- Registrado
- 16 de Nov, 2014
$250,000 is pretty steep, do you guys think he’d settle for a pack of cheese slices and other old shit I found in the fridge?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
He might pass a background check if they failed to enter him in the system, but it would still be illegal for him to attempt to purchase a gun. If he buys one and goes public, it would be reasonable to tell the ATF. I wouldn't even call that weening; he might be an actual threat.I'm pretty sure one of the California things was a 5150, though, and that would preclude him buying a gun unless he went through a fairly time consuming process. This is of course assuming they actually kept good records, which is not always the case.
A Waco on the Internet is exactly what we're worried about, actually. LOLWhile he wasn't arrested for the McCain thin he did get a record note for it, he did have a physical face to face with someone over it as well so it wasn't just a waco on the internet
I bet LanDUI would take his case!You have to bring us to court before we can "settle out of court" retard. Good luck finding an equally retarded lawyer to take your case.
Maybe Phil sees spreading disease like the followers of Nurgle thinking the plagues they bestow are "gifts?"
the 5150, which refers to the portion of the Welfare and Institutions Code that was made by the Lanterman–Petris–Short Act, describes in several sections how someone may be investigated and detained for psychiatric evaluation. it isn't an arrest, and the person is not a criminal. nothing in the act makes the person a prohibited person under federal law (as those are already defined in USC Title 18 922g). however in CA (and some other states), a determination of custody under 5150.3 can be a temporary prohibition against possessing firearms for up to five years in that state....The SS just checks you out if you get on their radar like he did, and he probably came across as a harmless sped at the time rather than a serious threat. I'm pretty sure one of the California things was a 5150, though, and that would preclude him buying a gun unless he went through a fairly time consuming process.
USC Title 18 922 (g) dijo:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
(4) who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;
OR, WA, AZ, NV, and CA have roughly the same language as the Lanterman–Petris–Short Act (in California). this sort of thing happened in the 70's and was widespread across the US with minor variations under different names and enacted in different time frames. by 1981 all states had some sort of involuntary psychiatric evaluation custodial hold in some form or another.I think one of his Oregon things was also an involuntary 72 hour hold of some sort, but I know less about that.
correct somewhat. in OR, the Public Records Unit (a department of the state's DoJ, FB) conducts a background check against 3 primary databases (criminal convictions, arrest records, and general background which has things like prior addresses). a CHL (and some other things) has the additional requirement of classwork/certification, and an in-person interview.I think it's possible he's in a situation in Oregon where he could buy a gun but not get a concealed carry permit.
in the US, if you are never convicted in court, your arrest records only show a pattern of poorly thought out behavior - it doesn't otherwise impact your life in any meaningful way outside of very specific employment or duties/responsibilities....He's had a number of voluntary and involuntary holds, Phils been a frequent flyer of the medical systems in both states several times. While he was released it's a cumulative thing on instance may be able to be written off or fall through the cracks but he's had several in a relatively short time, that is not a good indicator and will preclude him from gun ownership for the foreseeable at any rate but I will let
@Club Sandwich someone who's come across Phil in a professional context an expert on one of the States gunlaws answer that one far better than I could.
i agree wholeheartedly, i think Phil has some magical thinking that a gun is a talisman: merely possessing it may give him some power over others. sadly more competent people than Phil think the same way.I think Gunownership to him is a Scary Power fantasy...
Music video posts are pretty cheap, but this part made me laugh.Oh, what devious thoughts are brewing in that Arby's logo-shaped head.
what bike, cheese, or tattoo is over $250,000 ?I've seen mental patients less delusional than spud.
Plus I don't think 250k is going to cover all of what he wants to buy.