Aladdin live action 1st trailer

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Christine Ford recently taught me that we can have vivid memories from our youth, and yet still actually be lying when we express them...

With that said, a vivid childhood memory I still have- was being in the theater to see Aladdin, looking at the poster for the movie in the lobby, and realizing that the "release date" on it was the day I was there. (To all you younglings, this was well before the days where they had midnight showings of movies...) I guess my only real point is I was one of the first people to see Aladdin, and this looks like absolute shit to me.
 
I *almost* think these live action Disney remakes could have worked. But they would have had to have done something to make them distinct from the originals, rather than just say... literally fimling Beauty and the Beast as a life action movie with the chick who played Hermione, cutting out some of the better scenes.. and Lefou is now for some reason gay... ...for someone other than Gaston. (Who he was totally already gay for in the original)

It's kind of telling that the only example I can really of to compare this to is the (for the most part, terrible) Marvel "Ultimate" imprint- Familiar characters, only different. (usually in stupid ways). Something to make the movies unpredictable, and worth watching even if you saw the originals.

Maybe make Mowgli grow up in a desert instead of a jungle (yeah the name "The Jungle Book" wouldn't really work anymore, but a live action remake of a Disney cartoon is stupid on its head, I'm doing my best to switch it up a bit, cut me some slack).
Instead of 18th Century France, make Beauty and the beast take place in 2300 Australia or something.
Actually make your Aladdin be overtly post-apocalyptic, as many trash-tier "news" sites have speculated.

Yeah those ideas all suck, but at least they're more original than what Disney is doing.
 
Dude, come on. I wouldn''t say Aladdin from the original movie was looking that bad, but this guy is more fitting in 30's setting or our time. Unless arabs had tons of hair gel and pricey barbershops.
Ver archivo adjunto 565940
The guy playing Aladdin looks like a brown version of pic related
531e397d14c8592300f945a51051d35e
 
How are they going to handle the :islamic:, especially since Disney has all but stated their live action remakes are supposed to have a more feminist direction to them?

Jasmine and all the other ladies will be in full burqhas which the trailers won't show because they'll give the EVIL GOOBERGATERS more ammo (Also I think Jasmine looked better in her red outfit than green but that's just me)
 
I'm amazed they're even attempting this as recasting the genie seems completely impossible, it's also noteworthy then how the genie is a no show in the live action trailer considering he dominated the marketing for the original film
 
Hey look, in the weeks surrounding that film's release, I've got Avengers: Endgame, John Wick 3, and Godzilla: King of the Monsters.

I'm good.
 
The Jungle Book has been the least awful of these liveaction movies so far, and that's mostly just because of it's stellar visuals rather than its story. None of these film feel genuine. All I see is Disney so desperately looking for a quick buck.

Jungle Book is really the only life action film that makes sense in the Disney cannon as all other live adaptations of the story have been lack lustre because the animals. With CG you can create the emotive characters you want, an essentially do whatever does the story the most in terms of service. Though other films, it's just gonna be a passing fad, and six years from now no ones gonna remember the life action ones.

Disney as a creative enterprise is really circling the drain at this point in my opinion.

It goes with the territory that film studios that get too big to have a major failure are conservative by nature from a money and ideas point of view. Disney is no different, instead of trying to find something new and interesting or come up with a new film or hell a new animated feature, this is what we get, and what we will continue to get until at some point it proves unpopular and you have a Star Wars style box office meltdown, or the luddites run out of material to go watch.

People watch or at least used to watch Disney for their timeless animation films. Even their live actions back in the day, such as Pete's Dragon were also good serviceable films.

They missed the boat with Pixar when they didn't amalgamate it into the main company, so they weren't really ever able to compete with that brand in computer animation, and where Pixar didn't dominate, Dreamworks picked up the slack, essentially putting a Disney's own brand out of the market.

And so instead of actually coming up with new stories, it's easier to "cash in" on the large group of suckers who love the originals and will pay to see the rehash of kids of their own. As opposed to actually re-releasing the original movies for general cinema view.

Either way I won't be seeing them. If I do, I will do so in a way to prevent Disney from being rewarded for their creative bankruptcy.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo