Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

[instythot]

I read it all. I regret it all.
The people who have to read it for their job are in for some suffering. I hope the notes the judge will get about the filing will include a footnote saying something like "please tear them to shreds for the suffering they caused".

We should check for acrostics or other coded messages from Casey to Chupp. " Summary judgment please, they stopped paying me after the first week"

 

[NotaLolyer]

If it wasn’t clear enough,

“529 pages”

529 pages of, full page, horizontal, printed links.
529 pages of Exhibit P having two paragraph printouts that get cut off.
529 pages of comments without time stamps.
529 pages of stuff that has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
529 pages of privileged defamation.

 

[Reverend]

If it wasn’t clear enough,

“529 pages”

529 pages of, full page, horizontal, printed links.
529 pages of Exhibit P having two paragraph printouts that get cut off.
529 pages of comments without time stamps.
529 pages of stuff that has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

I did print this thing out because Autistic Reasons.

You can kill someone with this if you print it single sided and in black and white. This still took an industrial printer 10minutes to slog through to get out the other end.

This massive, useless, trash pile of a document is only used to keep Staples' stock up as someone has to print and read through it.

 

[Devilish Jack o Lantern]

Sure, she deserves to be pissed at him. Doesn't mean she has to join forces with people who want to stomp his dead, cold body into the dirt and then piss on it. Her affidavit has nothing to do with the case, anyway. Yes, he was a jerk and cheated. How does this prove that he assault all of these women?

I think she has a right to be pissed at Vic, but she doesn't have the right to destroy his life over it. I also think they know her affidavit proves nothing. They only want to really fucking hurt him and she's in on it.

isn't evidence of character redundant in court?

 

[Reverend]

For months, "things are going to slow down" but nope, these exceptional people keep giving Nick stuff to talk about on stream and laugh at.

And the GoFundMe is going to increase 10-15% each time Nick talks about this case as he plugs it.

Good job Fuhrer and LowTpickens. You just made Nick more money and increased your opponents WARCHEST (say it as if it were a GWAR song) to battle your clients.

My sides have left the building. If you think PULL was a great source being cited get ready for this one.

Ver archivo adjunto 849400

I can't (but at the same time fully can) believe this Glorious Example of a PotatoPerson used his own case as an example in the TCPA filing.

 

[instythot]

isn't evidence of character redundant in court?

Not with respect to honesty

 

[NotaLolyer]

I did print this thing out because Autistic Reasons.

You can kill someone with this if you print it single sided and in black and white. This still took an industrial printer 10minutes to slog through to get out the other end.

This massive, useless, trash pile of a document is only used to keep Staples' stock up as someone has to print and read through it.

The document that was submitted to the court was in a binder if that wasn’t obvious enough by the way the digital version has the binder punch outs.

They fullstop tried to match Ron Toyes Binder of tweets with a retaliatory TCPA binder that was equally as large.

AND they still haven’t addressed WHY they’re treating it as a joint TCPA, Ron and Monica are TWO SEPARATE DEFENDANTS.

 

[7proxy]

I'm currently skimming the TCPA. Here's a scary statement from Kara Edwards on page 307:

I've typed out a statement with the things I can remember- though new memories keep popping up the more I speak to various witnesses that were there for our interactions.

Clearly, this case is full of witnesses who keep coming up with "new memories." Quoting from this article about how false memories are formed:

Many of the visual images that the subjects were asked to imagine were later misremembered as actually having been seen.

That's what's scary to me: it's possible that some of those people started believing their own shit in some sort of collective delusion. Some of them may be petty and evil liars, but others might just be fucking crazy. And if I learned anything from lolcows it's that those people will go to any lengths to live their delusion to the fullest.

 

[instythot]

I started skimming. The structure is nonsense.

They lead with the assertion that Vic is a public figure, and start the factual background with something other than facts supporting Vic being a public figure. Even if it's in there somewhere, that set of facts are the basis that this is a matter of public interest. Fucking start with that, because anything you submit until you establish that means not a god damned thing

 

[RodgerDodger]

I read it all. I regret it all.
The people who have to read it for their job are in for some suffering. I hope the notes the judge will get about the filing will include a footnote saying something like "please tear them to shreds for the suffering they caused".

I feel for you. I’m just trying to start on this thing, and it’s awful. It’s like some bad British tabloid level of bullshit. But without their editing and fact checking standards. There is actual provable published perjury in here. They’ve actually included affidavits from certifiable mental patients. Did Lemonhead not even do a cursory google search before adding them?

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

Putting the over/under on the page count for the response at 7 pages, excluding signatures.

I give it a max 15-20 including signatures.

 

[Reverend]

I started skimming. The structure is nonsense.

The structure looks like there are a dozen chefs in the proverbial kitchen. 3 different lawyers (Casey, LemonJello, and Tboone) had their hands in putting this all together with god knows how many paralegals. There are at least 6 Exhibit A's, 3 B's, and god knows how many photo copies of faxed documents we have. You can tell they have been sitting on this since 6/22/19 as there is copies of that date scattered throughout on the header of some pages. Is this date important?

This entire document looks so poorly assembled , in-cohesive, and unorganized that if I were a SUPER LAWYER I wouldn't put my name anywhere near it. The only thing that is decent is the first 28 pages which have the crux of the assertions.


EDIT1: Exhibit S, 3rd page. They reference Urban Dictionary for the words "Lolsuit"....holy tapdancing christ...

 

[Soviras]

I feel for you. I’m just trying to start on this thing, and it’s awful. It’s like some bad British tabloid level of bullshit. But without their editing and fact checking standards. There is actual provable published perjury in here. They’ve actually included affidavits from certifiable mental patients. Did Lemonhead not even do a cursory google search before adding them?

Take back that horrible insult to British tabloids! They are award winning writing quality in comparison. Nothing deserves a comparison to this. That comparison should count as defamation per se.

And honestly I don't think this was made by a lawyer. Funds running out might have left the Moneyless Team on their own for drafting this.

 

[Wake me up]

The people who have to read it for their job

Nobody with a job has the time to read 500 pages of a document that should be 15 pages long, even if their job is to read said document. The judge is just gonna call for a hearing instead because that's faster than reading through all of it and he can't be expected to do it.

 

[repentance]

You can tell they have been sitting on this since 6/22/19 as there is copies of that date scattered throughout on the header of some pages. Is this date important?

It might be related to their original TCPA deadline, which got extended by a fair bit because of the depositions.

 

[Reverend]

. They’ve actually included affidavits from certifiable mental patients. Did Lemonhead not even do a cursory google search before adding them?

Who?

Clearly, this case is full of witnesses who keep coming up with "new memories." Quoting from this article about how false memories are formed:

This must be related to PULL's "Dream Rape" that Vic is synonymous with doing....

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

Just pointing this out:

Lemoine apparently has never heard of George Ouzounian v. Herrera et al, let alone bothered to look up "The LOLsuit" on Google.
It's literally the first result!

 

[TexOffender]

Who?

ljmanjawllo for one. Idiot has her own thread https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jenni...lady-in-tokyo-the-sensible-progressive.57946/

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

Seeing some sperging about this elsewhere. Mostly bitching and moaning about how evil Vic is. Badly tempted to quip, 'Who is Stan Dahlin', as well as remark on the idiocy of crying about Vic's GFM (not to mention 'internet shock jock Nick Rekieta').

 

[ErbBetaPatch]

The properly identify that it came from Chuck, not Vic.

Their argument is "Chuck Huber was identified as a trustworthy person by Vic, and he wrote this thing where Vic would admit to being a sex addict, therefore he is one."