Was refunded thanks to 81 republicans.
I stand corrected.
That happened because Trump cut NWS spending.
Iirc that was inasmuch that as much as it was a bad storm at a bad time in a bad place. Hard to prevent the worst case scenario even when you know of it.
We should if there's a reason to,
What would be a justified reason then? Reducing government spending and overeach tends to be the MAGA priority, unless you'd beg to differ on those as justified.
Yes, otherwise we have retarded educational policies like Florida teaching black kids that slavery was to their benefit.
That is retarded. However, California sex ed teaching how wonderful the troons are is also retarded, yet somehow it happens without any attention from said DOE, and sometimes even encouraged via title IX enforcement. It either allows your example to occur, in which case its incompetent, and/or it allows my example to occur, and is tyrannical. Either way, it would seem superfluos given the inability to execute its mission competently and fairly.
However, arrested random brown people, even ones here legally, and sending them to prison camps in El Salvador is indeed racism.
If you're meaning our beloved "maryland man" he had previous DV charges, human trafficking charges, and MS 13 connections. He was not a citiczen, and per US immigration law, can be removed from the US should he commit crimes. He was not allowed to be deported to el salvador, I'll grant you that, but removing him from the country is fully legal, and within the bounds of immigration law and power.
Except our spending to NATO is a literal drop in the bucket
And? My point isn't our spending, it is that the spending of our Allies is about 21 drops short right now. We all agreed to be allies, and part of that is that would all put 2% of our GDP in that bucket. They aren't delivering on their promises. Following on that when it comes to Greenland, it makes me wonder, if now during peacetime, when they still can't perform their obligations, when things go hot and the chips are down, can we really trust them to step up to the plate?
So no, you didn't really answer my question
True, I didn't. On the Epstein one, it should have been clear that I disagreed with the premise. As for the foreign wars, I also disagreed with the premise as written, but I also conceded the spirit of the question in that MAGA has become more interventionist that it was even a year ago.
Stop dodging the question.
As stated previously, I'm not dodging the question, I merely don't agree with the premise. If I asked you why you love to drink sewage water, and you responded telling me that you don't actually do that, you're not dodging my question, you're disagreeing with it's premise.
Also, for the love of god, if you want me to reply to you again, don't do the stupid line-by-line quote thing. Replying to that is tedious and awful.
My apologies, I find it easier, but I can change that it to just text blocks for your preference.