'Flash mob' steals $30,000 in merchandise from North Face store - Melanin : Predicted, Shock : Imagined.


'Flash mob' steals $30,000 in merchandise from North Face store
https://6abc.com/watch/

$30,000 in North Face merchandise stolen by 'flash mob'. Watch video of the incident from July 1, 2019.




Saturday, July 6, 2019 1:50AM
PLEASANT PRAIRIE, Wisconsin -- A Wisconsin North Face store was rushed by a group of ten people who ransacked the store in what police are describing as a "flash mob."

On July 1, 2019, an estimated $30,000 in merchandise was stolen in less than 30 seconds, police told local media.

According to Kenosha News, Sgt. Aaron Schaffer of the Pleasant Prairie Police Department said the group grabbed "as much merchandise as they could carry before running to the cars and leaving the property."

No one was injured in the incident.

Police posted photos and video of the incident hoping the public could help lead them to the suspects.



Please calmly discuss race theory below.
 
As fucked up as it sounds, I kinda hope this becomes the norm. Most of the intercity stores are likely owned by rich white liberals. Maybe this will finally be the thing which redpills them.
 
As fucked up as it sounds, I kinda hope this becomes the norm. Most of the intercity stores are likely owned by rich white liberals. Maybe this will finally be the thing which redpills them.

This was at a shopping center, not a downtown store in South Chicago where stores like that won't thrive. However, if intercity hoods can just drive half an hour to a suburban shopping center and bum rush it, expect shop and building owner to militarize and lockdown the area to prevent this from happening.
 
a pointless idea. business owners (especially small business) tend to heavily lean to the right already anyway.
I suppose you're right really. Most of the ones that are still lefty are likely so beyond all hope that it wouldn't matter anyway.
 
Surprised they aren't Korean, those dudes love their puffy jackets.
As they should. Warm when wet, easy to seal when a section is torn, durable, and usable in a pretty wide range of temperatures depending on the undergarments. A nice one also costs roughly $300 if not on sale, so I guess they stole about 100 of them. Puffers are amazing. Don't know why you would go with North Face instead of Patagonia though.
 
A while back, Kim du Toit (whom I've quoted on the Farms before) wrote an article which seems fairly apt.

Kim du Toit dijo:
This tragic tale reminds me of something of my own experience.

Back when I worked for the Great Big Research Company, I had a client who was VP of a large supermarket chain. One day, the local Chicago “city” newspaper (i.e. 99% Black readership) published a stinging exposé which showed that the chain’s suburban store prices were as much as a third lower than those of their inner-city stores.

Cue a visit from an irate “community organizer” (I don’t know which one, but I sure hope it was one Barack Obama) who demanded to see the VP, wanting to know why “his people” were being “gouged” by the (obviously) racial practice of discriminatory pricing.

The VP (a tough little Irish bastard from the South Side) then explained the facts of life to the “organizer”, thus:

“We’re in business to make a profit. Our inner-city stores have a lower profit than our suburban stores because of what we call ‘stock shrink’ — which is a nice name for ‘theft’, or ‘shoplifting’. Suburban stores typically have a shrink percentage of less than 2% — in other words, less than two percent of sales are lost each year to theft. In our inner-city stores, that percentage loss is over ten times as much — between 12 and 14 percent. We have to make up the lost sales and profits somehow, and so we put our prices up in those stores to make up the difference. If we didn’t put up the prices, the stores would have to be closed altogether. So,” he concluded, “if you don’t want your people to pay those higher prices or find the stores have closed, you need to tell your people to stop stealing from our stores. And that’s the end of the story. Was there anything else?”
This happened about thirty years ago. Nowadays, of course, he’d be imprisoned for telling the truthbeing so racially insensitive.

I miss the old days so much…
And that's how you run off chain stores and destroy locally-owned businesses. It's like ghetto rats are being issued a manual in how to fuck themselves, their family, and their homies up over the long term, and mindlessly follow it. Did the fucking Irish ever behave this way? Or the Chinese?
 
As fucked up as it sounds, I kinda hope this becomes the norm. Most of the intercity stores are likely owned by rich white liberals. Maybe this will finally be the thing which redpills them.
It won't be. All they'll do is close the store(s) having this problem and jack up prices everywhere else to compensate.
 
Anyone surprised? Niggers stealing shit from brands made for nigger-tier humans.
Get something better.

Also why don't these nogs steal from luxury brand stores such as LV?
Simple, they have guards with guns. Wanna deter a pack of monkeys stealing shit? Have someone armed on premise, or just toss a banana outside.

Chad melonated Kang VS Virgin Criminal Nignog

This should be the norm. The police are now so cucked that rightfully putting down savage animals carries the easily outraged white liberal media whining about raycizm. The police should just hire blacks who are sick of the scummy niggers in their group, since they have nothing to fear when they rightfully put these subhuman trash down.
 
Última edición:
A while back, Kim du Toit (whom I've quoted on the Farms before) wrote an article which seems fairly apt.


And that's how you run off chain stores and destroy locally-owned businesses. It's like ghetto rats are being issued a manual in how to fuck themselves, their family, and their homies up over the long term, and mindlessly follow it. Did the fucking Irish ever behave this way? Or the Chinese?


I don't know much about economics, but wouldn't jacking up the prices in a neighbourhood where people couldn't afford them just lead to more theft or at the very least, less sales?
 
A while back, Kim du Toit (whom I've quoted on the Farms before) wrote an article which seems fairly apt.

And that's how you run off chain stores and destroy locally-owned businesses. It's like ghetto rats are being issued a manual in how to fuck themselves, their family, and their homies up over the long term, and mindlessly follow it. Did the fucking Irish ever behave this way? Or the Chinese?

No, they didn't, because the Irish way of doing things is to blame yourself for not being strong enough, pull up your pants, take a shot of whiskey, and get on with your day because no one else is going to do it for you and everyone's going to say it's your fault anyway, so succeeding is your way of giving the entire planet a middle finger.

This should be the norm. The police are now so cucked that rightfully putting down savage animals carries the easily outraged white liberal media whining about raycizm. The police should just hire blacks who are sick of the scummy niggers in their group, since they have nothing to fear when they rightfully put these subhuman trash down.

You'd never know it because the media won't cover it, but there's a big push by the black community to force this issue. I know this because I've met some of the guys trying to do it on the local level. They really want to address the actual problems in the community and more importantly, get them to stop blaming everyone else for their fucking problems. The issue is that a lot of the current generation come from broken homes and there's ten fucktons of people within the black community actively trying to keep that community down.
 
Última edición:
I don't know much about economics, but wouldn't jacking up the prices in a neighbourhood where people couldn't afford them just lead to more theft or at the very least, less sales?

Possibly, but OTOH it's selling food, the textbook example of inelastic demand. People aren't going to not buy food just because it costs more, and if they were going to steal it they'd steal it if it was cheaper anyway.

You also wouldn't raise the price of staple goods (because "evil store charges poor people through the noise for basic goods" is bad PR no matter how bad the shrinkage is), you'd make up the differance by jacking up the price on other stuff that people can go without but will still buy. If you're losing 10% of your profits because people are constantly stealing ceral and milk, you raise that price a bit, but you double the cost of stuff like beer. People will still by beer, perhaps less of it but as long as you make up the differance in volume via higher sales revenue, that doesn't matter.
 
The large city north of that outlet mall had a beautiful mall (Mall #1) on the Northwest side at one time. Now it's derelict and scheduled to be torn down (but the owners are trying to stop that). Another mall (Mall #2) on the Northeast side near a more wealthy suburb is also going through yet another renaissance (supposedly). and the reasoning is that there are not enough shoppers.

No one ever goes into WHY there are fewer shoppers but Amazon and the Internet sure didn't cause the decline of Mall #1 - that was the projects close by whose residents were causing issues and slowly encroaching on (and eventually taking over, and decimating) the entire area.

Now Mall #2, hot off the heels of having to impose curfews for teens and after going from a classic indoor mall style to a lovely outdoor shopping enclave with restaurants and courtyards, is experiencing a decline as well. But no one will address the elephant in the room - it's the black teens.
 
The North Face, really? That was passe in NYC in the late 90s.
IKR, what is this, back to school shopping circa 1998?

This isn't new. I remember a cop from bumfuck Oklahoma talking about these melaninated redistributions 10 or so years ago. If I remember right, the stores responded by putting the targeted items behind the counter or something similar.
Go to a any store in Diver City, and even fucking laundry detergent has security fobs because thugs will steal it to cut drugs.
 
I don't know much about economics, but wouldn't jacking up the prices in a neighbourhood where people couldn't afford them just lead to more theft or at the very least, less sales?
I think that's where the "food desert" sob piece comes from. Stores don't stay open where jacking prices enough to make up for shrinkage wards customers away anyway. The mom and pops sadly go out of business and retire. The chain stores sacrifice 3 locations in the hood because their 8 locations in the suburbs make money for a lot cheaper. If inelastic demand is goods that people will buy no matter what, well, then inelastic supply is stores writing off certain neighborhoods as not worth their effort because the profit margins just aren't attractive no matter how you tweak your business model.

You'd never know it because the media won't cover it, but there's a big push by the black community to force this issue. I know this because I've met some of the guys trying to do it on the local level. They really want to address the actual problems in the community and more importantly, get them to stop blaming everyone else for their fucking problems. The issue is that a lot of the current generation come from broken homes and there's ten fucktons of people within the black community actively trying to keep that community down.
The last thing the media wants is to give attention to blacks who want themselves and their communities to be better because that requires first admitting black communities need to change something about themselves, which is kryptonite to a woke white media/socjus outrage industry that needs them to stay destitute and shitty so they can monetize their own heroism. You can't look like a hero for saving the poor deer with the broken leg when the deer are swatting you away and telling you to leave them alone because your constant hobbling the deer population with casts on their legs is what leads to them being unable to break the poverty cycle in the first place. I hate to even mention race and refer to socjus as all white people but in this case it's just true, I've met plenty of black people of every political persuasion who still say that socjus is just privileged white people fighting other white people for woke points and using the illusion of black victimhood to do it without ever asking real black people how they feel about it and refusing to address any black community issue that can't be "solved" by a white college kid signing a petition or tweeting the right tag.
 
Niggers will steal your eyeballs and come back for your sockets
 
Atrás
Top Abajo