AI art criticism general - The only place on the internet for right wing criticism for AI art.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
People can use AI to express themselves, though
If you're just putting prompts into a generator, it's the same as asking someone for a commission.
You're not the artist, you're just asking someone/something to do it for you.

If you do like I suggested and draw a sketch, then ask AI to smoothen out the lines and such, that's a different thing.
It's an idea from your head that's being touched up by AI.
 
If you're just putting prompts into a generator, it's the same as asking someone for a commission.
You're not the artist, you're just asking someone/something to do it for you.

If you do like I suggested and draw a sketch, then ask AI to smoothen out the lines and such, that's a different thing.
It's an idea from your head that's being touched up by AI.
Most prompters are too lazy for even that. This technology doesn't encourage creativity.
 
They conflate the liberalism with being into art, or being an artist, so they'll gladly sell a part of our souls to the devil. It didn't occurr to enough right wingers that they should try getting into creative media. It's clear that the few right wing artist there are bothers liberals, however they just simply don't and take the side of corporations, the same corporations which demand for nearly every AI chatbot to be completely censored.

I didn't know novelty and fun was this great moral standards. You know alot of drug addicts consider drugs fun.


This is the gayest shit I've ever heard.
they can't find any "right wing art" because "right wing" isn't an actual ideology, it's just "not left wing"
left wing is a globalising unifying ideology, so of course youre gonna have those types openly claim to be "left wing artists".
"right wing" usually means "nationalist", which means "not in english". There's plenty of quality nationalist artists out there RIGHT NOW, but not in america. I find that those who identify as "right wing artists" are really only doing it to be contrarian, so it just ends up being pretentious and shit. Hell, some liberals will call a slightly-more-centrist-nationally-inclined-liberal a "far right propagandist". It really means nothing.
It's french revolution jargon that became outdated by around the 1870's if you ask me.

i just find it amazing that those who identify as "traditionalists" are willing to not only play into the hand of the most despicable corporations ever, but are willing to destroy the oldest and most eternal tradition ever.

I personally don't create anything for a foreign audience, i do it in english (because my language is too hard and english is stupid simple) and because in my country nobody will take you seriously if you don't, which i find to be a shame. You can convince liberals of anything if you do it beautifully enough. These retards don't know shit, aren't willing to create, and it just feels like they're jealous because there are people out there willing to display their soul and feels prostrate and vulnerable for the whole world to see and devour.
 
Don't we already have an AI art criticism thread?
I just like photo manipulation and I use it for that. People have cut me off over it, because they're retarded. I was never going to pay anybody for my profile picture. Before AI I'd run fanart through tons of Photoshop, or use an avatar creator.
Edit: LavenderTowne is a dick and deserves her own thread.
LavenderTowne's attempts to "destroy" AI in her video were very pathetic. That said I don't think there is enough there to make a thread
 
i just find it amazing that those who identify as "traditionalists" are willing to not only play into the hand of the most despicable corporations ever, but are willing to destroy the oldest and most eternal tradition ever.
I've been thinking about this over the past few months. Not to long ago, a lot of people were complaining about the lack of male writers, but they didn't see the reason why. I think so many of the problems we see at the moment are down to senile boomers in power and a lack of substance to anything we consume. Also a lack of community and these corporations wanting tech feudalism.
These are the same corporations that not so long ago had the Troons pushed everywhere. The same corporations that are now making any semblance of "traditional" life impossible. Many men today would rather follow weird psyop "traditional" influencers than engage in any intellectual stimulation. You know, how they used to be in the times they "love" so much?

These niggas want a woman that's basically a second mom without putting anything in. I hate it when people pretend that corporations are on the side of the little guy because of the way they advertise themselves.
The West has fallen, but not for the reasons these retards think.
 
Última edición:
1744907501039.webp
the AI facebook groups I follow now all get spammed with those generic comic model to the point it start to get annoying.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Well, art is about how it relates to us. Imagine a friend draws you with his hands. Imagine if a machine draws you. Which has more value?
Is that what art is about? Art is about a lot of things. And I can make an interesting criticism out of either scenario. Have you seen the robot that constantly leaks oil and tries to scoop it back up into itself? I find that vastly more interesting than a drawing of a hand.
 
We already have a thread for this.
That thread is more or less neutral towards it, from what I can gleam from it
 
Well, art is about how it relates to us. Imagine a friend draws you with his hands. Imagine if a machine draws you. Which has more value?
typical jew mentality. art isn't about value. it's about understanding the world. Before photography, art was the basis of science. Unless you're a post modern artist, in which case, art goes back to being about value (money laundering)
 
do people actually do that
Coomers will literally subscribe to AI gen patreons which just give them generic anime girls in the same style every month. Companies will hire indians to ask ChatGPT to do the job for them since it's supposedly "more efficient". I saw a company making shovelware slop VNs for the Switch that claimed to have actually paid someone else to generate the assets for them (both visuals and text were slop) instead of doing it all themselves.

They're already outsourcing the work to a random number generator, imagine PAYING to DOUBLE outsource it. Absolute lunacy.
 
I feel indifferent towards AI art, the art scene has been creatively bankrupt ever since an urinal made it to a museum, but somehow, only retards tend to support to the death AI art like if they are modern day iconoclasts.

In conclusion, grifters are gonna grift
 
This is more a ChatGPT criticism than A.I. Art in general, but I noticed how I can't seem to make ChatGPT generate "2D illustration" type images without making them look like they've gone through the filter. This explains the Ghibli shit spam on those facebook group posts.

do people actually do that
Coomers will literally subscribe to AI gen patreons which just give them generic anime girls in the same style every month.
Coomers really are the bottom of the barrel consumers. The easily most suckered idiots out there. No wonder why artists make big bucks whoring themselves by drawing some furfag's OC in ABDL fetish art.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo