Disaster The world's first solar road has officially crumbled into a total failure - "At least we tried"

Source.
1566076008618.png


In July, the French daily newspaper Le Monde reported that the 0.6-mile (1 kilometre) solar road was a fiasco.

In December 2016, when the trial road was unveiled, the French Ministry of the Environment called it "unprecedented". French officials said the road, made of photovoltaic panels, would generate electricity to power streetlights in Tourouvre, a local town.

But less than three years later, a report published by Global Construction Review says France's road dream may be over. Cracks have appeared, and in 2018, part of the road had to be demolished due to damage from wear and tear.

Even at its peak, the road was only producing half of the expected energy, because engineers didn't take into consideration rotting leaves falling on the road.

Here what the road looked like in all of its former glory, and how it got to this point.

1566076028004.png


It was all smiles and high hopes in 2016, when the world's first solar panel road, called Wattway, opened. France spent US$5.2 million on 0.6 miles (1 kilometre) of road, and 30,000 square feet (3,000 square metres) of solar panels. It was hailed as the longest solar road in the world.

Media gathered around to take a walk down what was thought to be the road of the future. The French minister for energy said she wanted to have solar panels on one mile of road every 621 miles in the country within the next five years.

Despite grey skies on the day of the inauguration, France was leading the world for solar transportation.

But the brake was never removed, and the wheels never started rolling - so to speak.

It was a bold move beginning a solar panel trial in Normandy, France, since the region doesn't have the most sunshine. Caen, a city in Normandy, only has 44 days of strong sunshine in a year. Thunderstorms also reportedly broke solar panels on the road.

The trial road was meant to produce about 150,000 kWh a year, which is enough power to provide light for up to 5,000 people, every day. Instead, it was making just under 80,000 in 2018, and fewer than 40,000 by July 2019.

Colas, the company that built the road, said in 2016 that the solar panels were covered with resin containing sheets of silicon to make them capable of withstanding all traffic. But since the opening, panels have come loose or broken into little pieces.

In May 2018, 300 feet (90 metres) of the road had to be demolished since it wasn't salvageable.

1566076045200.png


The engineers also didn't take into account the effects of leaves, which caused damage and limited the amount of electricity the panels could produce. They also didn't think about the pressure and weight from tractors, two locals told Le Monde.

And now the trial looks like it's all over. Wattway's managing director Etienne Gaudin told Le Monde that it would not be going to market.

"Our system is not mature on long distance traffic," he said. The company would focus on creating electricity for smaller things, like CCTV cameras and lighting bus shelters.
A damn shame, really. I think it's a pretty cool idea, it just needs to evolve over time.

As a gearhead, by the time this technology is perfected, I wonder if burnouts would be even more illegal than what they currently are?

 
How do these people lack such critical thinking skills?

Critical thinking is what an UNCARING person does! Because they're always telling me how my ideas won't work!

Telling me unicorns aren't real when I FEEL THEY ARE!


It's why environmentalism is so cultist in it's behavior, people with actual solutions are chased off as not being pure. While those who propose impossible laws and regulations like the GND are hailed as heroes because they mean so well....

What's better, the fact we can cut power plant emissions 10% by installing this actual technology, or that we could cut fossil fuel use 100% if we dump millions on this guy who says he's only 2 years from the solution but Big Energy(tm) is suppressing him?

I think we know which one is BETTER!

Modern environmentalists try to make the utopic plan work through good vibes instead of sweating and breaking their backs to get an actual measurable result.
 
I don't get how anyone can look at a normal road, which is made of FUCKING ROCKS, and all the cracks and potholes on it and think, "You know what? I'm sure this would be fine made out of glass and plastic and never be even scuffed up too bad to let light pass through it to a bunch of solar panels, much less cracked all to pieces."

Large-scale solar panel deployments? Sure, whatever. But put them above the road, or next to the road, somewhere that doesn't have huge-ass trucks rumbling around on top of it.
 
Modern environmentalists try to make the utopic plan work through good vibes instead of sweating and breaking their backs to get an actual measurable result.
Modern environmentalists are idiot rubes that just regurgitate whatever nonsense their handlers tell them. They are an unthinking mob that can be wound up and thrown at whatever project didn't grease the right palms. It's never about the environment, ever, it's about who gets what and funneling money in to the right people's pockets.

On the solar thing. It is on the margins and will always be. The only way to make it work would be massive energy storage capability, but if we could do that we would use it in conjunction with a more economical energy production method, not solar.
 
Modern environmentalists are idiot rubes that just regurgitate whatever nonsense their handlers tell them. They are an unthinking mob that can be wound up and thrown at whatever project didn't grease the right palms. It's never about the environment, ever, it's about who gets what and funneling money in to the right people's pockets.

On the solar thing. It is on the margins and will always be. The only way to make it work would be massive energy storage capability, but if we could do that we would use it in conjunction with a more economical energy production method, not solar.
theyre a bunch of watermelons. green on the outside, red on the inside, and their head is mostly full of water.
 
SOLar FrEAKin ROaDwAYs

Seriously, everybody who threw money at this horseshit should be tarred and feathered and exiled from polite society. This shit was the epitome of "LOOK AT HOW TECHY AND STUFF THIS IS! ITS TOTALLY GONNA BE THE FUTURE GUIZ!" spin covering up an idea objectively dumber than turning nuclear power plants into fucking microbreweries.

For those who dont want to watch that ultrasperg Thunderf00t's series on this shit, basically the sheer expense of this idea in practice in the US alone to rip up every fucking road and replace every square inch with glass and delicate and expensive electrical componants would be IIRC greater than the amount of money that actually exists on the planet right now, and thats before you get to the fact it would require more electronic component resources than exist in the global market....and thats before you consider how a road made of fucking glass and plastic would be ripped apart by friction within literal days if not hours since there is a really good fucking reason why roads are made out of asphalt given how much erosion tyres and vehicles cause on roads.

And all this just to achieve the grand result of having LED road signs and parking dividers that light up at night as opposed to turning on your freakin headlights....jesus fucking christ they got MILLIONS donated for this embarrassing pig swill

Also all the celeb fucktards like wil wheaton and nathon fillon who endorsed this shit should straight up be skinned alive

You threw money at this via federal taxes.

Modern environmentalists are idiot rubes that just regurgitate whatever nonsense their handlers tell them. They are an unthinking mob that can be wound up and thrown at whatever project didn't grease the right palms. It's never about the environment, ever, it's about who gets what and funneling money in to the right people's pockets.

On the solar thing. It is on the margins and will always be. The only way to make it work would be massive energy storage capability, but if we could do that we would use it in conjunction with a more economical energy production method, not solar.

Most environmentalists are extremely wasteful people following a trend. The buy the latest "green new thing" and then throw it out a month later.
 
You threw money at this via federal taxes.



Most environmentalists are extremely wasteful people following a trend. The buy the latest "green new thing" and then throw it out a month later.

You never forget the first time you see a "Save the Planet" bumper stikcer on a Hummer H2....
 
I paid very little attention to SOLAR ROADWAYS when people were raving about them so I just assumed they'd work like the Korean example posted for pretty limited select stretches of road. I had no idea people were retarded enough to actually try and make the fucking roads themselves out of solar panels.
 
That's not entirely true, some solar power generation techniques (using them to power steam turbines for example,) absolutely are economically viable and are done commerically. Nuclear is still the way to go in terms of efficiency and cost efficacy though.
This. It's really just photovoltaics that suck and I don't know where the obsession for them comes from. It's almost like there's a politically motivated group with lots of money that wants the west buying tons of rare earth metals...
 
This. It's really just photovoltaics that suck and I don't know where the obsession for them comes from. It's almost like there's a politically motivated group with lots of money that wants the west buying tons of rare earth metals...


It is fairly hilarious that people will reject nuclear because it's "Big Energy" but then ignore the fact that a lot of money has been poured into Renewables that they are part of "Big Energy" Hell most of the leaders of Green parties around the world have massive investment in renewable companies that they will fight for it for monetary reasons alone.
 
Then I've mixed something up and should be disregarded.


I believe Rare Earth minerals tend to be used for other renewable such as Wind Turbines and energy storage, the flaw with the most Solar Panels outside of less efficient flexible ones (Such as ones found in calculators) is that manufacturing of them uses toxic heavy metals such as Cadmium and Lead.
 
I believe Rare Earth minerals tend to be used for other renewable such as Wind Turbines and energy storage, the flaw with the most Solar Panels outside of less efficient flexible ones (Such as ones found in calculators) is that manufacturing of them uses toxic heavy metals such as Cadmium and Lead.
And China presumably has much laxer environmental regulations for this process then the West does. So I'm still correct by accident?
 
You threw money at this via federal taxes.



Most environmentalists are extremely wasteful people following a trend. The buy the latest "green new thing" and then throw it out a month later.
Bingo. I family member totaled their car and came to me for help. I found them a nice older Impreza on Craigslist that I could zero out for them with their insurance settlment. They rejected it in favor of a leased brand new Carolla hybrid because it is "better for the environment". Green marketing is a powerful drug.
It is fairly hilarious that people will reject nuclear because it's "Big Energy" but then ignore the fact that a lot of money has been poured into Renewables that they are part of "Big Energy" Hell most of the leaders of Green parties around the world have massive investment in renewable companies that they will fight for it for monetary reasons alone.
The push comes from oil and gas interests. Renewables only work if there is natural gas power stations to back them up.
 
PV cells use semiconductors, not rare earth metals.
But if you're gonna go full solar, you'll need a fuckton of batteries to store all that power for when the sun isn't shining. Lithium ion is the best battery tech we have right now, but mining lithium takes a huge toll on the environment; nuclear would actually be much cleaner than solar for mass energy production, even accounting for uranium mining and the (actually very easily handled) nuclear waste products.
 
SOLAR ROADS ARE THE FUTURE
[soyboy facial expression.jpg]
 
And China presumably has much laxer environmental regulations for this process then the West does. So I'm still correct by accident?

And regular asphalt roads are made almost entirely from recyclable materials .

Fun fact: China used more concrete in 3 years than the USA used in 250 years....
 
Atrás
Top Abajo