Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
🤡 GoonclownSteven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Doe v. Bonnell
1:25-cv-20757— District Court, S.D. Florida
Docket No.
1:25-cv-20757
Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
17 de Feb, 2025
Nature of Suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Cause
28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Defendant
Last Filing
22 de Jul, 2026
Parties (2)
Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 369)
#
Date
Description
Filing
284
22 de Jul, 2026
PAPERLESS ORDER RESETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby RESET before the undersigned on Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 7/23/2026. (dgj) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
—
22 de Jul, 2026
280
29 de Jun, 2026
PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
—
29 de Jun, 2026
—
29 de Jun, 2026
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
Technically the duty to preserve evidence doesn't start when you get served a lawsuit but when you can reasonably expect that a lawsuit is going to happen.
If they can argue that Tiny should reasonably expect a lawsuit for leaking Pixie's private sex tapes to an underaged discord kitten then they would be right in saying that he should have preserved the evidence since then.
And you can very easily argue that he knew that he fucked up considering he wiped all of his logs almost instnatly.
a full dox on Mr. Mouton or Whick would be really good as those two fat fucks are just as complicit in all this doxxing shit as anyone else by running cover for it.
Progressive Victory had already doxxed their creators in their 2024 FEC filings. Whick has said on stream many times that he lives in PA. Is Howard Fudge WhickTV aka DeathOfCertainty?
Technically the duty to preserve evidence doesn't start when you get served a lawsuit but when you can reasonably expect that a lawsuit is going to happen.
If they can argue that Tiny should reasonably expect a lawsuit for leaking Pixie's private sex tapes to an underaged discord kitten then they would be right in saying that he should have preserved the evidence since then they would be correct.
And you can very easily argue that he knew that he fucked up considering he wiped all of his logs almost instnatly.
I wonder if it's more clear cut than that. Destiny has talked over and over about wanting to go after Solo, and even discussed it with Pxie shortly after the leaks. In any lawsuit brought by the two of them, individually or together, the Rose/Destiny chatlogs and the Pxie/Destiny chatlogs would almost certainly be relevant. Maybe not the AbbyMC logs or other logs. If Destiny did sue Solo, he would have been bound by the duty to preserve the moment the leaks happened, and if he did delete anything after that he'd probably be shit out of luck.
The big question would be if the courts recognized a 'carrying over' of the duty to preserve between two hypothetical cases. I think they should in this case mainly because it was the same event (the leaks) that made Destiny contemplate suing Solo, and Pxie eventually suing Destiny. Moreover, for them to not carry over this duty would mean Destiny had a lot of leeway to placate Pxie by talking about legal action then destroying everything the moment he thought she might turn on him.
The november (leak) date is interesting and kneecaps the extent of how late into the "reasonably expect"ing phase tiny started to delete shit.
January 20, 2025 pxie publishes her substack which opens with her intent to sue.
Thanks to the extremely cute @Code Cave for archiving the now deleted page.
Could he reasonably expect it at this point? Let's see.
"Defendant admitted at deposition that he deleted his Discord messages with
Abbymc "sometime maybe at the end of 2024, 【...】He also admitted on a May 13, 2026 livestream that "after the leaks, in January or February [2025], I ran like a whole redact of my Discord," thereby placing the deletion squarely after his preservation duty had attached.
Brooke attests that Defendant deleted his messages to her on Discord "ometime in early February 2025."
Witness A. "Sometime after January 21, 2025," Defendant "deleted the messages between [Witness A] and him on Discord" and removed her access to the Google Drive containing the explicit content he had shared.
C. Defendant Deleted His Side of His Communications With Multiple Witnesses
After His Duty to Preserve Attached.
2 All citations to “Peters Decl.” in this Motion that do not contain an ECF number refer to the Declaration of J.
Peters, dated May 18, 2026, filed concurrently herewith.
3 Even assuming the transmission to Rose occurred prior to CARDII’s effective date, the Video remained
continuously accessible on Discord’s CDN servers and on Rose’s Discord account – and was thus made accessible
by Defendant within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 6851(a)(4) – well past CARDII’s effective date. See ECF 247, pp. 4
Defendant communicated with at least five women whose communications are relevant —
Plaintiff, Abbymc, Hannah Brooke, Witness A, and Witness B — before and after the November
2024 leaks. Each attests that Defendant deleted his side:
Abbymc. Defendant admitted at deposition that he deleted his Discord messages with
Abbymc "sometime maybe at the end of 2024," Dep. Tr. Bonnell, 243:25–244:3, Ex. A Peters
Decl. He also admitted on a May 13, 2026 livestream that "after the leaks, in January or February
[2025], I ran like a whole redact of my Discord," thereby placing the deletion squarely after his
preservation duty had attached. See Peters Decl. ¶¶ 38-39. Abbymc separately attests that in
April 2025, Defendant "deleted all of his direct messages to me on the Discord platform, including
the sharing of the video of Pxie." ECF 49-2 ¶ 9. The destruction is critical: due to Defendant’s
deletions, Abbymc cannot produce the Video, and Defendant produced none of the media files he
sent to Abbymc.
Hannah Brooke. Brooke attests that Defendant deleted his messages to her on Discord
"ometime in early February 2025." Brooke Decl. (ECF 21-2) ¶ 11. Defendant admitted
communicating with Brooke on Discord and, when asked whether he deleted those
communications, conceded "it's possible." Dep. 244:11–21, 246:22–24, Ex. A to Peters Decl.
Plaintiff requested the Brooke communications, but Defendant produced none. Peters Decl., ¶¶13,
16.
Witness A. "Sometime after January 21, 2025," Defendant "deleted the messages between
[Witness A] and him on Discord" and removed her access to the Google Drive containing the
explicit content he had shared. Witness A Decl. (ECF 49-4) ¶ 9. Defendant produced no
communications with Witness A. Peters Decl. ¶ 17.
Case 1:25-cv-20757-JB Document 262 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2026 Page 4 of 20 Witness B. Defendant admitted to Witness B that he shared her video with Rose. Witness
B Decl. (ECF 49-5) ¶ 7. "Sometime after the November 29, 2024 leaks," Witness B discovered
Defendant had deleted messages between them. Id. ¶ 9. Defendant produced no communications
with Witness B. Peters Decl. ¶ 18.
Plaintiff. Defendant deleted his side of his Discord communications with Plaintiff from
her view, leaving her unable to access his messages. Doe Decl. ¶ 17 (ECF 21-1). Defendant
produced a two-way Discord chat thread with Plaintiff at SB000551-001452, but Defendant's
transmissions of intimate images are not visible in the thread itself, and he produced none of the
underlying attachments. Peters Decl. ¶ 16.
When was he formally warned not to delete evidence? January 22, 2025
The blatant spoliation has been covered ITT.
(ETA here is tiny teaching you what spoliation is and insisting he "has no obligation to keep things public" - well, as long as we can agree all that sexual material sharing was public.)
3:00
He also says all the witnesses who possessed the Pxie videos have "nothing to do with this case" so it doesn't matter that they noticed he deleted it. And even if he did, how do they know he didn't preserve it?? The plaintiff hadn't even asked to see his logs yet!! *cue curb your enthusiasm theme song over foodstamps stream 'the logs are lost!!'*)
(Eta 2 -
IIRC, I don't think solo ever tells us which are deleted at that point, and if they are Google Drive or discord uploads. Note this is dec 3, 2024.
Yes. Conveniently merely days after being told he shouldn't, when even the website breaking November 2024 leaks wouldn't move him to do so! This person won't even delete CSA made specially for him, why would this shit matter?
Also dont they know that the most prolific distributor of tiny's sex tapes was tiny himself?
No hint of irony.
Tiny corralled pxie into the "legal option" which meant they would take on Solo together. I think someone who allowed tiny to disseminate her sex video might have chosen that option, but Pxie correctly identified tiny as the original transgressor. Of course, that's a backstab to any garden variety narc.
So here it seems we recognize that tiny DID e-rape, but not when the statute was active. Again, wide dissemination of the material didn't spook tiny to DFE, but Pxie's substack and subsequent order to preserve evidence certainly did.
its_a_volvo cryptically replies to Pxie's post on narcissistic rage and injury on twitter. "This sounds so familiar"
Volvo lonerbox summary.
Volvo was a fan before Lonerbox dated her
Also small streamer DickersTV who got into a spat with Hutch recently is following volvo now. I think he's about of the jstlk, kuihman group but I wouldn't know for sure
.
But I can't imagine no ones DMed her or tried to make contact with her since her dono over a month ago.
Yes. DickersTV's discord is a great place. We all know that Chud Logic is a Judas and knelt before Tiny. Total betrayal.
Ver archivo adjunto 9027628
its_a_volvo cryptically replies to Pxie's post on narcissistic rage and injury on twitter. "This sounds so familiar" Volvo lonerbox summary. Volvo was a fan before Lonerbox dated her
Also small streamer DickersTV who got into a spat with Hutch recently is following volvo now. I think he's about of the jstlk, kuihman group but I wouldn't know for sure .
But I can't imagine no ones DMed her or tried to make contact with her since her dono over a month ago.
Does it even matter the date he should've retained the evidence if he got caught improperly retaining it and then forging it?
Also if he just deleted the evidence and didn't then forge it and present it as the true logs, would the judge just accept abby's word/message as true since there's no refutation? So that would mean there's motive to forge it to avoid something like a negative inference?
This was filed last night too, but didn't want to use pacer to get it. I think the only interesting thing IMO is RFP #2 and #3 to Steven for the discovery and seeing that Steven's lawyers were basically just stonewalling on providing any of the media, attachments, metadata, or really any conversations with anyone in the RFP since October 17 2025.
263 - May 18, 2026 - Affidavit in Support of Motion Main Document
RFP: 1, 2, 3
1. Copies of all statements, sworn or unsworn, made by you in the past, including
verbal statements that have been transcribed, that have any relationship to the allegations in the Complaint, including but not limited to statements made on any social media platform or in public
forum, or deposition in which you have participated.
2. All documents and/or communications you and your attorney relied on or made
reference to in preparing the Answer to the Complaint, the Opposition to the Motion for
Preliminary Injunction, and your declaration in support thereof (Dkts. 17, 42, 42-1).
3. All documents and/or communications identified, or that you relied on, or that
support, each of your Affirmative Defenses in your Answer to the Complaint (Dkt. 17).
4. All documents and/or communications identified, or that you relied on, or that
support, your responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories.
5. All documents and/or communications that support each of your denials of any of
Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions.
6. With respect to all witnesses whom you have consulted or have considered to call
as experts to give opinion testimony at trial, including any person retained, consulted, or
specifically employed as an expert, produce a copy of his/her curriculum vitae, copies of
documents examined by the witness and copies of any written reports rendered, and drafts of such
reports.
7. All documents you intend to offer as an exhibit during any proceeding, deposition,
hearing, or trial in this case.
8. All the documentary evidence you possess or know of which has or may have any
relationship to any facts, claims and/or defenses by any party in this case, even though you may
not present it during the trial.
9. All documents identified in Your Initial Disclosures.
10. The Google Drive shared link that you sent to the individual with the screen name
Rose that contained the Video.
11. The Google Drive shared link that you sent to the individual with the screen name
Abbymc that contained the Video.
12. Each and every Google Drive shared link you have ever sent to any individual
containing intimate images since September 1, 2020.
13. Each and every publicly or privately posted comment or statement or media content
that you have made about Plaintiff or that is in any way related to the allegations of the Complaint
or your affirmative defenses since January 1, 2025 to date.
14. All documents and/or communications that support your allegation in docket 42-1
at paragraph 22 that you “have lost tens of thousands of subscribers and an estimated $300,000 in
revenue.”
15. All documents and/or all communications you have had with a) the individual with
the screen name Rose, and b) the individual with the screen name Solotinyleaks, including but not
limited to dates, platforms used, and the content of the communications.
16. All documents and/or communications that you allegedly have preserved and/or
deleted pursuant to your declaration at docket 42-1 at paragraphs 20 and 21, including any and all
documents and/or communications with any relationship to the allegations of the Complaint or
your affirmative defenses that you have preserved and/or deleted.
17. All documents and/or communications that has any relationship to any contracts
you entered into or payments made in order to preserve and/or delete evidence.
18. All documents and/or communications that has any relationship to any efforts you
took, since November 29, 2024 to date, to remove the Video from the online platforms on which
it was or is hosted
1. All Communications between you and any witness identified in Your Initial
Disclosures pertaining to Plaintiff and/or to the allegations of the Amended Complaint from
November 1, 2024 through the present.
2. All Communications between you and Hannah Brookes from April 2024 through
the present.
3. All Communications between you and Dan Saltman pertaining to Plaintiff and/or
to the allegations of the Amended Complaint from November 1, 2024 through the present.
4. All Communications between you and Kyla Turner pertaining to Plaintiff and/or to
the allegations of the Amended Complaint from November 1, 2024 through the present.
5. All Videos and Intimate Images sent to Plaintiff, Rose, Abbymc, Hannah Brookes
and Peach.
1. All Communications between you and JSTLK pertaining to Plaintiff, Rose,
Abbymc and/or to the allegations of the Amended Complaint from November 1, 2024 through the
present.
2. All Communications between you and Willymac pertaining to Plaintiff, Rose,
Abbymc and/or to the allegations of the Amended Complaint from November 1, 2024 through the
present.
3. All Communications between you and Foodshops pertaining to Plaintiff, Rose,
Abbymc, the allegations of the Amended Complaint, and/or to the preservation/production of
evidence in this action from November 1, 2024 through the present.
4. All Communications between you and DariusIRL pertaining to Plaintiff, Rose,
Abbymc, and/or the allegations of the Amended Complaint, from November 1, 2024 through the
present.
5. Produce all documents and electronically stored information, including but not
limited to call logs, connection records, phone records, metadata, or screenshots, reflecting any
Discord, Skype, cellular, or other telephone calls, voice communications, or video calls between
you and any person identified or believed to be “Rose” or Attali Hall during the period April 1,
2022 and today. This request includes: Call logs or metadata showing the date, time, duration,
participants, and platform (cellular carrier, Discord, Skype, etc.); Any screenshots or device-
generated call history from mobile devices used for those calls; and any billing records or usage
summaries reflecting such calls.
6. Produce all communications, documents, and electronically stored information
(“ESI”) concerning your use of Redact.dev, or any similar application, program, or service used
to delete, conceal, modify, or archive data. This request includes, but is not limited to, any deletion,
concealment, or archival of communications or evidence involving Plaintiff, “Rose,” “Abbymc,”
or any matter relating to the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint during the period from
November 1, 2024 through the present.
For such an online and active community, it seems they don't understand online best practices. Never let your opponent know they are on the right track. Don't confirm doxxes. Don't provide examples of the type of attacks that bother you, or which criticisms you struggle to engage with. That just lets people know where to really latch on.
Like Hutch was crying about people making fun of his dead sister. So of course this is the type of response he should expect if he complains about it.
To you the day Parry declared his intentions to Chibi-Reviewsified your sister into furniture was the worst day of your life, but to Parry it was Tuesday.
5:34
Stardust crafting the least believable victim narrative that she's being threatend with sexual assault. Even Stardust must realize nobody in their right mind would want to rape her. But thanks for letting us know you hate being reminded that despite all the defense you run for Destiny, nobody in DGG cares about you
0:54
You can't be a part of a community that seal claps when Destiny laughs at the suggestion a famine was happening in Gaza, or makes excuses for Destiny tweeting like this, and then demand people engage with you like a respectable member of society.
I take back what I said about LUS. He mister magoo'd
-i take this back too. I think he was playing 4d chess and acted just retarded enough to get in tiny's good graces. LUS, you're a fucking rainman of law -
4 d chess'd his way into tiny admitting he did have continuous disclosure until way after CARDII.
Null throwing a fit about tiny's SA being made fun of has been retconned as Null telling everyone here they are deranged for what they post. Very cool. Definitely helps demonize the one place where the most info is kept about his court case.
Also love how tiny says he is extra wextra special weshul because NO OTHER LOLCOW has thread regulars who touch poo except his. I think someone would like a word with tiny. Ver archivo adjunto 9025068
They have some other things in common too. They both have a broken penis. Bent duck vs phimosis boy. Chris will be remembered in 10 years, though. Tiny will have probably taken one of his guns and ended it by then.
Thanks for the replies, you guys made great points but the reason I think the date matters is that Andy B can legal jargon weasel his way into justifying deletion before Jan 20,2025. And because that argument is more justifiable, he'll try to minimize the actually good arguments about data retention post Jan 20. I get insanely peeved when anyone gives the raped any excuses because his community is going to sperg out about the date instead of the fact he manipulated evidence
Ordinarily I'm a huge fan of Eli B's posts, but I am very upset with her right now for trying to spread the narrative that George wasn't Destiny's partner. They talked all the time about video games and Better Call Saul, they masturbated together, Destiny is still clearly in love with George, and we're going to pretend like that meant nothing? It's completely reasonable that George would fit into the "partner" category when it comes to sending nudes. Were they going steady? Were they exclusive? No, obviously not. But I know true love when I see it.
Also, just to avoid seeing Eli B getting roped into the Kiwi Farms cabal accusations, I've never spoken with Eli B, I just like the way she dog walks these dorks. I saw someone on twitter accusing her of being a Kiwifarmer and then changing it to being a former DGGer. (Bro everyone who really hates Destiny used to watch Destiny. It's kinda why we hate him so much.)
Now that I'm finding out this cabal is real, though, I'm upset that more hasn't been done to spread the mission of finding Melina's sock.
Thanks for the replies, you guys made great points but the reason I think the date matters is that Andy B can legal jargon weasel his way into justifying deletion before Jan 20,2025. And because that argument is more justifiable, he'll try to minimize the actually good arguments about data retention post Jan 20. I get insanely peeved when anyone gives the raped any excuses because his community is going to sperg out about the date instead of the fact he manipulated evidence
So, the key here is to not hang your hat on the legal aspect of this. Most of us don't know shit about the law, and the law really doesn't matter to us. Most of us have been criticizing Destiny's shitty behavior, legal or not, for years. So whether or not he technically broke the law with Pxie should really be irrelevant to most people. His actions, justifications, and actions after getting caught are really where the criticisms are. His complaint refusal to learn his lesson and take accountability for anything ever is where the criticism is. He'll say we're coping, but a lot of us always thought he was going to get off. Destiny thinks this is a new development, but it's obviously not.
Oh yeah I thought he was gonna get away with it scott free for a solid while as well, but the recent Andy B fuckups made me hopeful lol. I don't actually care if he faces anything legally, I just want his suffering to extend as much as possible.
Ultimate satisfaction would be the case going to trial and the trial dragging on for another year+. I would love to see him become broke and having to move to actually father his son inshallah
He’s 100% just mad that Solo posted he was just leaking everything because he got bored of Steven. I think the monthly checkup DMs asking for new nudes was only exacerbating his boredom making him feel a bit objectified. The revenge porn was nothing to Destiny compared to betraying his trust after confiding all of Melina’s secrets, LS’ location, his League woes, and thoughts on Breaking Bad. I assume that’s the order he goes in with everyone to be emotionally available with them.
Yeah, it's him. He revealed his age and birthdate on Twitter. He listed Annville as his location on his GoFundMe too. All lines up. Found other confirmation but not worth sharing.
Steven sperging about some randoms in discord and Hasan hanging out with important people, puff pieces in the NYT and podcasts with politicians.
The turk actually won, lmao.
Destiny and jstlk are going after each other on twitter right now. Destiny claims that Jstlk's discord server was harassing victims in his case. Destiny is the ultimate victim so these claims are largely correct. This is all really funny considering his tweets @pxie the other day.
He’s sounding pretty dejected in the motion reading on stream; really sucking a lot of the joy out of it.
He just goes on about how Destiny has all the evidence and you can just go eat his entire ass sans spoon if you want any proof. Not until Hasan and DeLaguna admit they’re behind everything (I don’t even feel like that is a stretch, he just needs that catharsis so bad). I haven’t heard him explain why he refused the third party evidence review, but I’m sure it’s just paranoia it will flex queue him 5 more years of revenge porn cases if it leaked (Ok, he said it was because that's some CIA shit so I'm counting it in my favor). His excuse for no e-discovery? It’s just cellphone messages bro. And what of Pena the expert witness? Retard.
Big respect for dropping the first(?) certified “It’s not true.”
Edit just for the clips:
0:53
coping and projecting
0:26
How dare they try to survive MSJ, it just makes me seethe
0:11
e-discovery? That sounds kinda like Joan's secret Puerto Rican jew jitsu she learned from some state influence operation tbh
Steven sperging about some randoms in discord and Hasan hanging out with important people, puff pieces in the NYT and podcasts with politicians.
The turk actually won, lmao.
.
