- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2016
Hey libtard did you know that in this thread, criticising Biden or Obama is forbidden, and no thread regular ever criticised Biden or Obama??!! Take these facts and logics!
Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.
- Iniciador del tema Mr Zero
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
hFkL9
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Feb, 2024
I still remind myself of her total silence and shame in her hearing to the intelligence committee about the Signal leaks.
These people are all idiots but the worst part is that they are not getting canned for being imbeciles at their job, but because they are not loyal enough to the orange african warlord.
- Registrado
- 19 de Dic, 2020
It's a terrible time to resign and I am shocked anyone permitted her to publish that letter. Either she's prioritizing her husband's comfort over the needs of the U.S. or Trump is purging his admin to appoint even more fanatical loyalists. Both are questionable justifications at best of times, but they're exceptionally bad during a war. She's abandoning the U.S. in the middle of a war started by the admin she was part of. It's understandable for normal people to care for their sick spouse, but she's not a normal person. She's the director of national intelligence and should prioritize the U.S. over all else.
Chicha Drinker
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Mayo, 2025
Oh look at that, a woman with fickle conviction, what are the odds.
- Registrado
- 13 de Dic, 2022
Do you think that she'd be able to do her high stress, long hours job effectively when her spouse is dying from an especially agonizing form of cancer at home? I mean, she's probably just fleeing a sinking ship, but it's a much better excuse than most, and her job hasn't been especially important anyway since Trump just ignores her whenever it's convenient for him.
- Registrado
- 19 de Dic, 2020
If she can't, she shouldn't have accepted the position in the first place. It's not a "job" for normal people.
Froggy Fresh Sextape
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Jun, 2025
You sound like a libtard.
The only goal in life for true MAGA conservatives who bleed red, white and blue is to get drafted so you can be blown up by an Iranian suicide drone, your dying thoughts being "I wish I had two lives to give to protect pedophiles"
SBG
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Nov, 2019
What'll really ruin whatever legacy she was building up is if she doesn't even bother speaking against how she was treated in Trump's administration. She was brought on to help signify the administration being more anti-war, then immediately sidelined as she wasn't allowed any serious responsibilities in spite of her position.
She ate shit and effectively pretends to have liked it.
- Registrado
- 19 de Ene, 2023
Miggers still can't realize the easiest way to prove you're not a low test beta cuck is to not seethe about it if you are called one.
Sad!
EDIT: What To Do When Someone Insults You Online
1. Ignore them: the most masculine response
2. Call them a fag and tell them to go fuck themselves: classic, but if you overdo it it sounds kind of effeminate
3. Complain to jannies: very low T but still standing up for yourself
4. Hide in DMs to seethe about a professional wrestler whose three-point plan to Make America Great Again was training, prayer and vitamins. Cucked, weak, embarrassing - lowest of T. Negative T possibly.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 21 de Ene, 2025
Its just going to keep getting worse sadly. The polarization of everything is going into turbo overdrive lately. People here generally feel more and more pressure to "act the part". I go into any random news thread and its just people saying all non whites should do, for no real reason but to signal they fit in here.
I wouldnt be shocked if this site just mostly becomes politics after the next presidential election tbh
- Registrado
- 13 de Dic, 2022
How often do you come across posts where a user has written something like, "it's time for someone to make a thread about this piece of shit"? It seems to happen a lot when a long conversation turns to some liberal with controversial opinions who argues with conservatives online.
- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2024
If she had resigned at the time Joe Kent did, and gave similar reasoning I would look at it differently. Or even if she resigned now, but gave a reason outside of personal problems like she did I might still look at it differently. But the way she did it, like you outlined just doesn't look good. It either looks like she's not able to do the job she was supposed to, or she is leaving for some other reason, but she's too much of a coward to put that out there, and is instead choosing to still cover for the admin.
You know. I would have agreed with you like two months ago. or at least for the last few years. But one of the very few whitepilling things for me lately. Is seeing more people move closer to my position on partisan politics. People are still extremely team sports brained. But I see more people finally starting to question party allegiance, thanks in part to Trump, and Israel. I'm sure there have been times like this in the past, but caused by different circumstances, but still. In my lifetime I do think this is the first time I've seen things move in quite this direction.
Just to be clear. I'm not saying I think partisan politics is going anyway. And I'm under no impression that a lot of people will finally realize that the whole democrat vs republican thing is fake and gay. But it does seem like there is a move to create a bipartisan coalition that I haven't seen in the past. And I really hope it can manage to gain more steam.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2024
They love the white race so much that they'd rather masturbate to underage anime girls and circlejerk about dead brown people on a gossip forum instead of actually helping white people in real life, because that's Communism or something.
Chicha Drinker
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Mayo, 2025
Fuentes (the whitest man alive on the right) said this will work though!!!
- Registrado
- 19 de Ene, 2021
Here's some information about the current Trump-Iran negotiations. Another offer made on either the 22nd or the 23rd, with a Trump response by the 24th. Trump says the odds are a "solid fifty-fifty" that he will order attacks. Iran still wants its enriched uranium stockpile and control of the Strait; the US doesn't want either of those.
ISW's Iran Update Special Report, May 23, 2026
Link / Archive
Key takeaways only:
ISW's How Iran Hopes to Control the Strait of Hormuz: It’s Not Just About Fees
Link / Archive
Final paragraph, to summarize:
I find the article's statement "...then it will unfortunately be necessary to resort to force [to reopen the Strait of Hormuz]" very important. I've read hundreds of reports, assessments, and articles from the ISW, and this is one of the few times I've seen such a direct statement. That should highlight the significance of the Strait, and how horrible an unforced fuck-up it would be for the world if Trump's war against Iran ends badly. Israel doesn't really give a fuck either way, though.
ISW's Iran Update Special Report, May 23, 2026
Link / Archive
Key takeaways only:
Coin flip odds of war. Where's BossmanJack when we need him to hit some coin flips?
ISW's How Iran Hopes to Control the Strait of Hormuz: It’s Not Just About Fees
Link / Archive
Final paragraph, to summarize:
One of Iran’s primary objectives in the current negotiations is to secure its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. This objective is more important for Tehran than securing fees from merchant vessels as they transit the Strait. Many Iranian officials have said that their goal is to ensure Iranian sovereignty over the strait, and this demand has featured prominently in negotiations to end the Iran War.[1] Tehran may be willing to “trade” this objective for major gains on the nuclear program, sanctions relief, the release of frozen funds, or a large-scale US withdrawal from the region.[2] But all of these “trades” are still bad from a US perspective and accomplish other key Iranian strategic objectives. US and world vital interests require denying Iran control of the strait by negotiations or by force.
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognized by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones (or credibly threatening to do so) at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands related to transiting the strait. Very few countries—and perhaps none—will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s scheme to extract large fees for safe transit through the strait will likely fail, absent a major change in the appetite among shipping companies for risking sanctions. But the failure of the fee scheme does not ipso facto result in a failure of Iran’s scheme to control the strait. Many shipping companies are extremely hesitant to pay Iran for transit due to sanctions compliance issues, but even if these ships do not pay Iran, they still cannot pass the strait without serious risk-taking.[3]
To illustrate the point, if a ship wants to pass the strait, it has four basic options. First, it can pay the Iranians.[4] Second, it can refuse to pay the Iranians and not transit the strait.[5] Third, it could seek out a government that would work out a bilateral agreement with Iran to enable the vessel’s transit without a fee.[6] Fourth, it could “run the guns” and attempt to transit the strait (an incredibly small number of ships have done this so far).[7] The first violates sanctions, the third is not viable for many vessels, and the fourth carries extreme risk. Iran may not be able to collect fees, but it will retain its leverage.
Some industry analysts have suggested that Iran does not actually control the Strait of Hormuz at all because any “Iranian vessel” exiting the strait is subject to the US Navy blockade.[8] The US Navy blockade does not negate Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz because the blockade is against Iranian ports—not against ships that have accepted Iran’s terms for passing the strait as long as they do not travel to or from Iranian ports.[9] The current US blockade thus does not impede de facto Iranian control over the passage of the strait for other countries. Any vessel that uses Iran’s transit scheme but does not leave or enter Iranian ports can still exit, and any vessel that does not use the transit scheme will still get shot at by the Iranians. For example, Iraq negotiated a tanker’s transit through the Strait of Hormuz with Iran.[10] The tanker did not pay a fee, and though the US Navy stopped it briefly, it was subsequently released because it did not violate the blockade by traveling from an Iranian port.[11] The Iranians may suffer grievous economic damage from the blockade, but the blockade itself is not undermining Iran’s assertion of control over the passage of third-country ships through the strait.
The strait will not “return to normal” without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open to prevent Iranian control. The third option is recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty over the strait, which is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a “return to normal” in the strait. The Iranians could maintain their stranglehold over the Strait of Hormuz for as long as they are willing to attack, harass, and threaten shipping there. The international community cannot “wait out” Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz. The protraction of the current situation, on the contrary, serves Iran’s interests by letting Tehran normalize its de facto control of transit through the strait. The Iranians are likely aware of that fact, which is one of the reasons they are stalling and delaying the negotiations process. The US and the world should not allow Iran to impose a new reality on this critical international waterway. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognized transit scheme, then it will unfortunately be necessary to resort to force.
[1] https://x.com/PHREUTERS/status/2057554457584607466?s=20; https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-special-report-may-13-2026; https://t.me/rahbar_enghelab_ir/374; https://t.me/mehrnews/377775 ; https://www.khabaronline dot ir/news/2216274; https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-must-not-rule-the-strait-of-hormuz/; https://t.me/rahbar_enghelab_ir/353
[2] https://tasnimnewsdot ir/fa/news/1405/03/02/3598627 / https://archive.ph/8BJp6
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/business/iran-toll-strait-hormuz.html
[4] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.ph/1BPpB
[5] https://www.ft.com/content/28c8ca92-0c98-46c8-8d51-7c90c68821b7?syn-25a6b1a6=1 / https://archive.ph/fedrl
[6] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.ph/1BPpB
[7] https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-...-Through-Hormuz-to-Escape-Irans-Blockade.html / https://archive.ph/Ya7ja
[8] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/business/iran-toll-strait-hormuz.html
[9] https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS...kade-ships-entering-or-exiting-iranian-ports/ / https://archive.ph/Va9Hc
[10] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.is/1BPpB
[11] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.is/1BPpB
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognized by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones (or credibly threatening to do so) at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands related to transiting the strait. Very few countries—and perhaps none—will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s scheme to extract large fees for safe transit through the strait will likely fail, absent a major change in the appetite among shipping companies for risking sanctions. But the failure of the fee scheme does not ipso facto result in a failure of Iran’s scheme to control the strait. Many shipping companies are extremely hesitant to pay Iran for transit due to sanctions compliance issues, but even if these ships do not pay Iran, they still cannot pass the strait without serious risk-taking.[3]
To illustrate the point, if a ship wants to pass the strait, it has four basic options. First, it can pay the Iranians.[4] Second, it can refuse to pay the Iranians and not transit the strait.[5] Third, it could seek out a government that would work out a bilateral agreement with Iran to enable the vessel’s transit without a fee.[6] Fourth, it could “run the guns” and attempt to transit the strait (an incredibly small number of ships have done this so far).[7] The first violates sanctions, the third is not viable for many vessels, and the fourth carries extreme risk. Iran may not be able to collect fees, but it will retain its leverage.
Some industry analysts have suggested that Iran does not actually control the Strait of Hormuz at all because any “Iranian vessel” exiting the strait is subject to the US Navy blockade.[8] The US Navy blockade does not negate Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz because the blockade is against Iranian ports—not against ships that have accepted Iran’s terms for passing the strait as long as they do not travel to or from Iranian ports.[9] The current US blockade thus does not impede de facto Iranian control over the passage of the strait for other countries. Any vessel that uses Iran’s transit scheme but does not leave or enter Iranian ports can still exit, and any vessel that does not use the transit scheme will still get shot at by the Iranians. For example, Iraq negotiated a tanker’s transit through the Strait of Hormuz with Iran.[10] The tanker did not pay a fee, and though the US Navy stopped it briefly, it was subsequently released because it did not violate the blockade by traveling from an Iranian port.[11] The Iranians may suffer grievous economic damage from the blockade, but the blockade itself is not undermining Iran’s assertion of control over the passage of third-country ships through the strait.
The strait will not “return to normal” without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open to prevent Iranian control. The third option is recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty over the strait, which is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a “return to normal” in the strait. The Iranians could maintain their stranglehold over the Strait of Hormuz for as long as they are willing to attack, harass, and threaten shipping there. The international community cannot “wait out” Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz. The protraction of the current situation, on the contrary, serves Iran’s interests by letting Tehran normalize its de facto control of transit through the strait. The Iranians are likely aware of that fact, which is one of the reasons they are stalling and delaying the negotiations process. The US and the world should not allow Iran to impose a new reality on this critical international waterway. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognized transit scheme, then it will unfortunately be necessary to resort to force.
[1] https://x.com/PHREUTERS/status/2057554457584607466?s=20; https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-special-report-may-13-2026; https://t.me/rahbar_enghelab_ir/374; https://t.me/mehrnews/377775 ; https://www.khabaronline dot ir/news/2216274; https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-must-not-rule-the-strait-of-hormuz/; https://t.me/rahbar_enghelab_ir/353
[2] https://tasnimnewsdot ir/fa/news/1405/03/02/3598627 / https://archive.ph/8BJp6
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/business/iran-toll-strait-hormuz.html
[4] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.ph/1BPpB
[5] https://www.ft.com/content/28c8ca92-0c98-46c8-8d51-7c90c68821b7?syn-25a6b1a6=1 / https://archive.ph/fedrl
[6] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.ph/1BPpB
[7] https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-...-Through-Hormuz-to-Escape-Irans-Blockade.html / https://archive.ph/Ya7ja
[8] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/business/iran-toll-strait-hormuz.html
[9] https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS...kade-ships-entering-or-exiting-iranian-ports/ / https://archive.ph/Va9Hc
[10] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.is/1BPpB
[11] https://www.reuters.com/investigati...land-checkpoints-diplomatic-deals-2026-05-20/ / https://archive.is/1BPpB
- Registrado
- 3 de Feb, 2013
Man, the fat, dementia-riddled pedophile sure fucked the whole world over with his retarded warmongering for Israel
- Registrado
- 7 de Ene, 2026
Aw FUCK, I guess I'll get thread banned for calling Biden a half dead mummy and Obama a mid-at-best.
YOU WILL WORSHIP THE MOE BLOB YOU NORMIE SCUM!
Anime died with the OVA's.
No, their dying thoughts are supposed to be "LIving rent free in libtard minds, kek. You mad!?"
That doesn't work for him, brother.
And yet when you propose doing what Afroman wants to do, and that's kill all blacks, they suddenly get defensive!
- Registrado
- 14 de Abr, 2018
Battlefield2142EU
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
They are making Trump ball room look like the gayest false flag operation ever.
- Registrado
- 7 de Sep, 2024
the puritanical persecution complex faggotry is the gayest shit ever and just creates more gay shit in contrarian response
now on the shots fired situation:
MAN DOWN! MAN DOWN!