character concepts that look more lively and natural despite having abnormal human proportions. Part of this comes form his ability to draw characters loosely and freely, as opposed to Dobson who draws his characters very static and with the very minimal of ink work.

Also, the loose coloring shown by this artist is much more interesting than Dobson's 2 tone color scheme. It isn't that 2 tone color schemes aren't enough to look interesting, it's that Dobson doesn't understand shape and how light reacts to it, causing his color shading to look flat and boring. Understanding how light reacts to shape is vital in creating dimensions after all.

Well, i can undesrtand that , i guess you got a point
i really need to read more of this Dobson guy, maybe he is a terrible artist but i still fail in seeing his crime
 
Última edición por un moderador:
You know, his REAL artistic crime is his complete inability to take any kind of criticism whatsoever. He doesn't have to follow it but he also doesn't have to be such a smug dickhole about it when people try to give him any. Part of being an artist and putting your stuff on the web is getting and dealing with feedback, good AND bad. He cannot do that. Besides his terribly bland and barely-competent cartooning, that is why I dislike him and consider him a bad artist.
 
You know, his REAL artistic crime is his complete inability to take any kind of criticism whatsoever. He doesn't have to follow it but he also doesn't have to be such a smug dickhole about it when people try to give him any. Part of being an artist and putting your stuff on the web is getting and dealing with feedback, good AND bad. He cannot do that. Besides his terribly bland and barely-competent cartooning, that is why I dislike him and consider him a bad artist.

Now i get it , damn, i wish i could get that attention or even a single critic in Deviantart, and this guy got it but instead of learning from it he just get worse.
 
Well, i can undesrtand that , i guess you got a point
i really need to read more of this Dobson guy, maybe he is a terrible artist but i still fail in seeing his crime

Understanding why people dislike Dobson involves taking a trip in the way back machine, and reading up on his hypocrisies and flame baiting. Maybe you'll see more of it in the near future, Dobson has a knack of directing unwanted attention to himself.
 
I notice he actually got and style of drawing by now, maybe its not the style for all people.
and about his fetishes and obsessiones, well, he's entitled to have his obsessiones i guess, i cant see the crime here, he's cerntainly not Chris Chan
Well, i can undesrtand that , i guess you got a point
i really need to read more of this Dobson guy, maybe he is a terrible artist but i still fail in seeing his crime
Hi Dobby.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo