🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Dr Nurse]

How much you wanna bet that the 'leak' steven is talking about is dooby.

It 100% wouldn't surprise me cause he's done this exact same op-sec with him in the past twice

 

[cmzng]

2:23

(t/a)
Disgusting, but saving it because I can't imagine it would stay up long if DGG start harassing her.

Edit:
I thought the idea of Henry getting high off of digital markers was hilarious and needed to share it

 

[chilly like a villy]

To AbbyMc

I suspect someone faster and smarter than me has covered all of this, but here we go anyway.

Spoiler: Text of image

Defendant's Three Productions Concerning Abbymc Contradict Each Other and
Establish Both Fabrication and Destruction.

Defendant has made three distinct productions concerning his communications with
Abbymc. Compared against one another, they establish both fabrication and destruction.
1. The two-way Discord chat thread (SB000006-41).
A 36-page chronological tabular export of Discord direct messages between Defendant
("omnidestiny") and Abbymc ("inbloom1991"), covering March 7, 2023 through May 7, 2025. See
Ex. C, Peters Decl. Both sides are present. The thread contains four Google Drive URLs Defendant
transmitted to Abbymc in 2023:
• April 24, 2023, 19:08:21 EDT (SB000016): Google Drive URL preceded by
Defendant's message: "I've got a 5 minute video of me eating someone out, do you want
it?"
• May 5, 2023, 23:26:20 EDT (SB000017): Google Drive URL preceded by
Defendant's message: "Did I ever send you the one of her blowing me?"
• November 3, 2023, 14:39:36 and 14:39:44 (SB000034): Two consecutive
Google Drive URLs.
The thread also references numerous audio recordings, video files, and other media
Defendant was sending or had sent to Abbymc — but the transmissions of those files are not visible
in the thread itself, and the underlying files were never produced. Peters Decl. ¶ 26, and Ex. C
thereto. Only the transmissions from Abbymc to Defendant are visible, and only those underlying
files were produced. Id.
2. The one-sided Discord export (SB000063-168).
Defendant produced a 106-page Discord export captioned for the username "I.C. Wiener"
and rendered in the Discord visual interface. See Ex. D, Peters Decl., ¶ 29. The export covers the
same time frame but contains only Abbymc's side; no responses from Defendant appear for more
than two years -- until May 1, 2025 (SB000160). The two productions display different usernames
for the same person ("inbloom1991" vs. "I.C. Wiener") — confirming they were generated at
different times and contradicting Defendant's sworn statement that he "preserved the entirety" of
his Abbymc communications. ECF 213 ¶ 12. The thread in Exhibit D also references numerous
audio recordings, video files, and other media Defendant was sending or had sent to Abbymc —
but the transmissions of those files are not visible in the thread itself, and the underlying files were
never produced. Peters Decl., ¶¶ 31-31.
3. Defendant's self-prepared Exhibit E (ECF 213-5).
On January 30, 2026, Defendant filed in support of his MSJ a declaration averring:
"Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct log of every media file and Google Drive link
that I ever sent to Abbymc," and: "I have preserved the entirety of my communication logs with
Abbymc, including all media files." ECF 213 ¶¶ 11-12. Exhibit E lists 22 entries between March
and November 2023; only two are Google Drive links, both November 3, 2023.
Exhibit E is demonstrably false on the face of Defendant's own production: it omits
both the April 24, 2023 and May 5, 2023 Google Drive links that Defendant's own produced chat
thread shows him sending Abbymc. See Ex. C to Peters Decl., SB00016-17. And Defendant has
produced none of the 22 items Exhibit E identifies as having been sent — the underlying Google
Drive files "are not existing anymore." Dep. 237:3-6, Ex. A Peters Decl. See also, Peters Decl., ¶
32. Defendant has thus, in a single filing, sworn that 22 specific items of responsive ESI existed
within his control and failed to produce any of them. The destruction is conclusively established
by Defendant’s own admissions.
Defendant's deposition testimony confirms that he possessed the very record his
productions lack. To create Exhibit E, Defendant "sorted all the sent messages to AbbyMC's
Discord account, and then [he] deleted every message that didn't contain a media file," and "put
into a spreadsheet the timestamps for which [he] sent any media files." Dep. Tr. 305:25–306:6,
Ex. A Peters Decl. The source he used was therefore a complete chat thread containing every
outbound message Defendant sent Abbymc, with each attachment identifiable by name and
timestamp. Defendant possessed that source on January 30, 2026. He has not produced it. Nor has
he produced any of the underlying media files. Defendant produced — at separate Bates-stamp
numbers — the attachment files Abbymc sent to him (Peters Decl., ¶ 33), but produced no
attachment files he sent to her, in any form, under any Bates number. Id., ¶ 32. Either he still
possesses them and has withheld them, or he destroyed them after January 30, 2026, or he modified
the source to strip his outbound transmissions prior to production. Each scenario is destruction or
non-production of ESI Defendant himself confirmed under oath having had in his possession.
Defendant has also admitted that Exhibit E was manually fabricated. On a public Foodshop
livestream broadcast on September 8, 2025 — one week before he filed Exhibit E — Defendant
told his audience: "Information is lost! There is no original file! I'm trying to reconstruct a file! I'm
artificially creating a file by reconstructing a log." ECF 150. At deposition he testified that he was
"merg[ing]" files with "different timestamps" — "Unix code" versus "universal time code" — "to
make it line up." Dep. Tr. 306–07, Ex. A Peters Decl.
The May 5, 2023 omission is independently dispositive. At 23:23:59 Defendant sent
Abbymc the message "Did I ever send you the one of her blowing me?" At 23:26:20 he sent the
Google Drive URL. See Ex. C Peters Decl., at SB000017. The URL is now dead; the underlying
file is destroyed; the link does not appear on Defendant's sworn "true and correct log." If the link
depicted Plaintiff, Defendant made a post-CARDII transmission of intimate content of her —
establishing the very transmission his MSJ denies. If it depicted any other individual, Defendant's
sworn completeness statement is independently disproven. Either scenario establishes intentional
spoliation. Abbymc's October 12, 2023 message in the produced thread — "I still watch the bj
video" (id. at SB000032) — supports the inference that what Defendant sent on May 5, 2023
depicted Plaintiff: more than a year before the leak, Abbymc was openly referring to a "bj video"
Defendant had sent her, and that video does not appear on Exhibit E.

Highlights:
Exhibit E lists 22 entries between March
and November 2023; only two are Google Drive links, both November 3, 2023.
Exhibit E is demonstrably false on the face of Defendant's own production: it omits
both the April 24, 2023 and May 5, 2023 Google Drive links that Defendant's own produced chat thread shows him sending Abbymc. And Defendant has produced none of the 22 items Exhibit E identifies as having been sent — the underlying Google Drive files "are not existing anymore. [...]

The export covers the same time frame but contains only Abbymc's side; no responses from Defendant appear for more than two years -- until May 1, 2025 .The two productions display different usernames for the same person ("inbloom1991" vs. "I.C. Wiener") — confirming they were generated at
different times and contradicting Defendant's sworn statement that he "preserved the entirety" of his Abbymc communications.

So this dumdum submitted 3 conflicting versions of the chat with Abby:
one where both of their sides are visible but referenced links and files are missing (only tiny's, because the ones Abby sent are there);
one in which it appears Abby talks to her fucking self for 2 years;
and a third in which her username is different which implies it was exported at a completely different time.

In his deposition, he also says he
"sorted all the sent messages to AbbyMC's
Discord account, and then [he] deleted every message that didn't contain a media file," and "put into a spreadsheet the timestamps for which [he] sent any media files."
So we have to trust his judgement on what was worth preserving.

I also suspect he is being fast and loose with "media file", where earlier he referenced media files and g drive links, those have melted into one thing.

Backtracking to the topic of how long files are kept, I think we can also see why he was totes ok with showing or recreating Google drive links, but no Discord uploaded media (also a link):
Google retention policy (AI pls no bully):


Discord media (also AI result):


So basically this idiot was fine to share and recreate Google drive links cause, after the owner deletes the file, anyone clicking the link gets nothing and they're gone from the server after a month in the right conditions. But for Discord, that shit exists as long as one message of it exists. Discord doesn't do any deleting. In other words, Google Drive links delete content from the main source- down, and Discord deletes it down -to the uploaded source (their servers). It's arguable if Discord deletes that at all, or if it just exists but no one can really access it (unless the url is preserved). So he can delete every discord link he shared, but if someone else sends it to someone else... well that link persists, doesn't it?

It sounds to me like there is no reference material from Google or discord, but what do I know. In that interview with friend of the thread LUS, tiny seemed very comfortable with continued distribution being a non issue. I think someone doing a live example for the court would work wonders to aid understanding.

 

[cmzng]

What is the problem here with the protective order anyways, Destiny should be totally safe to share these videos with Joan/Carlos; otherwise he can just pursue a neutral third party if they're just too unhinged for his liking. It's just laughable he's even worried about his privacy under this level of legal scrutiny. If anything he's probably getting off to the idea of it.

As long as that May 5th 2023 video was of an adult not named Pxie, what the heck is the problem Steven. Liberate yourself!


Sure hope it or any of those other videos you omitted weren't child porn or anything. How much BJ stuff did you have really...

 

[myshkin]

Okay, this Spider guy is dumb. Immediately deleting your twitter account after someone posts your dox signals that the dox was legit.

 

[MarlboroRedEnjoyer]

but lolcows are incapable of accountability and reflection.

This is the interesting thing about Steven, he does seem capable of understanding what creature he is and how he comes across: "im the guy who burns bridges", non stop inflammatory statements, shit-slinging on twitter, repugnant comments to everyone who had any interest in him - famous 'cum guzzling' comments to Sam Sedar. In the clip linked earlier where he blackmailed Melina he said 'his reputation is zero already so he's willing to expose all dirt'.
He does know that his reputation is in the gutter already. But he can't understand why internet hates him. It must be those snarkers paid by Hasan!

He just needs to write one more manifesto, then it will all go away. Then everyone will treat him with 'charity' that he has not once given anyone else, despite claiming to be the most charitable person online.

He is like a child. You'd expect a child to be an asshole but still get unconditional love and care from parents and society. Steven, you are 30 years too old for that kind of treatment!

 

[Strychnine]

Destiny just casually greenlit doxing of his own in house lawyer orbiter, Kafka. Very smart of him to indirectly support doxing his own fans just for the sake of his own position he thought of 5 minutes ago.

 

[Vrilify]

Okay, this Spider guy is dumb. Immediately deleting your twitter account after someone posts your dox signals that the dox was legit.

They don't include a pamphlet for what to do when you get doxed for being a gay nigger who lives at home with your parents.

 

[chilly like a villy]

Destiny just casually greenlit doxing of his own in house lawyer orbiter, Kafka. Very smart of him to indirectly support doxing his own fans just for the sake of his own position he thought of 5 minutes ago.

Can u clip or link something? Was he generally stating that everyone should be doxxed (ie all public figures should be fine with being doxxed) or does he have some issue with Kafka?

I look forward to Kaka joining us here.

 

[hFkL9]

Destiny just casually greenlit doxing of his own in house lawyer orbiter, Kafka. Very smart of him to indirectly support doxing his own fans just for the sake of his own position he thought of 5 minutes ago.

The fag is fine with it and for some reason sent his info to destiny already

 

[Sneed or Death]

They actually think Blav was paid by Putin lmao actually retarded people

Nice try Kremlinbot, we've exposed your secrets.

Spoiler: The Blav Files

Name: Nikolai Andreivich "Blav" Blavokin / Николай Андреевич «Блав» Блавокин
Occupation: IT Systems Administrator & Communications Specialist (Contract Service, Russian Armed Forces Signal Troops /Reserve/Detached Duty)
Rank: Warrant Officer (Прапорщик) / technical track, non-command.

Joined: Apr 7, 2022
Total Posts: 1900+

Location: Saint Petersburg, Russia (relocated to Belgrade, Serbia in 2022)
Birth Date: Feburary 15, 1988
Address: 13 Nikola Pašić Square, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Known Associates / Family

• Father: Andrei Petrovich Blavokin (retired Russian Army signals officer)
• Mother: Svetlana Blavokina (school teacher)
• Younger sister: Anna (married, lives in Moscow)
• No wife or kids on record

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

Listen, we only technically have records of one woman blowing Destiny (I'm not going to try to correct this), so by process of elimination of all women admitting to it I think this sounds kinda bad.

I guess Destiny could claim that this was actually a video of an unrelated trans woman and he was just respecting this woman's pronouns. This wouldn't even be in the top 10 plot twists or top 50 weird sexual things we learned about Destiny related to this case.

What is the problem here with the protective order anyways, Destiny should be totally safe to share these videos with Joan/Carlos; otherwise he can just pursue a neutral third party if they're just too unhinged for his liking. It's just laughable he's even worried about his privacy under this level of legal scrutiny. If anything he's probably getting off to the idea of it.

So weird to see Destiny get this prudish about his sex tapes. He had no problem sending these videos of him jacking off to a complete stranger within a week of making contact with them. By now he has built up far more rapport with Joan, certainly he should be at least as comfortable.

Maybe Joan just needs to claim to be a sex worker so Destiny uncritically trusts her understanding of consent and privacy.

 

[lurker makes an account]

its_a_volvo cryptically replies to Pxie's post on narcissistic rage and injury on twitter. "This sounds so familiar"
Volvo lonerbox summary.
Volvo was a fan before Lonerbox dated her
Also small streamer DickersTV who got into a spat with Hutch recently is following volvo now. I think he's about of the jstlk, kuihman group but I wouldn't know for sure .
But I can't imagine no ones DMed her or tried to make contact with her since her dono over a month ago.

 

[ProxyAnon]

Chud also said he talked to shamoo before cutting him off. also on and unrelated note DGG got chuds discord account suspended for 24 hours.

0:34

 

[kiwiburgerplanet]

He is like a child. You'd expect a child to be an asshole but still get unconditional love and care from parents and society. Steven, you are 30 years too old for that kind of treatment!

Worse. He's like a low class white woman. Entitled; doesn't take care of his kid; abuses other women; get's others to fight his battles; passive-aggressive faggot. I guess you could argue he is an entitled child, that was never raised properly. Seems like that is accurate, given how little his parents seem to care for Nathan.

They don't include a pamphlet for what to do when you get doxed for being a gay nigger who lives at home with your parents.

They should seek out Brianna Wu. Is he still part of the dgg orbit, or was he so embarrassing that they dropped him.

Nice try Kremlinbot, we've exposed your secrets.

I read this and the theme for Golden Eye started playing. Wonder if his password is KNOCKERS.

So weird to see Destiny get this prudish about his sex tapes. He had no problem sending these videos of him jacking off to a complete stranger within a week of making contact with them. By now he has built up far more rapport with Joan, certainly he should be at least as comfortable.

If I recall, in one of the filings very early Joan called him out out for being very apathetic. I think null posted his email message to him, which was very aloof. Also to Null's credit he censored those posts. Which outside of this he and this community should get credit for.

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

If I recall, in one of the filings very early Joan called him out out for being very apathetic. I think null posted his email message to him, which was very aloof. Also to Null's credit he censored those posts. Which outside of this he and this community should get credit for.

Technically Destiny didn't send that email to Null, it was his 'assistant'

I wonder who that assistant might be. Ninou, who was his merchandise manager at the time? NotSoErudite? Someone else?

 

[hFkL9]

He just needs to write one more manifesto, then it will all go away. Then everyone will treat him with 'charity' that he has not once given anyone else, despite claiming to be the most charitable person online.

He seems to really think everything is going back to normal after this, and he is somehow getting all his reputation back. In my opinion this is just no it, his past manifesto somehow worked because the people he beefed with were people with a small niche community, and the intent of the manifesto was to destroy the person's reputation inside of his audience(like mrgirl, who until everything happened, his community was really split between liking him or not) He never "recruited" anyone from the outside.

He promised either yesterday or the day before that a bunch of people are going to get nuked, like who? Kuihman? Jstlk? Kilo? Pxie? His entire community hates all of these people already, and the people that don't follow destiny already hate them as well because of their numerous other feuds online, or they are part of their small commentary community

My impression is that it is not going to change a lot of people's minds like he thinks it will, he might get someone like H3 to be more on his side. I think ethan might watch it on stream, especially since I think Destiny is gonna prepare a section about H3Snark.

But I know we will see a ton of "I was a kuihman fan until I saw destiny's manifesto stream", dgjeets love to do things like this.

Ninou

Almost for sure it was her, she had in her insta bio something like "streamers assistant" or something similar

 

[cmzng]

I read this and the theme for Golden Eye started playing. Wonder if his password is KNOCKERS.

"You sit on it, but you can't take it with you." would of been really good too, but alas.

 

[Kay878]

Forgive me for posting Jeet screeds, but that statement by Pxies lawyer on its own does sound stupid imo. Does anyone have a good steelman for it?

It also does look like Steven fucked up with the AbbyMC messages so hopefully that's enough to extend his suffering even more.

I'm also unsure what the actual consequences of this motion are. Can any autist here tell me what's the worst case and best case consequence for Steven here? And what the chances are of the worst be falling him?

 

[cmzng]

Forgive me for posting Jeet screeds, but that statement by Pxies lawyer on its own does sound stupid imo. Does anyone have a good steelman for it?

I'm also unsure what the actual consequences of this motion are. Can any autist here tell me what's the worst case and best case consequence for Steven here? And what the chances are of the worst be falling him?

The deletions around the initial leaks would almost make sense from Steven's perspective if it weren't for the fact the first and only most immediate things he deleted near that November 2024 time frame were details about his affair with Lauren Southern. The full redact'ing of all his DMs with all these girls was after Pxie made her substack post with the intent to sue (~1/20/25). There may have been some other deletions in the middle though. He only started deleting everything completely around 1/23/25 when he lost control over the women flocking to gossip and talk about him in places like jstlk's discord. But regardless, he should still be able to provide the source material he deleted at the very minimum independent of all of this and he is refusing to which opens him up to some adverse inferences about what the videos contain if he can't provide a sufficient accounting for them. An adverse inference that the May 5th 2023 video was of Pxie instantly defeats his MSJ and we go to trial. I think it'd be crazy for the judge to just smite all his defenses though, he can atleast try his implicit consent argument at trial if he really wants to. But best case, he needs to reply to that spoliation motion with some info to disambiguate those videos that he won't provide as being unrelated to Pxie. Right now all he has is his word and BabyPeach's word that the videos aren't of Pxie. It will be tricky to prove with any confidence the videos he does provide even correspond to the google drive links in question though, I don't know if they can map back some metadata about the underlying videos to the google drive links to just increase the probability they are the same e.g. same resolution, file size, video length, etc...

And the cope about Abby not being a party to the case is nonsense, she was originally looking to independently sue Destiny for the same shit because it happened to her too apparently.