Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

I think it’s pretty “notable” that he never assaulted people in any way. Unlike the left’s heroes like Floyd, Renee, or Pretti.

How’s that for notable nigger?

Obeying the law is a pretty low bar for being notable when the only other greatest accomplishment achieved was an adult in his late 20s arguing with stupid kids 10 years younger than him (anybody under the age of 25 is a stupid kid) and "cant breev" after compression to his neck.

Not that naming things after St Floyd isn't stupid.

I'm just saying there are conservatives who didn't flunk out of community college* things could be named after instead.

*LOL flunking out of the easiest form of college. I guess some people just can't cut it in the high stakes world of 2 year certificates.
 
Última edición:
Obeying the law is a pretty low bar for being notable when the only other greatest accomplishment achieved was an adult in his late 20s arguing with stupid kids 10 years younger than him

Let me phrase this in a way your peanut brain can comprehend.

Kirk talk to young people. Kirk offend young people a lot. Kirk bad??? No.

Floyd attack woman. Floyd take bad crystal. Floyd bad??? Yes.

Renee attack cop. Ram big metal horse on cop. Renee bad??? Yes.

Pretti also attack cop. Spit on cop. Bring out boom stick by many people. Pretti bad??? Yes.

Kirk deserve remembering more than stupid bad people.


In all seriousness Kirk deserves it because he was actively attempting to educate the youth on a large-scale, civilized, and meaningful way. He had gained much notoriety even before the assassination. He did more than “argue with kids” because thanks to the internet he was exposed to way more of the population than you’re proposing. Was he always right? No. But he was civil and respectful with it.
 
I'm just saying there are conservatives who didn't flunk out of community college* things could be named after instead.

*LOL flunking out of the easiest form of college. I guess some people just can't cut it in the high stakes world of 2 year certificates.
Horrendous bait by the way, he voluntarily left to focus on TPUSA (and became more successful and influential than he would've been at any college.)
 
Horrendous bait by the way, he voluntarily left to focus on TPUSA (and became more successful and influential than he would've been at any college.)

Not saying he couldn't cut it as a successful pundit.

He just couldn't cut it in basic math. which is why he probably spent the rest of his life jealous of people who could. (Just like he couldn't cut it joining the military.)

Money can't eradicate the insecurity of knowing that a black person is capable of long division when you are not.
 
Última edición:
Apperently they are naming a highway after him. Did Charlie really do anything notabel that changed the world for the better?
Not saying he couldn't cut it as a successful pundit.
It's worth pointing out that TPUSA was a highly influential organization. Their campus events are often one of the first times university students interact with decent quality right wing and conservative ideas, especially if they didn't get any of it from their home life. Most entertainment media only contains caricatures of these ideas, something to look down on.

It's one of the reasons right wing people understand left wing people much better than vice versa.

Charlie Kirk played a significant role in the re-election of Donald Trump. It's probably more impact on the world than you or I will have in our entire lives.
 
It's worth pointing out that TPUSA was a highly influential organization. Their campus events are often one of the first times university students interact with decent quality right wing and conservative ideas, especially if they didn't get any of it from their home life. Most entertainment media only contains caricatures of these ideas, something to look down on.

It's one of the reasons right wing people understand left wing people much better than vice versa.

Charlie Kirk played a significant role in the re-election of Donald Trump. It's probably more impact on the world than you or I will have in our entire lives.

I would think it would be better if the students interacted with right wingers who managed to graduate from community college. If that happened then maybe Charlie Kirk wouldn't have had to curate minutes of epic ownage from hours of college students hurting his feelings.

Also most of those college students aren't going to die by the age of 30 so I think long-term they made a better choice with their academic and career paths, regardless of money.
 
Just here to say that Candace Owens is acting out the stereotype of the black woman who hates the white woman who was "picked" over her.

I don't know how else to explain this sick and twisted trajectory of her career.
 
I would think it would be better if the students interacted with right wingers who managed to graduate from community college. If that happened then maybe Charlie Kirk wouldn't have had to curate minutes of epic ownage from hours of college students hurting his feelings.

Also most of those college students aren't going to die by the age of 30 so I think long-term they made a better choice with their academic and career paths, regardless of money.

I'm sick of this braindead "but he debates with COLLEGE BABIES" schtick. It's a lazy argument.

Fuck off. College students are legal voting adults, being taught things with a huge political slant in one direction. People like Charlie Kirk challenge that programming.

More people should debate college students and make them at least think about the things they are being taught in the classrooms instead of taking it all for gospel and acting out like it's dogma.
 
I'm sick of this braindead "but he debates with COLLEGE BABIES" schtick. It's a lazy argument.

Fuck off. College students are legal voting adults, being taught things with a huge political slant in one direction. People like Charlie Kirk challenge that programming.

Disregarding these adult children as irrelevant is also a major part of the reason why we are in the mess we are in.

Yes, they may be overgrown toddlers, but they and their teachers and handlers still have their tentacles in every aspect of western civilization. They were by no means harmless.
 
I'm sick of this braindead "but he debates with COLLEGE BABIES" schtick. It's a lazy argument.

Fuck off. College students are legal voting adults, being taught things with a huge political slant in one direction. People like Charlie Kirk challenge that programming.

More people should debate college students and make them at least think about the things they are being taught in the classrooms instead of taking it all for gospel and acting out like it's dogma.
Not to mention charlie has pretty much done it all. He's went to oxford and cambridge, he's gone on jubilee with tiktok debatebros and he's debated the poggers twitchfags like hasan and vaush. only thing missing really was destiny and that would've probably happened sooner or later, he was also scheduled to debate adam mockler who is pretty much destinys student.
 
Disregarding these adult children as irrelevant is also a major part of the reason why we are in the mess we are in.

Yes, they may be overgrown toddlers, but they and their teachers and handlers still have their tentacles in every aspect of western civilization. They were by no means harmless.
Boomer conservatives be like "They're dumb youngins, they'll grow up once they experience the real world." Meanwhile, they grow up demanding to be taken care of by the government when they hit the real world, even resorting to violence to get what they want.

Gee, wonder why the GOP lost the youth vote. If people grow up hearing nothing but "This side good, that side bad" for their entire lives, then they are 100% absolutely going to live out the rest of their lives thinking like that too. We see it now, obviously. Politics has been treated like a religion over the past 30 years, and look how shitty everything is.
 
I'm sick of this braindead "but he debates with COLLEGE BABIES" schtick. It's a lazy argument.

Fuck off. College students are legal voting adults, being taught things with a huge political slant in one direction. People like Charlie Kirk challenge that programming.

More people should debate college students and make them at least think about the things they are being taught in the classrooms instead of taking it all for gospel and acting out like it's dogma.
As stated before, anybody under the age of 25 is a dumb fucking idiot and still a child. Science backs this up with research about myelination of the prefrontal cortex. This does however bring up a good point about not letting people under the age of 25 vote.

in addition, as stated before, Charlie Kirk had to curate minutes of epic ownage from hours of getting his asshole reamed by other master debaters. Somebody who took a freshman level intro to logic course from their community colleges philosophy department has the upper hand here. His goblin of a wife also probably could have benefited from some basic critical thinking courses before affiliating herself with a middle age singer who likes to have sex with 14-year-olds.

At the very least, St. Charlie (PBUH) lived and died by his opinion of the second amendment. I guess that's worth something.

Milton Friedman would probably be a better role model for fiscally conservative individuals to follow.
 
Última edición:
As stated before, anybody under the age of 25 is a dumb fucking idiot and still a child. Science backs this up with research about myelination of the prefrontal cortex. This does however bring up a good point about not letting people under the age of 25 vote.

in addition, as stated before, Charlie Kirk had to curate minutes of epic ownage from hours of getting his asshole reamed by other master debaters. Somebody who took a freshman level intro to logic course from their community colleges philosophy department has the upper hand here. His goblin of a wife also probably could have benefited from some basic critical thinking courses before affiliating herself with a middle age singer who likes to have sex with 14-year-olds.

At the very least, St. Charlie (PBUH) lived and died by his opinion of the second amendment. I guess that's worth something.

Lex Friedman would probably be a better role model for fiscally conservative individuals to follow.
Like it or not, Charlie Kirk played a huge role in getting Trump re-elected.

This take of yours is null and void.
 
As stated before, anybody under the age of 25 is a dumb fucking idiot and still a child. Science backs this up with research about myelination of the prefrontal cortex. This does however bring up a good point about not letting people under the age of 25 vote.
Translation: Charlie Kirk was wrong and dumb for trying to reason with college kids, instead he should have… campaigned to make them ineligible to vote. Gotcha.
 
Translation: Charlie Kirk was wrong and dumb for trying to reason with college kids, instead he should have… campaigned to make them ineligible to vote. Gotcha.

He was at first but then he hit the age of 25, failed to intellectually or emotionally mature, developed no useful life skills, did not evolve to being able to handle mature adults closer to his age, and then managed to make money by virtue signaling. Basically he succeeded where gamergate era social justice warriors didn't. He hit the lottery in that regard..

There's nothing wrong with him making money that way, but he is still just virtue signaling at the end of the day. It:s like emotional masturbation but instead of a successful cam whore he's a successful word whore.

Also he died around the age of 30 so he didn't even have a good chance to enjoy all that money he made. LOL.

edit: my nigga Milton Friedman had plenty of money and lived way past the age of 30..
 
Última edición:
As stated before, anybody under the age of 25 is a dumb fucking idiot and still a child
Cope from commies that want to indoctrinate 'kids' with the ability to vote and want absolutely no push back
He was at first but then he hit the age of 25, failed to intellectually or emotionally mature, developed no useful life skills, did not evolve to being able to handle mature adults closer to his age, and then managed to make money by virtue signaling. Basically he succeeded where gamergate era social justice warriors didn't. He hit the lottery in that regard..

There's nothing wrong with him making money that way, but he is still just virtue signaling at the end of the day. It:s like emotional masturbation but instead of a successful cam whore he's a successful word whore.
Why does this read like you are seething about the dude? If he was so irrelevant why are you trembling with rage and shitting out terrible bait?
Also he died around the age of 30 so he didn't even have a good chance to enjoy all that money he made. LOL.
We don't pick when we die chud!
I'm so mad about DEI. If it wasn't for DEI then Charlie Kirk would not have flunked out of community college. He was right to blame black people for his academic failings.
Bait used to be good
 
Última edición:
We don't pick when we die chud!
We can heavily influence when we die with more responsible life choices.

To that regard, St Charlie, king of kings, was a word slut who behaved provocatively in a public space. He was not asking for it, however you don't dip yourself in honey and enter a bear cave.

Translation: Charlie Kirk was wrong and dumb for trying to reason with college kids, instead he should have… campaigned to make them ineligible to vote. Gotcha.
Correct, and for similar reasons a rental car company charges a premium to anyone under 25, (or why a landlord demands first month, last month, and a security deposit)
 
Última edición:
We can heavily influence when we die with more responsible life choices.

To that regard, St Charlie, king of kings, was a word slut who behaved provocatively in a public space. He was not asking for it, however you don't dip yourself in honey and enter a bear cave.


Correct, and for similar reasons a rental car company charges a premium to anyone under 25, (or why a landlord demands first month, last month, and a security deposit)

So what you're saying is "Freedom of Speech exists, but hey, if you get gunned down for it, then that's on you. You shouldn't have said that thing that made someone mad."

What even.

Also, you can focus on age 25 all you want ... The fact of the matter is that 18 is the legal adult age in the US, and it's not likely to change. You making the argument that the legal age should be 25 does not erase the fact that 18 year-olds vote, go to college, pay taxes, get drafted to war, etc. What you are bitching about isn't the actual reality.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo