💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Potentially Cat Mom]

This is complete bullshit. Nick has no clue what he's talking about and probably slept through ethics. Unless a lawyer is sworn in as a witness, he is not, strictly speaking, "under oath." Now, a lawyer is bound by the professional oath he took as part of the licensing process, but it's a different oath.

This doesn't mean a lawyer can just lie to the court without facing penalties. There are civil, criminal, and disciplinary penalties for lying to the court (or making bad faith or objectively unreasonable arguments).

But to give a specific example that pretty much speaks for itself, why would they bother swearing in a lawyer as a witness when he is one, if they're already under oath anyway?

Nick is a fucking idiot and needs to do more CLE and less G

A probation violation has hit the docket. Rekieta has admitted to the court that he missed drug tests on March 16 and April 3.

Nick, in admitting missing the tests, has accepted a sanction of a) increased drug testing and b) 16 hours of community service completed in the next month in lieu of confinement.

Ver archivo adjunto 8867728
Ver archivo adjunto 8867748

The sanction document itself isn't available on MCRO.

Ver archivo adjunto 8867732

So basically they are giving him a slap on the wrist? smh.

 

[florida_cat_enjoyer]

Nick literally had the easiest probation possible and still fucked it up

Maybe to us kiwi stalkers who view everything myopia of poverty, but taking a couple minutes every morning to check if you have to test is almost impossible if you’re as busy as he is.

 

[Potentially Cat Mom]

I quoted from here https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nichol...ieta-u-early-leopard-8351.53871/post-24263337

But that was from Nick's stream.

I finally found it on Stallyn. Was rewatching but i am like, he stole his semen? Took it with out asking...like what? wouldn't that be considered some sort of sexual battery? Would he have been in capitated and Nick found out about it later? Why isn't he presses charges? So many questions and I am not sure I want the answers.

 

[Schpoots]

Live streaming, keeping the house clean and not drugging your kids is a monumental task. I can understand why the judge went easy on him.

 

[waffle]

May this be the first of many PVs.

Y'all know what they say about missed tests round these parts?

Spoiler: They call em...

positive tests.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

Nigga ending up on increased scrutiny puts you from the 'whatever, it's just some white dude who cares' into someone actually looking at your tests.

He's on his way to getting Bossman'd where 5 years of probation done by 2-3 with good behavior turns into 10 years of extended probation via fucking around.

Next fuck up is gonna be getting booked and having to talk to the judge with some rehab sprinkled in.

The mugshot when they catch and release his ass on bond is going to be glorious.


Edit: continuing to hope we get someone photographing him in the wild picking up litter, like how we got gas station DSP.

 

[Bean Sidhe]

I hope so, the "animesuckscopeandsneed" MATI segment was a gutbuster, I laughed so hard I felt sick.

Same... I initially found Nick himself rather horrifying, but Null laughing his ass off while watching the clip was hilarious.

 

[Sneed Force One]

The sanction document itself isn't available on MCRO.

@Potentially Criminal
Could these documents be available from the courthouse? Or is it like the PSI report?

 

[Vibralldo]

So Nick was only getting tested every 2 weeks? That's plenty of time to go on a bender with most substances and have it all wash out of your system, right? If they're going to step that up to weekly, things might get interesting. Maybe we'll see Nick hitting the Galaxy Gas harder since its half-life is instantaneous.

I guarantee that's what was happening.

The worker says that they are there to make things as easy for Nick during probation so they just wanted him out of their hair.

May this be the first of many PVs.

Y'all know what they say about missed tests round these parts?

Spoiler: They call em...

positive tests.

Nick mentioned having to explain """"false""" positives".

 

[Captain Manning]

So basically they are giving him a slap on the wrist? smh.

There is room for escalation. Especially if they are gonna be testing more frequently. This is his first PV. He's being dinged for missing drug tests. Not failing one, or being caught with drugs. Where I presume they would have gone in much harder on him.

Plus Rapt did say, back in February, that his new P.O. is less of a lazy fuck than his last one, so stay tuned.

Rekieta's new probation officer (female again) is also somewhat more of a Rekieta and ratwife agnostic than the last one who was basically a lazy and almost fawning Rekieta family lapdog. The magic is wearing off now that Rekieta family money is less plentiful.

---

May this be the first of many PVs.

Amen.

 

[Goatchoker]

Ver archivo adjunto 8867925
Why is he writing like a girl

His audacity to think he’s better than anyone is amazing.

Most people do bumps in corners. Lines in bathrooms are lame.

 

[Sexy Potoo]

Ver archivo adjunto 8867925
Why is he writing like a girl

He writes like a girl because he likes to receive loads of goo in his ass.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

Actually you can plead the Fifth in a civil trial, if your testimony could lead to criminal exposure, but unlike in a criminal trial, the other side can argue this is evidence your answers would have been incriminating.

The judge could even find against you from the bench, ruling that whatever fact you refused to testify about is established, and if there's a jury, instructing them so.

Wasn't this part of Aaron's potential problem in Nick's dream civil suit against him? He could testify and break his Kayla's restraining order or refuse to testify and the civil court would be obliged to take the worst possible interpretation.

 

[AnOminous]

So Nick is willing to go on record....that Dr Steve violated HIPPA by discussing Melton's medical information with a non responsible party?

Never mind the other obvious shit that whatever he says about whatever Dr. Steve said is the rankest form of hearsay and falls under none of the exceptions.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

As an unlicensed medical non-professional I am telediagnosing Aaron with a rather troublesome case of Toe-in-Mouth disease.

Aaron doesn't have a gag order of any kind with respect to MELTON and the boomer doctor is a Melton problem in the case not Rekieta problem.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Join Rekieta as he marks one year sober!​

0:54

 

[Sneed Force One]

Wasn't this part of Aaron's potential problem in Nick's dream civil suit against him? He could testify and break his Kayla's restraining order or refuse to testify and the civil court would be obliged to take the worst possible interpretation.

It also works in reverse in Aaron's HRO against Nick, if he refuses to testify in relation to alleged events such as CFAA violations of Aaron's Google account, and how other information was procured, his silence can be interpreted adversely.

 

[AnOminous]

At least he spelled HIPAA correctly. A small but important win for the Toe.

If I posted a correction every time some goddamn moron spells it "HIPPA" I'd be spamming the thread (I mean more than I usually do), but goddamn do I cringe every single time.

 

[Maraschino]

But he accused, uh, either he accused Patrick Melton of forging a letter about his own medical condition. [...] It was very, very interesting, and it opens up some very funny possibilities for the near future for me. [...]"

I believe Nick believes this, but I doubt it means what he thinks it means.

"I talked to Dr. Steve, uh, you know, because he, he talked to me, um, you know, and mentioned that he was going to write a recommendation that Patrick not travel because of the pain that he was in. It, it just, you know, um, he was, he was under the legitimate medical care of Dr. Steve. Uh, that, that's a real thing. I don't know, I don't know if you guys know this, but you can, a licensed medical professional, you can consult whichever one you want, like in multiple. You don't have to go to, like, a clinic. If you know a doctor is willing to work with you, they can be your private doctor. That, that's an okay thing to happen. [...]

I hope you aren't testifying to something that can be used against you (lie, I hope he did, because it'd be really funny for him to be proven wrong once again).

So anyway, um, but this letter is 100% legitimate. I offered, this is wild too, I offered to the court, but I said, "Your Honor," or, well, I, I, sorry, I said to my attorney, "I will testify to the legitimacy of this letter and the situation. I'll testify because I have personal knowledge of it."

I hope you aren't testifying to something that can be used against you (lie, I hope he did, because it'd be really funny for him to be proven wrong once again).

So Nick is willing to go on record....that Dr Steve violated HIPPA by discussing Melton's medical information with a non responsible party? Or will Dr Steve produce a form that the pedo signed allowing him to release information to Nick and therefore confirming he did in fact practice medicine in a state that he was not licensed in. No matter which way you spin it, some laws were broken.

There's another possibility: maybe Dr. Steve did what we think he did, because Nick suggested/outright said that he would be allowed to do it and it'd be legal. Which could be legal advice. Which he's not allowed to give out. And I think (IANAL so YMMV) if you aren't legally permitted to be practicing as an attorney, you can't establish attorney-client privilege, so whatever you fucking said to Steve while suspended likely isn't protected.

And not only did you, in this hypothetical, commit a crime by giving out legal advice when you weren't supposed to, you did it in a way that resulted in Steve committing a crime (unathorized practice of medicine), in the process of helping Melton commit a crime. I'm not Canadian or a gambler, but I believe this is what you would refer to as a triple feltening.

The backstory of Melton's back

I hope his stupidass idea came from Nick.

'll probably mix up the details if I try repeating the full story, but my all-time favorite Rekieta lore is when he botched a group project meant to teach ethics because he ignored all the instructions, unethically spied on the other group, and then focused solely on getting the best results regardless of how he was behaving. The professor tore him a new asshole in front of the whole class for his shenanigans.

Mind you, we only know about this because Nick himself repeated the story while framing his professor as a monster.

From TheScarebro on X:

Stick around, I've got a story that was relayed to me.
Imagine a law school contracts class project.
Your class is split into groups.
And then further split into sides A and B, to negotiate a contract.
Let's presume you are in Side A.
You are given parameters on what your goals are and what you have to offer.
The conditions are the same for each group.
Now, you've been always been told you were smart.
So what do you do?You sit close to another group's Side B to determine what their parameters are for the negotiation. What they can offer, what their goals are, etc.
You return to your group and use this insider information for your negotiation.
You win big, and think you're amazing.
Your entire feedback piece is stroking your own ego about how much you "won" in the negotiation process.
But then comes the review, and it has a few things that dock points from you (and maybe your group).

• failure to maintain proper records or go through appropriate channels
• substantive unconscionability (the terms were so bad the contract was not legally enforceable)
• lack of consideration (promising nothing of value)
• misrepresentation/fraud (promises that could not be fulfilled)

And then imagine being so butthurt about it you complain to the professor about the unfairness of it all.

Wasn't this part of Aaron's potential problem in Nick's dream civil suit against him? He could testify and break his Kayla's restraining order or refuse to testify and the civil court would be obliged to take the worst possible interpretation.

I doubt it. I think any court which isn't completely fucking retarded is going to hear Aaron say, "I was asked by the COURT ITSELF to testify," and recognize it as a legitimate exception. Nick thinking he can try to use the HRO against Aaron in this way sounds fucking stupid and falls under "This is obviously not how this shit works", and I'm not even a fucking attorney.

and the boomer doctor is a Melton problem in the case not Rekieta problem

As I said above, it could be a Rekieta problem if Nick gave him what could be interpreted as legal advice to go ahead with what he did, which was not legal.

If I posted a correction every time some goddamn moron spells it "HIPPA" I'd be spamming the thread

It's Null's new oshi, Hipkin Hippa.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

At Hackamania, it's more like a HIPPO violation.