LGBT 9/04/2014 Chris claims discrimination

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Última edición por un moderador:
It's funny that the manager lady banned him from two Wal-Marts at once (if you believe Chris, anyway). Whatever he did during that whole incident must have been pretty cataclysmic. :briefs:

This is serious business though. Chris's sweetboy is probably a Person of Wal-Mart, and being banned from there is going to put a serious crimp in their relationship.
... well, another one. :pickle:
 
Well apologizing and begging haven't worked *sigh*
I guess it's time to run over the manager? :evil::alog:
 
So guess who's asking for help to Human Rights because Walmart won't unban him?... yeah:

QCXgqD5.png


How long it took him to ask the LGBT community for help because he felt being discriminated (when that's not remotely the case)?

So, Miss [REDACTED] is the new Michael Snyder in Chris' black little Grinchy heart now, is she?

c0130361188ae8ed69b9973513304643-orig

Rise up, Lesbians! Rise up and smash the evil Manajerk! March onward towards Victory For Chris!!

"Honest impulse" I think, your suggestions make too much sense.

What a CWC Impulse looks like:
Anthos_Sharp-dressed.png
 
dude says he understands why he was banned in one breath, then proves he doesn't in the next
 
It's funny that the manager lady banned him from two Wal-Marts at once (if you believe Chris, anyway). Whatever he did during that whole incident must have been pretty cataclysmic. :briefs:
This makes me wonder about what he actually did (aside from defacing some property). As others have pointed out after a month or so Fatty could of walked back in and if he could resist acting like a tard, he could of continued shopping there. Even if a manager did recognize him as long as he wasn't doing anything stupid all they would of likely done was keep a close eye on him for a while and let him be. Instead he's still banned from wal-mart. Still banned. How the hell does one do that? Wal-Mart gets all kind of weirdos and nutjobs going through it's doors, some of them do wind up getting kicked out for acting like exceptional individuals but after a month or two are able to come back as long as they behave. So how the hell did Chris manage to receive what seems to be a perma-ban from wal-mart?
 
This makes me wonder about what he actually did (aside from defacing some property). As others have pointed out after a month or so Fatty could of walked back in and if he could resist acting like a tard, he could of continued shopping there. Even if a manager did recognize him as long as he wasn't doing anything stupid all they would of likely done was keep a close eye on him for a while and let him be. Instead he's still banned from wal-mart. Still banned. How the hell does one do that? Wal-Mart gets all kind of weirdos and nutjobs going through it's doors, some of them do wind up getting kicked out for acting like exceptional individuals but after a month or two are able to come back as long as they behave. So how the hell did Chris manage to receive what seems to be a perma-ban from wal-mart?

Didn't you read his post his is autistic and a lesbian (trapped in a male body) and transgenderled. Which happens to be the only types of people Wal*Mart doesn't want money from
 
So guess who's asking for help to Human Rights because Walmart won't unban him?... yeah:

QCXgqD5.png


How long it took him to ask the LGBT community for help because he felt being discriminated (when that's not remotely the case)?
1275389857_naked-gun-facepalm.gif
Hey, I'm also autistic (stealing the limelight by having Aspergers), does this mean that I can burn down a Chuck E Cheese's because I had a bad day at work making cotton candy for nine straight hours? I think NOT, but according to Chris I could get away with it?
Go! generalmeldor! Go out and flame to the extreme!

It's obvious by his post that he doesn't/refuses to understand why he was banned, so I think it's another Game Place situation: lots of smaller problems that kept getting worse until they were actively looking for a reason to kick him out. Of course, being Chris, he not only gave them an excuse, he practically gift wrapped it for them by making it an actual crime.
 
God do I ever want to see that letter of apology he wrote.

I like to imagine it went something like this:

Wallmart Manager, I've slept on it, and I have realized that Hex-box defacing is not the way to get attention. And I don't really want to meet with either you nor the Hex-box display, no offense. I'll tell you what, let's forget the meeting, and if you will allow me to come back to Walmart, I will do all of the following:

-I will never write "H" on Hex-box displays again.
-I'll consider unbanning you from life.
-I'll consider knocking you up my Scale of Respect by 2 points (0=No Respect...10=Respect).

Please reply via snail maill.

Christian "KaKa" C.

But seriously, its amazing how long it took Chris to realize that he could use the "Tomgirl card" the same way that he uses his austism. As a pass for his bad behaviour and an excuse to feel victimized even more. Pretty soon, America's favorite pasttime will be "kick the Tomgirl identified lesbian".
 
I called it, I knew he was full of shit when he actually claimed to be transgender. That's the thing with Chris, he has no sense of anything so he can't keep up a ruse for long since he'll make his goal clear almost immediately (see: every "apology" ever)
 
You'd think in a store with something vital to your mother's health, you'd NOT go out of your way to deface the store because you really don't wanna get banned.
Let's face it, his problem with the ban has nothing to do with Barb.
Of course it doesn't, but that doesn't mean he won't use her as an excuse for why he shouldn't be banned. As long as it makes the manager look like the villain, it's fair game to Chris.
 
Man child + vandalism x banned for life = discrimination against autism and LGBT rights.

Man, you have to stretch to come up with that form of logic. But we all know how far he'll go to avoid taking 100 percent of the blame.

Of course, only Chris can get away with such claims in his mind.
"Won't lift a ban on me for property damage even after I said sorry? Discrimination!"

"Took me to court because I violated a ban and hit him with my car when he tricked me by making me assume he didn't work there anymore? Discrimination!"

"Banned me for soliciting at *insert place here*, yet I am not a solicitor of any kind and they got in the way of my sweatheart search!? DISCRIMINATION!!!"

And like always, things just don't work the same the other way around. When Chris says foul, he's in the right. When someone else says foul, their a no good troll who just wants to play kick the autistic.
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo