- Registrado
- 10 de Mar, 2019
I thought that was a prerequisite for being hired at a Waffle House.Maybe if someone called him a lousy cook, thus preventing him from being hired at the local Waffle House?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
I thought that was a prerequisite for being hired at a Waffle House.Maybe if someone called him a lousy cook, thus preventing him from being hired at the local Waffle House?
Nobody would turn down that application. It would be the most popular Waffle House in the nation.Maybe if someone called him a lousy cook, thus preventing him from being hired at the local Waffle House?
If anything he'd be overqualified... he's at least Applebee's material.Nobody would turn down that application. It would be the most popular Waffle House in the nation.
If anything he'd be overqualified... he's at least Applebee's material.
Just do like I do, don't expect anything, then everything will be entertaining when it happens.everything is disappoint
Just do like I do, don't expect anything, then everything will be entertaining when it happens.
Legal question to the afficionados: Do we get informed if there's sur-replies we should be waiting for, or a date dropping for the oral arguments?
Having watched the streams, I agree. The replies to Moronica’s brief and especially the fees appeal were excellent, and easily the best replies they did here. They were solid, on the mark and had very little typing errors. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that these were the most polished of the bunch. Out of the four defendants, these two were the ones that did the most damage and these two replies had to be good. Thankfully, they were.Nothing is ever 100% in court, but the fees issue is probably about as close as it gets. Damn good filing. The best one from Ty so far by a long shot. Lemonfuhrer got totally BTFO imo. Wick Phillips is chasing their tail if they keep wasting more money on bs fees motions.
Do MoRon have to pay for Wick Phillips tail chasing on the fees issue?
Which all things considered, pretty sure they haven't hid the fact that Marchi's was basically a third wheel in all of this,Having watched the streams, I agree. The replies to Moronica’s brief and especially the fees appeal were excellent, and easily the best replies they did here. They were solid, on the mark and had very little typing errors. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that these were the most polished of the bunch. Out of the four defendants, these two were the ones that did the most damage and these two replies had to be good. Thankfully, they were.
So overall, the Moronica replies were the best, the Funimation one was generally good marred by weak grammar and misspelling and the Marchi one was easily the weakest and most sloppy of the four, redeemed only by its vicious tone and effective arguments regarding defamation.
Nothing is ever 100% in court, but the fees issue is probably about as close as it gets. Damn good filing. The best one from Ty so far by a long shot. Lemonfuhrer got totally BTFO imo. Wick Phillips is chasing their tail if they keep wasting more money on bs fees motions.
Do MoRon have to pay for Wick Phillips tail chasing on the fees issue?
I agree. These files maybe messy ( especially marchi's) but they get the point across loud and clear. It honestly shows that mike Dummford and the rest of of law twitter didnt actually read the filings and only made fun of the errors. They wont even admit that lemonie's filings in this whole case is the actual dumpster fireHaving watched the streams, I agree. The replies to Moronica’s brief and especially the fees appeal were excellent, and easily the best replies they did here. They were solid, on the mark and had very little typing errors. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that these were the most polished of the bunch. Out of the four defendants, these two were the ones that did the most damage and these two replies had to be good. Thankfully, they were.
So overall, the Moronica replies were the best, the Funimation one was generally good marred by weak grammar and misspelling and the Marchi one was easily the weakest and most sloppy of the four, redeemed only by its vicious tone and effective arguments regarding defamation.
They think Lemwaaagh's filings are good and BHBH's are bad because they honestly seem to believe character attacks > case lawI agree. These files maybe messy ( especially marchi's) but they get the point across loud and clear. It honestly shows that mike Dummford and the rest of of law twitter didnt actually read the filings and only made fun of the errors. They wont even admit that lemonie's filings in this whole case is the actual dumpster fire
So far the lesson from this case has been "everything > case law".because they honestly seem to believe character attacks > case law
They'll glorify Phlegmoine's butchering of the English text and senseless money spending and vilify Ty and Martinez's documents for admitted spelling errors and sloppy grammar (which are nevertheless common in law expertise), because fuck common sense! To hell with the truth! They need to keep their narrative alive at all costs!So far the lesson from this case has been "everything > case law".
They think Lemwaaagh's filings are good and BHBH's are bad because they honestly seem to believe character attacks > case law
Tbf, based on the way Mr. Toye's been talking in his recent interviews been talking in his recent interviews, he seems to believe he knows the most about the case law out of anyone. Maybe he should just fire his council and represent himselfAs stylistically fucked up as Ty's filings have been at times, Lemoine's are at least equally as bad and the arguments are worse. If I'd give Ty's filings in the appeal a C-, Lemoine's are hovering between D and F and are easily the worst in the entire case, from the trial court to now. Erick's are second worst.
Tbf, based on the way Mr. Toye's been talking in his recent interviews been talking in his recent interviews, he seems to believe he knows the most about the case law out of anyone. Maybe he should just fire his council and represent himself
True, but in his mania of control he seems to forgot that his personal fucking fiance has even accused Vic of that and he "chose to stand by it"He still literally doesn't even know what "sexual assault" means.
Not sure if arguing for or against him representing himselfHe still literally doesn't even know what "sexual assault" means.
