Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total de votantes
    4,031
It is but so were the "bare branches" in China, millions of young men who were disenfranchised and unable to find a suitable partner. In the 19th century, they were a significant force that fueled all those uprisings.

If you think that human biology and psychology have changed significantly in the last 220 years, well...
Chinks like to kill their daughters and so constantly end up with literally only enough women for half their male population, but that's not really comparable to the west where pretty much any man can get laid pretty easily provided he has a job and isn't some flavor of defective that previous generations would have institutionalized.

The only thing incels might accomplish is forcing people to accept that technology can be devastatingly bad for borderline cases who replace real world social interaction and accomplishment with the Internet and video games and never learn how to socialize or integrate like a normal person. But even that will be less of an issue down the line when advancements in prenatal testing and societal acceptance of aborting defectives means the spergs never make it out of the womb.
 
Chinks like to kill their daughters and so constantly end up with literally only enough women for half their male population, but that's not really comparable to the west where pretty much any man can get laid pretty easily provided he has a job and isn't some flavor of defective that previous generations would have institutionalized.

The only thing incels might accomplish is forcing people to accept that technology can be devastatingly bad for borderline cases who replace real world social interaction and accomplishment with the Internet and video games and never learn how to socialize or integrate like a normal person. But even that will be less of an issue down the line when advancements in prenatal testing and societal acceptance of aborting defectives means the spergs never make it out of the womb.
The final solution to the incel question being eugenics is not something I expected to read today.
 
It is but so were the "bare branches" in China, millions of young men who were disenfranchised and unable to find a suitable partner. In the 19th century, they were a significant force that fueled all those uprisings.

If you think that human biology and psychology have changed significantly in the last 220 years, well...
All those poor Chinese men who can’t get laid. Fuck those baby girls who dared to be murdered by their parents rather than grow up to marry Chinese incels. Incels are the real victims.
 
Millions of girls had their lives stolen from them by being murdered. They wouldn't have "incels" if they didn't kill off the women. At least the men got to live.
And I agree! Did I somehow blame the unborn girls killed due to the CCP's "one-child"? CCP just repeated the same mistake the Chinese rulers did before - instead of caring about their people's well-being, they've decided to play God and institute population control in the most retarded way possible and this will bite them in the ass.

All I'm saying is that bare branches are a thing and all manners of rulers have used young men, that have nothing to live for and nothing to lose as cannon fodder. I also think that, unfortunately, unless there will be some sort of way to channel young men back into society, whatever strife West will have next, parties to that strife will use the current iteration of "bare branches" - incels, as cannon fodder extensively too.
 
And I agree! Did I somehow blame the unborn girls killed due to the CCP's "one-child"? CCP just repeated the same mistake the Chinese rulers did before - instead of caring about their people's well-being, they've decided to play God and institute population control in the most retarded way possible and this will bite them in the ass.

All I'm saying is that bare branches are a thing and all manners of rulers have used young men, that have nothing to live for and nothing to lose as cannon fodder. I also think that, unfortunately, unless there will be some sort of way to channel young men back into society, whatever strife West will have next, parties to that strife will use the current iteration of "bare branches" - incels, as cannon fodder extensively too.
I agree that the Chinese elite will basically use their unhappy male population as fodder. The thing is, you seem to like coming into this (plagued) thread to make snide remarks about how people don't understand incels, and you insult people, so trying to make off-topic political points is going to fall-flat. Even if it's correct, your set-up looks disingenuous, because everyone is going to assume you're setting up for more snide remarks.

And If you want to talk about China, why don't you go to an actual China thread? There's only dozens of them.
 
The thing is, you seem to like coming into this thread to make snide remarks about how people don't understand incels
People don't. People don't usually understand most people suffering from mental illnesses. If people did understand what incels are, they wouldn't turn the term into another buzzword insult du jour.
If you think that I'm derailing the thread, you can contact a mod. Backseat moderation is even worse than just moderation.

and you insult people
That comes from a person who tardraged about me breaking up the nice little echo-chamber about incels and how they're all hurr durr evul.
 
All I'm saying is that bare branches are a thing and all manners of rulers have used young men, that have nothing to live for and nothing to lose as cannon fodder. I also think that, unfortunately, unless there will be some sort of way to channel young men back into society, whatever strife West will have next, parties to that strife will use the current iteration of "bare branches" - incels, as cannon fodder extensively too.
China aside for the moment, I'm not convinced the incels are a large enough segment of the population for it to matter whether they're included as the cannon fodder for the New World Order's Hostile Takeover of Everyone™ or not.
 
China aside for the moment, I'm not convinced the incels are a large enough segment of the population for it to matter whether they're included as the cannon fodder for the New World Order's Hostile Takeover of Everyone™ or not.
Eh, if I'm wrong then I'll happily accept it.
 
How do you "radicalize" people who continually post rape and murder fantasies and openly worship mass shooters? I mean how much more radical can they get?
For decades prior to 2016, self-described incels were not those thing outside maybe a couple years on love-shy. Things changed in 2016. The major incel forums from 1993-2016 were not reported on at all.

Mainstream media elevated psycopaths across the board in 2016, (including in incel spaces, although that was a small component), so they could stay financially solvent and have more sensational shit to report on.

So they, along with call-out culture people, basically took a subreddit with 1-2k people (/r/truecels), and blew it up, at it's height, to around around 100k-300k members or so across many subreddits. Although thankfully it's dying down now. (it being active forum membership)
 
People don't. People don't usually understand most people suffering from mental illnesses. If people did understand what incels are, they wouldn't turn the term into another buzzword insult du jour.
Killing all incels is a step too far. But making fun of people for posting rape fantasies on the internet, pedophilia, or encouraging others to get multiple plastic surgeries is something that I can't argue with.

There's a good number of lonely men who have an incel-like phase, and a few who have full blown incel phases and post on incel forums. The men who can be saved usually get help for it, whether it is inadvertently by falling into a job or a new living situation or by choosing to change/talking to someone professional or people they love. There's incel men who have real depression, anxiety, bipolar, autism, and other such illnesses that fall through the cracks and turn lonely and bitter and become the older wizards. This is a problem with our attitude towards mental health and our lack of good care across most nations along with a general misunderstanding of how family and friends should treat diseases and disorders like that. This will take years and generations to fix, something we should aim for but don't have the ability to do so overnight. My heart goes out to the incel brothers and sisters (lolcow and twitter) who are just legitmately lonely and depressed with bad social skills. These fall into a bad crowd and can parrot things online without acting on them IRL just to fit in.

Autism & mood disorders are no excuse for posting long diatribes on things you know are morally wrong and doing things that are morally wrong. Acting out spitefully towards others is something you are taught not to do throughout all of K-12, and even though mental illness is heavily influencing you, there is no excuse for trying to rally others into detrimental activities like lookmaxing and being nasty to IRL people trying help. Men who get too into it, whether it be long Hitler-blaming-Jews-but-replace-it-with-women diatribes or advocating for rape and pedophilia are inexcusable. They know it's wrong by society's standards but advocate for it anyway. Those who act on said impulses to commit crimes or just generally be a dick to people have the same problem Chris has, where yes, the disorder influences them, but they're competent enough cognitively to know right from wrong and choosing to act on your shitty impulses is still a choice. Men (and legbeards) who spitefully engage in destructive behavior and refuse to change even with help (no its everyone else who is wrong) are failing themselves and there's not much we can do for those types aside from make fun of how pathetic they are (we are here for cheap laughs after all) to show flaws in their logic so others do not follow them into the dark.

I have more sympathy for the looksmaxers but even then I stop at a certain point. Body dysmorphia in males is almost never addressed, and needs more study. The gay male community can tell you that. Posting anorexic positivity type threads encouraging others and yourself to harm themselves is something that should be stopped, and without taking down the forum or being able to pry these people off the computer (we're not their IRL family or friends) the most we can do is constantly point out flaws in the logic and make fun of it. We could try to be nicer to the men who do it, but this is not the site to do it on to put it mildly.

Those of us who know incels IRL or as internet friends will do our best to try and steer them away. Several farmers have talked about trying to help cases IRL and whether or not they've been successful. However, there are always going to be men (and legbeards) who choose to be hateful bastards and throw themselves further into their ways. These people do not want help, they want to throw tantrums and have the world conform to them. These people are the ones most threadgoers prefer to make fun of on this site dedicated to humans making terrible choices and not changing their ways, but yeah we can get cheap laughs out of those suffering too.

TL;DR: this is a site dedicated to making fun of people regardless of mental stability and lets people do free speech even if the jokes are dark, we're not here to moralfag even if irl we try to help our friends and family who fall into this. Rape and pedo advocates should get the rope as well as spree shooting retards (and glowies need to stop encouraging them too yeah). A lot of us have sympathy but we again aren't here to parent people, we came to laugh at others.

Edit: spelling thanks to phoneposting.
 
Killing all incels is a step too far. But making fun of people for posting rape fantasies on the internet, pedophilia, or encouraging others to get multiple plastic surgeries is something that I can't argue with.

There's a good number of lonely men who have an incel-like phase, and a few who have full blown incel phases and post on incel forums. The men who can be saved usually get help for it, whether it is inadvertently by falling into a job or a new living situation or by choosing to change/talking to someone professional or people they love. There's incel men who have real depression, anxiety, bipolar, autism, and other such illnesses that fall through the cracks and turn lonely and bitter and become the older wizards. This is a problem with our attitude towards mental health and our lack of good care across most nations along with a general misunderstanding of how family and friends should treat diseases and disorders like that. This will take years and generations to fix, something we should aim for but don't have the ability to do so overnight. My heart goes out to the incel brothers and sisters (lolcow and twitter) who are just legitmately lonely and depressed with bad social skills. These fall into a bad crowd and can parrot things online without acting on them IRL just to fit in.

Autism & mood disorders are no excuse for posting long diatribes on thongs you know are morally wrong and doing things that are morally wrong. Acting out spitefully towards others is something you are taught jot to do throughout all of K-12, and even though mental illness is heavily influencing you, there is no excuse for trying to rally others into detrimental activities like lookmaxing and being nasty to IRL people trying help. Men who get too into it, whether it be long Hitler-blaming-Jews-but-replace-it-with-women diatribes or advocating for rape and pedophilia are inexcusable. They know it's wrong by society's standards but advocate for it anyway. Those who act on said impulses to commit crimes or just generally be a dick to people have the same problem Chris has, where yes, the disorder influences theme, but they're competent enough cognitively to know right from wrong and choosing to act on your shitty impulses is still a choice. Men (and legbeards) who spitefully engage in destructive behavior and refuse to change even with help (no its everyone else who is wrong) are failing themselves and there's not much we can do for those types aside from make fun of how pathetic they are (we are here for cheap laughs after all) to show flaws in their logic so others do not follow them into the dark.

I have more sympathy for the looksmaxers but even then I stop at a certain point. Body dysmorphia in males is almost never addressed, and needs more study. The gay male community can tell you that. Posting anorexic positivity type threads encouraging others and yourself to harm themselves is something that should be stopped, and without taking down the forum or being able to pry these people off the computer (we're not their IRL family or friends) the most we can do is constantly point out flaws in the logic and make fun of it. We could try to be nicer to the men who do it, but this is not the site to do it on to put it mildly.

Those of us who know incels IRL or as internet friends will do our best to try and steer them away. Several farmers have talked about trying to help cases IRL and whether or not they've been successful. However, there are always going to be men (and legbeards) who choose to be hateful bastards and throw themselves further into their ways. These people do not want help, they want to throw tantrums and have the world conform to them. These people are the ones most threadgoers prefer to make fun of on this site dedicated to humans making terrible choices and not changing their ways, but yeah we can get cheap laughs out of those suffering too.

TL;DR: this is a site dedicated to making fun of people regardless of mental stability and lets people do free speech even if the jokes are dark, we're not here to moralfag even if irl we try to help our friends and family who fall into this. Rape and pedo advocates should get the rope as well as spree shooting retards (and glowies need to stop encouraging them too yeah). A lot of us have sympathy but we again aren't here to parent people, we came to laugh at others.
I'm not entirely sure at this point in my life that laughing at legitimate psychopaths would be a good choice either (I'm on a lolcow forum, I know) but you do have a point. There are people who legit need to be committed or at the very least countered and I do agree with that. The thing is, however, is that incel question provides a very easy platform for people to moralize and grandstand without any nuance and/or any lulz even. Evidence being in this very topic. Who's going to argue for you, that you are not a bad person if you argue for female enslavement and if you denigrate half of the global population? It's really easy to get a dopamine hit when you're just dunking on people who do not have even the slightest leg to stand on.

Often, very same people who populate threads like this one religiously, act their own dysfunctions and they attempt to resolve their own mental situation by rationalizing that there's someone, out there, who does worse things than they do. I think it's important, provided that you counter people with legitimate context and not with a contrarian if you'll allow me a neologism, "hurrdurrism", to provide a perspective on the position of other members of any community.

Nobody in their sane mind should publicly proclaim that they're an incel. However, nobody should forget that when you're dunking on hateful losers, you're also dunking on harmless loners who find a sense of belonging in this group. It is psychopathic and it is malignant but it is a signifier of problems, that society either refuses or cannot solve yet.
 
Última edición:
For decades prior to 2016, self-described incels were not those thing outside maybe a couple years on love-shy. Things changed in 2016. The major incel forums from 1993-2016 were not reported on at all.

Mainstream media elevated psycopaths across the board in 2016, (including in incel spaces, although that was a small component), so they could stay financially solvent and have more sensational shit to report on.

So they, along with call-out culture people, basically took a subreddit with 1-2k people (/r/truecels), and blew it up, at it's height, to around around 100k-300k members or so across many subreddits. Although thankfully it's dying down now. (it being active forum membership)
The issue is that before they didn't have an outlet or a place where they can all gather, share stories and get radicalized. Now they do. That's the issue here. I'd say that at least half of the incels out there are just guys with an unfortunate lack of social skills because they spent their youth sitting indoors and playing video games. They never "learned" how to speak to people and so are slightly behind the curve. And instead of trying to learn how to human they just throw up their hands, say it's impossible for them to change and then seethe in their inability to get pussy.

And if they stopped being so damned autistic for half a minute and actually put their minds to it they could succeed. Sure they might not get the prom queen or the head cheerleader but at least they'd have someone. But no it's easier to blame women for them not having game and not blame themselves for not trying. Look at Elliot Roger. He did everything he could think of to get a woman except, you know, actually talking to them. Most women are not going to walk up to you, whip your dick out and start sucking it. You need to be the one to over there and get her into the mood to do it.

Don't like it? Too bad. That's how the world works. Nothing that you get that you didn't work for is ever truly worth it.
 
I'm genuinely interested about the point you're trying to convey, beyond just emotions.
The point I'm making is that the incel problem in China is 100% a problem created by men, through the murder of baby girls so I don't really have much sympathy for the Chinese incels when the problem stems from wholesale slaughter of a gender for a generation.
 
The point I'm making is that the incel problem in China is 100% a problem created by men, through the murder of baby girls so I don't really have much sympathy for the Chinese incels when the problem stems from wholesale slaughter of a gender for a generation.
The problem was created not so much by men, as by party functionaries. Had they not tried to play God, people wouldn't have done this whole selective abortion thing, as the Chinese countryside was still living in the Middle Ages where a male is a potential helper and a meal ticket for when you get older.

On one hand, it's funny that you see it as a male-created problem, on another - just telling about what you're doing in this thread.
 
The problem was created not so much by men, as by party functionaries. Had they not tried to play God, people wouldn't have done this whole selective abortion thing, as the Chinese countryside was still living in the Middle Ages where a male is a potential helper and a meal ticket for when you get older.

On one hand, it's funny that you see it as a male-created problem, on another - just telling about what you're doing in this thread.
I'm here to laugh at incels. What're you doing here?
 
The problem was created not so much by men, as by party functionaries. Had they not tried to play God, people wouldn't have done this whole selective abortion thing, as the Chinese countryside was still living in the Middle Ages where a male is a potential helper and a meal ticket for when you get older.

On one hand, it's funny that you see it as a male-created problem, on another - just telling about what you're doing in this thread.
No, the party might've made the One-Child policy, but it was the fact that male children were highly preferred over female children that led to the selective abortions.
 
The problem was created not so much by men, as by party functionaries. Had they not tried to play God, people wouldn't have done this whole selective abortion thing, as the Chinese countryside was still living in the Middle Ages where a male is a potential helper and a meal ticket for when you get older.

On one hand, it's funny that you see it as a male-created problem, on another - just telling about what you're doing in this thread.
Wasn't part of the issue the whole thing with women being less valuable? Sure, the party came up with that, but I'm willing to bet it was rooted in misogyny.

Edit: Ninja'd
 
Atrás
Top Abajo