Race/Ethnicity Statistics and Research Megathread

Seems to be correct. That's a lot less brain size.
1200s is upper limit Homo Erectus.
So basically niggers are geniuses... in homo erectus standards.


The more I dig into forbidden race science the more answers pop out. It all makes sense.
I dont think brain part is most accurate because it seems like an old book who can't accurately measure it.

But yeah. Keep going.
 
I dont think brain part is most accurate because it seems like an old book who can't accurately measure it.

But yeah. Keep going.
I did a deepdive in the conspiracy thread.

Tl,dr, non-blacks migrated out of Africa far earlier and then interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. The Abbos split up and later whites/yelloes split again. Blacks never left Africa.

Neanderthals had genes for bigger brain size, early sapiens for better brain matter, which mixing created the white/yellow IQ advantage. The event that sparked civilised humans into being was a chance crossbreeding that nigs had no part of.
 
I did a deepdive in the conspiracy thread.

Tl,dr, non-blacks migrated out of Africa far earlier and then interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. The Abbos split up and later whites/yelloes split again. Blacks never left Africa.

Neanderthals had genes for bigger brain size, early sapiens for better brain matter, which mixing created the white/yellow IQ advantage. The event that sparked civilised humans into being was a chance crossbreeding that nigs had no part of.
Can you link it?
 
Can you link it?

The digging starts here.
 
1000000881.jpg
@Male Idiot
 
@Joseph McCarthy do you need social stats like these or dna analysis?
Both

Race statistics is pretty pointless when you can just see how a racial group performs in the real world either as a community or a country.
The problem is a lot of midwits, especially if they live in an area that isn't very "diverse", will write off nigger behavior as "just one bad nigger".
 
No. There are people who blame France for the fucked up state Haiti is in.
Yeah, there is a lot of liberal whites and niggers huffing copium who like to blame whitey and poverty for all their problems. But it's circular reasoning because even when niggers run their own countries, it's still a dumpster fire, and even when there's rich niggers, their kids still perform suboptimally at life compared to whites. People don't want to admit that it's a biological thing. Races are subspecies. Negroids are not fit for life in first-world white countries. The elites all know this too.
 
Yeah, there is a lot of liberal whites and niggers huffing copium who like to blame whitey and poverty for all their problems. But it's circular reasoning because even when niggers run their own countries, it's still a dumpster fire, and even when there's rich niggers, their kids still perform suboptimally at life compared to whites. People don't want to admit that it's a biological thing. Races are subspecies. Negroids are not fit for life in first-world white countries. The elites all know this too.
My most controversial take is that welfare should be limited to white people.

SNAP-participation-by-race.png
 
I agree. Either that or niggers must agree to self-sterilize in order to accept welfare. There's too many welfare queens gaming the system by popping out more and more niglets.
They and hispanics are a net drain to our economy.

image-17.png
Asian Americans by IQ score and detailed ethnicity.

As expected, three big boys have the highest average IQ and Indians aren't aryan.
 
This might be a silly question, but maybe I can get a good answer here; do these stats ever account for cheating or selective testing? Here in Canada, there has been quite a few scandals involving cheating and Chinese/Indians, so it makes it a lot tougher to take any stats on I.Q seriously.
 
This might be a silly question, but maybe I can get a good answer here; do these stats ever account for cheating or selective testing? Here in Canada, there has been quite a few scandals involving cheating and Chinese/Indians, so it makes it a lot tougher to take any stats on I.Q seriously.
Yes and no. Yes insofar as you discount obviously incorrect data. The Indians have attempted to cheat on things like PISA tests but failed even at that. The Chinese don't need to cheat, but they have the opportunity to selectively test populations and their kids grow up in intense academic environments, so it's unclear to what extent their scores represent the average person in China vs. the middle-upper class.

You can usually get a good feel for a country's average IQ just by looking at violent crime statistics. It's a good indirect measurement of retards.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo