💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
His parents do have a local house and they are up there sometimes. But I've never found any sign of them trying for influence in the usual ways which would be campaign contributions to the sheriff/prosecutor/judges. And somewhat honestly, if they did have political influence in that area, the search warrant would never have happened at Nick's house.
I think it's a combo of Nick knowing how to schmooze, who to talk to, him being a first time offender, and the law trying to keep the family unit together.
 
His parents do have a local house and they are up there sometimes. But I've never found any sign of them trying for influence in the usual ways which would be campaign contributions to the sheriff/prosecutor/judges. And somewhat honestly, if they did have political influence in that area, the search warrant would never have happened at Nick's house.
Some of the local authorities go to some of those retarded parties with the rekietaboomers tho
 
Let’s say this whole Dr. Steve thing was a work. It still wouldn’t be the slam dunk they seem to think it is. The judge is a normie. They’d be taking it for granted that he wouldn’t look askance at the doctor’s note being from a guy who’s participated in Melton’s anti-Aaron content machine for years. That would be a pretty fucking stupid thing to do.

I think the other pattern is that they have to be women that he could emotionally manipulate and subject to negging.
By definition only 9s and 10s can be negged. Nick has never been involved with a woman who qualifies for negging. What he does is belittle and dismantle whatever self-esteem they have, manipulating and convincing them it’s their fault. It’s classic abuser shit. But these women aren’t hot enough to be neggable.
 
So Cecil raided this random ass show on Rumble then Nick showed up in chat and asked for the link. I don’t think he knows anyone besides JimTellsYou.

4113aa5d-fd58-4a4b-bf7e-0d63b9981d3f.jpeg
 
Holy shit Nick is laying it on thick......rehashing all the lies. Keeps talking about AAron's dick, him not knowing his lawyer is on medical, hos other lawyer not confirming that he can make the 13th, talking about all he wanted was a trial....what a fag.
All he wanted was a trial, just like he would EASILY beat those drug charges, because the police lied!

It is insane how detached from reality he STILL is.

The funny thing is that Nick has managed to get his former friend jailed, broke up a marriage, and now a doctor is possibly losing his license thanks to Nick talking too much.

All before Nick goes to jail.
Teflon Nick can do not wrong.
 
All he wanted was a trial, just like he would EASILY beat those drug charges, because the police lied!

It is insane how detached from reality he STILL is.

The funny thing is that Nick has managed to get his former friend jailed, broke up a marriage, and now a doctor is possibly losing his license thanks to Nick talking too much.

All before Nick goes to jail.
Teflon Nick can do not wrong.
It is crazy that these 5 other fags are just licking all the shit up that he is spewing. fucking retards.
 
So IANAL but..Nick is saying he has all these text messages to say Aaron hates his kids, abuses his last two wives etc that he wants to bring up.
Does that open the door, or is it even allowed to have testimony from a witness to refute those claims?

Because it would be very funny and weird if April got subpoena'd to provide evidence to refute his claims. Especially as her new BF seems to hate crackieta like the best of us.

I imagine having April testify against him in the HRO would be absolutely devastating to him, but oh so funny
 
So IANAL but..Nick is saying he has all these text messages to say Aaron hates his kids, abuses his last two wives etc that he wants to bring up. Does that open the door for testimony from witnesses to refute those claims?

Because it would be very funny and weird if April got subpoena'd to provide evidence to refute his claims. Especially as her new BF seems to hate crackieta like the best of us.
I imagine having April testify against him in the HRO would be absolutely devistaing to him, but oh so funny
This "evidence" has nothing to do with the case and just makes Nick look schizo and doesnt need to be refuted.
 
So IANAL but..Nick is saying he has all these text messages to say Aaron hates his kids, abuses his last two wives etc that he wants to bring up.
Does that open the door, or is it even allowed to have testimony from a witness to refute those claims?

Because it would be very funny and weird if April got subpoena'd to provide evidence to refute his claims. Especially as her new BF seems to hate crackieta like the best of us.

I imagine having April testify against him in the HRO would be absolutely devistaing to him, but oh so funny

If he has the text that state that then he can show them. Now I would think Aaron could sue Nick for saying that April told him that he ate his cum. He would then need to get April to testify that it happened so it is not hearsay. Then again I am past due on my CLEs....and JD.
 
Wow, good comeback, Nick:

49e83a4f-fa84-4a24-b31a-429a2d403877.jpeg

Note he is responding to all the chats while he’s on stream. You can hear him mashing the keyboard as everyone else is trying to have a stream.
 
Nick is saying he has all these text messages to say Aaron hates his kids, abuses his last two wives etc that he wants to bring up.
So in his infinite wisdom, Nick is talking about his legal strategy, which is to bring up irrelevant things during trial, to continue harassing Aaron while on the stand, under oath, testifying?

Nick really is a fucking retard with holes in his brain.
This is EXACTLY the kind of stuff he is expected to NOT talk about, NOT bring up about someone who has a TRO against him.

And threatening to bring up humiliating information during a court trial is on another level of retardation.

Judge: "Mr. Rekieta, this trial is to determine weather the plaintiff is granted an HRO against you.
Nick: "Yes, your honorablness. Did I tell you about that one time when I came into his wife and then he licked the jizz out of her bleeding pussy?"
 
Atrás
Top Abajo