Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
📚 MegathreadTranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
Can it really be called a 'genocide' when they did step 1 and 2 on their own? The made their categories, see whatever the genderwiki/LGBTQ+/MOGAI wikis.
They've also been doing stage 6, polarisation, by themselves (no moderates, only extremes).
There aren't really any moderate trannies out there.
When was the last time you heard of a troon who likes to crossdress when visiting the local gay bar, but would never go into a women-only space?
Do online pooners ever claim to present in a way that they're often mistaken for men, yet freely admit that they'll never be males?
Do they call it bodily autonomy when they take their cross-sex hormones, and yet also preach that children should never be allowed to transition? That trans shit should be kept out of schools? NEVER! And if one ever did, the rest of the trans mob would cancel them in a heartbeat.
They keep pushing the very extremes of trans ideology. Troons in women's sports and rape crisis centres. Cutting our daughters' tits off or else. Deny material reality or lose your job.
This doesn't make us want to bargain, barter and somehow meet them in the middle; it shows us just how dangerous and ridiculous the trans movement truly is.
They are always extreme. They have been for over a decade. Of course most people have come to see their demands as "polarising".
Still not a genocide. (ETA: but I sometimes wish it was)
Because it’s a fetish along with an unhealthy dose of pedophilia. Men’s sexual appetites are easily manipulated into very gross areas.
This is why I can’t get behind Christian creationism. There are so very many ways where catastrophic things can go wrong, often very quickly, that I can’t buy a perfect creator overlooking. Even with sin entering the picture, which is how the explain things like fetishes and mental illness.
We're sorry. We have been so very busy perpetrating the fake genocide against indigenous children that we've not had time to properly get going on the fake genocide against the trannies. Also, we have been taking altogether too many breaks to write homoerotic-hockey bean-bait while boofing maple syrup.
Compare this to being gay or lesbian. Even if you were a bible thumping straight edger, the thought of being attracted to members of the same sex has been a part of human history.
This may have contributed to his sense of entitlement -- a self effacing mother. He applies that standard to all women because he's too retarded to understand women aren't an undistinguished glutinous mass.
You ever see someone and you immediately know he's going to be a mass shooter one day? Physiognomy Is claimed to be a pseudoscience, but I think it's underrated.
Even at "Best" being a tranny means you're mentally ill. If you truly believe you're the wrong gender than your mind is telling you something that doesn't match reality and that's insanity.
The Gendered Ape, Essay #5
HOW NATURAL IS LGBTQ+ DIVERSITY?
Florida Senator Rick Scott recently declared that “Men are men, women are women,” adding “we believe in science.” He was talking about transgender athletes.
I wish the senator did believe in science, though, because to reduce the gender palette to just two colors with nothing in between hardly works for biological sex and even less for gender expression and identity. It’s an outdated view.
Photograph: Donna is a gender-nonconforming chimpanzee of the female sex with a masculine body and habits. She often performs bluff displays side-by-side with adult males, with all her hair bristling. Donna is nonaggressive and socially well-integrated. Photograph by Victoria Horner.
The social roles of men and women are surrounded by persistent myths, often accompanied by the term “natural” as a stamp of approval and “unnatural” for patterns that we condemn. Most natural/unnatural distinctions have little grounding in biology, however. This is because biology is much more flexible than people assume. In the same way that no two trees of the same species are identical, nature is marked by high individual variability. Variability is what evolution works with. Since every individual comes with a unique genetic make-up, we can’t expect them to show the same sexual orientation and gender expression.
As American sexologist Milton Diamond is fond of putting it: “Nature loves variety, even though society hates it.”
Over five decades working with apes, I have known quite a few that acted atypically for their sex. These individuals form a minority, but nearly every group seems to have one. There are always males with less machismo than others, and always females who act tomboyish. Males who ignore the social hierarchy may be muscular giants, yet stay out of confrontations. They never reach the top, but also don’t sink to the bottom, because they are perfectly capable of defending themselves. The typical status game (and the social tensions and physical risks that it entails) is not for them.
As for the females, let me describe Donna, who grew up in a large grassy outdoor area with twenty other chimpanzees at the Field Station of the Emory Primate Center, outside of Atlanta. As a youngster, Donna always ran up to me if I walked by to engage me in a tickling match while giggling her hoarse chimpanzee laugh. She also frequently sought out the alpha male of the colony for wrestle play. This large male roughhoused daily with little males eager to test their strength against him. That Donna enjoyed the same games was the first hint that she was different.
Donna grew into a robust female who acted more masculine than any other I have known. Her genitals were those of a female, but she had the large head with rough-hewn facial features, sturdy hands and feet, and broad shoulders typical of males. Even her body hair reflected this. As in our species, male chimpanzees are the hairier sex. This allows them to look larger than life when they “go pilo” (from piloerection, or bristling hair). Donna could go pilo all over her body like a male. She furthermore acted as if she was part of the male world, charging by their side during noisy hooting displays. You’d swear you saw a full-grown male.
Individuals born as one sex, yet feeling to belong to the opposite sex, are known as transgender. Transgender persons usually turn this around and prioritize their felt identity. They were born as one sex but inside the body of the other. We have no way of applying this to Donna, because we can’t know how she perceived her gender, yet she clearly was far less feminine than other females.
Science often focuses on typical behavior, thus ignoring exceptional individuals, but once we start looking for it I’m sure we’ll find plenty of gender diversity outside our own species. This also holds for sexual orientation. Homosexual behavior is well-documented throughout the animal kingdom. In some species, such as dolphins and bonobos it is so common that I prefer to label them bisexual: they don’t seem to have a clear preference for sex with one gender or the other. In other species, homosexual behavior is less common than heterosexual behavior, but we know for penguins, sheep, monkeys, apes, and tons of other animals that such behavior regularly occurs, and not only in captive settings.
The first reports that wild male and female macaques frequently mount members of their own sex were met with disbelief and attempts to explain this behavior away (the poor monkeys must have been confused about their partners’ gender or else were only engaging in “pseudo-” or “sham-sex”), but the evidence is now overwhelming that homosexual behavior is deliberate and serves important social functions, which is why nature has added pleasure to it. It’s no accident that both dolphins and bonobos have the largest clitorises in the animal kingdom, considerably larger than those of human females.
The most important difference with other species is not so much the degree of gender diversity in our species, but the way we react to it. Other primates show none of the discomfort and intolerance that LGBTQ+ individuals face in human society. Their societies accept other individuals as they come. I have never noticed hostility towards individuals escaping typical gender patterns.
FURTHER
LGBTQ+ stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others. The "plus" represents other sexual identities including pansexual and Two-Spirit.
The variable sexual behavior of bonobos is well-documented, and here is a 2021 report on chimpanzees in the journal Behaviour: “Sociosexual behaviour in wild chimpanzees occurs in variable contexts and is frequent between same-sex partners” (brill.com/view/journals/beh/158/3-4/article-p249_3.xml)
For further details and references to the literature, read “Different: Gender Through the Eyes of a Primatologist” (Norton, 2022). A video about the book can be seen here: https://fb.watch/ffbauZBzNb/
Donna, the gender non-conforming asexual chimpanzee
Frans claims that he had seen ‘gender diversity’ within apes, with Donna a supposed gender non-conforming asexual chimpanzee being the only example he could offer. As an infant Donna apparently wrestled with adult males, when normally adult male chimps do not tolerate such behaviour from young females. As an adult Donna had big shoulders, a big head and a lot of hair, and therefore more male in appearance than female. She had, however, obvious female genitalia. Throughout life she continued to hang out with the males.
Frans described her as ‘asexual’ and said that she wasn’t interested in sex with other chimps, of either sex and therefore did not think she was a lesbian. Donna was very peaceful and well-accepted in the group.
Whether we might call Donna “trans” is beyond my ken, because with animals, this is impossible to know. […] The best way to describe her is perhaps a largely asexual gender-nonconforming individual.
Frans claimed that until now primatologists had not paid attention to these ‘exceptional individuals’ but instead focussed on typical male and typical female behaviours, ignoring the males who wanted to be more quiet. In the lecture Frans said that:
[…] if we start looking for gender diversity we gonna find a lot of that in primates. And the beauty of it, in my mind, is that these individuals are always accepted. I have never heard of an individual like that not being accepted. […] That’s an interesting difference in human society.
The most obvious counter argument to Donna being gender non-conforming is that she lived in a sanctuary, this was not a wild chimpanzee. Presumably keepers ensured there were no food supply problems, managed the population to ensure that there were equal numbers of males and females and proactively managed any infighting. Because the one thing we all know about chimps is that you do not want to piss them off. In fact, Frans’ book begins with a dramatic story in which a male chimp had been ‘butchered by two rivals’ (page 6), so his argument about tolerance doesn’t really scan.
I know for the sake of accuracy everyone defining men and women has to go on about gametes etc, but really, if you were born with a dick you're a man. If you weren't, you're a woman, That covers 99.9% of people, and its simple.
Fucking truth. This is what I always say too. It's like how we describe a human. A human is born with two arms and two legs. No that doesn't fucking mean if you lose an arm or are born without one due to a genetic defect that you're not human. That's retarded. No one seems to argue that we shouldn't describe humans that way though.
It's just so much easier to say it this way. Were you born with a dick? Man. Born with a vagina? Woman. And when they bring up genetic defects then you can go further about chromosomes and gametes.
Funny enough as I was typing this my youtube feed just started playing a channel I'm subbed to called Midwest Audit. For those who may not know it's a guy (and sometimes his girlfriend) who hold a sign that says "Transwomen are MEN" in public and record everything. You'd be amazed how many people get violent with them and resort to trying to steal the sign or attack them. He's had to pepper spray a guy before. I highly recommend the channel to people here.
I saw a clip from that podcast where they asked Gorlock what kind of man he wants. Mother fucker said "a 6' tall Mexican man". I've heard of impossibly high standards but I don't know that's even genetically possible.
"But what about the lionesss with hormonal imbalances and a mane"! No, but ever time I hear this argument, TRAs still continue to play dumb and not understand it. The main problem with TRAs is that gender doesn't exist (At least in the animal kingdom) because animals dont have these strict gender rules that are assigned to male and female animals. Nobody looks at a lioness being exile from her pride (usually males are the ones who get banished) and goes "That lioness is a male lion".
Sometimes a tranny pops up in my feed and it's usually boring so I just hide and move on, but this one made me laugh. This is regarding Contrapoints who is probably the most intelligent online tranny I know of. He is educated and not a marxist. In fact Contra has angered the shit out of the left because he was understandably upset that Kamala losing was largely in part due to retards protesting against her over Israel/Palestine. So as usual, the left eat their own. He made a big post awhile back about why he is disappointed with the left and people like Vaush took it personal wanting to see Contra lose all his support.
It is quite hilarious to me. Contra being arguably the best version of a tranny the left could point to as a success. Weird for sure, but beloved without crazy sex pedophile scandals. Never the less, it's not enough.
Troons are like the white version of Indians. They hate each other and themselves and given enough power and influence they will try as hard as possible to not associate with the others, because no one knows how annoying they are more than they are.
fetish
