🦊 Furry David Frederick Hoffman / UnrealSkybox / leto / unicodefag
- Iniciador del tema 12CBDEAB2D6C274A80CABC153
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa. -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
This request for a thread ban is the perfect illustration of why this forum has zero credibility with anyone who matters, including law enforcement.
You are demonstrating the exact problem in real time: this isn't a forum for investigation or debate; it's an echo chamber for a pre-approved narrative. The moment someone dissects the "evidence" and points out its flaws—medical imagery passed off as CSAM, unverifiable logs, logically impossible honeypot theories—the only recourse is to silence them. It’s pure bias.
Law enforcement doesn't take information from sources that:
- Only tolerate one side. Any legitimate tip line or investigation requires scrutiny. A forum that bans users for factual counter-arguments is, by definition, an unreliable source.
- Operate on mob rule. A "mod" making a decision based on popular sentiment against a dissenting user proves the process is about narrative control, not truth-seeking.
- Have a documented history of fabrication. As seen in this thread alone—accusing someone of a felony based on "implication" and Google Images.
Do what you want. A thread ban just confirms this entire operation is a LARP, not an investigation. Anyone watching can see that.
- Registrado
- 15 de Sep, 2023
you're running defense for a CP spammer, anything you say is irrelevant.
Your statement is a logical fallacy—specifically, poisoning the well. You’re trying to dismiss everything I say by associating me with a horrific label, because you cannot engage with the substance of my argument.
Let's be clear:
I am not "running defense" for anyone. I am pointing out the other users claim lacks evidence. There is a critical difference. Demanding proof for an accusation of "CP spamming" is not defense; it is the basic standard of any rational discussion or investigation.
You have provided no verifiable proof of the "CP spammer" allegation. The "evidence" shown was an unverifiable ban log and, as established, the actual content involved medical imagery. Calling it CP does not make it so.
By your logic, anyone who questions the lack of evidence in a murder trial is "running defense for a murderer." It's an absurd, intellectually bankrupt way to avoid having to support your own claims.
If my words are so "irrelevant," it should be trivial for you to disprove them with facts. Yet, you consistently resort to deflection. That speaks volumes about the strength of your position.
The floor is yours. Present a single piece of independently verifiable evidence for your claim. If you can't, then your comment isn't an argument—it's a confession that you have none.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 19 de Nov, 2025
Guys, he's using EM dashes, "it isn't just x, it's y", and the rule of 3. They're all AI-generated responses.
Just wait for the Spergatory-ing.
Última edición:
john5433
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Sep, 2025
do you know how imageboards work, imageboard "catalogs" have a certain set of pages which limit the amount of posts that can be made on it, when the max is hit, the oldest thread is pruned and thus all data is gone. Quote himself has said this is how it works, all data and fingerprint is lost when a thread is pruned and "slid" of the catalog it is gone. Quote says this himself in a response to a subpoena.
This screenshot doesn't prove your point—it dismantles it.
You've presented a legal document where the site operator explicitly states they cannot provide user information because posts are anonymous, unregistered, and permanently pruned with all associated data. You are literally using evidence that no usable data exists to defend your claim that you have specific knowledge of a user's ("Leto's") activities. This is a fundamental contradiction.
Let's be clear about what this means:
- It confirms the site's design is for anonymity. The operator cannot identify users from post IDs. This underscores that your entire narrative is built on unverifiable, anonymous posts.
- It does not validate your accusation. The operator stating "we cannot provide data" is not proof that your specific claim about "CSAM spamming" is true. It is only proof that the platform's architecture makes verification impossible—which is why your accusation remains a baseless assertion.
- It highlights the failure of your "evidence." Your previous "proof" was an unverifiable ban log. Now you cite a document stating user data is systematically destroyed. You cannot simultaneously argue that definitive logs exist to prove your claim while citing the site's policy that all such data is intentionally purged.
john5433
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Sep, 2025
hey dipshit tell your AI it's an email and not a document before copy and pasting it
doublebrapping to take down this point, messages that get you banned are saved (except for images) which are tied to IP addres.
You're focusing on the font of the message to avoid its content, and your new "evidence" claim only proves my original point.
Regarding your first quip: The format is irrelevant. Whether it's an email, a document, or a skywriting, the facts contained within it don't change. Your fixation on presentation is, again, a distraction from your inability to address the substance.
Regarding your second "point": You state that banned messages are saved and tied to an IP address. Let's apply basic scrutiny:
- You are describing a log of an accusation, not evidence of a crime. A saved message that says "user X posted Y" is a record of a moderator's claim. Without the actual content (Y), it proves nothing about what was posted. You could log "user posted illegal content" for anything.
- You admit images are not saved. This is the fatal flaw. If the allegation is about posting illegal images (CSAM), and the images themselves are not archived, then your saved log is just a text file of an unverified allegation. It's hearsay.
- This perfectly demonstrates the circular, evidence-free bubble of this forum. You treat an internal administrative note as conclusive proof, while the actual material that would verify it is absent.
Until you produce that evidence, all you have is a trail of unverifiable admin actions and increasingly desperate personal attacks. The ball is still in your court.
john5433
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Sep, 2025
I can't do much to argue with your AI but that's because I'm not that invested in Leto as a whole, the only thing I know is his interaction with the soysphere, but can your AI debunk these posts is the question?
Note: This has grown to the point where I merged OP's post with mine.
Ever seen an avatarfag on 4chan posting one of the following characters? That's an infamous shitposter called Leto, now turned owner of Ecker / 4chan.gay and pedophile groomer.
As of June 2025, he's pretty much public enemy of 4chan N° 2 (formerly 1) and the...
Leto / Unrealskybox aka Unicodefag / Foxe
Ever seen an avatarfag on 4chan posting one of the following characters? That's an infamous shitposter called Leto, now turned owner of Ecker / 4chan.gay and pedophile groomer.
As of June 2025, he's pretty much public enemy of 4chan N° 2 (formerly 1) and the...
Reacciones:
x 34 x 9 x 4 x 3 x 1
x 34 x 9 x 4 x 3 x 1
Last week:
Like I said above, the MAP/torfags that assumed leto and cabal to be fellow child rapists got their rude awakening. Two days ago cloudfare started asking questions again and Leto stated the servers are hosted in Canada, where lolicon art is likely to be interpreted as CSAM. Leto starts blogging his dealing with Cloudefare's service while looking for new hosts, implying (reminder: lying) that the CF worker was reading the convo as it happened.
note he's still using the faildox name.
Volunteers instantly flipped out and took to accuse Leto & cabal of being...
Like I said above, the MAP/torfags that assumed leto and cabal to be fellow child rapists got their rude awakening. Two days ago cloudfare started asking questions again and Leto stated the servers are hosted in Canada, where lolicon art is likely to be interpreted as CSAM. Leto starts blogging his dealing with Cloudefare's service while looking for new hosts, implying (reminder: lying) that the CF worker was reading the convo as it happened.
note he's still using the faildox name.
Volunteers instantly flipped out and took to accuse Leto & cabal of being...
Reacciones: x 8 x 3
x 8 x 3
biznbuy
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2024
I don't think anyone needs evidence or counter points to call you a faggot.
You must be confused the halls of intelligentsia and debate are through the gas chamber door, step inside an take a deep breath.
document <> email
*font of the message / *vernacular of the message
What tool are you using to do this, because you don't seem very good at using it.
Additional info for anyone curious.
City of Allen falls under collin county. Colin County Tax Office has a search function for names, most counties have one.
Based on what I saw don't see anyone with that exact name owning property that area. So could be an apartment but based on the map I don't think any apartments are in that area.
Figured I would drop this in case anyone was curious.
This information is a propaganda piece, not an investigation. It commits the basic fallacy of substituting massive volume for actual evidence. Its core criminal allegation—CSAM spam—is presented with zero verifiable proof. It then builds a smear campaign on guilt-by-association with communities and individuals, citing unverifiable logs and gossip from the most biased source possible: an adversarial harassment forum. Law enforcement and rational people require evidence, not elaborate fan fiction. Until you provide a single piece of independently verifiable evidence for the main claim, this entire wall of text is just a libelous LARP.I can't do much to argue with your AI but that's because I'm not that invested in Leto as a whole, the only thing I know is his interaction with the soysphere, but can your AI debunk these posts is the question?
Note: This has grown to the point where I merged OP's post with mine.
Leto / Unrealskybox aka Unicodefag / Foxe
Ever seen an avatarfag on 4chan posting one of the following characters? That's an infamous shitposter called Leto, now turned owner of Ecker / 4chan.gay and pedophile groomer.
As of June 2025, he's pretty much public enemy of 4chan N° 2 (formerly 1) and the...Reacciones:Last week:
Like I said above, the MAP/torfags that assumed leto and cabal to be fellow child rapists got their rude awakening. Two days ago cloudfare started asking questions again and Leto stated the servers are hosted in Canada, where lolicon art is likely to be interpreted as CSAM. Leto starts blogging his dealing with Cloudefare's service while looking for new hosts, implying (reminder: lying) that the CF worker was reading the convo as it happened.
note he's still using the faildox name.
Volunteers instantly flipped out and took to accuse Leto & cabal of being...Reacciones:
Your reply is not an argument; it's a specimen. It confirms everything I've stated about the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of this thread's position.
Let's be clear about what you've just provided:
- A Slur: This is base harassment, not discourse.
- A Violent Threat ("gas chamber"): This moves the discussion from bad-faith arguing into the realm of potential criminal threats and unequivocal hate speech.
- Zero Engagement with Substance: You have explicitly stated that evidence and counterpoints are unnecessary. This is a formal, written concession. You have admitted that your stance cannot be defended with facts or logic.
Your comment stands as its own rebuttal and will be treated as such by any rational observer. It is proof, not refutation.
john5433
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Sep, 2025
some advice, archive.today technically blocks scraping and bots due to recaptcha which is why it isn't able to read them and only goes by 'farms, I'd recommend copy and pasting every word from archive.today links so it can read it
john5433
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Sep, 2025
he also posts the same shit twice sometimes geg
- Registrado
- 24 de Jul, 2025
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Urusei Baktsura
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 12 de Jun, 2025
Don't interact with the obvious Leto alt, it's what he wants.
- Registrado
- 19 de Nov, 2025
I think this account might've been sold to Leto or one of his buddies, if it wasn't made by them. The typing style outside this thread itself is human (and occasionally misspelled to the point of incomprehensibility), while its last "real" post was on April 17th, 2025. I still think something should be done to a guy saving face for a gay pedophile.