💰 Grifter Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Not sure we are thinking of the same moment, but Ty very clearly said "nothing is finalized" at some point.
I can't easily just get updates on it if it's filed in state court. If it's in the Eastern District of Texas, though, here's their RSS:

You can use an RSS filter to track anything involving Mignogna if it is filed there. It doesn't seem it has been yet.
Thanks for the follow up guys, as a non lawyer any info is greatly appreciated and i only ask as i know Anominous has provided fantastic information in the past.
:semperfidelis:
 
I think Marchi has now checked out of reality.

684805


Need to save this one for posterity.

 
Just went and saved a bunch of threads where Jamie Marchi made in response to this. Boy is she panicking.

 
Última edición por un moderador:
Meanwhile, Marchi has accomplished only this much in 6 days. Last donation was a day ago. VicKicksBack is making more than that per day. No way these cunts are winning in the court of public opinion.

684821
 
I'm sure that Marchi is capable enough of representing herself in court. You harassers should know shame talking to Marchi when she's a strong independent woman who needs no soy.
 
Justice Boner™ is now at 96%. I think it just accelerated a little bit because of the stream.

Ver archivo adjunto 684808
Meanwhile, Marchi has accomplished only this much in 6 days. Last donation was a day ago. VicKicksBack is making more than that per day. No way these cunts are winning in the court of public opinion.

Ver archivo adjunto 684821
The Virgin Legal Defense Fund - VS - The Chad Legal War Chest
 
Meanwhile, Marchi has accomplished only this much in 6 days. Last donation was a day ago. VicKicksBack is making more than that per day. No way these cunts are winning in the court of public opinion.

Ver archivo adjunto 684821

If that's their combined legal fund, they're not even going to be able to afford a retainer.
 
Nick suggested that the people who deleted tweets (or their entire accounts) after being made aware that a lawsuit is coming might be in trouble for that on top of everything else, so it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.
 
Nick suggested that the people who deleted tweets (or their entire accounts) after being made aware that a lawsuit is coming might be in trouble for that on top of everything else, so it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.
They (as in a jury) have to assume the worse about anything that is deleted so it would be incredibly unwise to delete anything.
 
Nick suggested that the people who deleted tweets (or their entire accounts) after being made aware that a lawsuit is coming might be in trouble for that on top of everything else, so it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.

Twitter will have any of that if they get subpoenas for it.

However, the fact they tried to destroy it will be admissible in cross examination about it should they deny anything contradicted by it, possibly admissible as evidence in its own right, as evidence from which a jury can draw a permissible inference that their motivation for attempting to destroy the evidence was that it would tend to disprove their case.

They (as in a jury) have to assume the worse about anything that is deleted so it would be incredibly unwise to delete anything.

They don't have to, but it's a permissible inference, i.e. the plaintiff can introduce the fact of deletion as evidence and argue in front of the jury that they should infer a deceptive motive to it. If they actually destroyed the evidence, the jury could infer that the evidence destroyed would have been bad for the defendant.

Also, as a sanction, that is, a punishment, if the court found the destruction to constitute spoliation or deliberate and impermissible destruction of evidence, the court could order that the factual issue it related to simply be flat out decided against the party who destroyed the evidence, or even in extreme situations, strike the party's legal arguments, claims, or defenses, or even outright just rule against them in the whole case.
 
Última edición:
The Virgin Legal Defense Fund - VS - The Chad Legal War Chest
I want to see the virgin Shane VS the chad Ty memes
  • Chain smokes cigarettes, drinks soy milk, shoe for dinner, abused chair, can't finish sentences, wikipedia law degree, needs help from discord, no arguments
VS
  • Drinks straight 'Duke' Kentucky bourbon, beautiful $2k leather chair, practicing law for 22y, black belt, live hand grenade, played 40k before you were born, MENSA, authored book used by the RAND corporation +more
 
Atrás
Top Abajo