Honestly, with her penchant for vanity searching, if someone made a thread on her it'd be funny if she came in and chimped. Falvie for esteemed Animal Control guest 2018?
That's how the furry art economy works. Who cares if some other artist has a similar/better style, cheaper price, and actually finishes their commissions when you can commission popufurs. In the furry fandom, getting a commission from a popular artist is seen as a thing to be proud of.
The Great Autistic "You're Stweawing Mwy Stwywe" Wars Continue, featuring scpkid this time.
The accused has their account on lockdown, but honestly? Their art isn't that similar, unless scpkid wants to copyright vaguely canine animals facing right. Plenty of people emulate this shittily-lined, fat, cartoony, sloppy uwu cute artstyle and don't get in trouble, so I have no idea why scpkid honed in on this one individual. Maybe because they actually execute anatomy the slightest bit better. There was actually the same wishy washy vagueposting about the same person a few months ago, maybe I'll hunt it down later.
Ver archivo adjunto 469481
Ver archivo adjunto 469483
http://archive.is/uJqQp (tweet thread)
As you can see there's some really big stylistic and anatomical difference that develops in the later images. For someone who makes as much off their shitty art as scp does, I'm honestly dumbfounded as to why bother at all. I can think of at least five pretty well off copycats/similar artists who haven't gotten the same treatment.
Apparently Sweet n Treat was caught vaguing but I missed it and didn't screenshot. Sad!
That's exactly what I said. Even scp's own partner has a strikingly similar art style.
They didn't steal shit. If you go on aliexpress stores will sell chinese knockoffs of existing fursuits that look like that but use an image of the real, actually good fursuit.
I swear the majority of furries never learn to actually draw, just how to mimic a style and the one animalistic purpose it has.That's exactly what I said. Even scp's own partner has a strikingly similar art style.
It's only missing the weird fat tumor legs.
Well, again, the fandom is nothing. The only thing it produces is ego, and having half as many drawings at twice the price just because the artist's name is recognizable is how most prefer to run their popu-business.
They didn't steal shit. The person who made the original suit still has the original suit. All they did was buy a shitty bootleg off a chinese website. The original still exists, which is the same exact reason piracy isn't theft either.
This. Really, i don't understand why furries think that their art is somehow a big dmca bait when in actuality a judge would scoff at any case about it.
Falvie thread when
