'Preference' implies a choice in the matter. Most people who identify with the sub-orientation (??) can end up sexually/physically attracted to people of either sex (or any ~ gender ~) purely due to intellectual/emotional connection, even if they had no prior history attraction to that sex/"gender". I don't know anyone who develops romantic relationships this way who gives a shit about LGBTQIXYZ or oppression points. I'm sure there are plenty out there who do play pretend with it as a self-label.
Ha ha, no, polysexuality is "attraction to multiple, but not all genders". It's a subsitute for "bisexuality" as that reinforces the gender binary.
I’d assume that polysexual means multiple partners at once, whereas pansexual means attraction to anything (and lol, I highly doubt that) but only one at a time. Of course there’s a lot of crossover. For example a polysexual might have relationships and STDs from multiple people at once, where a pansexual will only pass STDs on to one person at a time no matter if they are a man, woman, trans, or bitter that they have no other personality traits other than their nounself pronouns.
The technical definition is that you don’t experience sexual attraction whatsoever until you develop a close relationship with the person. There’s also a counterpart regarding the split attraction model called “demiromantic” that applies to romantic attraction, whatever the hell that means.
No that would be polyamory. “Polysexual” would supposedly exist between pansexual and bisexual. Only one of those is even worth an identity and label, however
No that is polyamory.
What are some examples?
