YouTube Deleted 2.5 Million ‘Dislikes’ From Biden White House Videos, Data Indicates - Youtube Removed Dislike visibility because Biden is a Snowflake


YouTube has deleted about 2.5 million ‘dislikes’ from videos on the official White House channel of President Joe Biden, according to data collected and posted online by a researcher who wished to remain anonymous. YouTube recently announced that it’s testing a new page design that hides the dislike count.
The Google-owned video platform allows users to give videos either a thumb up (like) or thumb down (dislike). For at least two years, it’s had a policy to remove likes and dislikes it considers spam.
“We have policies and systems in place to ensure that the engagement on YouTube is authentic, and remove any fraudulent metrics,” a YouTube spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email, but when asked, wouldn’t go into details on what criteria it uses to make these calls.
The White House videos have seen these kinds of interventions on an ongoing basis, but it appears it’s only the dislikes that are disappearing.
The channel has posted more than 300 videos that have garnered nearly 3.7 million dislikes of which nearly 2.5 million were removed, according to data posted on the website 81m.org. The author of the website started to track the engagement on January 26 and has published all the data as well as the methodology used to collect it, but wouldn’t comment on his or her identity when asked via email.
YouTube is deleting close to 8,000 dislikes per video on average. Not a single like was removed, the data indicates.
Even after the interventions, the videos have nearly six times more dislikes than likes on average, the data shows. Without intervention the ratio would be over 17 dislikes for every like.
Posts on social media indicate that some supporters of former President Donald Trump make a point of disliking the Biden White House videos. The videos often get thousands of dislikes shortly after popping online, only for a large portion of the dislikes being deleted later.
In some cases, batches of dislikes would be removed about once an hour, keeping the dislike count around the same number. In other cases, a large portion of dislikes would be chopped down at once, the data indicates.
The website 81m.org lists results of the same analysis for several other YouTube channels with large followings. None of them exhibited dislike removals of this magnitude.
Videos of PewDiePie, one of the most popular channels on the platform, do show some like and dislike removals, but never more than a few dozen per video, based on a review of the data for the past more than two dozen videos on the channel.
YouTube recently announced testing of a design that still includes the dislike button, but no longer shows the number of dislikes.
“This is a test for a small group of users and is a response to creator feedback that the visible count may impact their wellbeing,” a spokesperson said via email.
YouTube and its owner, Google, have long faced accusations of political bias. The companies have said their products are developed and run as politically neutral, but employee accounts and leaked internal materials indicate the companies are infusing their politics into their products.
According to research psychologist Robert Epstein, Google shifted millions of votes in the Nov. 3 election by skewing its search results and other tools, compared to competitors.
“Google search results were strongly biased in favor of liberals and Democrats. This was not true on Bing or Yahoo,” Epstein told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, referring to data from more than 700 voters who worked with him to monitor what results they were receiving from channels such as search results, reminders, search suggestions, and newsfeeds ahead of the election.
Google previously rejected Epstein’s research results.
Follow Petr on Twitter: @petrsvab
 
oh no the heccing youtube upboats why aren't the boomers who voted for Biden giving more upcummies!?!?!?!
 
This had been a common occurence among youtube videos that the company supports for a long time. Biden's video isn't new or exciting, it's just another on a list of manipulated statistics that Youtube's been fucking people over with for a long ass time.

Why anyone is making a big deal out of this now eludes me.
 
When will you understand? He didn't get that many votes because he's that popular. It's that everyone fucking despises the Orange Hitler so much that they went out and voted for the incontinent geriatric instead. Not everybody loves your cult leader.
If that's really what happened, that's kind of a self-own isn't it? Why didn't they just elect someone who isn't wasting away before our eyes? Makes me think they gave their base a lesser of two evils choice and are using this opportunity to do whatever they want. If I was a Democrat voter, I'd feel pretty scammed at this point.
 
If that's really what happened, that's kind of a self-own isn't it? Why didn't they just elect someone who isn't wasting away before our eyes? Makes me think they gave their base a lesser of two evils choice and are using this opportunity to do whatever they want. If I was a Democrat voter, I'd feel pretty scammed at this point.
yea I don't know why the left didn't resurrect Stalin and start a 5 year plan either. Probably jews.
 
When will you understand? He didn't get that many votes because he's that popular. It's that everyone fucking despises the Orange Hitler so much that they went out and voted for the incontinent geriatric instead. Not everybody loves your cult leader.
Oh fuck there's two Hogans, now
 
Because they really want President Harris to have her 2 and a half terms.
Then why didn't they just put Kamala in? That's the thing about the whole "Trump was so bad a pile of shit on a plate would have won against him" theory. If that's the case, why didn't they put in literally anyone else? They could have put in Kamala, Bloomberg, Yang, or any other of the corporate democrats and the end result would have been the same supposedly.

I really just don't get why Joe of all people? Did they think he was the one with the best shot of winning? He just had so much baggage and doesn't seem popular to anyone at all. I don't think even the hardest Biden dicksuckers like the guy so much as like the idea that he's a bumbling old grandpa who won't rock the boat politically.
 
When will you understand? He didn't get that many votes because he's that popular. It's that everyone fucking despises the Orange Hitler so much that they went out and voted for the incontinent geriatric instead. Not everybody loves your cult leader.
"Went out and voted..." is a really strong choice of words. Why do you think the Democrats pushed mail-in voting so hard? They knew many people wouldn't actually go out of their way to vote for Biden/Harris. Even if you believe 100% of votes were legitimate and there were no false votes (which I highly doubt), the Democrat Party wasn't confidence they could win against Trump without pushing for easy voting that isn't known to be the most secure.
 
Then why didn't they just put Kamala in? That's the thing about the whole "Trump was so bad a pile of shit on a plate would have won against him" theory. If that's the case, why didn't they put in literally anyone else? They could have put in Kamala, Bloomberg, Yang, or any other of the corporate democrats and the end result would have been the same supposedly.
I agree with you, I was just shitposting. Your guess is as good as mine, really.
 
"Went out and voted..." is a really strong choice of words. Why do you think the Democrats pushed mail-in voting so hard? They knew many people wouldn't actually go out of their way to vote for Biden/Harris. Even if you believe 100% of votes were legitimate and there were no false votes (which I highly doubt), the Democrat Party wasn't confidence they could win against Trump without pushing for easy voting that isn't known to be the most secure.
damn it's almost like if Trump promoted Mail in Voting and didn't spend months trying to delegitimize it, way more boomers would have voted for him. Almost like Trump's older base was the demographic already most open to mail in voting and it was a massive strategic blunder.
Imagine being so retarded you tell your political side to not use an easily accessible voting method so you can own the libs by losing the election :story:
 
Atrás
Top Abajo