- Registrado
- 22 de Mayo, 2020
We're reaching levels of cumbrain that shouldn't be possible.
Not a fetish, though.
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Iniciador del tema Real Mayun
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Not a fetish, though.
- Registrado
- 17 de Abr, 2018
Yes they do, but lesbians don't read/fap to the same "yuri" as male do, it's like lesbian porn who are absolutely not made for women and no lesbian get turn on to these videos.
Women just got their own sites, usually manga reading online or very female dominated social medias like tumblr/twitter where yuri are made by women for women, while the men and troons will read their "own" yuri porn this time made by men for men from reddit/porno sites/hentai sites.
- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2020
Women also read a lot of written lesbian porn. Even drawn yuri made for women usually has more text, context and preamble than the usual "hi I just met you and this is crazy so dive into my muff maybe" from lesbian porn made for men.
- Registrado
- 20 de Jun, 2019
- Registrado
- 4 de Dic, 2018
This woman is a trip. A nice juicy bb cow.
Allegedly comes from a rich family but was disowned thanks to her being “gay af”. Constantly posts on r/raisedbynarcissists—a sureproof sign of actually being a narcissist— to complain about her parents.
Was making multi-course meals for her family at 11. Was scheduling her own doctors’ appointments as a preteen without her parents knowledge.
Claims her parents would force her to strip naked so they could see if she got her period(?!) and also appraise her breast growth.
Mother also reacted upon seeing cow’s “thoughtful” tattoo by attempting to rip off her clothes in public.
Says her twin brother is also queer, has nicknamed him Closet. Said brother is now married to a woman, has a kid, and seems perfectly normal. Brother even offered to take her for a time after her husband died.
Attempted to ruin her brother’s wedding by being a drama queen.
Came out as a troon at 18 after taking a gender studies course at college.
On T for 6 years. Did so much damage she had to get a hysterectomy at 31.
Claims she has IBS but is forever cooking Indian food.
There’s an excuse for everything. She called over THIRTY mental health clinics to book an appointment but no one was accepting clients. She called a suicide hotline and was asked if she’d found Jesus.
Says she “self-trained” her support dog and that the dog can turn off being on duty and just be a regular doggo upon her command.
Got politely rejected by a therapist as not good “long term client” material because of her “complicated history” (read: untreatable borderline)
Bottoms with her vagina (re: PIV sex; she’s a straight woman.)
Whines when people point out her preference for PIV sex makes her a straight woman.
Got called out for posting about her “gay” husband eating her totally not female pussy on a gay male sub. Complains about gay men not wanting to hear about carpet munching.
“Every man except my husband raped me!”
Gets suckered into being DP’d by two “cis gay men” who double team her in the vag.
Tries to start shit on various FTM subs about how more troon than thou she is.
Is a deeply private person. Really. If you don’t need to know, she won’t tell you.
- Registrado
- 17 de Mar, 2019
If they're on a transwoman, they're external ovaries, bigot! Now you owe me big time for forcing me to educate you and do emotional labor on your part!
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 12 de Sep, 2019
"clits are mini penises"
"penises are just inside out vaginas"
from those two statements, it would follow that "clits are just mini inside out vaginas"
her arguments sound a lot like "chimpanzees are just humans with more hair" lol
- Registrado
- 19 de Jul, 2020
As for dr. Heidi and her Frankenstein-like, second asshole, castration (is that what nullifying is?) and other surgeries - I actually have to admire her hustle. There's some talk about a lot of psychopaths being attracted to surgery and someone who does this seems like one to me. Second, she probably has a big ego like surgeons usually do. The fact she's one of the only, if not the only person in the world offering these surgeries has to be a massive ego trip. And then there's the fact that she's aggressively pushing the limits of medical ethics. Basically she's playing God, taking huge amounts of money from troons/their insurance and at the end of the day she's not legally responsible for their feeling of regret or the 41%-ing.
Obviously I think this should be illegal, but if the medical establishment in the US has decided to allow and embrace it (the whole easy access to hormones and lack of medical gate keeping for troons is already huge ethical issue imho), fuck it - might as well go all in. Can't wait to see most post-op results as I'm morbidly curious.
Obviously I think this should be illegal, but if the medical establishment in the US has decided to allow and embrace it (the whole easy access to hormones and lack of medical gate keeping for troons is already huge ethical issue imho), fuck it - might as well go all in. Can't wait to see most post-op results as I'm morbidly curious.
- Registrado
- 9 de Jun, 2018
My response to the question "do women get off at their self-image" (ie, are women autogynophilic):
I am gonna get downvoted by the TERFs for saying this but I don't give a shit: I think that TERFs' (and Blanchard's) insistence that women do not get off at the image of themselves as women is total nonsense and wishful thinking. TERFs' wishful thinking about this is just evidence of the TERFs' own Madonna/whore complex, where cis women are all Madonnas and trannies are all whores. TERFs will bend over backwards and into a Pretzel to deny the fact that oversexed female narcissists truly honestly and unambiguously do get off at their self-image as sexual women, and that there are gradations of this amongst women in general.
I find it very telling that TERFs, in attempting to debunk the idea of women getting off at their self-image, will refer to a woman wearing lingerie, like garter belts and a wonder bra, and insist that a woman getting wet at seeing herself in the mirror or seeing a picture of herself in garter belts and a wonder bra is only getting aroused because The Man/The Patriarchy has brain-washed and Pavlov-trained women that garter belts and wonder bras are supposed to be sexy and arousing, so that women is only having a Pavlovian response. Perhaps so, but what about women being asked to look at their own pussies in the mirror (or on a smartphone) during masturbation 101? Did The Patriarchy brainwash women that looking at their own pussies in the mirror (or on their smartphone) is arousing? Or do women honestly sincerely get off at looking at themselves because it's something you're not supposed to see (if only for anatomical reasons)? I am sure TERFs are going to say "that's just to teach them anatomy", but bitches, you know that's bull. During these masturbation workshops, women are not only encouraged to look at their pussies in the mirror/on a smartphone in order to learn the different parts, but rather to marvel at the reflected image of their own pussies, in other words, to get off looking at themselves being sexually exposed and aroused. Only a TERF would seriously insist that women supposedly only have a purely technical/fuctional view of their own pussies.
TERFs can only emphasize with a completely desexualized woman and any hint of self-indulgent sexuality on the part of a woman is explained away by TERFs as that woman only putting on a show for The Man. TERFs insist that women have no idea what they want sexually outside of whatever The Patriarchy has brainwashed them to want, and TERFs insist that women only learn how to make themselves available and servicable to men, not how to get themselves off by themselves for themselves.
I don't think any woman in her right mind would ever honestly answer the question of whether she gets off at her own self-image with an affirmative "yes", because women know how self-indulgent vanity on the part of a woman is only praised and awarded in some women (young, beautiful and slim) while mocked and looked down upon in other women (old, fat, ugly). The fact is that only certain women are encouraged to be exhibitionistic, and even those women would downplay it because they know that too much self-indulgent vanity on the part of a woman is punished by society.
With regards to TERFs' insistence that regular women never get off at themselves as women, I think TERFs like to forget that regular women do not have the inhibitions or hang-up about sex that TERFs have, so these women are more likely to flaunt it where TERFs don't see it. TERFs have this extremely annoying habit of expecting all women to be as self-conscious as themselves (this comment thread is a perfect example of that, with TERFs all piling in to insisting that no woman has ever masturbated in a public bathroom or even in their own bathroom).
I think TERFs only hang out with other TERFs and this echo-chamber shields them from just how narcissistic, exhibitionistic and over-sexed regular women can get when they feel like they can get away with it or when they feel like this behaviour on their part is going to be positively received. Because of their isolation from non-feminist women TERFs only deal with images of women and this distorts their perception of women outside their echo-chamber.
I think TERFs are extremely invested in their desexualization of other women because they have internalized the sexist idea that only a completely desexualized woman is worthy of protection and credible victim status under law. Instead of challenging this ridiculous assumption on the part of the legal system TERFs have accepted and internalized it. TERFs want that legal protection for themselves but they will desexualize women in general to claim blanket-protection for their "class".
Suffice to say no self-respecting women would ever entrust a TERF (or Blanchard for that matter) with their true sexual desires or sexual ambitions because why the hell would a woman confess these things to a judgemental crank who is going to call her a "cum bucket" and a "HOP" for being sexual? It's therefore plainly ridiculous to expect TERFs to know what women really want or how women really feel about themselves sexually.
That said, a male fetishist getting off while cross-dressing in feminine fetish wear and LARPing at being a stereotypically horny woman is obviously not the same thing as a woman just being openly sexual, even exhibitionistically or narcissistically so. Only delusional TRAs like Julia Serano insist that's these two different things are supposedly same thing, but then again, I guess this is why Julia Serano divorced his wife within a year of transitioning. Because he really has no fucking clue about women, even while claiming to be one.
I find it very telling that TERFs, in attempting to debunk the idea of women getting off at their self-image, will refer to a woman wearing lingerie, like garter belts and a wonder bra, and insist that a woman getting wet at seeing herself in the mirror or seeing a picture of herself in garter belts and a wonder bra is only getting aroused because The Man/The Patriarchy has brain-washed and Pavlov-trained women that garter belts and wonder bras are supposed to be sexy and arousing, so that women is only having a Pavlovian response. Perhaps so, but what about women being asked to look at their own pussies in the mirror (or on a smartphone) during masturbation 101? Did The Patriarchy brainwash women that looking at their own pussies in the mirror (or on their smartphone) is arousing? Or do women honestly sincerely get off at looking at themselves because it's something you're not supposed to see (if only for anatomical reasons)? I am sure TERFs are going to say "that's just to teach them anatomy", but bitches, you know that's bull. During these masturbation workshops, women are not only encouraged to look at their pussies in the mirror/on a smartphone in order to learn the different parts, but rather to marvel at the reflected image of their own pussies, in other words, to get off looking at themselves being sexually exposed and aroused. Only a TERF would seriously insist that women supposedly only have a purely technical/fuctional view of their own pussies.
TERFs can only emphasize with a completely desexualized woman and any hint of self-indulgent sexuality on the part of a woman is explained away by TERFs as that woman only putting on a show for The Man. TERFs insist that women have no idea what they want sexually outside of whatever The Patriarchy has brainwashed them to want, and TERFs insist that women only learn how to make themselves available and servicable to men, not how to get themselves off by themselves for themselves.
I don't think any woman in her right mind would ever honestly answer the question of whether she gets off at her own self-image with an affirmative "yes", because women know how self-indulgent vanity on the part of a woman is only praised and awarded in some women (young, beautiful and slim) while mocked and looked down upon in other women (old, fat, ugly). The fact is that only certain women are encouraged to be exhibitionistic, and even those women would downplay it because they know that too much self-indulgent vanity on the part of a woman is punished by society.
With regards to TERFs' insistence that regular women never get off at themselves as women, I think TERFs like to forget that regular women do not have the inhibitions or hang-up about sex that TERFs have, so these women are more likely to flaunt it where TERFs don't see it. TERFs have this extremely annoying habit of expecting all women to be as self-conscious as themselves (this comment thread is a perfect example of that, with TERFs all piling in to insisting that no woman has ever masturbated in a public bathroom or even in their own bathroom).
I think TERFs only hang out with other TERFs and this echo-chamber shields them from just how narcissistic, exhibitionistic and over-sexed regular women can get when they feel like they can get away with it or when they feel like this behaviour on their part is going to be positively received. Because of their isolation from non-feminist women TERFs only deal with images of women and this distorts their perception of women outside their echo-chamber.
I think TERFs are extremely invested in their desexualization of other women because they have internalized the sexist idea that only a completely desexualized woman is worthy of protection and credible victim status under law. Instead of challenging this ridiculous assumption on the part of the legal system TERFs have accepted and internalized it. TERFs want that legal protection for themselves but they will desexualize women in general to claim blanket-protection for their "class".
Suffice to say no self-respecting women would ever entrust a TERF (or Blanchard for that matter) with their true sexual desires or sexual ambitions because why the hell would a woman confess these things to a judgemental crank who is going to call her a "cum bucket" and a "HOP" for being sexual? It's therefore plainly ridiculous to expect TERFs to know what women really want or how women really feel about themselves sexually.
That said, a male fetishist getting off while cross-dressing in feminine fetish wear and LARPing at being a stereotypically horny woman is obviously not the same thing as a woman just being openly sexual, even exhibitionistically or narcissistically so. Only delusional TRAs like Julia Serano insist that's these two different things are supposedly same thing, but then again, I guess this is why Julia Serano divorced his wife within a year of transitioning. Because he really has no fucking clue about women, even while claiming to be one.
- Registrado
- 9 de Ago, 2019
https://www.reddit.com/r/TransyTalk...thinking_about_how_ill_never_be_able_to_have/ (Archive)Reddit Troon dijo:[Vent] Thinking about how I'll never be able to have a uterus or carry a child.
My transition's been going quite well and I've been happy with the direction my life has been going both socially and physically, and even though I know there are some left over effects from my puberty that I'll never be able to reverse, they don't make me feel too bad, since I still pass and I don't hate the effect they have on my overall appearence.
There's one thing that's been really bothering me lately though, and that's how, even after I eventually get bottom surgery, I'll never have a uterus. When I place my hand over that spot below my stomach, just beneath which would in most women reside a womb, that organ which grants humanity the ability to create and nurture life, there's nothing there. I know that there can never be anything there besides a bladder and some intestines, and I just feel empty. I'll never be able to see my body pour so much of itself into creating another life, I'll never be able to feel the first kicks of my baby and dream of who it might turn out to be, I'll never get to hold my newborn and see myself in its eyes while lying exausted and overjoyed in a hospital bed, because there's just nothing inside of me that can do that.
Maybe I'm just fetishizing the cis experience, or maybe this is just my dysphoria moving the goalposts every time I make progress so I can never truly be satisfied. Maybe me making such a big deal of this in my mind is delegitimizing to cis people without functional uteri. I don't know. But it sucks to think of what I should have had in an ideal world and to know that I can't, no matter what I do. I should probably just try not to think about it, but I felt like I had to get it off my chest somewhere.
I've heard there have been successful uterine transplants, and I've done some research into it. I won't lie, it does give me hope, but I don't want to put all my faith in something that probably won't become available until after I'm already past the point of having children. Hopefully future trans people will be able to enjoy that procedure, even if I won't.
- Registrado
- 16 de Jul, 2019
Here's a weird one
This guy post pictures of himself almost everyday standing in the same spot on his decking in the same pose but in different outfits
He claims to be "Non-Binary" and has a wife whom he describes as "Gender Nonconforming"
HE's also apparently famous enough in the trans reddit circles that people have drawn terrible artwork of him
www.reddit.com
This guy post pictures of himself almost everyday standing in the same spot on his decking in the same pose but in different outfits
He claims to be "Non-Binary" and has a wife whom he describes as "Gender Nonconforming"
HE's also apparently famous enough in the trans reddit circles that people have drawn terrible artwork of him
r/transadorable - My expression soo proactive when Monday comes. If Monday had a face I'd punch it, but can't, being a Lady :-) Make Monday the start of something wonderful. Stay safe and healthy Lol !!!
4 votes and 15 comments so far on Reddit
www.reddit.com
Archivos adjuntos
Última edición por un moderador:
- Registrado
- 21 de Dic, 2018
I'm sorry, but I don't get how you could look at those post op pictures and not immediately see it as genital mutilation. Obviously neo vaginas are inherently disgusting, but this is taking it to another level. I mean for christ sakes most of these just look like deflated nut sacks with a large hole underneath. Their "labias" first off don't look formed at all, and second off dont even run the length they should and just terminate above their new stink ditch. What would even be the point of this surgery? There would be no possible way of achieving an orgasim with this stink ditch, so I'm left to conclude its sole purpose is to cause sepsis in the patient.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2020
You know the seals of the Apocalypse are breaking loose when Nikocado's near-prolapse asshole still looks better than what the top medical experts on the field create for these loonies for thousands of dollars. Maybe it's for the best if it's the sepsis that kills them rather than the innevitable regret that'll follow.
- Registrado
- 9 de Jun, 2018
Wow, the great thing about posting something that goes against TERF orthodoxy in this thread is that TERFs immediately come out of the woodwork to downvote my post, exactly as predicted. On a forum like KiwiFarms which is packed with examples of oversexed female narcissists being exhibitionistic, you're not allowed to point out that some cis women really truly are exhibitionistic and narcissistic out of their own free will and might even get off at seeing themselves like that. Here's another thought for you: would trannies be as narcissistic, exhibitionistic and vain (aka as autogynephilic) as they are if they didn't have so many examples of female vanity, narcissism and exhibitionism to ape and model themselves after in the first place?
- Registrado
- 11 de Ene, 2019
I believe your post was "downvoted" because it was autistic. How many times has it been said this thread is to laugh at tranny sideshows? Thinking your post was flocked by TERFs and not people just thinking it was retarded is, in fact, retarded. You're allowed to point out whatever you want and people are allowed to think it's stupid and rate it whatever they want. Post ratings don't mean anything at all.
tiggles
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 12 de Sep, 2019
I’m here to laugh at trannies, not roll my eyes about histrionic women. If you want to sperg about terfs to a receptive audience there is a thread for that.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2020
Not to derail again but...
I dunno what kind of TERFs you're talking to. I'm not intimately involved in that scene but many I know who would call themselves as such are lesbians and have sexual feelings and thoughts, and aren't scared of them or trying to repress them. I agree there are some feminists who seem to believe women are inherently asexual and get sex foisted upon them, but the majority of women I know would argue instead that they have things they don't sexually like foisted upon them by (almost always) men. The most common examples I've personally seen are a boyfriend (or even fwb) pressuring the girl into anal or a threesome, with both of these being typically male fantasies. The distinction being women are sexual (duh), but they aren't always sexual in the way men (and by extension, MUH PATRIARCHY) want them to be. You see this all the time - guys being grossed out by actual lesbians because they're not the porn stars they thought they would be, or having rude awakenings about anal being poopy (hah) or threesomes being awkward.
I truly don't believe most women would get aroused from a picture of themselves, which is a pretty bold claim to make (I don't have insight on this, but do guys get off to pics of themselves? Even gay guys?). Masturbating while watching yourself, especially in a workshop about masturbating your genitals to me doesn't scream "vagina fetish" either (which doesn't exist), because you aren't necessarily masturbating to your genitals, just watching a process you don't get to see very often. Most women don't know what their junk looks like intimately, and watching themselves be touched can be arousing in the same way that watching someone go down on you is arousing without you having an oral fetish. If the whole point is to masturbate your genitals while becoming familiar with a part of your body you don't get to ruddy see 99% of the time, with the end goal of knowing what feels good and where...you're kind of doing it wrong if you're not watching yourself masturbate. Especially if you've paid for the workshop.
Being aroused from wearing lingerie isn't (usually, I maintain that a small amount of women could be aroused literally only from the lingerie, but I've never ever seen or heard it) about the lingerie itself but what it signifies - your partner getting hot and bothered, being about to do a sex, being seen as hot and sexy by another person. Looking in a mirror wearing lingerie and masturbating is pretty squarely in "things a dude would do if he had a woman's body for a day", because even lesbian women aren't getting off to themselves, or getting aroused from seeing a bra on the floor, or from thinking of their boobs. That literally doesn't happen, and basically only men and troons (so, men) are under the firm impression that it must.
I dunno if it makes me a big bad feminazi to say that women aren't taught how to pleasure themselves, and for a long time, nobody cared if they were. The female orgasm being a myth, the lack of sex education, and the general awkwardness of talking about masturbation along with weird Puritan beliefs lead to a LOT of women never learning to masturbate or even orgasm into their 20s, despite many being sexually active before then. Porn doesn't really help because it's a fantasy, and jackhammering a girl for 15 minutes isn't going to make a girl (usually) scream in a good way, but nobody teaches young people how sex should work: always mind your partner, and even just talk about what you like beforehand with a new partner and set boundaries ("don't stick it in my poop chute, and wear a condom"). But the problem with the latter, looping back to the masturbation workshop thing, is that most women don't masturbate regularly period (don't blast me for HuffPost), and the vast majority do it once a week or less. One might infer that most women this have a low sex drive but IMO the problem is most women have tried masturbating unsuccessfully, likely without even orgasming, and never tried again. Or, put shortly, many women don't know what they like sexually. Not NO woman knows what she likes sexually - I'm sure Mr. Chad Thundercock's wife gets 10 billion orgasms a day - but many don't.
Less than half of women orgasm during straight sex, and only 6% orgasm regularly from it. Those rates are abysmal. I find the workshop kind of cringe, but I get where they're coming from.
I'm sure there are women who take racy pics of themselves in lingerie and get turned on, or are turned on by wearing lingerie under their clothes at work, or have a favorite pair of lingerie that they feel particularly sexy in. But none of these amount to a lingerie fetish, because it's never about the lingerie in isolation like it is with men, who get aroused from wearing the lingerie. It's almost always about outside perception - my hubby thinks my butt looks cute in this babydoll, nobody knows I'm wearing lacy thongs to work and this is taboo (and, the most common continuation of this fantasy IME is "someone will catch me and be very aroused by it, and we will sex"), taking nudes of myself and posting them online or sending them to someone is risky and erotic and they will find it sexy. And it's normal (not necessarily common) for women to feel they look attractive in lingerie, but again this isn't indicative of a fetish. Wearing a one-piece and then looking in the mirror and going "damn girl you got it" isn't about being like "would you fuck me? I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me hard" but rather "wow my body looks attractive in this thing and other people (be it a partner or their onlyfans) would think so too".
This legitimately retarded belief that women are aroused by themselves, thus AGP is debunked, is annoying as fuck because it really shows how troons are incapable of understanding women's perspectives (note how the women on this thread are saying "lol wtf no women don't have lingerie fetishes" and the token troons are saying "what no they totally do
") and how little people know about women's sexuality. Most women WANT to be sexy and desirable (most people in general do, but for women this is a particular point of importance as women are more valued for their appearances than men - not even being a scawy feminist here, just a fact) and for most women this precludes being physically and conventionally attractive.
This became a huge derail but this pants on head argument is aggravating to read.
I truly don't believe most women would get aroused from a picture of themselves, which is a pretty bold claim to make (I don't have insight on this, but do guys get off to pics of themselves? Even gay guys?). Masturbating while watching yourself, especially in a workshop about masturbating your genitals to me doesn't scream "vagina fetish" either (which doesn't exist), because you aren't necessarily masturbating to your genitals, just watching a process you don't get to see very often. Most women don't know what their junk looks like intimately, and watching themselves be touched can be arousing in the same way that watching someone go down on you is arousing without you having an oral fetish. If the whole point is to masturbate your genitals while becoming familiar with a part of your body you don't get to ruddy see 99% of the time, with the end goal of knowing what feels good and where...you're kind of doing it wrong if you're not watching yourself masturbate. Especially if you've paid for the workshop.
Being aroused from wearing lingerie isn't (usually, I maintain that a small amount of women could be aroused literally only from the lingerie, but I've never ever seen or heard it) about the lingerie itself but what it signifies - your partner getting hot and bothered, being about to do a sex, being seen as hot and sexy by another person. Looking in a mirror wearing lingerie and masturbating is pretty squarely in "things a dude would do if he had a woman's body for a day", because even lesbian women aren't getting off to themselves, or getting aroused from seeing a bra on the floor, or from thinking of their boobs. That literally doesn't happen, and basically only men and troons (so, men) are under the firm impression that it must.
I dunno if it makes me a big bad feminazi to say that women aren't taught how to pleasure themselves, and for a long time, nobody cared if they were. The female orgasm being a myth, the lack of sex education, and the general awkwardness of talking about masturbation along with weird Puritan beliefs lead to a LOT of women never learning to masturbate or even orgasm into their 20s, despite many being sexually active before then. Porn doesn't really help because it's a fantasy, and jackhammering a girl for 15 minutes isn't going to make a girl (usually) scream in a good way, but nobody teaches young people how sex should work: always mind your partner, and even just talk about what you like beforehand with a new partner and set boundaries ("don't stick it in my poop chute, and wear a condom"). But the problem with the latter, looping back to the masturbation workshop thing, is that most women don't masturbate regularly period (don't blast me for HuffPost), and the vast majority do it once a week or less. One might infer that most women this have a low sex drive but IMO the problem is most women have tried masturbating unsuccessfully, likely without even orgasming, and never tried again. Or, put shortly, many women don't know what they like sexually. Not NO woman knows what she likes sexually - I'm sure Mr. Chad Thundercock's wife gets 10 billion orgasms a day - but many don't.
Less than half of women orgasm during straight sex, and only 6% orgasm regularly from it. Those rates are abysmal. I find the workshop kind of cringe, but I get where they're coming from.
I'm sure there are women who take racy pics of themselves in lingerie and get turned on, or are turned on by wearing lingerie under their clothes at work, or have a favorite pair of lingerie that they feel particularly sexy in. But none of these amount to a lingerie fetish, because it's never about the lingerie in isolation like it is with men, who get aroused from wearing the lingerie. It's almost always about outside perception - my hubby thinks my butt looks cute in this babydoll, nobody knows I'm wearing lacy thongs to work and this is taboo (and, the most common continuation of this fantasy IME is "someone will catch me and be very aroused by it, and we will sex"), taking nudes of myself and posting them online or sending them to someone is risky and erotic and they will find it sexy. And it's normal (not necessarily common) for women to feel they look attractive in lingerie, but again this isn't indicative of a fetish. Wearing a one-piece and then looking in the mirror and going "damn girl you got it" isn't about being like "would you fuck me? I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me hard" but rather "wow my body looks attractive in this thing and other people (be it a partner or their onlyfans) would think so too".
This legitimately retarded belief that women are aroused by themselves, thus AGP is debunked, is annoying as fuck because it really shows how troons are incapable of understanding women's perspectives (note how the women on this thread are saying "lol wtf no women don't have lingerie fetishes" and the token troons are saying "what no they totally do
") and how little people know about women's sexuality. Most women WANT to be sexy and desirable (most people in general do, but for women this is a particular point of importance as women are more valued for their appearances than men - not even being a scawy feminist here, just a fact) and for most women this precludes being physically and conventionally attractive. This became a huge derail but this pants on head argument is aggravating to read.
Back on track, some fresh cringe from r/mtf:
Link / Archive
The tie between incels and troons grows stronger by the day.
And a pretty ominous pic from a protest:
Link / Archive
And a lovely AGP post to cap it off.
Link / Archive
Choice comments:
"I am mid puberty so sadly I apparently have a lot of sperm" sounds like an AI predicted text.
And ironically, an argument about cis women fetishizing their bodies:
Fabelhaft
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 30 de Jun, 2019
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2015