Disaster ‘Consensual incest’ should be decriminalized, advocates say - turning catparty mode on

Article (archive)

-Start-

couple-005.jpg


Consensual incest advocates are rooting for an anonymous New York parent who wants to marry their own adult child.

Australian Richard Morris, who is pushing to change incest laws in about 60 countries, said he supports the legal push in Manhattan Federal Court and that such behavior between consenting adults “should not be criminalized.”

He and other advocates have launched about 130 petitions, mostly on change.org, seeking to change incest laws around the world. Most have received little support.

“We haven’t moved any mountains yet,” he told The Post.

Morris was inspired to fight for those in consenting incestual relationships, he said, after learning about a Scottish case in which a long-separated father and daughter were reunited, started an affair and were then criminally convicted.

Fighting for true “marriage equality” is “the right thing to do, isn’t it?” Morris said.

“It seems to be as unjust as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop people of different races marrying,” he added.

Keith Pullman, who runs the blog Full Marriage Equality, also cheered on the New York lawsuit.

couple-004.jpg


“It is absurd to say that an adult can’t consent to marry their parent. That same adult can be sent to war, take on six or seven figures of debt, operate heavy machinery, be sentenced to death by a federal court, and consent to sex with five strangers (and marriage with one of them) but can’t consent to marry someone they love?” he told The Post. “In some of these cases, the genetic parent didn’t raise them and they met for the first time two years ago. Allegations of ‘grooming’ are laughable attempts to deny someone their rights even though it will have no impact on the person objecting.”

-End-

Jesus, I was, and still am, accepting of gay marriage, but incest marriage is where I draw the line.
 
But remember, gay marriage was not the start of a slippery slope, and we are not currently careening down a steep slope on top of what can only be described as a full-fledged mudslide.
 
Última edición:
Jesus, I was, and still am, accepting of gay marriage, but incest marriage is where I draw the line.
I’m pretty sure I once heard An0minous once say something along the lines of “Just because the slippery slope is a fallacy doesn’t mean the slopes aren’t real and they’re not slippery.”
 
I don't feel the need to make a counterpoint, because that would require me to momentarily entertain this degeneracy. If you believe in this, you should be put down like a dog.
 
Yeah, let degenerates have their own Hapsburg shit on their homes. What could gone wrong? didn't they pass biology class? I guess they didn't because they can't recognize that incest is no no and they can't into biological sex. Fucking clown world.
 
Years of grooming does not magically disappear when the victim turns 18.

So, fuck no, and someone get the rope.
This is probably the best argument against this. You'll never be able to guarantee that the parent didn't essentially brainwash their child into a future fucktoy. Making it legal just means that anyone degenerate enough to do something like that is now incentivized to do so.

To put it in a slightly different context, would you be comfortable with your child marrying their babysitter they've had since they were a baby? Probably not. This is the same thing.

The genetic argument is wrong because we allow people with severe genetic disorders to breed. There's no rule against intentionally creating a child whose existence will be a short but intense nightmare. There should be, but there isn't.
 
The genetic argument is wrong because we allow people with severe genetic disorders to breed. There's no rule against intentionally creating a child whose existence will be a short but intense nightmare. There should be, but there isn't.
There's the issue of consent and parental responsibility when you're talking about folks with Down's Syndrome.

They aren't really known for being breadwinners or becoming successful in life.
 
I was surprised when I read the name Morris, but then Pullman showed up.

Reminder that these are the same people who want a single payer healthcare system. So fat acceptance, downplaying HIV, casual sex causing STDs to increase, wanting drug use legalized/destigmatized, stoner culture, preteens on hormone blockers, SRS for troons, abortion on demand, etc. Even if you had a good healthcare system liberals would fucking ruin it. I'm starting to think liberalism is worse than communism tbh.
 
There's the issue of consent and parental responsibility when you're talking about folks with Down's Syndrome.

They aren't really known for being breadwinners or becoming successful in life.
I'm talking about two otherwise healthy adults. You could argue that wanting to fuck your son means you're not actually healthy but you know.

I definitely don't think having sex with, much less having a baby with, someone whose IQ is significantly lower than yours is a moral act under any circumstances. For a number of reasons.
 
Imagine being such an unforgivable and unredeemable pervert, that you allow your own fetishes to rule you to the point that you're willing to put your name in news articles to promote parents fucking their kids. Their identify revolves around their own sexual desires that they can't even wrap their fucked heads around the actual real-world damage this will do to children already in homes where they are being groomed.

The sexual revolutions of the 60s and 70s was a mistake. Bring back public hangings. It says a lot about our society that these people can have their names out in public and not be in a perpetual state of fear over being recognized and lynched because of their perversions in public.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo