Law A 5-Year-Old Pulled Down a 3-Year-Old's Pants. The Preschool Workers Are on Trial. - "We are here because one preschooler pulled down another preschooler's pants," says defense attorney Jason Flores-Williams.


Tagged: Free-Range Kids
Lenore Skenazy | 4.3.2023 5:30 PM


8c6cd119d581d002fc8d9c8eb781784c29960d02.png
The Schoolhouse (Jeffrey Beall / Wikimedia Commons)

Two Colorado child care workers will go on trial this June for presiding over a day care center where a 5-year-old pulled down a 3-year-old's pants.

Amy Lovato and Roberta Rodriguez of The Schoolhouse day care center in Poncha Springs face criminal charges for not reporting this incident to the authorities quickly enough, and for putting the children in danger.

"Let this fact not be obscured: We are here because one preschooler pulled down another preschooler's pants," Jason Flores-Williams, Lovato's attorney, told 11th Judicial District Judge Brian Green on Thursday, asking him to dismiss the charges.

Added Flores-Williams, these charges "criminalize preschool behavior by turning a 5-year-old into a deviant and a 3-year-old into a victim for acts that are neither sexual, abusive, criminal, negligent, or against any reasonable person or community standard."

Judge Green denied the defendants' motion, according to The Colorado Sun.

"This is the perfect case for the jury to hear," he announced to a courtroom that was packed with school parents who came to support Lovato and Rodriguez. The attendees expressed their feelings so loudly—sighing and groaning with exasperation—that the judge had to warn them to be quiet.

"I understand the great importance to the community, but I don't want to be sidelined or distracted," he said.

Green is presiding because the first two judges assigned to the case had to recuse themselves; their kids attend the day care center in question, Flores-Williams tells Reason.

The case against Lovato and Rodriguez seems to involve four charges, but even the judge found the case so muddled that he instructed the prosecutors to present it more cogently.

No one disputes that on January 16, Lovato was filling in as a classroom teacher because the center was short-staffed. When one of the kids wet their pants, Lovato left the classroom for between 3 and 5 minutes to clean the kid and deposit the wet clothes in the laundry. When she returned, she saw the 5-year-old "crouched over" a 3-year-old who later told Lovato that the boy had tried to pull her pants down and touch her butt.

The next day, when Lovato went into the center's bathroom, she found three kids there, including a girl with her pants down and the same boy. He was touching her butt.

The school did not ignore this misbehavior. It called the parents involved. It planned an all-school meeting on the topic of keeping your hands to yourself. Rodriguez took it upon herself to call the Chaffee County Early Childhood Council to find out what else she should be doing. She also reported the touching incidents to the child welfare department and the kids-briefly-in-a-room-without-a-teacher incident to the state licensing office.

But as the toddlers themselves discovered, sometimes there is just no way to cover your rear end. The authorities shut down the day care center midday on January 24, calling parents to immediately come pick up their kids. Terrified moms and dads raced over to find six armed deputies and a slew of cop cars.

"When they realized their children were safe, they wondered if they had been molested," reported The Colorado Sun. "Neither the sheriff's deputies or Chaffee County child welfare authorities who joined them in the raid of the child care center were providing information."

It was only two days later, during a meeting at the sheriff's office, that the parents learned what had happened.

In summary, the potential wrongdoing seems to involve not reporting the incidents immediately enough—these were officially reported to the authorities about three days later—and leaving the kids unsupervised for the briefest of moments.

The defense attorneys argued that the question of how quickly a school must report an incident of abuse is vague. So, it seems, is the definition of abuse. And so is whether leaving the room to clean off a pee-soaked kid constitutes neglect.

The problem, says Flores-Williams, is that we give child care workers enormous responsibility, "and yet we afford them no discretion in the way they handle those responsibilities."

It's also a problem that the authorities would seek to punish a preschool for being a place where there are preschoolers. Unruly kids are a fact of life, and treating a common occurrence like a criminal matter is absurd. A trial is not in the best interests of the kids, their parents, or anyone else.

"In some ways, this perfectly illustrates a system we set up that winds up leaving nothing but trauma and harm in its wake, and yet we justify it in the name of 'protecting the children,'" says Richard Wexler, executive director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. "An awful lot of time has gone into this: The police had to investigate, child protective services investigated, there's a trial that's about to happen. All that time and money and effort is, in effect, stolen from finding the relatively few children in actual danger."

Wexler added that Colorado has set up a task force to study the mandatory reporting issues.

"They should look very closely at this case," he says.

But for now, the case is going to a jury. Expect more groans and sighs.

Lenore Skenazy is president of Let Grow, a nonprofit promoting childhood independence and resilience, and founder of the Free-Range Kids movement.
Tags: Free-Range Kids, Children's Rights, Children, Parental Rights, Police in Schools, Criminal Justice, Overcriminalization, Courts
 
Agreed, it doesn't matter as long as someone is home with the children.

Preschool is great, I can't remember anything bad from it, Not that I could remember in terms of mental development at the time but my dad in his home office has a small piece of burlap cloth with my handprints in green oil paint on it with a small poem about how I'd grow up and he'd remember the handprints I'd put everywhere.

Daycare nearly killed me.

Years after the fact my mom told me how disgusting the restroom was in that place and that made her decide to take me out of it, but not until the damage was done. There's a photo taken around that time shortly before I became sick with rotavirus and you can just see it.
Daycare I have a problem with. Occassional daycare is fine, but every day is awful.
It's unavoidable in some cases, though.

Preschool though is fantastic, kids learn new things, make friends with kids they're likely going to go to school with etc gets them ready for school.

This though is bizarre. I get the kid is a butt toucher, but he's probably just curious.
It defeats the idea of preschool - to spot deficits before kids end up in school.
 
I pants niggas all the time as a kid. I remember we were playing a huge city in a middle school soccer game and I pants this nigga I hated and he showed his dick to like 2000 people.

It was hilarious and him getting bullied for it for years and everyone laughing at him ruled.

So, I mean, it was a net positive for humanity. It’s immature and naive to think otherwise.
 
Kids should be home the first couple of years. After that, a bit of nursery /preschool is fun for them to meet others, but most of the time still should be spent with parents. VERY few people in the UK can afford a parent at home, our wages are low and our cost of living is crazy. Many women work just for the pension contributions and NI contributions, or they’re screwed in old age
Unless there’s more here I can’t see what they did wrong - inform all parents that day (?) and educate the rest on not touching and keep a close eye on it.
 
Fucking Americans need to blow up everything, just inform the 5 year old parents that their son is an assgrabber so they need to correct his behavior or look for another pre school. Nooo huge court-case, helicopter parents going apeshit because little Sally has learned that boys have a penis and like asses, and kids dragged to psychotherapists to alleviate the trauma.
 
I just don't understand the judge acting like he's presiding over a sitcom courtroom. He gets that legal representation costs money, and forcing a bullshit case to trial to prove some obscure point can still be financially ruinous, right? And how the hell does, "This is a perfect case for the jury to hear," qualify as a ruling on a motion to dismiss unless the motion was written in crayon?
 
I just don't understand the judge acting like he's presiding over a sitcom courtroom. He gets that legal representation costs money, and forcing a bullshit case to trial to prove some obscure point can still be financially ruinous, right? And how the hell does, "This is a perfect case for the jury to hear," qualify as a ruling on a motion to dismiss unless the motion was written in crayon?
This is one argument for election of judges. Colorado has a merits-based appointment system, whereas many other states have judicial election. In a (sane) state with elections, no judge would allow this to go through because they would know having an entire pre-school's worth of parents thinking you're retarded is a horrible way to start your next campaign. If two other judges have a connection to that one pre-school, it clearly is a big part of the local community. But the judge doesn't have to care at all here, so nothing tempers his judicial discretion.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo