Beria? Hoover? If there’s one thing the left loves, it’s going hard after their ideological opponents. Labor is salivating at the prospect of putting in pet projects and bringing about utopia before the decade ends. I can imagine 2020 on steroids on the streets of London.
It's true though.
thats correct, because being a citizen in a western country is like working at an amazon warehouse, your best day there is your first day and it gets steadily worse. if you completed first grade in the US, congrats your salary statistically is going to be half that of someone who only came here when they were teenagers or adults. and that doesn't even factor in the benefits like dedicated government positions and charities dedicated to help you "beat the system" in a way the average citizen never gets access to. look at canada, if you were born there to white canadians then you will have to struggle with a shit job market and inability to get proper housing and have to struggle with a shit education to even get accepted to your shitty universities, meanwhile immigrants just get auto-accepted to colleges, they get special houses with cheaper rents compared to citizens, affirmative action also helps them get their foot in the door and thats all before you start to factor in the ethnonarcisissm that is hilariously lacking. You know what words only white people hear from the people of their community? "fuck you, i got mine!" I know extremely religious boomers who told their own kids that they had to "forge their own path" and refused to help them get jobs, and because of that. even with those degrees and living in major metro areas, they're working at the fucking grocery store returning carts, living at home well into their 40s.
Pedo Island? The UK is nothing compared to America. The US of A is the fucking Mecca of the nonce world.
I dunno about that. I think Ukraine might be the Mecca. That's where Ghislaine sourced most of her sex slaves.
It will take literally decades to affect the kind of changes you're thinking about. That's if the infrastructure doesn't completely collapse first, bankrupting the country and ensuring that most of these freeloaders go home because there's no money here.
According to our Constution, some things need a 2/3s majority for the legislature to do.
TBH, if Labor goes all in on their ideal utopia, they may end up speedrunning some kind of collapse. And then the bets have got to be off.
I’d have to think Muslims turning against them would be an absolute nightmare for the posh part of Labor, especially if some Islamists try their hands at politics in the future. Because then they’d have to confront some parts of Islam that would make them uncomfortable and “might make them look like bigots” or worse, prove Nigel Farage and Britain First right.
I don't think so, no
A supermajority means the ruling party can get anything passed without support from the fringe elements on the backbench. It's sort of like, you know how Kevin McCarthy went around sabotaging winnable races for Republicans during the mid-terms because they wouldn't suck his cock? And then he had trouble getting confirmed as Speaker and eventually got booted because Matt Gaetz and his allies became a lot more powerful. It's exactly like that here.
Funny you should say that because Labour MP Jess Philips, who has accused Tommy Robinson of "racism" for exposing the evils of Islam, was shouted and jeered at by a group of Islamic males while she was trying to give her victory speech during the election.
Unlikely for that, however they were already opening new outlets to replace it under the Tories. Despite the histrionics Tavistock's closure did not mean the whole thing stopped, it's just that specific one that got so bad it could not be hidden and using the same place again is poor optics.I can't wait for the troon factory at the Tavistock to be re-opened!!!!
I mean, Labour since Blair has been Tory-lite so I don't know it it's much of a difference.
There's also:
Starmer doesn't support transitioning kids and he more or less gets to control the parliamentary agenda.
It's not about left and right and hasn't been for years. The big three are all different branches of the same paternalist, statist, pro-immigration, anti-privacy fuckheads, while the minnows are generally single-issue parties who broadly agree with the big three, and whose only real problem is that the majors don't autistically focus on their particular issue as much as they like. The only difference between tory, labour, and lib dem is how they justify any given common stance. For instance, the tories want more immigrants to reduce worker power and suppress wages, labour want more immigrants to pay for the ever-growing NHS and pensions/benefits promises they'll make, and the lib dems want more immigration to "correct historical wrongs". The net result is more pakis and west albanians piling in to the country no matter who is in charge. Pick any subject and you'll find that the colourful rosette is just window-dressing for the same fundamental policy.
You don't get the insult. That's okay because it's dumb.
In the US, having a supermajority in the Senate allows the US President to circumvent the filibuster and actually get things done.
A working majority might be a better term since there are times when you have dissent in the back-benchers or MPs just don't turn up to vote. I think that there is generally slightly more dissent amongst UK MPs than US Congressmen which I always got the impression very rarely disented against the Party in Congress. That's why parties have Whips in the first place. The bigger your majority means you need to spend less