Highly debatable. A few reasons they might not, from your sources:
You misunderstood the point. I am saying that reports for rape are going to skew toward male victims in a prison setting because the laws 20 years ago skewed toward a penis being required to "rape." Obviously sexual assaults that result in "rape" categorization will select for men.
Again, I didn't realize the thread was primarily women (who can't understand data as a natural part of their being). When the data overwhelmingly rejects what you wish to be true, "Well, these are just self-reports, you know? Men probably rape each other way, way more, they just don't report it."
Even the study itself comments on the large discrepancies in numbers:
Why did you selectively cut off the paragraph there?
More specifically, unwanted and sexually suggestive touching of breasts, genitals, or buttocks is more typical inside prison than the act of rape itself. Second, in the vast majority of studies, male facilities have been found to have higher rates of sexual assault compared to female facilities.
15–
18 Yet the perpetrators of sexual assaults against female inmates, compared to male inmates, are less likely to involve staff.
Seems pretty relevant that it's confirming that women are sexually assaulting the women in female prisons. It also confirms men are more likely to report assault from the staff:
There were no statistically significant differences between males and females in rates of experiencing staff-on-inmate sexual violence. While female inmates were more likely to be sexually victimized by other inmates than by stafwf (21.2 vs. 7.6%), male inmates were more likely to report an incident of sexual victimization perpetrated by staff (7.6 vs. 4.3%).
Your entire post is screenshotting lone sentences without attribution that don't even challenge anything. "
So, they have to tell some reporter guy that they got fucked in the ass. Nobody likes to admit this, but men even less so, because this implies that they were turned into another man's bitch. This negatively impacts his masculinity in a way that a woman being made into another woman's bitch does not. You also had to explain that you were assaulted by a man in an in-person interview (ie: to someone's face). Bonus points that response rates aren't great:
Instead of cherry-picking whatever you can to try and reject reality, maybe read the actual studies I'm posting? Or my posts where I have already specified that exact study already controlled for this:
- Reliability: Inquiring about sexual victimization invokes feelings of stigma and shame. Previous studies have relied on face-to-face interviewing or, more commonly, self-administered pencil and paper surveys to inquire about sexual victimization in prisons. The literature indicates that computer-assisted self-administered interviews (CASI), with audio added to assist with literacy problems, are the most reliable method for eliciting information about potentially stigmatizing behavior.12,32–39
To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the prevalence of sexual victimization within a state prison system. It is also the first to use (1) a full population sampling design of approximately 20,000 inmates at 13 prisons; (2) multiple general and specific questions to measure sexual victimization; and (3) audio-CASI to administer the survey
But it doesn't matter anyway, because your refusal to acknowledge what's plain as day isn't grounded in anything but an 80 IQ. All of your responses can get a response like above, but pigeons and chess and all that.
Your
second citation isn't a research paper, it's an essay written in first person. However, the
actual paper it does cite for its numbers it doesn't necessarily do you any favours:
Where do you see that I've linked that essay?
or possibly horny boys parading real or imagined sexual conquest as a badge of honour, rather than the male/male mark of shame
As always, men can't be victims! The data must be wrong! They're lying! We need TFD.
Now, again, this is not adjusted per capita - the point is only to show that the ~90% of males reporting female victimization is either a weird outlier, a difference in reporting (this source, for instance, interprets 'invasion of privacy' to be the same as grabbing your ass') or possibly horny boys parading real or imagined sexual conquest as a badge of honour, rather than the male/male mark of shame. This is corroborated by this statistic, which is (unfortunately) not sorted by the sex of the perp/victim, but does at least confirm that the DOJ considers most reports to be unsubstantiated:
You are too math illiterate to understand the data you're discussing. "Now, again, this is not adjusted per capita" invalidates the rest. Why don't you adjust those for the prison populations?
This is corroborated by your youth source:
When you make no logical point from any established data, shoehorning in more of it doesn't "corroborate" anything.
