Disaster ‘Consensual incest’ should be decriminalized, advocates say - turning catparty mode on

Article (archive)

-Start-

couple-005.jpg


Consensual incest advocates are rooting for an anonymous New York parent who wants to marry their own adult child.

Australian Richard Morris, who is pushing to change incest laws in about 60 countries, said he supports the legal push in Manhattan Federal Court and that such behavior between consenting adults “should not be criminalized.”

He and other advocates have launched about 130 petitions, mostly on change.org, seeking to change incest laws around the world. Most have received little support.

“We haven’t moved any mountains yet,” he told The Post.

Morris was inspired to fight for those in consenting incestual relationships, he said, after learning about a Scottish case in which a long-separated father and daughter were reunited, started an affair and were then criminally convicted.

Fighting for true “marriage equality” is “the right thing to do, isn’t it?” Morris said.

“It seems to be as unjust as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop people of different races marrying,” he added.

Keith Pullman, who runs the blog Full Marriage Equality, also cheered on the New York lawsuit.

couple-004.jpg


“It is absurd to say that an adult can’t consent to marry their parent. That same adult can be sent to war, take on six or seven figures of debt, operate heavy machinery, be sentenced to death by a federal court, and consent to sex with five strangers (and marriage with one of them) but can’t consent to marry someone they love?” he told The Post. “In some of these cases, the genetic parent didn’t raise them and they met for the first time two years ago. Allegations of ‘grooming’ are laughable attempts to deny someone their rights even though it will have no impact on the person objecting.”

-End-

Jesus, I was, and still am, accepting of gay marriage, but incest marriage is where I draw the line.
 
I can’t think of anything witty to say anymore. We truly are reaching the end of days.
 
I'm talking about two otherwise healthy adults. You could argue that wanting to fuck your son means you're not actually healthy but you know.

I definitely don't think having sex with, much less having a baby with, someone whose IQ is significantly lower than yours is a moral act under any circumstances. For a number of reasons.
Technically speaking, incest has an increased risk of the kid being born with something wrong or it might die early...And that's essentially it, if we're ignoring what society generally thinks of it and some psychological issues that might be going on.
 
"OK man, it's legal now to marry your mom or whatever, but people are still going to rip on you all the time and think your whole family is composed of mouth-breathing retarded mutants and nothing will ever change that."

*A heavy sigh of despair as some inbred uncle fester looking motherfucker starts to write up another op-ed article*
 
Incest is regulated (not banned, regulated, as in they draw the line at a certain level of consanguinity, say xth cousin) for two main reasons:
  • birth defects from your family tree being a family circle
  • power dynamics leading to abuse, with no family support to allow escape (because you're marrying another member of your family, and especially in the case of a parent taking sexual advantage of their children, even if those children have already grown to adulthood)
You can maybe control for the second with a psych eval (although... why. just don't marry/fuck your own family) but how exactly do these modern Hapsburgs intend to prevent the first?

It's strikingly difficult to find photos of these people, but this Keith Pullman guy's blog...
gross.png

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wish I were a fly on the wall at that Thanksgiving Dinner
 
Última edición:
This is probably the best argument against this. You'll never be able to guarantee that the parent didn't essentially brainwash their child into a future fucktoy. Making it legal just means that anyone degenerate enough to do something like that is now incentivized to do so.

To put it in a slightly different context, would you be comfortable with your child marrying their babysitter they've had since they were a baby? Probably not. This is the same thing.

The genetic argument is wrong because we allow people with severe genetic disorders to breed. There's no rule against intentionally creating a child whose existence will be a short but intense nightmare. There should be, but there isn't.
"Feminists" will never understand that this is why Twilight is no longer popular.
 
Based and royalty-pilled, imagine the Tard babies that would result
 
Look at this DEGENERATE SHIT:
"People's attitudes to human rights have changed a lot, especially with greater awareness of the UN rules about human rights, more widespread knowledge of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and especially the right to personal and sexual autonomy; fewer people, even the religious can afford to be so very moralistic and judgmental as in the past, and most people are better educated, travel to more distant places more often and are more tolerant and understanding of a great diversity of cultures and types of sexual relationships than ever before. "
Makes sense. This shit is being pushed by the den of degeneracy that US the UN human rights council.

 
Well, the horrible truth is that we're all related to each other if you go far back enough, so you can't completely outlaw incest, only restrict it when they're too closely related. Every single one of you has a common ancestor with every single person you've fucked, it's been estimated that the most distantly related people on earth right now would be about 50th cousins to each other.
 
This is just disgusting. Are they trying to prove the fundies right?

If the State of New York legalizes this, then Protestant traditionalists from Appalachia will do to New York what Californian refugees are doing to Texas and Arizona....

Wait a minute...





You know what? On second thought...

DO IT, FAGGOT!!!

Make New York redder than my cousin Joe's homemade wine.

It'll be the biggest self-own urban leftists will do. Legalizing incest to own the cons, only to have some of the most socially conservative people in the Eastern United States flock to your state.

I hope those Brooklyn hipsters love bluegrass, Confederate flags, Bart Simpson T-shirts, NASCAR, Budweiser, Chick Tracts, velvet posters of Elvis and Jesus, Friends of Coal bumper stickers, meth,. heroin and oxycontin, and InuYasha reruns because they're gonna be overrun with them if they legalize incest and attract Appalachian refugees.

Appalachian conservatives are not the cool "based" kind that post frog memes on anime image boards and wear Fred Perry but are real old-school fundie traditionalists. The same kind these queers are trying to spite by legalizing incest. It's like poetry, it rhymes.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo