AI art criticism general - The only place on the internet for right wing criticism for AI art.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Modern Audience

Mmm cat
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
4 de Feb, 2025
As you all know, there have been developments in AI imaging and language, and alot of this was built on these corporations taking artworks and photographs and training off of that. Because of that, you're able to direct these in creating any sort of image, to the point in which you can get down to the specifics, cat washing monkey in space, redraw this image in ghibli style.

1744647572836.webp
1000029015.webp

And such, instead of associating this this with the emotion put into it, with the souls of the people who made it, we associate it with an image generated by a machine thus tainting it.

Screenshot 2025-04-14 120444.webp

1744648160532.webp
There is a certain individuation taken out in the AI images as well. For example, the AI images there is an orange tint that isn't present in authentic ghibli movie screenshots. The reason is likely the fact that alot of artists give there works an orange tint and alot of people like orange unknowingly and associate it with the cozy feeling of ghibli. So all of the false ghibli images are stripped of there individuality unknowingly and are mixed in with everything else even if that doesn't seem like the case.

AI arts issues don't end with mere just the honor of artistry. There is also the fact that people generate porn with it. Porn is bad, and with AI, more and more of it will get crapped out for every single weird fetish there is. I shouldn't have to describe why this is bad.

Obviously this is a vice in that instead of art being something meaningful which says something, it just makes art about whatever a machine can make. You aren't a producer, you aren't appreciating anything real, you are the ultimate consumer. But if you point that out you get people, furious with you. Lavandertowne recently made some videos where she tried sending AI corrupted images, hoping to fuck with it when it tries to recreate her works. Her efforts were in vain, as huge corporations have more power than one woman. And then you have people on happy that Townes works are being recreated.



1744770836335.webp

And you have people using left wing rhetoric when critiquing AI art.

1000029419.webp

For some reason you have these dudes jumping on the anti kinkade circlejerk.

1000029418.webp
And dudes using the intelligent ape rhetoric.

I know some people are going to use there own example of liberals overreacting with AI art. I wont pretend that progressives aren't being obnoxious in regards to AI art, they've pretty much denigrated every other part of living, even art, they don't really have the right to care about this with what they've done to art in the past.

But that doesn't change the fact that if you're a devotee towards AI, I'm talking more than casual usage, you're a bugman. The same way trannies are to real women, prompters are to artists. AI art is basically the homosexualisation of art in that instead of sex being about love, and art being about meaning, it basically turns art into instant gratification to the ultimate degree. Homosexuals claimed that acceptance of there lifestyle has no affect on broader society, but it turned out that wasn't true. AI shills claim that acceptance of there ideology will have no affect on broader things and that's already turning out to be untrue.

These corporations are basically ruining any sense of truth we have all because they think they will get more money. I'm serious, open AI gets funding from other corporations because they think this will make things more convenient, when all it was doing was basically lie to us. Fake AI users, fake AI images and there is no way for any oversight to be placed over these groups.

AI art was the worst thing to happen to art since the "art is subjective" movement and we should have higher aims than being bugs. Anyways that was my peice, the point of this thread is just general criticism towards insitutions such as openai, and figuring out what to do about this situation.
 
Don't we already have an AI art criticism thread?
I just like photo manipulation and I use it for that. People have cut me off over it, because they're retarded. I was never going to pay anybody for my profile picture. Before AI I'd run fanart through tons of Photoshop, or use an avatar creator.
Edit: LavenderTowne is a dick and deserves her own thread.
 
Última edición:
We already have a thread for this.
 
We already have a thread for this.
That thread serves a different purpose
 
We already have a thread for this.
That thread is for covering the type of people that would use this thread.
 
The problem I have with AI art, and I don't think this will ever be fixed, is that it's boring.
It can be the most technically impressive stuff but it's boring, doesn't make me feel anything.
Not to mention, I see 5-10 generated by the same AI, I already see a pattern.

What I would use AI for is, if I was drawing something but I wasn't competent enough to fully translate my ideas into an image, I would draw a sketch and ask AI to smoothen things out for me.

Or if I made music, I would get AI to do all the boring shit where you clean out the audio, arrange everything and add plugins.
There's also this really cool AI tool where you sing and the thing turns it into a saxophone, I think they're working on other instruments too.
That will honestly be a revolutionary tool in music creation, you will see that shit everywhere 10 years from now.
I won't have to learn how to play the electric guitar in order to record a nu metal album :)

Truth is, art that is 100% generated by AI will never replace human made art, I think, because art is for self expression and people connect to that self expression.
An algorithm can't express itself, it can only express an amalgamation of people self expression.
 
The problem I have with AI art, and I don't think this will ever be fixed, is that it's boring.
It can be the most technically impressive stuff but it's boring, doesn't make me feel anything.
Not to mention, I see 5-10 generated by the same AI, I already see a pattern.
The problem is that it's not going through any real creative process, rather, it's taking the most average route to complete the desired prompt. The way it formats images is based on the most average path. The way it writes is also painfully average.
I've tried using AI as a pseudo-editor for my early drafts and it just does not cut it. It gets lost on minor things yet understands the overall story and theme, it cites things directly from the manuscript and pretends like its an original observation, it sometimes offers "alternatives" that are the most marvel reddit tier shit i've ever read.
 
The problem is that it's not going through any real creative process, rather, it's taking the most average route to complete the desired prompt. The way it formats images is based on the most average path. The way it writes is also painfully average.
I've tried using AI as a pseudo-editor for my early drafts and it just does not cut it. It gets lost on minor things yet understands the overall story and theme, it cites things directly from the manuscript and pretends like its an original observation, it sometimes offers "alternatives" that are the most marvel reddit tier shit i've ever read.
While some AI truly performs poorly, others overprotect AI art as if it were a magic spell allowing them to pose as artists, even though traditional artistic methods like using a pencil remain relevant in 2025. The fact that people choose to rely on a machine instead of pursuing formal art education is, frankly, sad.
 
While some AI truly performs poorly, others overprotect AI art as if it were a magic spell allowing them to pose as artists, even though traditional artistic methods like using a pencil remain relevant in 2025. The fact that people choose to rely on a machine instead of pursuing formal art education is, frankly, sad.
It's what the other guy said about AI "artistry" being trannies to women.

Though, the actual dynamic here is that it's becoming clear who just has that artistic dog in 'em and who doesn't.
You don't need a "formal education" in art, that's a cope by those who don't have talent.
 
It's what the other guy said about AI "artistry" being trannies to women.

Though, the actual dynamic here is that it's becoming clear who just has that artistic dog in 'em and who doesn't.
You don't need a "formal education" in art, that's a cope by those who don't have talent.
Frankly, I only use AI as a hobby—something fun to mess around with, but never for creating official work. I always trust a human artist for things like comics or quality fan art. Also, why are people paying over $50 for AI art? I always thought the rule of the internet was: "If they start charging money, find a free version." It's the same reason people don't pay for porn—you can find a free version online, and boom.
I'll never pay for AI; it feels like wasted money. Why spend $20 on Ghibli-style AI art when I could pay an actual artist to draw something similar in that style?
 
Frankly, I only use AI as a hobby—something fun to mess around with, but never for creating official work. I always trust a human artist for things like comics or quality fan art. Also, why are people paying over $50 for AI art? I always thought the rule of the internet was: "If they start charging money, find a free version." It's the same reason people don't pay for porn—you can find a free version online, and boom.
I'll never pay for AI; it feels like wasted money. Why spend $20 on Ghibli-style AI art when I could pay an actual artist to draw something similar in that style?
I still just find it fascinating that the AI companies think charging 20 for a glorified chatbot is justified. Does anyone even pay that? That's gotta be some kind of joke
 
The fact that people choose to rely on a machine instead of pursuing formal art education is, frankly, sad.
It's just a trend that's happening with education in general. People don't really value intellect and effort in such a fast-paced, instant gratification world. It's depressing as hell to see kids who can't read or do basic maths because their brains are fried and their parents don't want to do their job and actually raise them. These kids that are coming up are the ones that are going to be the next doctors, lawyers, presidents, and a lot of them don't even want to bother putting effort in for college. In the U.S we focus on retarded identity politics instead of doing anything that would actually help.
Open AI is currently scraping data from educational intuitions like Harvard and Oxford. Our new education secretary (US) wants children to learn AI when many of them can't even read. Let alone spell. Employers are using AI to check resumes instead of actually looking. I hate how People don't want to see the problems with this because Mega Corp said they were going to cure cancer.

Even here with the same people who criticize eating bugs, living in a pod and not owning anything, they love this shit. CGI hasn't created any more jobs for practical effects people. AI isn't going to open doors for anyone who's going to be replaced. It's coming for a lot more than just art. People like to quote books like Brave New World or 1984, but when it happens in real time, suddenly they don't care. If you think the lack of privacy you have in the modern world is bad now, wait until everywhere is like a more retarded version of the CCP.

Sam kid diddling Altman and all the other goy fags behind this are not your friends. It's more likely you live and slave away at a corporate town than you get a utopia where everything is free and you don't need money. I shit you not there are dumb rich kids over in the silicon valley who genuinely think that's gonna happen. Proko did an interview with one of them.
 
We already have a thread for this.
That thread is supposed to be for both pro and anti AI crazies but it's probably 95% pro AI.
 
I see AI art being used in fucking childrens books now. I remember seeing some Calvin Coolidge book or something like that where every single page had only AI art. (I think the text was AI too) AI art is already pretty stupid in my opinion but it's much worse when it's being used for making cheap shit for money. Doesn't help the fact that people are losing jobs to it, even if some of them are insufferable faggots.
 
The problem I have with AI art, and I don't think this will ever be fixed, is that it's boring.
It can be the most technically impressive stuff but it's boring, doesn't make me feel anything.
Not to mention, I see 5-10 generated by the same AI, I already see a pattern.

What I would use AI for is, if I was drawing something but I wasn't competent enough to fully translate my ideas into an image, I would draw a sketch and ask AI to smoothen things out for me.

Or if I made music, I would get AI to do all the boring shit where you clean out the audio, arrange everything and add plugins.
There's also this really cool AI tool where you sing and the thing turns it into a saxophone, I think they're working on other instruments too.
That will honestly be a revolutionary tool in music creation, you will see that shit everywhere 10 years from now.
I won't have to learn how to play the electric guitar in order to record a nu metal album :)

Truth is, art that is 100% generated by AI will never replace human made art, I think, because art is for self expression and people connect to that self expression.
An algorithm can't express itself, it can only express an amalgamation of people self expression.
replace no .speed up yes as go forword on your right type does see it as tool or algoritm in safe not seen a ai general. so tend( keep simple supid )in general with repasoce with right wing types seen. ai probems chage as it goes for people. go back for them simple turm cost vs effectecny to matter.to them trump repubic find some level lack craftilycy on the craft. even code maker. trying milk drip s it open socre rip that copo opion bongage off. thay pull ladder sort can,t any more got flood out market wise.usa ai maker keep geting flooded out till up one card lessin for coding asia all figer out on matter as is., as saying disprutive tech it chage how hole thing to work . even with voice . govmint side there tool tell if shit bag if lieing or not. that to be normal pubic keep poltishion onist can,t lie any more tool thay can tell what you eat in morning. ai shit been aruond form like aruond 1998 on pubic side. awwareness is that long shit show be like 1920 all over again pick up same lession of then.when you say 10 boucko thay folding learing path. for stuff like how japanese work there swords.fold it reoidce time. some say 15 yr can rework it down to 3. yr..

(It's just a trend that's happening with education in general. People don't really value intellect and effort in such a fast-paced, instant gratification world. It's depressing as hell to see kids who can't read or do basic maths because their brains are fried and their parents don't want to do their job and actually raise them. These kids that are coming up are the ones that are going to be the next doctors, lawyers, presidents, and a lot of them don't even want to bother putting effort in for college. In the U.S we focus on retarded identity politics instead of doing anything that would actually help.
Open AI is currently scraping data from educational intuitions like Harvard and Oxford. Our new education secretary (US) wants children to learn AI when many of them can't even read. Let alone spell. Employers are using AI to check resumes instead of actually looking. I hate how People don't want to see the problems with this because Mega Corp said they were going to cure cancer.) how kid learn has be come diffent what has past old meathed yet again going come back resheap people and tool to matter.. yet way dispuive tech it needed.to nateral growth so call ai can be disupriced ezy in lot way govmint sort that lot harder to matter of it.unkrine good exmple how ai warfare does and works..hearsh say get lead out become efffection or lie dead in way side. hursh kiddo's whating in all.at this point won,t us usa in any form on contraivsion.. till base standist for them come. back to trable like figer thing asia has all sorted in all.one usa come to table new veiw of ai as hole chage in probem of in topic in sort. talk of any how.. give hint to sort topic. (plastion allreday figerd out how beat per crime form isrealy vary fast. to those kown will kown. not that hard think of it.)
 
Atrás
Top Abajo