YouTube Deleted 2.5 Million ‘Dislikes’ From Biden White House Videos, Data Indicates - Youtube Removed Dislike visibility because Biden is a Snowflake

YouTube Deleted 2.5 Million ‘Dislikes’ From Biden White House Videos, Data Indicates

YouTube has deleted about 2.5 million ‘dislikes’ from videos on the official White House channel of President Joe ...

www.theepochtimes.com

YouTube has deleted about 2.5 million ‘dislikes’ from videos on the official White House channel of President Joe Biden, according to data collected and posted online by a researcher who wished to remain anonymous. YouTube recently announced that it’s testing a new page design that hides the dislike count.
The Google-owned video platform allows users to give videos either a thumb up (like) or thumb down (dislike). For at least two years, it’s had a policy to remove likes and dislikes it considers spam.
“We have policies and systems in place to ensure that the engagement on YouTube is authentic, and remove any fraudulent metrics,” a YouTube spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email, but when asked, wouldn’t go into details on what criteria it uses to make these calls.
The White House videos have seen these kinds of interventions on an ongoing basis, but it appears it’s only the dislikes that are disappearing.
The channel has posted more than 300 videos that have garnered nearly 3.7 million dislikes of which nearly 2.5 million were removed, according to data posted on the website 81m.org. The author of the website started to track the engagement on January 26 and has published all the data as well as the methodology used to collect it, but wouldn’t comment on his or her identity when asked via email.
YouTube is deleting close to 8,000 dislikes per video on average. Not a single like was removed, the data indicates.
Even after the interventions, the videos have nearly six times more dislikes than likes on average, the data shows. Without intervention the ratio would be over 17 dislikes for every like.
Posts on social media indicate that some supporters of former President Donald Trump make a point of disliking the Biden White House videos. The videos often get thousands of dislikes shortly after popping online, only for a large portion of the dislikes being deleted later.
In some cases, batches of dislikes would be removed about once an hour, keeping the dislike count around the same number. In other cases, a large portion of dislikes would be chopped down at once, the data indicates.
The website 81m.org lists results of the same analysis for several other YouTube channels with large followings. None of them exhibited dislike removals of this magnitude.
Videos of PewDiePie, one of the most popular channels on the platform, do show some like and dislike removals, but never more than a few dozen per video, based on a review of the data for the past more than two dozen videos on the channel.
YouTube recently announced testing of a design that still includes the dislike button, but no longer shows the number of dislikes.
“This is a test for a small group of users and is a response to creator feedback that the visible count may impact their wellbeing,” a spokesperson said via email.
YouTube and its owner, Google, have long faced accusations of political bias. The companies have said their products are developed and run as politically neutral, but employee accounts and leaked internal materials indicate the companies are infusing their politics into their products.
According to research psychologist Robert Epstein, Google shifted millions of votes in the Nov. 3 election by skewing its search results and other tools, compared to competitors.
“Google search results were strongly biased in favor of liberals and Democrats. This was not true on Bing or Yahoo,” Epstein told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, referring to data from more than 700 voters who worked with him to monitor what results they were receiving from channels such as search results, reminders, search suggestions, and newsfeeds ahead of the election.
Google previously rejected Epstein’s research results.
Follow Petr on Twitter: @petrsvab

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Then why didn't they just put Kamala in? That's the thing about the whole "Trump was so bad a pile of shit on a plate would have won against him" theory. If that's the case, why didn't they put in literally anyone else? They could have put in Kamala, Bloomberg, Yang, or any other of the corporate democrats and the end result would have been the same supposedly.

They tried to with Kamala. Look up any articles pre-Tulsi destruction in that debate, and all the MSM is batting for her. It's just that Kamala, despite being groomed as a vagina-having Barry Obama, is so unlikable and scummy that one precise attack was enough to stymie her entire campaign. If it weren't for her own lack of favorability, Kamala would be sucking off Willie Brown in the White House.

 

[Techpriest]

>The Epoch Times

Yeah I'm going to press X to doubt here.

 

[Thiletonomics]

I wonder if they also removed the millions of dislikes from Netflix's Cuties trailer video as well...

 

[Vulva Gape]

where all you had to do was have a warm body check the Democrat box and mail it in.

That sounds great to me. I'm all for abolishing disenfranchisement and having every sane law-abiding adult American citizen able to vote.

every single politically disinterested inner city slob

I thought you guys were against the "Democrat elites" but the hatred you have for the average voter and working class shows.

 

[Zarael]

The two Republicans before Trump, McCain had around 59 million votes and Romney had 60 million.

Trump in 2016 had 62 million and in 2020, 75 million.

For comparison with the Democrats, King Nigger had 69 million in 2008 and 65 million in 2012. The old corporatist cunt in 2016 had 65 million. Biden had 81* million.

Trump gained votes whereas King Nigger lost votes in his re-election bid.

Yes it's obvious complete bullshit but it's the only excuse they have. Trump massively increased his vote and it's clear there was a very enthusiastic core voter base for him just based on his rally turnout. Biden couldn't even muster 15 people to most of his rallies and there was very little enthusiasm around him but he gets the most votes ever? It means they need to appeal to a hidden demographic of people who don't really like Biden but hate Trump so much they'll vote. There's no real indication that such a large demographic actually exists, but you need to just accept it because if it's not the case then how else do you explain it?

I'll leave it up to you whether you think it's reasonable to think that a completely hidden demographic of millions of people who hate orange man showing up to vote is a reasonable explanation for a dude who had less visible popularity than Hillary Clinton getting the most votes in history.

That sounds great to me. I'm all for abolishing disenfranchisement and having every sane law-abiding adult American citizen able to vote.

As long as they're making their own decision on the matter. Sticking a ballot under someones face and saying "Vote for this guy" is manipulation.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Yes it's obvious complete bullshit but it's the only excuse they have. Trump massively increased his vote and it's clear there was a very enthusiastic core voter base for him just based on his rally turnout. Biden couldn't even muster 15 people to most of his rallies and there was very little enthusiasm around him but he gets the most votes ever? It means they need to appeal to a hidden demographic of people who don't really like Biden but hate Trump so much they'll vote. There's no real indication that such a large demographic actually exists, but you need to just accept it because if it's not the case then how else do you explain it?

I'll leave it up to you whether you think it's reasonable to think that a completely hidden demographic of millions of people who hate orange man showing up to vote is a reasonable explanation for a dude who had less visible popularity than Hillary Clinton getting the most votes in history.


As long as they're making their own decision on the matter. Sticking a ballot under someones face and saying "Vote for this guy" is manipulation.

There is a BBC article where this election had the same signs as rigged elections in Africa. Biggest red flag was the vote counts being stopped in the same key swing states on election night.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

A 13 year-old Rebecca Black handled getting dislikes better than Joe Biden, the fucking president of the US.

What a bitch ass nigga.

 

[Vulva Gape]

Sticking a ballot under someones face and saying "Vote for this guy" is manipulation.

That's not what happened though.

Ballots came in the mail. People did them in private and sent them back, like every other election.

Are you saying that Biden bros forced people to vote for him? I told you, no one cares about Biden other than the DNC establishment. I don't think any Biden supporter would go to those lengths, at least not enough to change the results in any meaningful way.

 

[Zarael]

That's not what happened though.

It is what happened. Democrats had canvassers who would go out and basically fill out the forms for anyone they talked to then came back a week later and made sure that the form was filled for Biden and mailed it off for them. This is basically like having a Democrat enter the voting booth with you to make sure you vote the right way. It's not so much that people hated Trump that the Democrats much more effectively preyed on the politically disinterested majority who simply complied with whatever the volunteer canvassing them told them to do.

There were other things such as selectively mailing back ballots that were incorrectly filled out (always for Biden voters of course, Trump votes were simply left to be invalidated). When New York first tried mail in voting almost 20% of ballots were invalidated. In Pensylvania it was 0.1%. There are a lot of red flags with the entire process because so many laws designed to protect the integrity of the election were relaxed to allow the Democrats to harvest as many votes as possible from people who had no real intention of voting until solicited and told that the canvassers would do everything for them except tick the box.

 

[pwnest injun]

Then why didn't they just put Kamala in? That's the thing about the whole "Trump was so bad a pile of shit on a plate would have won against him" theory. If that's the case, why didn't they put in literally anyone else? They could have put in Kamala, Bloomberg, Yang, or any other of the corporate democrats and the end result would have been the same supposedly.

I really just don't get why Joe of all people? Did they think he was the one with the best shot of winning? He just had so much baggage and doesn't seem popular to anyone at all. I don't think even the hardest Biden dicksuckers like the guy so much as like the idea that he's a bumbling old grandpa who won't rock the boat politically.

Joe Biden has the relationships with corporate America, the pentagon, and the intelligence agencies that keep them all in line. He is the most known quantity in politics.

 

[UselessIdiot]

They tried to with Kamala. Look up any articles pre-Tulsi destruction in that debate, and all the MSM is batting for her. It's just that Kamala, despite being groomed as a vagina-having Barry Obama, is so unlikable and scummy that one precise attack was enough to stymie her entire campaign. If it weren't for her own lack of favorability, Kamala would be sucking off Willie Brown in the White House.

That's why I'm really skeptical of people saying that the Democrat powers want Kamala to reign for ten years. She couldn't make it past the primary and she just isn't likable. Even with cheating, it would still be quite difficult to pull off a win for her for president.

 

[Exigent Circumcisions]

If I was a Democrat voter, I'd feel pretty scammed at this point.

You'd have to be able to follow a thought from point A to point B to arrive at that conclusion.

 

[Vulva Gape]

Democrats had canvassers who would go out and basically fill out the forms for anyone they talked to then came back a week later and made sure that the form was filled for Biden and mailed it off for them.

X to doubt. They were in my area; all I got were text messages and I think some places did door-to-door but not all due to covid.

The courts through out every single election case sans one. There is no evidence to prove these magical claims. Get over it.

 

[verissimus]

I said this once, I'll say it again:

Hillary CLINTON was more likable than Joe Biden.

Before the election I would laughed at you or anyone else that said that, now though...yeah, now I think I'm in agreement.

 

[FunPosting101]

Is anyone really surprised that youtube is running interference for mainstream politicians and probably have been for some time now? My first sarcastic thought when reading this was basically, "no really, you think?". Of fucking course a website that is trying to become part of the left-leaning liberal establishment is interfering in favor of it's own side. Why wouldn't they after all? Old and fun youtube is long dead by now.

UselessIdiot said:
That's why I'm really skeptical of people saying that the Democrat powers want Kamala to reign for ten years. She couldn't make it past the primary and she just isn't likable. Even with cheating, it would still be quite difficult to pull off a win for her for president.

Thing is that this doesn't mean they won't try to fraud her in like they did with Biden. The problem for the dems though, is that the amount of electoral fraud necessary to do that would be absolutely gigantic and unprecedented even for third-world elections.

 

[Mr Cuddles]

That's not what happened though.

Ballots came in the mail. People did them in private and sent them back, like every other election.

Are you saying that Biden bros forced people to vote for him? I told you, no one cares about Biden other than the DNC establishment. I don't think any Biden supporter would go to those lengths, at least not enough to change the results in any meaningful way.

Dude, you are either just a retard or disingenuous as fuck. Stop!

If you cannot think of any reason why mail in votes are vulnerable to manipulation then I suggest you send some cash money by mail. Because as far as security goes they are about the same.

Edit: And that's not even factoring blatant ballot harvesting

 

[whogoesthere]

Yes it's obvious complete bullshit but it's the only excuse they have. Trump massively increased his vote and it's clear there was a very enthusiastic core voter base for him just based on his rally turnout. Biden couldn't even muster 15 people to most of his rallies and there was very little enthusiasm around him but he gets the most votes ever? It means they need to appeal to a hidden demographic of people who don't really like Biden but hate Trump so much they'll vote. There's no real indication that such a large demographic actually exists, but you need to just accept it because if it's not the case then how else do you explain it?

I'll leave it up to you whether you think it's reasonable to think that a completely hidden demographic of millions of people who hate orange man showing up to vote is a reasonable explanation for a dude who had less visible popularity than Hillary Clinton getting the most votes in history.


As long as they're making their own decision on the matter. Sticking a ballot under someones face and saying "Vote for this guy" is manipulation.

I do think you are missing the point by saying Biden was rather bland and lacked any real turn out. The notion is they voted against Trump, Biden just happened to have the name on the "Not Trump" box. His popularity was never a major factor, nor his policies or lack of support. It was all based on Trump, and he had no end of coverage, and the hatred they had been whipped up into with 4 years of slander and lies.

I would say the vote being a sham was put in 4 years ago when the press was allowed to run blatant falsehoods and lies in order to ruin Trumps chances. (I don't think Trump was perfect either, plenty of things he can be criticised over. But that doesn't generate hatred, so the press largely ignored his dodgy stuff).

 

[mr.moon1488]

no dude trump got more twitter likes, he won the election

Neither one won the election. The jews win every election.

 

[All Cops Are Based]

Dilate harder.

when a 6th grader learns new slang from the older kids, doesn't quite know what it means, but knows that using it makes you cool so he uses it anyway

 

[babadook]

Guys please no upsetting the heccin wignatonis he needs this place