Disney's Cruella - because we need to sympathize with the animal abuser

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Live action Cruellas are never as attractive as the animated one.

I had a very complex childhood.
Did you ever watch that 90s animated Saturday morning 101 Dalmatians TV series? It was supposed to be a direct sequel to the movie.

I remember enjoying that as a kid but I seem to be one of the few to remember it.

But how do you feel about this sequence?
dalmation.gif
 
Did you ever watch that 90s animated Saturday morning 101 Dalmatians TV series? It was supposed to be a direct sequel to the movie.

I remember enjoying that as a kid but I seem to be one of the few to remember it.

But how do you feel about this sequence?
Ver archivo adjunto 2212438
Bro please, not gyaru, I’m trying to avoid going on autistic tirade about what I find attractive.
 
All in all, I am surprised that the plot didn't make the villain a guy.

Think about it: Instead of Cruella's loving, caring foster mother being killed by a cruel woman that turns out to be her biological mother, you change it like this:
Cruella's real mother is killed by some evil guy who then turns out to be her father, who her mother divorced from, cause he was an abusive, rapist, bigot (so: a regular man according to the Kool-Aid-Cult). Make it so he was a fashion designer, who constantly stole her ideas until he had a breakthrough and he had to kill her to hide that secret to protect his career.

Once more I am flabberghasted how half-assed these people truly are.

Did you ever watch that 90s animated Saturday morning 101 Dalmatians TV series? It was supposed to be a direct sequel to the movie.

I remember enjoying that as a kid but I seem to be one of the few to remember it.

But how do you feel about this sequence?
Ver archivo adjunto 2212438
Memo to myself: The ass was fat.

and if they remade that cartoon today, you just know they'd have a black dalmatian with white spots.
 
Última edición:
Now compare that to a movie like Joker, which focuses on a severely fucked up male character. That movie acknowledges that Arthur/Joker is severely fucked up, and the big take away from it is that society creates these lunatic monsters. Arthur is NOT a hero, and he is NOT justified in what he does. There is room for some sympathy given his situation, and some of the people he hurts are bad, but he is not presented as being right to do what he does.

Good God, I just thought of something. Could you imagine a gender flipped version of A Clockwork Orange where they make the now female Alex unironically the hero?
I had that discussion with my brother. The Joker at least has mental problem, and the only time he really does something that is outright unjustifiable is when he is pushed to a corner in every possible way. He might not be a hero, but he is a tragic monster that couldn't avoid its fate without outside help.

Cruella is a rich psycho bitch who skins dogs for purely materialistic reason. There is no justification whatsoever to what she does. She is beyond redemption.
 
Also I think holding a small dog while rolling down a hill would break the dog's neck. And what was with the choice of music for that scene?
 
Think about it: Instead of Cruella's loving, caring foster mother being killed by a cruel woman that turns out to be her biological mother, you change it like this:
Cruella's real mother is killed by some evil guy who then turns out to be her father, who her mother divorced from, cause he was an abusive, rapist, bigot (so: a regular man according to the Kool-Aid-Cult). Make it so he was a fashion designer, who constantly stole her ideas until he had a breakthrough and he had to kill her to hide that secret to protect his career.

See now that could work pretty well but you know that to make it so, Cruella would have to be a troon. Which whilst hillariously believable, Hollywood would never allow.
 
Did you ever watch that 90s animated Saturday morning 101 Dalmatians TV series? It was supposed to be a direct sequel to the movie.

I remember enjoying that as a kid but I seem to be one of the few to remember it.

But how do you feel about this sequence?
Ver archivo adjunto 2212438
Did her ass just explode or did she just have spontaneous cellulite expansion. Either way what the hell is this?
 
This is aimed at girls, yes? Most girls like animals and have been around dogs.

I don't think even the awkward dangerhairs who live on Twitter busily promoting feminism will be able to relate to, support or even like Cruella because however ambitious and "charismatic" she is, in the end she became a psychotic maniac who wanted to kill a hundred puppies so that she had a nice coat.

The people who greenlit this are out-of-touch sociopaths (they work for Disney, of course) who will be surprised when this flops. "But it had feminism! Why do audiences not like the vain, aspiring animal killer?"

Edit: read the bit about Cruella's adoptive mother getting pushed off a cliff by dalmations and laughed. It sounds like something from a parody.
 
Última edición:
Did her ass just explode or did she just have spontaneous cellulite expansion. Either way what the hell is this?
I actually remember bare amounts of the show, and that episode Cruella is trying to seduce Roger so him and Anita will break up and Cruella can get the deed to the farm. She’s in an inflatable “sexy” outfit, and the puppies pop it from behind or something
 
I actually remember bare amounts of the show, and that episode Cruella is trying to seduce Roger so him and Anita will break up and Cruella can get the deed to the farm. She’s in an inflatable “sexy” outfit, and the puppies pop it from behind or something
God, the '90s were a wild time for cartoons.
 
I actually remember bare amounts of the show, and that episode Cruella is trying to seduce Roger so him and Anita will break up and Cruella can get the deed to the farm. She’s in an inflatable “sexy” outfit, and the puppies pop it from behind or something
*Raises a hand*

Um Yes, Honka Honka Burning Love from Clown News Network...I would like to know if Cruella had a plan for sexy times when Roger tried to strip her down and realized that Cruella de ville did not magically become Pamala Anderson.
 
Now this might be the sexist in me but have you noticed Disney is more focused on making their female villains more sympathetic than their male villains? Perhaps the Lion King prequel will lay on more of the Shakespeare motif but aside from Scar, Disney had a chance to show an origin story for Jafar instead of just doing a live action remake of Aladdin.
Who knows they may yet do it. Perhaps Iago could originally be a manipulative white man who manipulates poor Othello I mean Jafar into some sort of heinous act that starts his slide into evil? After all Disney are creatively bankrupt and with Shakespear being too racist for schools the majority of their audience won't get it.

On topic this looks awful and I am ecstatic to watch it once, heavily inebriated, and never again.
 
*Raises a hand*

Um Yes, Honka Honka Burning Love from Clown News Network...I would like to know if Cruella had a plan for sexy times when Roger tried to strip her down and realized that Cruella de ville did not magically become Pamala Anderson.
God, the '90s were a wild time for cartoons.
Found the scene. It’s at 14:34.

Sound has been pitched high, but you’ll at least see it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo