Smashed & Slamed
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Jul, 2022
It depends actually. Many IJAAS(Imperial Japanese Army Air Service) had armor plates self sealing tanks and armored glass (Ki-43, Ki61, Ki-44, Ki-84). Later IJN(Imperial Japanese Navy) aircraft like the J2M and N1K as well as the last Zeroes the A6M6 had armor, tanks and glass.Incorrect. Or well, the example you give is correct but you are missing out that the rotation part only came about as a valuing of pilot lives.
Japanese planes valued combat performance above all else. They were lightly armored but on paper had the best stats until the last phase of the war. US planes however were heavily armored and had self-sealing rubber lined fuel tanks.
Had the Japanese opted to sacrifice performance for armor*, the pilot drive to stay in the air would have mattered much less. Also their increasingly inexperienced pilot pool would have mattered less and (if given the time and space) been self-correcting as their green pilots would have been more likely to survive their encounters with American aircraft and thus would have lived long enough to learn from them.
*This was a choice driven a lot by bushido (if you are defeated you should just die) and Japanese performance autism, but also by reality. Japan didn't have a lot of metal or fuel, so anything to save weight had extreme preference.
IJAAS pilots often willingly removed it for performance but so did Soviet pilots and nobody goes on about Bushido for them. The Zero tried to hit a very specific performance envelope and had to sacrifice everything for it. And in 1941 there was no better aircraft in the world, by 1942 the world had cought on.
The problems the Japanese had were that the Army and Navy hated each other. That Navy aircraft procurement lagged behind(The army adopted one new front line fighter each year. The navy pushed the compression on their zeroes and added a bit more ammo). And that they lacked high octane fuel. And also their pilot onboarding, training and such were shit.