Yes, in the first post I used that as an example but if you followed my other posts at all you might have noticed that I specified my point later on about autogynephilia and not just mere lingerie fetish.
My point was, that if it's so natural for women to masturbate to the markers of womanhood, lingerie for example, would that mean that, for example, tribes women who have never seen lingerie in their life find it arousing too, if masturbating to lingerie is such a natural part of womanhood? Well of course they don't! Some tribeswoman living in the rainforest doesn't have the cultural understanding of lingerie and how it relates to sexuality and sex, so why would she find it arousing? Thus, masturbating to lingerie, a western/modern world marker of womanhood, is not natural part of womanhood. Lingerie isn't womanhood itself. That's what's ridiculous about autogynephiles saying that it's natural part of womanhood.
And that's where I come for my other points, would a tribes woman masturbate to their facepaints, that could be their marker of womanhood? Does some asian woman masturbate to their modified long neck? To the neck rings used to make her neck long? I doubt it. Because women do not find our own womanhood arousing. We don't exist here thinking about how we are women and get aroused by it.