Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

Assuming "woof woof" really meant public sex... is public sex porn illegal? Like, doing it in public is illegal, but idk if there's a law against having a video of ppl fucking in public.
 
Assuming "woof woof" really meant public sex... is public sex porn illegal? Like, doing it in public is illegal, but idk if there's a law against having a video of ppl fucking in public.

Unlikely, but why would her story suddenly be consistent now? It never was before.

My 2 cents is that she wanted people to think he was into beastiality, everyone called that out as fucking stupid and rated her autistic and dumb and then someone suggested she meant "woofing", and she went "YEP THAT'S WHAT I MEANT THAT'S IT", hence why the earlier "this kind of porn is illegal" comment makes no sense.
 
Unlikely, but why would her story suddenly be consistent now? It never was before.

My 2 cents is that she wanted people to think he was into beastiality, everyone called that out as fucking stupid and rated her autistic and dumb and then someone suggested she meant "woofing", and she went "YEP THAT'S WHAT I MEANT THAT'S IT", hence why the earlier "this kind of porn is illegal" comment makes no sense.

Just like the rape allegations that got walked back as soon as people noticed the inconsistencies.
 
Just like the rape allegations that got walked back as soon as people noticed the inconsistencies.

It's happened with virtually everything she said. I will say, I'm at the point where I might be able to believe that Phil did indeed hire her once and she's been at his place, but she keeps spewing so much bullshit that it's obvious everything else is fabrication, and even that part might be untrue. She keeps saying things that sound like she's been there, but it's not verifiable unless you're Phil and even if Phil denied it, he's a known liar so it wouldn't matter.
 
It's happened with virtually everything she said. I will say, I'm at the point where I might be able to believe that Phil did indeed hire her once and she's been at his place, but she keeps spewing so much bullshit that it's obvious everything else is fabrication, and even that part might be untrue. She keeps saying things that sound like she's been there, but it's not verifiable unless you're Phil and even if Phil denied it, he's a known liar so it wouldn't matter.

That's what makes all of this so intriguing and interesting IMO. If all the answers were laid bare it would be too bland for my tastes. No one should get so hung up on any of this.
 
I find it funny that despite the lack of evidence to back any of those ridiculous claims and the grotesque of every new accusation that was thrown by that fake escort, we've still had so many members believing this autistic tale.
I, for one, am glad to have been scolded publicly, branded autistic and cast away from the original thread.
 
Just like the rape allegations that got walked back as soon as people noticed the inconsistencies.
That came from a troll who tricked her. It's sort of weird that she'd fall for shit like that if it was trolling, tbh. Jace was impossible to troll unless he was in on it.
 
Why do you care?

Don't want to speak on their behalf, but for people who know Phil's previous, the guy thrives off drama and would have died years ago without something to play up and get pity bucks from.

The only thing MW accomplished was fill Phil's pockets. For all the glee these boards had that despite the fact he'd raised so much money, his taxes were fake and he was actually paying MW - his taxes are probably still fake, he didn't have to pay MW, and he made 10k last month from the backlash.
 
As expected, the MW was fake. If possible I'd like to know how Null and Neger were so convinced that the one that ran the site was the same person that ran the twitter account, since I think that's what convinced most people to take it at face value.
Everyone that got banned was right. We can relish in the fact that we're slightly less autistic than the believers
 
Vidar & DSP must be pissing themselves laughing at how this played out. I still don't get the logic of ending the dox campaign considering it had little to do with MW in the first place.
 
As expected, the MW was fake. If possible I'd like to know how Null and Neger were so convinced that the one that ran the site was the same person that ran the twitter account, since I think that's what convinced most people to take it at face value.
Everyone that got banned was right. We can relish in the fact that we're slightly less autistic than the believers

In defence of Null and Neger, the entire situation was 'take or leave it' - something they both said numerous times. They verified that the person on here, the account on Twitter and the owner of the site appeared to be the same person and saw fit to verify with a degree of certainty that was correct.

That can be done by being able to change / post things on each account to show they control each element. At no point have they ever said 'she sent a verifiable picture/video proving she is the person in the photos' and that was made clear. What weight people put on this verification and the subsequent egging on of the board to believe tidbits of info is on individuals. A few subconscious 'filling in of the blanks' let this go on longer than it should.

There should be no relishing anything - those of us who didn't buy into the story might be less autistic, but we all take the L.
 
In defence of Null and Neger, the entire situation was 'take or leave it' - something they both said numerous times. They verified that the person on here, the account on Twitter and the owner of the site appeared to be the same person and saw fit to verify with a degree of certainty that was correct.

That can be done by being able to change / post things on each account to show they control each element. At no point have they ever said 'she sent a verifiable picture/video proving she is the person in the photos' and that was made clear. What weight people put on this verification and the subsequent egging on of the board to believe tidbits of info is on individuals. A few subconscious 'filling in of the blanks' let this go on longer than it should.

There should be no relishing anything - those of us who didn't buy into the story might be less autistic, but we all take the L.

Eh, I'm not blaming anyone nor do I want complain, I'd just be interested to know how the troll fooled them, out of curiosity. And if they don't want to tell, I don't care, just thought it'd be another piece of information for the saga. I don't even think dwelling on this any further is worth it, now we've got the mystery of the girlfriend and how... weird DSP's depiction of her and how she met her are.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo