US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Oh, here we go. The Greenland thing is at least in part a tit for tat regarding Diego Garcia.

Ver archivo adjunto 8449410
Yea that was pretty obvious.
They operate like our commies. When one manages to get away with doing something retarded the rest of them start doing it. They play around testing the waters then once they're given their inch they take a mile.
 
Why the fuck is the administration doing nothing about the situation in Minnesota? There’s like 2 dozen antifa members that lead all of these mobs. They’re the most violent and lead all of the chants. Many if not all of them are on video doing so.

Why the FUCK is there radio silence from the administration? Why aren’t skulls being cracked? Why are people just being allowed to be assaulted? Churches stormed? NOTHING from my government?

Holy fuck how toothless the administration truly is. Tough words don’t mean shit if you won’t back them up.

Fire Pam Bondi btw. Useless cunt.


In case you haven't noticed:

- Haitians eating dogs? - No one arrested.
- ANTIFA designated a terrorist org and open season? - no one arrested.
- Seditious 6? - No one arrested.
- Epstein Files? - No one arrested.
- Hillary Clinton? - Not arrested.
- Somalians stealing money? - No one arrested.
- Literally anyone who was going to be arrested for political persecution? - No one arrested.
- FBI? - Still there.
- CIA? - Still there.
- Biden? - Not arrested.

I'm sure someone will defend this with "cheap gas. ICE deportations. Quivering EU leaders". And ok. Great. But I remember the outrage and hype of all of these. While Trump does bring some fire, there's a lot of distraction smoke in the form of outrage bait.
 
Última edición:
Few things of interest:

Trump wants to import UK's Jews because Muslims are attacking them in UK
Screenshot 2026-01-20 152053.png
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2026/01/18/trump-administration-asylum-british-jews/ (https://archive.md/Vc4HS)

Trump wants Greenland because UK is being stupid (neither Denmark nor Greenland belong to UK, though I do agree with his point about the UK's deal)
Screenshot 2026-01-20 152418.png

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/01/20/trump-says-chagos-deal-is-act-of-stupidity/ (https://archive.is/wuG8M)

Belgium says that if Europe agrees to Trump's demands they would become "miserable slave[s]
Screenshot 2026-01-20 152719.png
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-n...-chagos-deal-greenland-takeover-macron-nato0/ (https://archive.ph/zRcW8)

Twitter sleuths discovered the “written documents” to Denmark's ownership of Greenland that Trump implied did not exist
Screenshot 2026-01-20 152932.png

(same links as before)
 
I remember the outrage and hype of all of these. While Trump does bring some fire, there's a lot of distraction smoke.
One of the main issues is that so many of the rank-and-file are unipartyist stooges who intentionally fuck everything up. Remember how they butchered the Comey indictment?
It's almost impossible to just replace all of these entrenched shitheads without either suffering system collapse or having some judge somewhere say you can't do that.
Of course, fall deep enough into that mindset, and you get to Fatpacks levels of "It's all pointless, so why bother?", but there's a reason the system worked so efficiently when the Biden admin was going after people a majority of the system already disliked compared to now.
 
iirc the minimum sentence is more of a guideline than a hard and fast rule, though I wouldn't put it past libs to do anything and everything for infiniggers.
@AnOminous is the user you're thinking of.
Mandatory minimums are statutory. Common examples include federal drug offenses, with the Continuing Criminal Enterprise or "Kingpin" statute carrying mandatory minimums of 20 years for a first offense. The statute also prohibits probation or parole or suspending the sentence.

I'm surprised anyone would be unaware of this as it is a very controversial practice and widely criticized.

The federal Sentencing Guidelines are an entirely different thing and generally well below the maximum sentence. Judges may deviate from those, but have to justify it in writing. Most sentences are within the guidelines when they apply, but there is no discretion with mandatory minimums (other than the prosecutor using them as a club to "persuade" someone to take a plea deal).
 
Yea that was pretty obvious.
Wasn’t to me, because it seems topically pretty bold to press the rest of the EU to get them to press England, on account of their base inclination to be forming a bloc against the U.S., and England is the sole entity that can do anything about Diego Garcia in a purely legal framework

Let the man cook, though. All the same my instinct would be to at least include more direct accusations of England cucking to China, and to publicly challenge Starmer to answer why
 
Atrás
Top Abajo