Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

So what you're saying is "Freedom of Speech exists, but hey, if you get gunned down for it, then that's on you. You shouldn't have said that thing that made someone mad."

What even.

He did not deserve to be killed for his speech. but like somebody who dresses provocatively and naively goes to a biker bar, sometimes you need to learn to make better life choices. as is the case with saint Dr Charlie Kirk PhD provocatively acting like a word slut around the issue of the second amendment.*

*tangentially, Kyle rittenhouse also acted in a metaphorically slutty manner by driving across state lines into an active riot zone.

Milton Friedman, however, never made any stupid skank decisions
 
Última edición:
uh? didn't happen, brother
trump-wrong.png

Charlie Kirk, time traveler:



Charlie Kirk, man with the third eye & magic powers (specifically astral projection, which Owens also claims to be able to do):



Both were originally posted to the later pages of Owens' own thread here on the Farms (beyond page 70 I do believe, been some time since I grabbed these).
 
He did not deserve to be killed for his speech. but like somebody who dresses provocatively and naively goes to a biker bar, sometimes you need to learn to make better life choices. as is the case with saint Dr Charlie Kirk PhD provocatively acting like a word slut around the issue of the second amendment.*

*tangentially, Kyle rittenhouse also acted in a metaphorically slutty manner by driving across state lines into an active riot zone.

Milton Friedman, however, never made any stupid skank decisions
This is just another way to say holding political belief X rationalizes violence against you for holding political belief X
 
I'm reminded that you aren't the only person out there that does this kind of mental gymnastics to blame the victims.
I still don't get at this point how there are people out there who think they are going to Ben Shaprio ebin debate faggots who have in no uncertain terms declared that they want you and anyone who agrees with you to be murdered. Time and time again these "revolutionaries" have shown that the only consistent point they live by is friend/enemy distinction and that you are The Enemy. They lie to your face, deliberately misunderstand your points, and do not care about being hypocrites. They venerate criminality and rot and detest stable, functional society. Words mean nothing to them except for how they can be twisted to argumentative advantage. Morality is something they want other people to live by while they feel entitled to take and destroy as they wish. If you're not trying to show an unsure observer what they're like, then the only interaction worth having with them in that regard is calling them retarded cattlebrain niggers and moving on with your day.
 
If people grow up hearing nothing but "This side good, that side bad" for their entire lives, then they are 100% absolutely going to live out the rest of their lives thinking like that too
I saw a tweet that I'm going to screenshot to here but I went back a page & boom there is your post. Turns out what you wrote is very apt indeed. It made me realize this is why lefties (or proggys at the very least) are the way they are.

1772222651546.png

It's also the same reason these idiots to this day parrot the Rittenhouse "he crossed state lines" crap.

*tangentially, Kyle rittenhouse also acted in a metaphorically slutty manner by driving across state lines into an active riot zone.
kinda like this idiot here.

in addition, as stated before, Charlie Kirk had to curate minutes of epic ownage from hours of getting his asshole reamed by other master debaters

Hey look here is the "The right is editing the left to make all lefties look bad!!!"

Unlike the left who had to use this tactic back in the Daily Show days, the right doesn't need to do any editing to make lefties out as idiots.
 
He did not deserve to be killed for his speech. but like somebody who dresses provocatively and naively goes to a biker bar, sometimes you need to learn to make better life choices. as is the case with saint Dr Charlie Kirk PhD provocatively acting like a word slut around the issue of the second amendment.*

*tangentially, Kyle rittenhouse also acted in a metaphorically slutty manner by driving across state lines into an active riot zone.

Milton Friedman, however, never made any stupid skank decisions
IMG_4662.jpeg
 
People in this thread sometimes wonder why there is almost no talk about Charlie Kirk now from the political right leadership in the US.

Why the opportunity wasn't seized to give the left back what the right has been receiving for at least a decade at that point.

It doesn't make sense. You have the problem that you have no good answers to those questions.

You can only live in that confusion as long as you ignore the possibility that there was a larger conspiracy beyond Tyler Robinson.

You may then not have certainty in how exactly it was pulled off and who exactly was involved, but it does resolve the why questions above. A larger conspiracy means that those involved want to give an easily digestable story, create a lot of fanfare for it, but then also have it quietly resolved. Too much attention on Charlie would be counterproductive and the only fitting reason why there isn't the level of attention on his death for years as would otherwise be expected for all the political capital and unity it could produce.

I think Sam Parker gave the best breakdown of it.



https://x.com/BasedSamParker
https://x.com/BasedSamParker
@BasedSamParker

OF COURSE ISRAEL WAS INVOLVED IN THE ASS*SSINATION OF CHARLIE KIRK.

In November 2023, a leaked call from Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL revealed a "major generational problem" regarding declining support for israel in America. He revealed polling that showed it wasn't "Left vs. Right," but it was "young vs. old." He called this the "TikTok problem," or the "Gen Z problem." He called Gen Z "useful idiots" and said the "real game" was to solve this problem. He called for the jewish community to put their collective brains together to solve this generational problem. Here's what we know they did:

1. They immediately pressured Tiktok to increase censorship. In November 2023 alone, TikTok deleted over 900,000 pro-Palestine videos. They also blocked various hashtags, including "israel did 911."

2. They mobilized a high-pressure campaign against the Ivy League campuses that were the epicenter of pro-Palestine protests & activism. Several university presidents were punished & replaced by jews and/or zionists willing to suppress free speech. (We must note that this campus activism was driven by Leftist organizations. This will be important later.)

3. They lobbied congress, which then passed new laws suppressing & punishing campus free speech & demonstrations classified as "antisemitic."

4. They lobbied congress to outright shut down & ban Tiktok, which congress obliged. However, Trump ended up "saving" TikTok, which was then forced to sell itself to a consortium of pro-israel jewish billionaires, led principally by uber-zionist Larry Ellison. That sale went through on September 16, 2025—6 days after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated.

5. In early 2025, the newly-installed Trump administration threatened to withhold $Hundreds of Millions in federal aid to several universities unless they put "safeguards" in place preventing the outbreak of pro-Palestinian activism (again defined as "antisemitism").

6. In 2025, israel, through organizations like Israel365, started spending $Millions on sending hundreds of American "influencers" to israel in order to get them promoting the zionist cause and rehabilitating israel's image.

7. In 2025, Netanyahu launched Israel's "8th-Front" Information Warfare campaign, targeting the social media & AI landscape in the United States. Israel has earmarked an additional $729 million in FY2026 for these operations.

8. Zionist billionaires took over the entire CBS/Paramount media ecosystem in August 2025. (And they've just now added the entire Warner Bros. Discovery ecosystem, which they've also been pursuing since the fall of 2025). But despite all of this, israel had a problem. Call it the Charlie Kirk TPUSA problem.

*Charlie led a campus organization for youth ON THE RIGHT, with 600k+ lifetime members, and 250k+ active members. The largest organization of its kind, completely beholden to his leadership.

* Charlie generated billions of views on Tiktok & across the social media landscape, and was firmly opposed to censorship of all kinds including and explicitly speech critical of israel.

* Charlie was completely critical of the ADL, calling for its ban on social media & diametrically opposing its calls for more censorship.

* Charlie was extremely outspoken and critical of Left-wing jewish activism, which he blamed for the radical, open-borders Marxism ruining the country.

* Charlie actively asserted his massive influence to oppose regime-change war in Iran, pressuring Donald Trump inside the Whitehouse itself.

* Charlie was becoming increasingly critical of israel & zionism: questioning the suspicious events of 10/7, openly platforming debates against zionism, & himself leading discussions that advocated for cutting aid to israel, releasing the Epstein files, and calling for AIPAC to be registered as a foreign agent under FARA. It should be noted that demanding FARA registration of the israel lobby was one of the actions that got JFK ass*ssinated by the same people.

* Charlie was giving TPUSA platform access to powerful israel-critical voices like Tucker Carlson & Dave Smith, and intended to expand that to include @RealCandaceO. You have seen how ape-sh*t crazy they're going over Tucker & Candace—people who were telling the truth about Epstein & israeli control over the US government and also discouraging war with Iran.


* We now also know that Charlie was done with the pro-israel cause and had been signaling his intent to drop it. We have the leaked text, but that didn't happen in a vacuum. That was no doubt the culmination of a lot of momentum in that direction. Here's what I want you to realize if you haven't already: Charlie Kirk was single-handedly undoing or undercutting every move israel & organized jewry had made over the previous 2 years to solve the "Gen Z problem." Remember how organized campus opposition to israel came from the Left? Well here came Charlie Kirk re-platforming it on the Right! Charlie had transformed TPUSA into a Trojan horse—allowing & amplifying everything they'd sought to eliminate from the Left!Charlie Kirk was a massive roadblock to the jewish plan to re-conquer the minds of the youth of America. He was literally AND figuratively the Big Man On Campus. The most influential man in America on the youth. He was allowing and accelerating the rising generation to be radically anti-israel while simultaneously being "Conservative Republicans" in good standing who wouldn't be canceled.

THE PLAN

The israel-network tried several (ineffective) methods to solve the Charlie Kirk TPUSA problem.

1. They tried to quietly & privately influence him in private with through people like Josh Hammer & Rabbi Wolicki, and surround him with pro-zionists like Rob McCoy & Frank Turek.

2. They launched a high-pressure influence operation against him, which culminated in a 2-day "moral blackmail" event in the Hamptons. He took to the media to denounce these efforts.

3. They tried to outright buy him off when Netanyahu offered $150 million. He refused.

4. They tried to force his hand by pulling funding—notable was the $2 million withdrawn by Robert Shillman. He responded by launching a DOGE effort to shore up the finances and by announcing his intentions to leave the pro-israel cause.

In summary: they dragged him privately & publicly; they blackmailed him; and then they tried to buy him. Nothing worked. He deflected everything, said 'NO,' and fought off all the attacks. He had resolved to find a new way forward with the new financial situation. Is there any doubt he would have succeeded?

That left the israel-jewish network with only one option—an option that time-and-time-again they've been all too willing to resort to.

Don't come at me with "Charlie Kirk supported israel!" and "Charlie Kirk loved the jews!" nonsense. John F. Kennedy also supported israel and embraced the jews. But there was a conflict: he put America first. And so did Charlie Kirk.

My facts are true. And my logic is sound. I won't hear of this "lone gunman" nonsense any more. Miss me with the "Some random kid all by himself drove 300 miles on a week's notice, shoved a 110-year old gun down his pants, walked onto a roof directly in front of Charlie, delivered a perfect 1-shot/1-kill, escaped with no problem, and then immediately texted the whole plan to his furry roommate."

Israel would not be able to take this country to war against Iran if Charlie Kirk were still alive today. Period. I don't care how much he loved jews on a personal level.

The hostile takeover of TPUSA was every bit as necessary as the hostile takeover of Tiktok and the Ivy league universities. Either you believe israel was the recipient of the most timely, fantastic stroke of geopolitical good luck ever, or you realize that Jonathan Greenblatt's injunction to take back Gen Z has been fulfilled in practically every particular.

A leaked call from Greenblatt of the ADL about the "Gen Z problem"
Screenshot_20260301_112512_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20260301_112537_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20260301_112554_Brave.jpg

The Charlie Kirk problem they had:
Screenshot_20260301_112608_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20260301_112608_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20260301_112622_Brave.jpg

Kirk prevented the solving of the Gen Z problem.
Screenshot_20260301_112639_Brave.jpg

Alternative solutions tried to solving the Kirk problem:

Screenshot_20260301_112652_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20260301_112706_Brave.jpg

The relation to the Iran War:

Screenshot_20260301_113125_Brave.jpg

And the video sam parker posted with it that proves where the ADL stood previously. The ADL managed to solve those problems in the years since:

 
Última edición:
Just wait until Hassan is Minecrafted. His thread will be like a party.
The manner in which someone dies matters. Like it's completely different if for example some idiot shoots him because he was hurt in his feelings for some dumb shit Hassan said, or if kaya bites him and he bleeds out.

The last time i was this exicted was when charlie kirk was killed and i witnessed the fallout live on twitter, holy shit
I saw this in the Iran thread.
 
People in this thread sometimes wonder why there is almost no talk about Charlie Kirk now from the political right leadership in the US.
Kirk was overrated, for one, and his wife's circus show following Kirk's death only made the mourning all the more cringe.

Also there is some CRAZY SHIT happening in the world every single week now. Nobody has time to keep caring about the murder of a podcaster.
 
I saw this in the Iran thread.
my guy, i was refering to the simple fact of witnessing such an historical event live, i am not fucking gravedancing.

Seriously why are so many people here are just outright retarded and can't think for even a second about what a post could POSSIBLY mean and just make shitty false assumptions instead???
 
my guy, i was refering to the simple fact of witnessing such an historical event live, i am not fucking gravedancing.

Seriously why are so many people here are just outright retarded and can't think for even a second about what a post could POSSIBLY mean and just make shitty false assumptions instead???

If everybody misunderstands you, the onus is on you to communicate better.
 
I think it's safe to say conservatives have lost the culture war, on this and in general. I'm not just talking about the superbowl halftime show, although that was bad enough on its own. The left can just post videos of them murdering their political opponents to widespread and unanimous praise. The platforms don't even try to enforce their own rules with it; it'd be stupidly simple with AI, they choose not to. They're still reveling in their victory while we've lost all of our energy. Make no mistake, this is the bedrock for their new ideology. Murder works and they've learned this lesson very well. Every single one of them, down to the oldest, most frail libtard, is a potential killer and is more than willing to kill you. There's only one way to deal with that.
It's to the point that "kirked" is a commonly used verb. It's a celebration, a painful reminder and a threat: "we're going to kill all of you." This isn't unprecedented: the soviets killed a lot of people who fought for the whites (the other side of the civil war) after they won, including in exile. That was over a hundred years ago and with a much less sympathetic world, nowadays with much more advanced technology and a browner, gayer world they could. The left has already decided our fate: total genocide, down to the last infant. Conservatives and non-total libtard Whites have to ditch this passive, pacifist loser mindset, accept that there will be no peace with anyone who wants you dead and be willing to defend themselves from them violently.

These posts (and many similar ones I've seen now) still understate just how atrocious the GOP's response to Kirk's murder was and the unparalleled sadism leftists expressed globally over it, because it overlooks something else just as significant:

Kirk was murdered right after Iryna Zarutska's murder footage went viral. That was also an otherwise watershed event. I think Paul Kersey expressed to Jared Taylor the outrage over her was on par with a dam breaking, and it seemed that way. It really seemed like you were beginning to see a genuine hardening of white racial attitudes after decades of civil rights propaganda. A random white girl who came as a refugee from a war-torn eastern euro country (who was likely a liberal herself) to be randomly murdered by another soulless nigger criminal that was only allowed to walk free because of a legal system that sees niggers as a race of sinless, sacred, never-do-wrong cosmic victims, who was met with complete indifference from the other black passengers, with the nigger even falsely accusing her of calling her a nigger after he stabbed her.

"America will never be the same" over the screenshot of her right after being stabbed was one of Kirk's last posts. You saw that reposted over and over, routinely garnering hundreds of thousands of likes. Then he got murdered a day or two later and you saw the biggest outpouring of psychopathy from leftists since BLM 2020, even more mask off given they didn't even attempt their schizophrenic messaging or tried to fall back on the "peaceful protests" that occurred then. The murder of a podcaster/activist most of them had never heard of being treated as the greatest thing to ever happen, because that's just what leftists really are. You saw countless leftists fired and doxxed over the next month, with some leftists like Tyler Gregory Sternbach sensing the right was genuinely going to do something. The huge spat with Jimmy Kimmel. Antifa *finally* being designated a terrorist organization. Expanded operations against them. All of that palpable outrage from the right.

And then....... nothing. An actual socialist Muslim became mayor of NYC and Jay "I want to kill the children of my enemies" Jones won in Virginia. That beaner hog schoolteacher who mimicked Kirk's assassination never got fired. The right wasn't actually doing much of anything. Leftists sensed this and they pivoted like never before to ruthlessly degrading his image with AI and turning him into a sadistic punching bag. Because the GOP, as usual, failed to do much of anything. Because after over 10 years, they're still almost as worthless as they were before Trump.

Oh, we also get "Iryna's Law", which prevents cash bail or whatever for violent criminals like what happened to the nigger that stabbed her to death. In one state. When this is still an epidemic across the entire country and for that matter other western countries. And Charlie Kirk coins!

All that really seems to have come out of this is it's "radicalized" more people on the right. Whatever that truly means at this point. I mean you did see more people celebrating the deaths of those two libtards in MN like they never would have before, and racism against Zoomalis is even more mainstream than Indians (which I still think this primarily an online phenomenon.) I'm sure it'll get worse and worse as time has gone on, and we'll almost certainly get more RW terrorism that's been influenced (if not explicitly) by the behavior of leftists. All a much more nebulous and degraded outcome than if the GOP actually did something, who have shown themselves to be mostly the same dickless eunuchs and grotesque traitors they were before Trump came along. But we'll just have to see. If we get something like an American Anders Breivik, and he's met with celebration on large swaths of the right, that will tell you something. An outcome that could have avoided if the GOP, again, did something, but also if leftists didn't act like sadistic psychopaths the world over and continue to do so.

It's also worth noting (and I've seen next to nobody remark on this) that leftists disavowed almost all of their anti-AI autism to degrade Charlie Kirk. They'd justify it with using his image to pervert the AI models, but that's not how it works, and many of them probably know that. They just wanted to express their atavistic sadism against a podcaster/activist that became a focal point for their frustration over not getting Trump in 2024 and all of their pent up bloodlust against all the evil chuds who don't worship every nigger criminal and every tranny. You can just imagine how many poor black families they killed to paste Kirk's image into anything they could.

Because leftists are mostly soulless animals who will do anything to harm their enemies, all in the service of the absolute dregs of humanity. This post was a perfect summation of what they are and what we're dealing with in the aftermath of his murder, aside from the fact the idea they're humans with souls:
dd27c594e.png
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo