Woman charged with raping female roommate at Susquehanna University - In other news: feminists and PoundMeToo movements surprisingly quiet.


801481


A Bronx co-ed has been charged with raping her female roommate at Susquehanna University, police said.

Pratigya Thakur, a 19-year-old sophomore, was arrested Monday on charges of rape, indecent assault and harassment in connection with the alleged May 16 attack at the school in Selinsgrove, according to an arrest affidavit obtained by The Post.

Thakur’s roommate reported the alleged rape to university officials May 29, then told cops June 6. She said both she and Thakur drank alcohol and smoked marijuana before the alleged attack, the arrest affidavit states.

The roommate said she was singing and dancing inside their Hassinger Hall dorm room as she packed up her belongings ahead of a move into another university housing unit for the summer when she decided to lie down on Thakur’s bed because her own was covered with clothing and other possessions, the affidavit states.

The roommate said she felt Thakur touch her but thought she was “just trying to move her” so the Bronx teen could also fall asleep in her bed, police said.

The alleged victim told police she awoke to find Thakur “on top of her straddling her” before grabbing her hands and placing them on her roommate’s breasts. Thakur then started kissing her roommate and further molesting her, the alleged victim told police.

The victim said she tried to stop Thakur’s unwanted advances, putting her arms across her body, but she felt “very intoxicated and weak,” she told police.

Thakur then asked her roommate why they hadn’t “done this before,” according to the arrest affidavit, before proceeding to slap the victim in the face and call her “b—h” and “slut.” Thakur also “kept hitting” her roommate in the face with her pelvis, the victim told police.

“Victim reports at this time she closed her eyes and tried to [be] somewhere else in her mind,” the arrest affidavit continued.

The nightmarish assault kept going as Thakur raped her with her hand, causing her to bleed, the roommate said.

A university spokeswoman confirmed to The Post that Thakur was enrolled at the school for the spring semester, completing her second year of study.

“Students who are accused of being in violation of the student code of conduct go through a student conduct judicial process, which could lead to sanctions up to and including expulsion,” spokeswoman Amanda O’Rourke said in a statement. “I cannot comment specifically on the status of this incident.”

Thakur was released from custody in Pennsylvania after posting $10,000 cash bond, The Daily Item reports.

A message left on a phone listed in Thakur’s name was not returned Friday. It’s unclear if she’s hired a lawyer.
 
Brock Turner was charged with sexual battery IIRC, which is what the DA thought they could definitely get a conviction on, because 'digital penetration' wasn't included in the definition of rape, under the California criminal code, at the time. They had the choice between charging him with something that they were guaranteed to get a conviction for, so they could get a sex offender order, or having a less than 50% chance of conviction on a rape charge, and guaranteed appeals if he was convicted. ...

I'm pretty positive that any type of forceful penetration with digits, bottles, night sticks has been ruled rape both in US and back in motherland. Wasn't there a case in NYC where a bunch of police officers raped some poor bastard in custody with a night stick? That was ruled rape, as it should be.

I'm sure that great defense attorneys will use every loophole and bad definition to the advantage of their client, while people have to be content with public DA making the case.
 
I'm pretty positive that any type of forceful penetration with digits, bottles, night sticks has been ruled rape both in US and back in motherland. Wasn't there a case in NYC where a bunch of police officers raped some poor bastard in custody with a night stick? That was ruled rape, as it should be.

I'm sure that great defense attorneys will use every loophole and bad definition to the advantage of their client, while people have to be content with public DA making the case.

Under California law at the time, digital penetration wasn't included as rape, and constituted sexual battery, AFAIK. Because no element of the crime met the threshold required to become a federal crime (state lines, children, or any number of other things), the only applicable definitions were the ones in the California State Penal Code. The DA was left with the option of a slamdunk conviction for sexual battery, where they could pursue sex offender registration, or some greater than zero chance of not securing a conviction, which creates a double-jeopardy situation, with very few means of re -initiating the case.

The really stupid thing about that case (other than the shit-tier legal definitions in play at the time) was the fact that the judge was the one that got fucked over by the backlash, and NOT the DA that brought the charges, and the fact that the judge got recalled at all. The DA brought charges they could make stick, and the key goal had to have been getting Turner's name on a sexual offender registry, because as great as a custodial sentence would be to add to that, Turner can't make that registration go away. He's already tried, and been denied, so he's on that list permanently.
 
Most people in these stories freeze up and act in weird-appearing ways when they're in a violent situation because people lucky enough in to live in this country, in this period of history, encounter violence so infrequently that it's completely foreign to them what they should be feeling, let alone doing.

In essence, we act weirdly to crime and assault because we rarely encounter it and have no past experience to draw from.
 
Most people in these stories freeze up and act in weird-appearing ways when they're in a violent situation because people lucky enough in to live in this country, in this period of history, encounter violence so infrequently that it's completely foreign to them what they should be feeling, let alone doing.

In essence, we act weirdly to crime and assault because we rarely encounter it and have no past experience to draw from.
Kind of funny to think of having spent time in some rough areas as being an asset.
 
Under no case is physical assault OK, if you attack someone attacking you, you're no better. Violence is never the answer.
Not sure if raised by the American School System or if trolling. Leaning toward and hoping trolling, because anyone who actually believes that probably SHOULD have the shit kicked out of them...
 
Atrás
Top Abajo